logo
Kanesatake election legit, says electoral officer

Kanesatake election legit, says electoral officer

The chief electoral officer selected to oversee the upcoming Mohawk Council of Kanesatake (MCK) election acknowledged a contradiction in the electoral code but confirmed he believes it is legitimate to abide by a four-year term.
'As far as my position goes, I wouldn't be taking the appointment if I wasn't comfortable with proceeding despite the fact that one provision is not being maintained on the timing,' said Graeme Drew, who is a certified electoral officer with experience managing around 80 elections and other votes for Indigenous communities since 2014.
The provision he refers to is the Kanesatake Custom Electoral Code's mandated election date of the second Saturday in June, which equates to June 14 this year. However, the code also defines a term as four years, and the previous election was held on July 31, 2021; at the time, the delay was attributed largely to complications owing to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The MCK has said Council will be dissolved July 31 ahead of an August 2 election.
The timing is a crucial question, not least because the code dictates that only a chief who has completed a full term is eligible to run for grand chief.
According to Drew, such discrepancies are not unique to the community's code.
'This is not all that uncommon, quite honestly,' said Drew. 'There will be times when there are contradictory rules within an election code. I get asked quite often to review and critique and edit and write sections of codes for nations. When I do that, I try to ensure the dates for the election itself are not so prescriptive that it ties the hands of the electoral officer and the administration.'
He said he always provides recommendations for future elections, and adjusting the language around the election date will likely be included in his advice.
'In the case of this here, the term of office is really important in terms of the leadership was elected for four years, and that four years will expire just around the time of when the election date will be,' he said. 'One argument can be made that they earned that right for the four-year term, and another argument can be made that it should have started earlier to make sure the June election date is achieved.'
By the time the request for proposals went out, Drew added, it was for all intents and purposes impossible for a June 14 date to be met.
'By then it was too late,' he said. He suggested it would have been a good idea to amend the code since the last election to provide clarity for this year's contest.
Amanda Simon, who has announced plans to run in the upcoming election, has been an indefatigable voice in demanding the June election date be met.
'At this point, it is too late to have any other date without breaching the timelines in the code anyway,' said Simon when informed that the electoral officer had weighed in on the election's legitimacy.
'I guess the quorum stacked their deck with lawyers giving their blessing, and now their BC chief electoral officer,' she added, a reference to Drew being based in British Columbia.
MCK chief Serge Otsi Simon said Drew was selected for his experience.
'He's been around for quite some time. He has an impressive resume,' said Serge.
'The guy, I think he's very qualified because he also has a background in conflict resolution. I think for this election, we're going to need someone with that kind of background.'
Drew will be travelling to Kanesatake next week, where he will meet with Council and MCK staff as he gets started on the task of administering the election.
'I have to earn some respect and trust with the incumbents and previous leaders and people that are running, and hopefully they'll see my intention is good in terms of trying to ensure that it's a fair election,' said Drew.
He will be at arm's length from Council during the process, he said, communicating with staff rather than elected officials as he embarks on fulfilling his role, and he is committed to administering the election according to Kanesatake's electoral code, he said.
'I'm like the referee, and that's my rulebook,' he said.
Drew suggested he is in favour of the plan for online voting to be used even though it is not included in the methods outlined in the electoral code, calling it an additive method – not taking away any established forms – with many advantages, especially for those who don't live on the territory.
'It's a very effective way to ensure as many people can vote as possible,' he said.
Key dates pertaining to the election, such as those pertaining to advance voting and the nomination process, will soon be finalized, said Drew.
marcus@easterndoor.com
Marcus Bankuti, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'
US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'

A sweeping environmental decision is raising major concerns about the future of America's wild spaces. The federal government is moving to roll back protections on a massive stretch of public land in Alaska, potentially opening the door to more dirty energy development in one of the country's most sensitive ecosystems. The U.S. government has announced plans to reverse a major public land safeguard, opening up 23 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A) to oil drilling and mining. The move would undo a December 2023 executive order from President Joe Biden that had blocked fossil fuel development in this remote Arctic region. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the change on June 2, arguing that the earlier protections hindered energy independence, according to reporting by the Guardian. Burgum was joined by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, showing the administration's full-court press in favor of dirty energy expansion. But environmental groups say this shift prioritizes corporate profits over public health and natural heritage. "The Trump administration's move to roll back protections in the most ecologically important areas of the Western Arctic threatens wildlife, local communities, and our climate," Kristen Miller, executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League, explained in a statement. The NPR-A provides essential habitat for caribou, polar bears, and migratory birds, and it's been central to the food, culture, and way of life for Indigenous communities for generations. Opening up this much land to oil and gas drilling could add more pollution to our air and water and disrupt fragile ecosystems. The NPR-A is the largest single stretch of public land in the country and helps keep air clean, protect biodiversity, and support the cultural and economic traditions of local communities. Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. More fossil fuel development also adds to the heat-trapping pollution that's warming our planet and straining public health systems. We've already seen backlash to similar Arctic projects, like the Willow Project, a major drilling proposal approved in 2023, which sparked widespread opposition over its long-term risks. Conservation advocates are gearing up to fight back by preparing lawsuits, and grassroots campaigns are gaining traction. "The public fought hard for these protections," Miller said. "We won't stay silent while they're dismantled." At the local level, Utah's push to save the Great Salt Lake is showing what dedicated community action can achieve, and it's inspiring similar efforts nationwide. New York now requires all-electric new buildings, while California is phasing out gas-powered cars. These efforts cut harmful pollution and help speed the shift toward cleaner, healthier energy. You can take part by reducing home energy waste, switching to electric appliances, or choosing a clean electricity plan. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine advisory committee
RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine advisory committee

Los Angeles Times

time4 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine advisory committee

WASHINGTON — Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday removed every member of a scientific committee that advises the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on how to use vaccines and pledged to replace them with his own picks. The 17-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices had been in a state of flux since Kennedy took over. Its first meeting this year had been delayed when the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services abruptly postponed its February meeting. Kennedy, who was one of the nation's leading anti-vaccine activists before becoming the nation's top health official, recently took the unusual step of changing COVID-19 recommendations without first consulting the panel. In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece, Kennedy said the committee members had too many conflicts of interest. Committee members routinely disclose any possible conflicts at the start of public meetings.

