Latest news with #Haitian
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Politics
- Boston Globe
Migrants in US face more uncertainty after Supreme Court ruling
Immigration lawyers reported that they had been fielding calls from families asking whether they should continue to go to work or school. Their clients, they say, were given permission to live and work temporarily in the United States. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Related : Advertisement Now, with that permission revoked while legal challenges work their way through lower courts, many immigrants fear that any encounter with police or other government agencies could lead to deportation, according to lawyers and community leaders. Guerline Jozef, executive director of immigrant rights nonprofit Haitian Bridge Alliance, said some Afghan, Haitian and Ukrainian families were already planning to migrate north to Canada, as about 30,000 Haitian families had done in 2017 during the first Trump administration. Jozef said thousands of Haitians who had followed the protocol set by the U.S. government for humanitarian parole felt blindsided by the Supreme Court decision. 'They feel they can no longer survive in the United States,' she said. Advertisement The court Friday allowed the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal status granted during the Biden administration to more than 530,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. The decision was a response to an emergency request by the Department of Homeland Security, effectively killing a program that had granted humanitarian parole to nationals from those four countries. Beneficiaries were able to fly directly to the United States and remain for two years if they had passed background checks and secured a U.S. sponsor. Related : The largest number of recipients are from Haiti, with 213,140, and Venezuela, with 120,760, according to official data. But how many of the parole recipients would be immediately vulnerable to deportation is difficult to know because some have applied for other legal pathways or deportation protections. Last week, a federal judge in Boston blocked Trump officials from pausing renewal of applications for many of those programs. An unknown number of migrants have also applied for asylum or for what is known as Temporary Protected Status. While a Supreme Court decision earlier this month revoked that protection for an estimated 350,000 Venezuelans, it is still valid for Haitians until Aug. 3. And the Supreme Court's ruling that the government could not summarily deport people, as the Trump administration did in the case of more than 100 people sent to El Salvador, has effectively mandated a measure of due process for people facing deportation. Related : 'No one can be put on a plane immediately,' said Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute. 'People may have ongoing court cases or pending applications for relief, such as asylum.' Advertisement Still, in Austin, Texas, Kate Lincoln Goldfinch, an immigration lawyer, said she had been advising her clients for months to apply for multiple forms of protection. 'My concern is ICE is going to be moving to remove all of these people as quickly as possible without due process,' she said, referring to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. Extra protection wasn't enough for Belen, 47, a teacher from Venezuela. She arrived in the United States in late 2022, one of the early beneficiaries of the Biden humanitarian parole program. The following year, she applied for Temporary Protected Status, after President Joe Biden declared that conditions in her home country made it risky for nationals to return. She thought TPS would give her an extra layer of security until her partner's asylum application was approved and he could sponsor her for a green card. But the Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration's decision to revoke TPS for Venezuelans. And Friday, the court allowed the administration to revoke humanitarian parole for Venezuelans and others. 'I never thought it would come to this,' said Belen, who spoke on the condition that she not be identified by name because she is concerned about being targeted by immigration enforcement officials. Belen, who works as a special-education teacher, said she was planning to meet with a lawyer to figure out her next steps. 'If there is no solution, I will return to my country because I don't want to remain here illegally.' For Jerome, the end of protections for many Haitians could upend not only his community in Ohio but the lives of many people in Haiti who depend on relatives in the United States for support. Advertisement He works nights at an Amazon distribution center, and his partner, Muriel, works days. While they have both filed asylum applications recently, their fate remained unclear, he said. 'If my work permit is cut off, how will I send money to my father and family?' Jerome said Friday. 'Sometimes I have thought of going to Canada, but I don't have family there to receive me,' he said. 'I have only distant cousins.' Jerome said that he had also heard that people who tried to cross the northern border were being detained. Only those with documents attesting to close kin living there were allowed to enter. In New York, Sandra Sayago is a co-owner of El Budare Café along a stretch of Roosevelt Avenue in Queens that has turned into a hub for Venezuelans who have arrived in the country in recent years. 