US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'
The U.S. government has announced plans to reverse a major public land safeguard, opening up 23 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A) to oil drilling and mining.
The move would undo a December 2023 executive order from President Joe Biden that had blocked fossil fuel development in this remote Arctic region.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the change on June 2, arguing that the earlier protections hindered energy independence, according to reporting by the Guardian.
Burgum was joined by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, showing the administration's full-court press in favor of dirty energy expansion.
But environmental groups say this shift prioritizes corporate profits over public health and natural heritage.
"The Trump administration's move to roll back protections in the most ecologically important areas of the Western Arctic threatens wildlife, local communities, and our climate," Kristen Miller, executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League, explained in a statement.
The NPR-A provides essential habitat for caribou, polar bears, and migratory birds, and it's been central to the food, culture, and way of life for Indigenous communities for generations.
Opening up this much land to oil and gas drilling could add more pollution to our air and water and disrupt fragile ecosystems.
The NPR-A is the largest single stretch of public land in the country and helps keep air clean, protect biodiversity, and support the cultural and economic traditions of local communities.
Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty?
Definitely
Only in some areas
No way
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
More fossil fuel development also adds to the heat-trapping pollution that's warming our planet and straining public health systems.
We've already seen backlash to similar Arctic projects, like the Willow Project, a major drilling proposal approved in 2023, which sparked widespread opposition over its long-term risks.
Conservation advocates are gearing up to fight back by preparing lawsuits, and grassroots campaigns are gaining traction.
"The public fought hard for these protections," Miller said. "We won't stay silent while they're dismantled."
At the local level, Utah's push to save the Great Salt Lake is showing what dedicated community action can achieve, and it's inspiring similar efforts nationwide.
New York now requires all-electric new buildings, while California is phasing out gas-powered cars.
These efforts cut harmful pollution and help speed the shift toward cleaner, healthier energy.
You can take part by reducing home energy waste, switching to electric appliances, or choosing a clean electricity plan.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Russian air attack on Ukraine strikes American plant
At least 16 people were killed in a Russian drone and missile strike on Ukraine that also struck an American business. Photo by Zakarpattia Region Procecutor's Office/EPA Aug. 21 (UPI) -- Ukrainian officials reported that Russia launched an overnight aerial attack that included a missile strike that hit an American business. Ukraine's Defense Intelligence agency announced that the Russian assault involved 574 drones, six ballistic missiles and 33 cruise missiles, of which 546 drones, one ballistic missile and 30 cruise missiles were shot down. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a post on X that 15 people were injured in the strike on Zakarpattia. The State Emergency Service of Ukraine posted to social media about three hours after Zelensky's message that the number of injured in the attack on Mukachevo has increased to 16. "Last night, the Russian army set one of its insane anti-records," he said."They targeted civilian infrastructure facilities, residential buildings, and our people." "And the Russians carried out this attack as if nothing has changed at all, as if there are no global efforts to stop this war. This requires a response. There is still no signal from Moscow that they truly intend to engage in substantive negotiations and end this war." "Pressure is needed," he concluded. "Strong sanctions, strong tariffs. I thank everyone who is helping." Zelensly added that "cruise missiles were lobbed against an American-owned enterprise in Zakarpattia" that was still ablaze at the time of its posting. Lviv Oblast Gov. Maksym Kozytskyi announced that an attack there killed one person and injured two. Ternopil, Rivne and Khmelnytskyi oblasts were assaulted by drones, and the city of Kyiv also reported an air attack. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha also stated a missile "struck a major American electronics manufacturer in our westernmost region." The plant, which Zelensky said "was a regular civilian business, supported by American investment, producing everyday items like coffee machines" has since been identified as the Flex factory in the western Ukrainian city of Mukachevo in Zakarpattia Oblast. The Kyiv Independent reported Thursday that a plant employee said that as the facility doesn't produce anything used by the military, buildings at the site will likely burn down due to the Russian attack.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration to rule on biofuel exemption requests, delay reallocation decision, sources say
