logo
Travel ban: Why is Trump stopping travel from these 12 nations?

Travel ban: Why is Trump stopping travel from these 12 nations?

USA Todaya day ago

Travel ban: Why is Trump stopping travel from these 12 nations?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
President Trump bans travel from several countries around the world
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation that bans travel from 12 countries and restricts seven others.
President Donald Trump issued a travel ban that will bar or partially restrict foreign nationals from nearly 20 countries from entering the United States, citing national security concerns.
In videotaped remarks from the Oval Office released Wednesday, June 4, Trump pointed to last weekend's attack on a group of demonstrators supporting Israeli hostages in Boulder, Colorado. The FBI has said it is investigating the attack as a "targeted act of terrorism," with the suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, a native of Egypt whose 2022 tourist visa is expired.
The countries are primarily in Africa and the Middle East, with a full ban on foreign nationals from 12 nations. They are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.
The president's proclamation also includes a partial travel ban of people from seven other countries − Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The restrictions are to go into effect on Monday, June 9.
Here is a closer look at why the administration says it is instituting full bans on the 12 nations.
Why is Haiti on the travel ban list?
Like nearly all of the countries on the full ban, Trump points to visa overstay rates as a key component in his reasoning.
The proclamation released Wednesday also says Haitian immigrants pose a security risk, echoing Trump's years-long claims linking immigrants with crime and criminal activity, despite consistent independent research that debunks the rhetoric. Research suggests immigrants actually commit fewer crimes than people born in the U.S.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced last month that the U.S was ending temporary protected status (TPS) for an estimated 520,000 Haitians. The program gives temporary legal status and work authorization to people from countries experiencing conflict, natural disasters and other extraordinary conditions.
Trump during his 2024 presidential campaign baselessly claimed that Haitian immigrants in Ohio were eating pets and promised mass deportations over complaints that their presence was hurting communities. President Barack Obama's administration first granted TPS status to Haitians in 2010 after a devastating earthquake killed as many as 300,000 people and decimated much of the nation's infrastructure. The country has remained unstable, including a 2021 presidential assassination that led to massive government instability, and a surge in gang violence over the past few years.
Why is Iran on the travel ban list?
Trump says in his ban that Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism, and that the nation "regularly fails to cooperate with the United States Government in identifying security risks," and has "historically failed to accept back its removable nationals." The country has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. government since 1984, which involves limits on U.S. foreign assistance, a ban on certain exports and various financial restrictions.
The U.S. and Iran recently restarted talks in an attempt to reach a nuclear deal. Since Trump pulled the U.S. out of the 2015 deal that curbed Iran's uranium enrichment activity, deeming the accord deeply flawed, Tehran has accumulated a stockpile of uranium refined to levels close to what would be suitable for nuclear bomb fuel, Reuters reports.
Why is Afghanistan on the travel ban list?
The ban points to Afghanistan's ruling government and visa overstays as the reason behind its inclusion on the list.
Because the Taliban, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist group according to the U.S., runs the country, the administration says it does not have "appropriate screening and vetting measures" and "lacks a competent or cooperative central authority" to issue passports and other identity documents.
As with other countries on Trump's list, the proclamation also cites Afghan nationals overstaying their visas as another reason for their ban.
The U.S. is ending the temporary protected status program for Afghanistan along with Haiti. Homeland Security Sec. Noem said in a May statement that safety and economic conditions had improved in the country enough to warrant the program termination, which could lead to the deportation of thousands of Afghans residing in the U.S. upon its July 14 end date.
Why is Myanmar on the travel ban list?
The Trump administration says Myanmar, referred to as Burma by the U.S. government, has "historically not cooperated with the United States to accept back their removable nationals," and pointed to visa overstays in its proclamation.
Why is Sudan on the travel ban list?
The administration points to what it says is the country's lack of a competent or cooperative central government, similar to the language used regarding Afghanistan, as the reason for its inclusion, claiming it results in a questionable ability to issue passports and civil documents.
Sudan is further accused of having relatively high visa overstay rates, according to Department of Homeland Security data cited in the ban.
Why are Equatorial Guinea, Republic of the Congo and Chad on the travel ban list?
These three African countries are on the ban due to the administration's argument that they have high visa overstay rates.
The ban says Chad's visa overstay rate, which is listed at over 55% and 37% among business and tourist visa holders in 2022 and 2023, "indicates a blatant disregard for United States immigration laws."
Why are Eritrea, Libya and Somalia on the travel ban list?
The administration points to visa overstay rates and lack of trust in each nation's government in its ban, and that Eritreafails to make the criminal records of its citizens available to the U.S.
Trump also explicitly singles out Somalia and Libya for the presence of terrorist groups and operations within its territories.
"The historical terrorist presence within Libya's territory amplifies the risks posed by the entry into the United States of its nationals," the proclamation says, also calling Somalia a "terrorist safe haven."
Why is Yemen on the travel ban list?
As with several other African and Middle Eastern nations listed, the administration accuses Yemen of not having sufficient measures in place for issuing passports and other travel documents. Trump's ban says the nation lacks control over its own land and has been the site of site of active U.S. military operations since January. The U.S. is involved in combating the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen, who have been engaged in a civil war for a decade.
At least 4.5 million people in Yemen have been displaced by the conflict since 2014, the United Nations estimates, with tens of thousands are living in famine-like conditions and 5 million living on the brink of famine.
Contributing: Trevor Hughes, Joey Garrison and Francesca Chambers, USA TODAY; Reuters.
Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@usatoday.com and on X @KathrynPlmr.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services
Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

San Francisco Chronicle​

time11 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.

