Two Chinese Aircraft Carriers Are Operating Beyond The First Island Chain For The First Time
The Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has released photos showing two of its aircraft carriers operating simultaneously for the first time beyond the so-called First Island Chain in the western Pacific. The latest development showcases China's growing carrier power as well as its ambition to challenge U.S. strategies of maritime containment in the Indo-Pacific region.
Photos of the aircraft carriers Liaoning and Shandong, as well as their J-15 Flanker fighters, were posted on the social media platform X by the official PLAN account. They were accompanied by a statement attributed to PLAN spokesperson Senior Captain Wang Xuemeng, who confirmed that the two carriers and their task groups had been 'training in the waters of the western Pacific to test their capabilities in far-seas protection and joint operations.'
The Chinese PLA Navy spokesperson Senior Captain Wang Xuemeng stated that recently the PLANS Liaoning and Shandong task groups conducted training in the waters of the Western Pacific to test their capabilities in far seas protection and joint operations. The routine training is… pic.twitter.com/EW0RASSM4Q
— ChinaNavy (@China_Navy) June 10, 2025
The statement continued: 'The routine training is organized in accordance with the annual plan, aiming at continuously enhancing the PLA Navy's capabilities of fulfilling the missions. It is in compliance with relevant international laws and practices and is not directed against any specific country or target.'
It should be noted that, although they are not thought to have been previously published, the photos in question could have originated on a different occasion and may not necessarily have been taken in the western Pacific.
Interestingly, the fighters seen arranged on the deck of the Liaoning in one of the photos reveal that all are the more modern J-15T versions. The J-15T is primarily distinguished from the original J-15 in being equipped for catapult takeoff but assisted recovery (CATOBAR) operations, rather than short takeoff but assisted recovery (STOBAR) operations. Neither the Liaoning nor the Shandong have CATOBAR equipment, but this will feature on the PLAN's forthcoming carriers.
Otherwise, the J-15T is fitted with domestically produced WS-10 turbofans in place of the Russian-made AL-31F engines previously found on production J-15s. It has more modern avionics, likely including an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, and is compatible with new weapons. However, the examples seen on the Liaoning are armed with the older PL-12 medium-range air-to-air missiles, rather than the more advanced PL-15 that they are also able to carry.
Regardless, it's notable that the PLAN is reporting the dual-carrier operations in these highly strategic waters so publicly.
The First Island Chain is a boundary defined by archipelagos opposite mainland East Asia, extending from the southern end of the Japanese home islands all the way to the South China Sea.
Extending further out into the western Pacific is the Second Island Chain, which links Japan to New Guinea and includes Guam and other U.S. island territories in the Marianas.
'Chinese naval vessels' activities in those waters are fully consistent with international law and international practices,' Lin Jian, a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said at a press conference today, in reference to carrier operations beyond the First Island Chain. 'Our national defense policy is defensive in nature.'
Confirmation that the Liaoning was sailing in waters beyond the First Island Chain emerged on Saturday, when its presence there was reported by the Japanese Ministry of Defense. The Liaoning has been underway since at least late May. It had been operating in the East China Sea before passing through the Miyako Strait and toward the Philippine Sea.
The same day, the Japanese Ministry of Defense said that the Shandong, together with four other PLAN vessels, was being tracked in the Philippine Sea, around 340 miles southeast of Miyako Island, southwest of Japan. To get there, the Shandong and its task group likely passed through the Luzon Strait, between Taiwan and the Philippines.
6/7、中国海軍クズネツォフ級空母「山東」を含む複数隻の中国海軍艦艇が、太平洋の海域において航行していることを確認しました。また6/9、艦載戦闘機等の発着艦を確認しました。#防衛省・自衛隊 は、引き続き #警戒監視・情報収集 を実施します。https://t.co/T0Z9JhLGFG pic.twitter.com/SJXGu42Mb0
— 防衛省統合幕僚監部 (@jointstaffpa) June 9, 2025
Included in the task group with Shandong were the Type 055 'super-destroyer' Zunyi, the two Type 054A frigates Yuncheng and Hengshui, as well as a Type 905 replenishment oiler, according to photos and pennant numbers published by the Japanese Ministry of Defense.
As of today, the Japanese Ministry of Defense reported the Shandong task group moving northeast, reaching a point north of the island of Okinotorishima, Japan's southernmost territory. In the process, the Shandong has been conducting flight operations, including flying J-15s and helicopters within Japan's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) around the island. The EEZ extends to a distance of 230 miles around Okinotorishima.
Naval operations within another country's EEZ are permitted under international law, as part of freedom of navigation and overflight.