COVID Crusader Writes Open Letter To RFK Jr On mRNA
COVID Crusader Writes Open Letter To RFK Jr On mRNA

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

COVID Crusader Writes Open Letter To RFK Jr On mRNA

A prominent group of health activists is threatening a political revolt against HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over what they call a betrayal of their movement's central cause. In a blistering open letter dated June 4, COVID crusader Dr. Mary Talley Bowden and several allies from the MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) movement — a grassroots coalition of vaccine-critical and medical freedom activists — accused Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary of watering down policies related to the controversial mRNA vaccine platform, especially in guidance affecting children and pregnant women. 'We did not fight for you to be in positions of leadership so that our clearly stated policy goals would suffer a 'bait and switch,'' Bowden wrote, warning Kennedy that MAHA voters 'can walk away' if their demands are not met. The letter criticizes recent CDC and FDA policy changes, calling them deceptive and insufficient, and claims the administration is engaging in 'linguistic misdirections' to hide the continued recommendation of mRNA shots for vulnerable populations. The MAHA letter insists the mRNA platform — particularly COVID vaccines — should be pulled from the market entirely, citing adverse event data and peer-reviewed studies. It demands sweeping reforms: a full ban on mRNA technologies, repeal of the PREP Act, elimination of vaccine-related conflicts of interest in federal agencies, and an end to direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. The signatories include author Naomi Wolf, podcaster Shannon Joy, and several other activists who rose to prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic by challenging government vaccine narratives. The backlash comes amid growing scrutiny of RFK Jr.'s recent actions as HHS secretary. Once one the nation's most vocal mRNA vaccine skeptic, Kennedy has walked a careful line in office, telling Congress in May that his personal views on vaccines are 'irrelevant' and vowing not to make sudden changes to CDC policy. 'I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me,' Kennedy told lawmakers, as reported by The Hill on June 2. Still, his critics on both sides see Kennedy's recent moves as consequential. Late last month, he released a 58-second video on X stating that COVID vaccines for healthy children and healthy pregnant women had been removed from the CDC's immunization schedule — a declaration Bowden and others say was misleading. Indeed, as The Hill previously reported, the CDC quietly changed its guidance to say healthy children may receive the COVID vaccine after consultation with a healthcare provider, while maintaining stronger recommendations for other vulnerable categories. For pregnant women, the recommendation was similarly softened but not eliminated, and pregnancy remains classified by the FDA as a high-risk health condition, allowing continued vaccine use under certain circumstances. Bowden's letter zeroes in on this ambiguity, arguing that wordplay is being used to sustain vaccine availability under the appearance of reform. 'Pregnant women have not been made any safer by your wordplay,' she writes, warning that MAHA activists are prepared to run their own candidates in upcoming elections if their demands are ignored. The political threat underscores the friction between Kennedy and the movement that once celebrated his nomination. While Kennedy has taken steps to reshape HHS in ways consistent with his skepticism — including canceling hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine— his first few months of actions have not thus far rendered the swift action that some would have hoped. Former CDC acting director Dr. Richard Besser and other public health experts have voiced alarm at Kennedy's willingness to circumvent the CDC's vaccine advisory panel, which has traditionally guided immunization policy through public, evidence-based deliberation. 'We're seeing a total side-stepping of the nation's leading public health agency,' Besser told The Hill. The vaccine panel has not yet weighed in on the updated COVID shot guidance. Its next meeting is scheduled for late June, and observers expect tense debate over whether Kennedy's changes represent science-based reform or political overreach. In the meantime, Bowden's warning reflects the fragile coalition Kennedy is attempting to hold together. The MAHA movement — built in part from disaffected MAGA voters, vaccine skeptics, and parents concerned about government overreach — played a pivotal role in rallying support for Kennedy's confirmation and the broader medical freedom agenda. Now, its leaders are openly questioning whether Kennedy's tenure will deliver the systemic change they demand — or whether they were simply used to fuel a political ascent. 'MAHA is not the possession of Secretary Kennedy,' Bowden wrote. 'It is the voice of millions of desperate parents… and their activism will outlast any administration.' The Dallas Express reached out to HHS but did not immediately receive a response. Kennedy previously spoke to The Dallas Express about a lawsuit Bowden brought against the FDA for misleading the public about using ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 during his presidential campaign in 2024 and just after the FDA settled the case. 'All three of the principal health agencies [CDC, NIH, FDA] suffer from agency capture,' Kennedy said. 'I would say 50% of the FDA's budget is from pharmaceutical companies. NIH scientists are allowed to collect royalties on drugs that they regulate –– which is clearly a conflict of interest. CDC … has devolved into an agency that primarily promotes the mercantile interests of the pharmaceutical companies.' He told DX that the agencies are overly influenced by perverse incentives from the pharmaceutical industry and added, 'I will change those incentives and unravel the culture of corruption that now has turned these agencies against public health.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store