Trump asks aides if they think Musk's behavior could be related to alleged drug use, source says
Trump asks aides if they think Musk's behavior could be related to alleged drug use, source says

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump asks aides if they think Musk's behavior could be related to alleged drug use, source says

President Donald Trump has asked aides and advisers if they believe Elon Musk's behavior over the past 48 hours could be related to his alleged drug use, privately seeking to understand the tech billionaire's broadsides against him while signaling publicly he doesn't care, a source familiar with the conversations told CNN. In his own telling, Trump is not wasting any time thinking about the man who, one week ago, was receiving a giant golden key in the Oval Office and has since lobbed insults toward its occupant. The president told CNN's Dana Bash in a brief phone call Friday morning he was 'not even thinking about Elon' and wouldn't be speaking to Musk 'for a while.' But questions about the spectacularly public break-up have come nonetheless. Talking to reporters on Air Force One Friday night, Trump said he would 'take a look at' canceling some of Musk's government contracts, a possibility he had floated on Truth Social in the height of their feud, and asserted the country would be fine without them. 'The US can survive without almost anybody – except me,' he said, adding that he was joking on the latter point. Though the source said Trump had privately inquired about Musk's alleged drug use, the president declined to weigh in on the matter publicly. 'I don't want to comment on his drug use. I don't know - I don't know what his status is,' he said on Air Force One, adding that New York Times reporting on the matter 'sounded very unfair.' CNN has reached out to a Musk representative. When Musk was asked about the report during his Oval Office farewell with Trump a week ago, he declined to answer and attacked the newspaper instead. The Times reported that Musk was 'using drugs far more intensely than previously known,' as he rose to prominence in Trump's inner circle in 2024, including 'using ketamine often, sometimes daily, and mixing it with other drugs,' according to people familiar. In a 2024 interview with Don Lemon, Musk acknowledged he took 'a small amount' of ketamine to treat negative moods, under a prescription, but that a heavy workload prevented him from using too much. Neither Musk nor his lawyer responded to the Times' request for comment about his drug use. CNN also reached out to his representative about the allegations at the time. Last week, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, whose wife Katie Miller left a job with the Department of Government Efficiency to work for Musk, told CNN he had no concerns over the New York Times report that Musk used drugs more extensively than previously known. In the day since the Trump-Musk feud erupted on their respective social media platforms, Trump's aides said the president has been focused on advancing that supersized bill that started the whole thing, and has directed his team to follow suit. His online presence Friday morning was limited to posts about the economy, without any mention of the tech billionaire. He spent the morning on the phone — not with Musk, but with the new president of South Korea, whom he invited to the US for talks. He chatted with the president of Poland about the upcoming NATO summit. And before traveling to Bedminster, New Jersey, in the evening, he stopped to tour a golf course. Whether the president is successful in turning attention away from the ugly spat remains to be seen. The Justice Department's announcement late Friday afternoon that Kilmar Abrego Garcia has returned to the US to face criminal counts began to shift the narrative. Nor was it precisely clear what effect the wreckage of the Trump-Musk alliance would have on the president's agenda bill being considered by Congress, on Musk's businesses or on the direction of the Republican Party. All seemed potentially caught in the undertow after the two men spent Thursday afternoon and evening lashing out at each other online. A tipping point for Trump and his advisers, people familiar with what was happening behind the scenes said, was Musk's linkage of the president to Jeffrey Epstein. Musk suggested the administration wasn't releasing information about the convicted pedophile because it invokes Trump. (Musk cited no evidence and gave no detail how he would have gained access to unreleased files.) White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called his claims an 'unfortunate episode' in a Thursday evening statement. After that, any chance of reconciliation appeared to be scuttled. For Trump, Musk's criticism of the major legislative package could only embolden Republicans who share the tech CEO's concerns the bill would explode the US deficit. Rep. Thomas Massie, who voted against the bill, told CNN that he thinks Musk's opposition could fuel buyer's remorse. And Rep. Michael McCaul, who supported it, said he worries that a prolonged fight between Musk and Trump could become a distraction for getting Trump's agenda passed, before going on to cite 'very good intelligence' that the two men would soon settle their spat. But Musk – who less than a month ago had said he'd spend 'a lot less' on politics – has also threatened to put his substantial spending power behind efforts to remove from office Republicans who vote for the bill. After spending more than $290 million to help elect Trump and Republicans last year, the future of Musk's political spending now appears unknown. Funds Musk privately promised to groups associated with Trump are now in doubt. One powerful Trump ally, Steve Bannon, suggested Trump use his power to go after Musk in multiple ways. He said on his 'War Room Live' show Thursday that Trump should begin deportation proceedings for Musk, saying he is 'illegal' and has 'got to go.' Musk was born in South Africa but became an American citizen in 2002. Bannon also suggested the Trump administration investigate Musk's alleged drug use, and potentially suspend his security clearance. Still, allies of both seemed to hold out hope the rupture would not be permanent, and that the two most dominant figures in current Republican politics might be able to patch things up. 'I'm not going to speak for either of them. I was with the president in the Oval Office yesterday afternoon as some of this unfolded. And I can just say he was disappointed. I mean, he said that himself. And I was, as well,' House Speaker Mike Johnson said Friday. 'I believe in redemption,' Johnson went on. 'I hope we can resolve it, get everybody together again. That's really important for all of us.' CNN's Hadas Gold, Molly English, Lauren Fox and Betsy Klein contributed to this report.

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services
Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store