Similarly, the PLAN is entirely within its right to operate in and around and beyond the various island chains. However, the significance of carrier operations here, especially involving two task groups, is something that Beijing will be keenly aware of.
After all, the island chains were created by the United States as tools of foreign policy, serving above all as strategic lines of defense to keep China's naval forces in check. By projecting its expanding naval power beyond these lines, Beijing demonstrates how it could, in a conflict scenario, contest the ability of the U.S. military and its allies to access these critical areas and the broader Pacific.
Meanwhile, the PLAN's fast-growing carrier force is a very visible and increasingly important tool as China, more generally, extends its reach further out into international waters, including beyond the Pacific.
While the Chinese Foreign Ministry may stress the 'defensive' nature of the PLAN vessels' activities, in wartime, they would very much be on the offensive, with carrier power at the forefront, to challenge for control of vast areas of the Pacific.
With that in mind, the PLAN's current dual-carrier deployment in the western Pacific is in keeping with ambitions to build a credible blue-water navy that is large and capable enough to challenge even the U.S. Navy.
Before too long, PLAN carrier task groups are also likely to be prowling around Guam, and venturing farther east, toward Wake, Midway, and eventually Hawaii. This is also in line with PLAN operations increasingly outside of its traditional areas of activity, including a growing focus on deployments around Alaska and in the High North.
It should be noted that the Liaoning and Shandong already conducted a joint operation last October, but didn't on that occasion venture beyond the South China Sea. Even so, dual-carrier operations in these tense waters also constitute a powerful symbol of Beijing's military and territorial ambitions.
With China's third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, now conducting pre-commissioning trials, it's only a matter of time before three PLAN flattops are able to conduct joint operations out into the western Pacific — and beyond.
A useful comparison of the Chinese aircraft carriers (CV-16), (CV-17), and (CV-18):
CV-16 vs CV-17 vs CV-18
pic.twitter.com/sIWQsBBHHk
— 彩云香江 (@louischeung_hk) June 16, 2022
With such a lot of hardware under construction, the PLAN will have the ability to project that much more capacity in the future. The growing size of the PLAN blue-water fleet means that Chinese naval power becomes an even harder problem to deal with, with the potential for Chinese warships, including carriers, to be in a lot of places at once.
Clearly, China's carrier power is still far more limited than that of the United States, but with at least another carrier under construction, together with big-deck amphibious assault ships, Beijing's efforts to counter the U.S. Navy and its allies in the Indo-Pacific region show no sign of slowing.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Pictures Show Chinese Jet Buzzing US Ally From Aircraft Carrier
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A patrol aircraft dispatched by Japan—a treaty ally of the United States—was intercepted by fighter jets launched from a Chinese aircraft carrier operating in the wider western Pacific. Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Defense and Foreign Ministries via email for comment. Why It Matters China, which has the world's largest navy by hull count—deployed both of its two aircraft carriers in active service beyond the First Island Chain on Saturday. The island defense line, comprising Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines, is in place to keep China's forces in check. In April, Beijing's state media released undated footage showing a Chinese J-15 flying close to a U.S. F/A-18 carrier-based fighter over an undisclosed maritime location. Aerial intercepts—if conducted in an unsafe or unprofessional manner—can lead to midair collisions, resulting in the loss of aircraft and aircrew. In 2001, a U.S. intelligence plane and a Chinese fighter jet collided near China, killing a Chinese pilot. What To Know On Wednesday, the Japanese Defense Ministry reported an "unusual approach" by Chinese military aircraft toward the Maritime Self-Defense Force, stating that a P-3C patrol aircraft had two encounters with J-15 fighter jets—launched from the aircraft carrier CNS Shandong—over the weekend while flying in international airspace over the Pacific Ocean. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet flies alongside a Japanese P-3C patrol aircraft over the Pacific Ocean on June 8, 2025. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet flies alongside a Japanese P-3C patrol aircraft over the Pacific Ocean on June 8, 2025. Japanese Defense Ministry In the first incident, which occurred between 10:30 a.m. and 11 a.m. local time on Saturday, Chinese fighter jets were spotted flying as close as 45 meters (147 feet) from the Japanese aircraft at the same altitude, which was conducting an unspecified surveillance mission. The following day, between 2 p.m. and 3 p.m. local time, Chinese fighter jets launched from the Shandong intercepted the Japanese aircraft for a second time, passing in front of it at a much greater distance—900 meters (2,952 feet)—while maintaining the same altitude. One of the photos taken from the Japanese aircraft shows a Chinese fighter jet flying with a missile visible beneath its wing. Another photo shows a jet flying alongside the Japanese plane. The horizontal distance between them in the photos remains unknown. