Eight best Wimbledon 2025 fashion moments so far
This year's courtside fashion is serving a range. The regular suspects are all here. Think: pleated skirts, seersucker suits, crisp shirting, and sun hats but with clever updates. Shirts are looser, collars are open, and all-white outfits are mixed with pastels and gingham. The vibe is relaxed but with just enough effort to say: yes, this is Wimbledon.
We have already seen some heavy hitters. Sienna Miller kept things breezy and simple in a floral mini, Lily Collins brought the colour, and Olivia Rodrigo and Louis Partridge leaned into couple-core with heavy matching. There is heritage dressing, statement tailoring, and plenty of personality if you know where to look.
Centre court may be where the real action happens, but the fashion in the stands is building a strong case for best in show. And with more VIP arrivals expected through finals weekend, the best may still be on its way.
So, here are the eight best looks so far:
Sienna Miller in Alessandra Rich
Sienna Miller was spotted in the stands on day nine of the tournament wearing a sweet white floral-print mini-dress by Alessandra Rich and carrying a black woven bag.
Monica Barbaro and Andrew Garfield in Ralph Lauren
The pair made their official hard launch in all-white looks in the classiest matching Ralph Lauren ensembles.
Olivia Rodrigo and Louis Patridge in Ralph Lauren
Immediately after the success of her Glastonbury performance, Olivia Rodrigo took her seat in the royal box wearing a strawberries-and-cream inspired vintage Ralph Lauren gingham shirt dress. She was joined by partner Louis Partridge in a crisp navy blue suit and contrasting red tie.
Priyanka Chopra in Ralph Lauren
Priyanka Chopra opted for a classic all-white look in the form of a crisp halter neck shirt dress by Ralph Lauren, with matching strappy sandals.
Lilly Colins in Stella Jean
Lily Collins served playful summer style in a blue striped Stella Jean sundress with embroidered birds on the bodice.
Ikram Abidi in Ralph Lauren
The model carried a Ralph Lauren leather brown handbag and wore blue and white contrasting pieces by the luxury label.
Mia Regan in Thom Browne
Match point. The actor was dressed in Thom Browne head-to-toe in a blue pinstriped blazer and matching pleated miniskirt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Olivia Rodrigo sparks speculation about new music at Osheaga 2025 festival finale
Olivia Rodrigo may have quietly teased her highly anticipated third studio album during the closing show of her GUTS tour at Osheaga 2025 in Montreal. In her final encore, the singer appeared on stage wearing a simple red shirt printed with a bedazzled '3' on the torso, instantly sparking speculation among fans and media alike. The unspoken gesture was interpreted by many as a sign that her next album, often referred to as OR3, is on the horizon. Rodrigo has not publicly commented on the shirt, but her history of planting subtle visual cues during performances lends credibility to the theory. In a 2023 interview, Rodrigo confirmed she had begun early work on her next album and intended to maintain her signature four-letter title format, following SOUR and GUTS. Among fan predictions are titles such as 'LUCK', 'BURN', and 'SWEET', though none have been confirmed. She previously revealed that around 25 tracks were written but not included on GUTS, leaving ample material for future releases. Combined with her ongoing songwriting habit and growing personal experiences, many believe Rodrigo's third album could take a new thematic turn, possibly focusing on love and maturity. Additionally, her shift in stage aesthetics, from the purple tones of SOUR and GUTS to vibrant reds, has fuelled theories about a new album era, perhaps exploring romantic themes. Though no official release date has been announced, Rodrigo's history of two-year album cycles points to a likely late 2025 or early 2026 drop.