By Jarrett Renshaw (Reuters) -The Trump administration is expected to rule on a growing backlog of requests from small refiners seeking relief from the nation's biofuel laws as early as Friday, but will delay a decision on whether larger refiners should make up for some of the exempt gallons, according to two sources familiar with the planning. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is expected to rule on a number of the 195 pending small refinery exemption requests that date back as far as 2016 on Friday, the sources said. The rulings will be a mixed bag, including some partial denials, but will not be a sweeping win for small refiners, according to one source briefed on the decisions. The administration is expected to issue a supplemental rule as early as next week to seek public comment on whether or not they should force larger refiners to make up for the exempted gallons in a process known as reallocation. The EPA said earlier this year that it would force larger refiners to make up for future exempted gallons, but was silent on how it would treat exempt gallons from the dozens of backlogged requests. The supplemental rule will include various options in a bid to test how the market may respond, the sources said. How the administration deals with exemption requests and the reallocation issues will have consequences for the oil and agricultural industries, and impact the price of commodities from gasoline and renewable diesel to soybeans and corn, along with the companies that produce them. In the past, widespread exemptions without reallocation have sent credit prices lower, along with prices for soybeans and ethanol. (Reporting By Jarrett Renshaw; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama ) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Biden's auto-pen pardons disturbed DOJ brass, docs show, raising questions whether they are legally binding
New documents and communications between Biden White House staff and career officials at the Justice Department prompted scrutiny of the legality of former President Joe Biden's thousands of last-minute pardons. The Oversight Project shared documents obtained from the Trump DOJ with Fox News Digital showing that a career prosecutor warned Biden's inner circle that the administration's pardon process was unorthodox and legally troubling. In the most scrutinized e-mail, then-Assistant Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer wrote a group email to several executive office staff members on Jan. 18 asking questions about the more than 2,500 pardons. "[T]he White House has described those who received commutations as people convicted of non-violent drug offenses. I think you should stop saying that because it is untrue or at least misleading," Weinsheimer said. "As you know, even with the exceedingly limited review we were permitted to do of the individuals we believed you might be considering for commutation action, we initially identified 19 that were highly problematic," he continued. He cited convicts Terrence Richardson and Ferrone Claiborne, who were included in the clemency grants, and noted the DOJ received "voluminous" objections from victims' families and law enforcement as the men had been "sentenced to life imprisonment for drug trafficking offenses during which a police officer was killed." That, according to Oversight Project vice president Kyle Brosnan, shows DOJ was concerned about the "vague" construct of Biden's pardons and how they appeared to be "illegally delegated" to staff. They also left the DOJ wondering at times which offenses, for people with multiple convictions, were specifically being expunged. "Later in the email, he was like, 'Look, I read the statement you put out in the president's name, saying you've released a bunch of non-violent drug offenders. You've got murderers on your list today. So I'm trying to figure out what the president wants here for this funky warrant.'" Discussing other documents received, Brosnan and attorney Sam Dewey cited a spreadsheet of convicts with "offenses described to the Department of Justice" for the second of several "collective" or catch-all warrants. "I think it best that we receive a statement or direction from the President as to the meaning of the warrant language," Weinsheimer wrote to White House staff. "That will allow us to give full effect to the commutation warrant in the manner intended by the president." There was ultimately no explanation for what the offenses or the proverbial descriptions were, according to the document tranche, Brosnan said, adding that the DOJ official suggested to Biden staff that "you should stop saying [pardonees were mostly 'nonviolent drug offen[ders]'] because it is untrue or at least misleading." Brosnan explained that a spreadsheet of convicts, said to be attached to one of the e-mails, came from the U.S. Sentencing Commission – and only the president has the power to grant pardons. Treating it otherwise, he said, would amount to an illegal delegation of presidential authority. To that end, Brosnan pointed to New York Times interviews with Biden in July, wherein the paper reported, "Mr. Biden did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons that applied to large numbers of people, he and aides confirmed." "Rather, after extensive discussion of different possible criteria, he signed off on the standards he wanted to be used to determine which convicts would qualify for a reduction in sentence." "High-profile" pardon recipients like retired Gen. Mark Milley were discussed directly with aides. "Biden did not pardon individual people, but laid out categories of types of people to release and left it to the staff to figure out who meets that criteria," Brosnan said, adding that many warrant documents were also found to be auto-penned. Dewey told Fox News Digital the situation was "worse than that" – because "literally no one," including DOJ officials, "understands what the [aforementioned pardon] criteria are." "You generally don't see people write emails like this," he said. "This isn't a 'CYA' – this is an 'I'm going to do a Pontius Pilate routine because this is a drug deal and I want to make very sure it doesn't come back on me." The entire situation, Dewey said, also has a precedent for such pardons being considered "invalid" going back to "before we were even a country." "If the pardon is invalid, it falls, and then you proceed as if there was no pardon." Biden previously defended his pardons, saying that he wanted to undo "disproportionately long sentences compared to the sentences they would receive today under current law, policy, and practice." "[This] clemency action provides relief for individuals who received lengthy sentences based on discredited distinctions between crack and powder cocaine, as well as outdated sentencing enhancements for drug crimes," Biden said in a statement. "This action is an important step toward righting historic wrongs, correcting sentencing disparities, and providing deserving individuals the opportunity to return to their families and communities after spending far too much time behind bars." Fox News Digital reached out to DOJ and a representative for Biden for further comment.