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet flies near a Japanese P-3C patrol aircraft over the Pacific Ocean on June 8, 2025. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet flies near a Japanese P-3C patrol aircraft over the Pacific Ocean on June 8, 2025. Japanese Defense Ministry While there was no damage to the Japanese aircraft and no injuries were reported among its crew in either incident, Tokyo's Defense Ministry expressed serious concerns, stating that the Chinese fighter jets' "abnormal" aerial maneuvers could lead to an accidental collision. According to an earlier press release from the Japanese Defense Ministry, the Shandong was tracked operating with four Chinese naval vessels in the Philippine Sea on Saturday—341 miles southeast of Japan's southwestern island of Miyako—during an eastward voyage. The press release also revealed that the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force had deployed a P-3C patrol aircraft to monitor and gather intelligence on the Chinese vessels. Two days later, the Shandong conducted flight operations involving its fighter jets and helicopters. What People Are Saying Senior Captain Wang Xuemeng, spokesperson for the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy, said in a statement on Tuesday: "This [dual aircraft carrier deployment] is a routine arrangement included in the annual training plan, aiming to improve the Chinese PLA Navy's ability to fulfill missions. The training complies with relevant international law and practice, and is not targeted at specific countries or entity." Lin Jian, spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said at a press conference on Tuesday: "Let me reiterate that Chinese naval vessels' activities in those waters are fully consistent with international law and international practices. Our national defense policy is defensive in nature. We hope Japan will view those activities objectively and rationally." What Happens Next Such close aerial encounters between Japanese and Chinese military aircraft are likely to continue as China's two aircraft carriers operate in waters near Japan's more remote islands.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
How a WWII submariner took the fight directly to the Japanese
By the middle of 1944, United States Navy submarines had weathered hard times of unreliable torpedoes and a necessary learning process to matured weapons of war, aided by onboard radar. At the same time, their Japanese opponents had yet to fully address the threat that these underwater marauders posed to the ships that brought oil and other foreign resources from their far-flung empire. So fully developed were the American subs that Adm. Chester W. Nimitz, commander in chief of naval forces, Pacific (CINCPAC), had started the year off by adding destroyers to his priority lists, so as to accelerate the elimination of America's principal enemies. Like their German counterparts, the Americans were also operating in wolf packs of two or more, while the Japanese were modifying and arming numerous varieties of other ships, such as minesweepers, to make up their sub-hunter losses. A dramatic example of the situation in 1944 began in mid-June, when three boats from Submarine Attack Group 9, named 'Parks' Pirates' for their commander, Cmdr. Lewis Smith Parks, departed Pearl Harbor to prowl the waters from Formosa to Luzon. They were led by Cmdr. Lawson P. 'Red' Ramage on Parche, followed by Steelhead and Hammerhead. The Massachusetts native graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy as an ensign in July 1931, with his first attempt to get a submarine assignment initially blocked due to an eye injury. His second attempt, in which he memorized the eye chart, succeeded in getting him aboard S-29 in January 1936. He was a radio and sound officer at Pearl Harbor in March 1941, and he was there when Japanese carrier planes raided it on Dec. 7. On June 6, 1944, Parks' Pirates embarked on their first patrol, with modest initial results for Hammerhead: a sampan destroyed on June 9, followed by a coastal oil carrier damaged. On July 29, Hammerhead had to curtail its sweep when it came under air attack, returning for repairs at Fremantle, Australia, on Aug. 17. At 10:30 a.m. on July 30, Steelhead was off Formosa when it sighted smoke, which, upon investigation, revealed an enemy convoy escorted by aircraft. Unable to attack until nightfall, Steelhead maintained contact until 8:15 p.m., when it shot off a message summoning Parche, relaying the enemy's course and speed. Ramage responded at full speed, joining Steelhead at midnight to make surface attacks. The latter commenced hostilities at 3:32 a.m. with a bow spread of six torpedoes that struck a freighter, then a tanker. Steelhead then turned to launch four stern 'fish,' while two flares signaled the Japanese alarm. Ramage had been trying to set up a flank attack at about 3 a.m. when he encountered an escort vessel. Enemy flares revealed three such escorts darting about, two of which were between Parche and the convoy, and one bearing down on the sub. Ramage put his boat into a circular maneuver that brought it astern of the escort, confusing the enemy. 