'I think most Venezuelans are wondering day by day about what will happen,' Sayago said, expressing frustration over the nation's rapidly shifting immigration policies. She added, 'We're in limbo.' The end of the parole program is likely to ripple through the U.S. economy as employers are forced to let its beneficiaries go. 'This will have a massive impact on businesses,' said Jennie Murray, president of the National Immigration Forum, an advocacy organization. 'It will be a huge destabilizing moment for the economy,' she said. A large senior living provider in northern Virginia, Goodwin Living, has 65 workers with some form of temporary status that allows them to live and work in the United States. Among the 13 Haitians employed there, four are vulnerable following Friday's court decision, according to Lindsay Hutter, chief strategy and marketing officer. Advertisement 'It gives us heartache that these team members contributing to our economy, supporting the residents of our senior living communities and contributing to the fabric of our society in Virginia are now at risk of returning to an environment that is precarious and dangerous,' she said. This article originally appeared in
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Politics
- Business Recorder
Trump gets key wins at Supreme Court on immigration, despite some misgivings
The U.S. Supreme Court swept away this week another obstacle to one of President Donald Trump's most aggressively pursued policies - mass deportation – again showing its willingness to back his hardline approach to immigration. The justices, though, have signaled some reservations with how he is carrying it out. Since Trump returned to the White House in January, the court already has been called upon to intervene on an emergency basis in seven legal fights over his crackdown on immigration. It most recently let Trump's administration end temporary legal status provided to hundreds of thousands of migrants for humanitarian reasons by his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden while legal challenges in two cases play out in lower courts. The Supreme Court on Friday lifted a judge's order that had halted the revocation of immigration 'parole' for more than 500,000 Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants. On May 19, it lifted another judge's order preventing the termination of 'temporary protected status' for more than 300,000 Venezuelan migrants. In some other cases, however, the justices have ruled that the administration must treat migrants fairly, as required under the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of due process. 'This president has been more aggressive than any in modern U.S. history to quickly remove non-citizens from the country,' said Kevin Johnson, an immigration and public interest law expert at the University of California, Davis. No president in modern history 'has been as willing to deport non-citizens without due process,' Johnson added. That dynamic has forced the Supreme Court to police the contours of the administration's actions, if less so the legality of Trump's underlying policies. The court's 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump during his first term as president. US says it will start revoking visas for Chinese students 'President Trump is acting within his lawful authority to deport illegal aliens and protect the American people. While the Supreme Court has rightfully acknowledged the president's authority in some cases, in others they have invented new due process rights for illegal aliens that will make America less safe. We are confident in the legality of our actions and will continue fighting to keep President Trump's promises,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told Reuters. The justices twice - on April 7 and on May 16 - have placed limits on the administration's attempt to implement Trump's invocation of a 1798 law called the Alien Enemies Act, which historically has been employed only in wartime, to swiftly deport Venezuelan migrants who it has accused of being members of the Tren de Aragua gang. Lawyers and family members of some of the migrants have disputed the gang membership allegation. On May 16, the justices also said a bid by the administration to deport migrants from a detention center in Texas failed basic constitutional requirements. Giving migrants 'notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster,' the court stated. Due process generally requires the government to provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing before taking certain adverse actions. The court has not outright barred the administration from pursuing these deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, as the justices have yet to decide the legality of using the law for this purpose. The U.S. government last invoked the Alien Enemies Act during World War Two to intern and deport people of Japanese, German and Italian descent. 