Express Tribune
6 days ago
- Express Tribune
Olivia Rodrigo stuns Lollapalooza with surprise Weezer duet
Olivia Rodrigo's headlining set at Lollapalooza took a sharp alt-rock turn on Friday night when she brought out none other than Weezer as her surprise guest. The crowd erupted as Rivers Cuomo and the band joined her on stage to perform their iconic hits Buddy Holly and Say It Ain't So, with Rodrigo playing guitar and singing alongside them in a full-circle pop-punk moment. Rodrigo, whose GUTS World Tour has already made headlines for unexpected collaborations, think David Byrne at Governors Ball and Robert Smith at Glastonbury, continued her trend of spotlighting legendary alt-rock artists. This latest cameo had fans buzzing, with some calling it the most exciting moment of Lollapalooza so far. Footage of the performance quickly flooded social media, showing Rodrigo beaming as she strummed along and harmonised effortlessly with Cuomo. The 21-year-old singer, known for her Gen Z heartbreak anthems, looked completely at home rocking out with one of the '90s most beloved bands. Weezer, who are currently making the rounds on the summer festival circuit, matched her energy with a playful yet nostalgic set that bridged two generations of music fans. Rodrigo's ability to weave these guest appearances into her tour without missing a beat has become one of her defining strengths. The collaborations aren't just stunt bookings, they're curated, reverent, and entirely on-brand. With only one show left in her world tour, Montreal's Osheaga Festival, speculation is mounting over who might show up next. Alanis Morissette? Avril Lavigne? The internet is already guessing. Regardless, Rodrigo's Lollapalooza moment proved one thing: she's not just collecting hits, she's collecting rock legends.
Express Tribune
25-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Wimbledon — the glitz, the glam, the hypocrisy
The writer takes interest in humanism and futurology. He has an MS from Houston and DDS from Nashville, Tennessee. He can be reached at bhasnain@ Listen to article Breakfast at Wimbledon' is a long-cherished tradition in sports. Here in America, as in London and across the globe, we can't wait to pour cream over strawberries or enjoy scones with hot tea or English muffins or even have Bangers and Mash. As the Commodores would say, "It's easy like Sunday morning." But for the die-hard tennis fans in Pakistan, it's "Dinner at Wimbledon." This year was no different. We lounged in front of our big screen TV sets. We picked our favourites. It was Carlos Alcaraz defending his title against Jannik Sinner. These two youngsters, the new kids on the block, have raised the level of competition to new heights. In an epic battle, Jannik Sinner outplayed Carlos Alcaraz defeating him in four sets, 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4, avenging his defeat in the French Open final earlier this year. A slew of Hollywood celebrities attended the final match. Keira Knightly, Matthew McConaughey and Nicole Kidman, as well as London's Mayor Sadiq Khan were seated in the Royal Box. Kate Middleton, Princess of Wales, presented the trophies to the winner and the runner-up. But beyond the glitz and the glam, hidden from our view and undetected from all the camera angles, lies the shameless hypocrisy of the All-England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club that organises this tournament. In 2022, the club banned players from Russia and Belarus from participating in Wimbledon in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The ban was lifted in 2023, but in subsequent tournaments, players from Russia and Belarus have been forced to play in Wimbledon as "neutrals" as if they don't belong to any country. This includes the Russian players Daniil Medvedev and Andrey Rublev as well as the world number one female tennis player, Aryna Sabalenka, who hails from Belarus. The All-England Club justified its apparently discriminatory decision "to prevent the Russian regime from using the tournament for propaganda purposes". Supporters of the decision argued that "it was a necessary step to condemn Russia's actions and show solidarity with Ukraine." Critics of the double standard argued that "it is discriminatory to punish individual athletes for the actions of their governments." What about the tennis players from the USA and Great Britain? After all, the United States, along with its ally, Great Britain, invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003 - and that too under false pretenses. Both countries have a chilling history of military interventions in foreign lands and territories. The British Empire is known to have established colonies from North America to South Africa, and beyond. In 1877, Queen Victoria imposed herself as the Empress of India. The British Empire not only stole billions (if not trillions as reported) from India, they subjected the local population to heinous and barbaric crimes. In the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre in 1919, for example, Gen Dyer who was commanding the British Indian Army ordered opening fire on a peaceful gathering of unarmed Indians who had gathered to protest against the colonial rule. Over one thousand innocent people died that day. In short, athletes from the USA and Great Britain are not to be discriminated at Wimbledon as those from Russia and Belarus. That's that.