'The Supreme Court has in several cases reaffirmed some basic principles of constitutional law (including that) the due process clause applies to all people on U.S. soil,' said Elora Mukherjee, director of Columbia Law School's immigrants' rights clinic. Even for alleged gang members, Mukherjee said, the court 'has been extremely clear that they are entitled to notice before they can be summarily deported from the United States.' A wrongly deported man In a separate case, the court on April 10 ordered the administration to facilitate the release from custody in El Salvador of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant who was living in Maryland. The administration has acknowledged that Abrego Garcia was wrongly deported to El Salvador. The administration has yet to return Abrego Garcia to the United States, which according to some critics amounts to defiance of the Supreme Court. The administration deported on March 15 more than 200 people to El Salvador, where they were detained in the country's massive anti-terrorism prison under a deal in which the United States is paying President Nayib Bukele's government $6 million. Ilya Somin, a constitutional law professor at George Mason University, said the Supreme Court overall has tried to curb the administration's 'more extreme and most blatantly illegal policies' without abandoning its traditional deference to presidential authority on immigration issues. 'I think they have made a solid effort to strike a balance,' said Somin, referring to the Alien Enemies Act and Abrego Garcia cases. 'But I still think there is excessive deference, and a tolerance for things that would not be permitted outside the immigration field.' That deference was on display over the past two weeks with the court's decisions letting Trump terminate the grants of temporary protected status and humanitarian parole previously given to migrants. Such consequential orders were issued without the court offering any reasoning, Mukherjee noted. 'Collectively, those two decisions strip immigration status and legal protections in the United States from more than 800,000 people. And the decisions are devastating for the lives of those who are affected,' Mukherjee said. 'Those individuals could be subject to deportations, family separation, losing their jobs, and if they're deported, possibly even losing their lives.' Travel ban ruling Trump also pursued restrictive immigration policies in his first term as president, from 2017-2021. The Supreme Court gave Trump a major victory in 2018, upholding his travel ban targeting people from several Muslim-majority countries. In 2020, the court blocked Trump's bid to end a program that protects from deportation hundreds of thousands of migrants - often called 'Dreamers' - who entered the United States illegally as children. Other major immigration-related cases are currently pending before the justices, including Trump's effort to broadly enforce his January executive order to restrict birthright citizenship - a directive at odds with the longstanding interpretation of the Constitution as conferring citizenship on virtually every baby born on U.S. soil. The court heard arguments in that case on May 15 and has not yet rendered a decision. Another case concerns the administration's efforts to increase the practice of deporting migrants to countries other than their own, including to places such as war-torn South Sudan. Boston-based U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy required that migrants destined for so-called 'third countries' be notified and given a meaningful chance to seek legal relief by showing the harms they may face by being send there. Murphy on May 21 ruled that the administration had violated his court order by attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan. They are now being held at a military base in Djibouti. The administration on May 27 asked the justices to lift Murphy's order because it said the third-country process is needed to remove migrants who commit crimes because their countries of origin are often unwilling to take them back. Johnson predicted that the Supreme Court will side with the migrants in this dispute. 'I think that the court will enforce the due process rights of a non-citizen before removal to a third country,' Johnson said.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
Trump wins big in Supreme Court; 500,000 migrants could lose legal status
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday let President Donald Trump's administration revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants living in the United States, bolstering the Republican president's drive to step up deportations. The court put on hold a federal judge's order halting the administration's move to end the immigration "parole" granted to 532,000 of these migrants by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden, potentially exposing many of them to rapid removal, while the case plays out in lower courts. Show more Show less
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Sport
- Miami Herald
How Fafa Picault overcame racism, adversity on road to Inter Miami, Haiti national team
Fabrice 'Fafa' Picault is known for his infectious smile and easy-going nature. But behind that happy face is a 34-year-old Haitian American whose journey from youth soccer player in Cutler Bay to Lionel Messi's teammate at Inter Miami has been anything but easy. It was long, circuitous, and arduous. He was spit on. He endured more racial slurs than he cares to discuss. He has bounced to 11 teams and four countries over his career. But he toils on, summoning strength and guidance from his 97-year-old grandfather, Henri Picault, a Haitian immigrant who drove a New York City taxi for more than 50 years before retiring four years ago; his father, Leslie, a former professional soccer player; and his mother, Lucerne, a lifelong educator. Every morning begins with a 7:15 a.m. wake-up call from his mother, and they pray together over the phone. 'My Mom is the first person I talk to every day,' Picault said. 'We pray before every training and before every game. I then talk to my Dad really quick, too, if he's up. They've always been available and around for me, so I'm blessed to have that.' That familial love and faith carried him through his most difficult moments. He remembers tearful four-hour family phone calls on Skype when things hit rock bottom. An honor student at Coral Reef Elementary and Southwood Middle School, Picault put academics on hold (much to his mother's dismay) and left Miami Killian High at age 16 to head to Italy and chase his soccer dream. He was invited to join Cagliari, Calcio's reserve team, on the island of Sardinia. Picault's maternal grandfather, Max Antoine, played for the Haitian national team. His father played for the Philadelphia Fever in the Major Indoor Soccer League. He was eager to follow in their footsteps. He fell in love with soccer while playing for youth clubs in West Kendall, Coral Springs and Weston, and with an academy team that was jointly run by Cagliari and local club, Strike Force. His father, with whom he trained from the moment he could kick a ball, supported his decision to go abroad. His mother took some convincing but eventually came around if he promised to keep above a 3.7 grade point average in his online schooling, which he did. 'Education is the sure way to go, but we took a chance because Fafa was very mature for his age, had a very special talent, and if he didn't do soccer now, when would he do it?'' Leslie Picault said. Spending the first eight years of his life in New York, and the next eight in Miami, he embraced his multi-cultural upbringing and never had any trouble blending into any group. He spoke four languages fluently – English, Creole, French and Spanish, and was excited by the idea of adding Italian to his list. But he was unprepared for the racism he encountered. 'Being the only black player there, I faced a lot of problems,' Picault said upon returning to the United States in 2012 to play for the Tampa Bay Rowdies and then the Fort Lauderdale Strikers. 'I could probably write a book. My second week, a teammate spat in my face. Other guys called me a black piece of this or that. There were lots of racial slurs. Even one of my coaches voiced his opinion of blacks openly, saying stuff to me like, 'This is not the jungle of Africa.' It was rough because I was trying to break in, and those guys made it harder for me.' Things got so bad in 2011 that he took some time off from the sport and moved to Paris to live with an aunt before returning to the United States. 'It was very hard on our family, having to parent him from so far away,' said Picault's father. 'We told him to try his best, and prove he belongs. But it got really, really rough on him, so we said, 'Son, we have soccer in the States. Come back home.'' Looking back on that stage of his life now, seeing how far he has come, Picault said those years in Italy sharpened his game, strengthened his resolve, and thickened his skin. 'There were things that happened then that wouldn't happen now, with social media and awareness, so I'm glad there has been progress,' he said. 'I've taken two things from that as I've gotten older. It toughened me up, created a thick skin that is unbreakable, where nothing bothers me. I can just silence all the noise.' He stressed that there were many wonderful people in Italy and at the club, adding, 'I don't want to make it sound like I went to Italy and everybody was a racist.' He still considers Cagliari a second home, goes back yearly on vacation, and has many close friends there, including some former teammates who took him under their wing. Because of that kindness from teammates, Picault makes it a point to be a mentor to newcomers in every locker room. 'As I've gotten older, I've taken that role of making sure the young guys are okay because I know how far that can go and how much that meant to me as a young player back then,' he said. Picault, who had been selected for some Under-20 U.S. national team camps, thought he would land with an MLS team after returning from Italy. It didn't happen. So, he attended the NASL Combine, signed with the Tampa Bay Rowdies and later joined the Fort Lauderdale Strikers. 'Fafa always had a unique ability to put the ball in the net, and he can accelerate with the ball to get away from defenders,' said Thomas Rongen, who coached Picault with the U.S. Under 20 team. 'His first few steps are quite remarkable. He's very mature, has a great sense of humor, is a gentleman and consummate pro.' In January 2015, he moved back to Europe and spent six months with Sparta Prague in the Czech Republic before signing with St. Pauli, where he impressed manager Ewald Lienen, a friend of German legend and former U.S. national coach Jurgen Klinsmann, who invited him to a camp in 2016. 'Fafa is an interesting character,' Klinsmann said at the time. 'He took the route to Europe and fought his way through, and came out in St Pauli with a coach I know really well, and he told me: 'The kid is a fighter.' He's a hungry goalscorer, takes on people. He has speed, smells where the ball goes, good instincts. These are things that are difficult to teach.' Picault says his resilience comes from his family lineage. His paternal gradfather, Henri Picault, fled Port-au-Prince, Haiti, at the age of 35 in December 1963 and headed to New York City with his wife Dinorah, to escape François 'Papa Doc' Duvalier's oppressive regime. Henri Picault got his first job at a deli, then spent a half century as a cab driver, with a Haitian flag hanging from his rearview mirror. Fafa loved getting rides from him. One of their favorite destinations was a Dominican restaurant called Malecon on 97th and Amsterdam. 'He knows every crevice and crack in that city,' Fafa said. 'The biggest thing I took from him was work ethic. He was loyal to his craft, to be doing his job for as long as he did, at his age, I really admire that.' His maternal grandfather, Max Antoine, was a former star on Haiti's national team and beloved. Fafa did not realize what a big deal his grandfather was until he attended his funeral in Haiti in 2005 and there were people lined up for blocks outside the church. Throughout his career, which includes stints with six MLS teams, Picault has become a fan favorite. That is especially true in South Florida, where the Haitian community has embraced his return. Jim Curtin, who coached Picault with the Philadelphia Union from 2017-19, said: 'He lights up a room when he walks into it with that smile, always has a positive attitude. He's a great guy in the locker room. On the field, Fafa's a playmaker. Everywhere he's been, on every team, in every situation, whether it's a club team, or internationally with his national team, he always makes big plays. Only certain players have that. 'He was so valuable to me in the locker room as a young coach, literally helping me translate in the film sessions, in the locker room. We had maybe 15 countries represented, and I think he had every language covered.' Picault's team-first mentality is something Inter Miami coach Javier Mascherano has mentioned on numerous occasions this season. Curtin said he was the same in Philadelphia. 'Whatever your teams needs, at whatever moment in the game, if it's make a 90-yard recovery sprint to break up a play, even though he's an attacking player, he'll do that defensive work for you,' Curtin said. 'If it's make a big play on a header, on a corner kick at the end of the game to win it, he'll do that. He's a guy who will do whatever it takes for a team to win, and that's a coach's dream.' After Saturday's Inter Miami game against the Columbus Crew, Picault is headed to Aruba to play for the Haitian national team in World Cup qualifying matches against Aruba and Curacao. Because of the political unrest and violence in Haiti, the Haitian team cannot host any games. Wearing that Haiti jersey, as his grandfather did decades before, makes him immensely proud. And playing for Inter Miami, in front of Haitian fans, is also special, he said. 'Every time I step on the field, I know I represent more than just myself; I represent a big community of Haitians, both here and abroad, who are supporting me and have my back,' Picault said. 'With the situation going on in Haiti, we Haitians play with an extra chip on our shoulder, an extra passion, knowing the joy we can bring and maybe some peace for the people there.'
The Star
10 hours ago
- Politics
- The Star
Trump gets key wins at Supreme Court on immigration, despite some misgivings
(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court swept away this week another obstacle to one of President Donald Trump's most aggressively pursued policies - mass deportation - again showing its willingness to back his hardline approach to immigration. The justices, though, have signaled some reservations with how he is carrying it out. Since Trump returned to the White House in January, the court already has been called upon to intervene on an emergency basis in seven legal fights over his crackdown on immigration. It most recently let Trump's administration end temporary legal status provided to hundreds of thousands of migrants for humanitarian reasons by his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden while legal challenges in two cases play out in lower courts. The Supreme Court on Friday lifted a judge's order that had halted the revocation of immigration "parole" for more than 500,000 Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants. On May 19, it lifted another judge's order preventing the termination of "temporary protected status" for more than 300,000 Venezuelan migrants. In some other cases, however, the justices have ruled that the administration must treat migrants fairly, as required under the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of due process. "This president has been more aggressive than any in modern U.S. history to quickly remove non-citizens from the country," said Kevin Johnson, an immigration and public interest law expert at the University of California, Davis. No president in modern history "has been as willing to deport non-citizens without due process," Johnson added. That dynamic has forced the Supreme Court to police the contours of the administration's actions, if less so the legality of Trump's underlying policies. The court's 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump during his first term as president. "President Trump is acting within his lawful authority to deport illegal aliens and protect the American people. While the Supreme Court has rightfully acknowledged the president's authority in some cases, in others they have invented new due process rights for illegal aliens that will make America less safe. We are confident in the legality of our actions and will continue fighting to keep President Trump's promises," White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told Reuters. The justices twice - on April 7 and on May 16 - have placed limits on the administration's attempt to implement Trump's invocation of a 1798 law called the Alien Enemies Act, which historically has been employed only in wartime, to swiftly deport Venezuelan migrants who it has accused of being members of the Tren de Aragua gang. Lawyers and family members of some of the migrants have disputed the gang membership allegation. On May 16, the justices also said a bid by the administration to deport migrants from a detention center in Texas failed basic constitutional requirements. Giving migrants "notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster," the court stated. Due process generally requires the government to provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing before taking certain adverse actions. The court has not outright barred the administration from pursuing these deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, as the justices have yet to decide the legality of using the law for this purpose. The U.S. government last invoked the Alien Enemies Act during World War Two to intern and deport people of Japanese, German and Italian descent. "The Supreme Court has in several cases reaffirmed some basic principles of constitutional law (including that) the due process clause applies to all people on U.S. soil," said Elora Mukherjee, director of Columbia Law School's immigrants' rights clinic. Even for alleged gang members, Mukherjee said, the court "has been extremely clear that they are entitled to notice before they can be summarily deported from the United States." A WRONGLY DEPORTED MAN In a separate case, the court on April 10 ordered the administration to facilitate the release from custody in El Salvador of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant who was living in Maryland. The administration has acknowledged that Abrego Garcia was wrongly deported to El Salvador. The administration has yet to return Abrego Garcia to the United States, which according to some critics amounts to defiance of the Supreme Court. The administration deported on March 15 more than 200 people to El Salvador, where they were detained in the country's massive anti-terrorism prison under a deal in which the United States is paying President Nayib Bukele's government $6 million. Ilya Somin, a constitutional law professor at George Mason University, said the Supreme Court overall has tried to curb the administration's "more extreme and most blatantly illegal policies" without abandoning its traditional deference to presidential authority on immigration issues. "I think they have made a solid effort to strike a balance," said Somin, referring to the Alien Enemies Act and Abrego Garcia cases. "But I still think there is excessive deference, and a tolerance for things that would not be permitted outside the immigration field." That deference was on display over the past two weeks with the court's decisions letting Trump terminate the grants of temporary protected status and humanitarian parole previously given to migrants. Such consequential orders were issued without the court offering any reasoning, Mukherjee noted. "Collectively, those two decisions strip immigration status and legal protections in the United States from more than 800,000 people. And the decisions are devastating for the lives of those who are affected," Mukherjee said. "Those individuals could be subject to deportations, family separation, losing their jobs, and if they're deported, possibly even losing their lives." TRAVEL BAN RULING Trump also pursued restrictive immigration policies in his first term as president, from 2017-2021. The Supreme Court gave Trump a major victory in 2018, upholding his travel ban targeting people from several Muslim-majority countries. In 2020, the court blocked Trump's bid to end a program that protects from deportation hundreds of thousands of migrants - often called "Dreamers" - who entered the United States illegally as children. Other major immigration-related cases are currently pending before the justices, including Trump's effort to broadly enforce his January executive order to restrict birthright citizenship - a directive at odds with the longstanding interpretation of the Constitution as conferring citizenship on virtually every baby born on U.S. soil. The court heard arguments in that case on May 15 and has not yet rendered a decision. Another case concerns the administration's efforts to increase the practice of deporting migrants to countries other than their own, including to places such as war-torn South Sudan. Boston-based U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy required that migrants destined for so-called "third countries" be notified and given a meaningful chance to seek legal relief by showing the harms they may face by being send there. Murphy on May 21 ruled that the administration had violated his court order by attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan. They are now being held at a military base in Djibouti. The administration on May 27 asked the justices to lift Murphy's order because it said the third-country process is needed to remove migrants who commit crimes because their countries of origin are often unwilling to take them back. Johnson predicted that the Supreme Court will side with the migrants in this dispute. "I think that the court will enforce the due process rights of a non-citizen before removal to a third country," Johnson said. (Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Additional reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)