'Parche was now between the escorts and the convoy,' Ramage reported afterward, 'but while this maneuver was going on, the entire [enemy] convoy had reversed its field and now was headed directly at Parche.' Ramage aimed for an oncoming medium freighter, but he overestimated the range and suddenly found himself a mere 450 yards from his intended target. A hard right turn avoided disaster by only 200 yards. Ramage then shot off two torpedoes. His freighter target dodged them, but in so doing it blocked the advance of an escort, preventing it from attacking the sub while allowing it to get off two bow shots, one of which hit the freighter. Five minutes later, Ramage brought Parche into position to attack two tankers. All four of his bow torpedoes struck home on the first tanker, which sank immediately. The second tanker, hit twice, slowed but kept on moving. At this point, Parche was in the middle of a milling mass of cargo ships and escorts, all ships involved behaving more like patrol torpedo boats in their half-blind attempts to ram their assailant. As for Ramage, placing his boat in the center of it all, he too alternated his direction and launched torpedoes as the opportunity offered, while his torpedo crew rushed new ones into place. At 4:43 a.m., Ramage was preparing to dodge two escorts when he saw a small merchantman bearing down on him from the starboard bow, determined to ram. Ordering full right rudder, he avoided collision by just 50 feet, only to find two escorts at either hand and a passenger cargo vessel coming on to ram. Unable to dodge this one, Ramage went for broke and fired three torpedoes in a down-the-throat shot. His first fish missed, but the other two hit, stopping the ship in its tracks. Ramage turned hard left, then fired a stern shot that struck the cargo ship amidships. At 4:42 a.m., it sank. After a look around, Ramage reported: 'There were still several small craft and escorts around, but no worthwhile targets that we could see. I decided to put some distance between us and this hornet's nest.' While Parche was fighting its way into a fiery hell and back, Whelchel and Steelhead were also busy on the sidelines — sending four torpedoes at a troop carrier at 4:49 a.m. and another four at a freighter. Both subs subsequently disengaged, having suffered neither damage nor casualties in the 46-minute melee. A postwar assessment credited Steelhead with the 7,169-ton freighter Dakar Maru and the 8,195-ton transport Fuso Maru. Both subs were jointly credited with the 8,990-ton transport Yoshino Maru. Parche emerged from its solo torpedo duel with credit for the 10,238-ton tanker Koei Maru and 4,471-ton passenger-cargo ship Manko Maru. Both submarine officers were decorated for their outstanding performance that night. Steelhead's commander, David Whelchel, was awarded the Silver Star, while Ramage received the Medal of Honor from President Franklin D. Roosevelt on Jan. 10, 1945 — not so much for the tonnage his sub had destroyed, considerable though it had been, as for the wild way he had achieved it. Asked what drove him throughout the encounter, he simply said, 'I got mad.' Ramage continued to rise up the Navy ranks, reaching the command of Military Sea Transport in Washington and retiring in 1969 as a vice admiral. He died in Bethesda, Maryland, on April 15, 1990, and was buried in Arlington National Cemetery.


San Francisco Chronicle
18 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California's massive dam removal hit a key milestone. Now, there's a problem
Last year, after the historic removal of four dams on the Klamath River, thousands of salmon rushed upstream into the long-blocked waters along the California-Oregon border, seeking out the cold, plentiful flows considered crucial to the fish's future. The return of salmon to their ancestral home was a fundamental goal of dam removal and a measure of the project's success. However, a problem emerged. The returning salmon only got so far. Eight miles upriver from the former dam sites lies a still-existing dam, the 41-foot-tall Keno Dam in southern Oregon. The dam has a fish ladder that's supposed to help with fish passage, but it didn't prove to work. While many proponents of dam removal say they're thrilled with just how far the salmon got, most of the 420 miles of waterways that salmon couldn't reach before the dam demolition still appear largely unreachable. This stands to keep the fish from spreading and reproducing in the high numbers anticipated with the project. Other migratory fish, including steelhead trout and Pacific lamprey, may face similar straits. The shortcoming has opened a new chapter in the decades-long effort to liberate the Klamath River, this one focused on Keno Dam. It has also left some people frustrated that the dam wasn't addressed sooner, when the other dams were dealt with. 'It's too bad that there wasn't enough forethought,' said William Ray Jr., chairman for the Klamath Tribes, who represents the native communities in the upper section of the Klamath Basin where salmon haven't been able to get to. 'The fish could have gone a lot farther, and that was the whole point. … The job just wasn't done, far from it.' The $500 million dam-removal project, considered the largest in U.S. history, was overseen by the states of California and Oregon in partnership with tribes and environmental groups, which initiated the effort to restore the 250-mile Klamath River to its natural conditions. The former owner of the power-generating dams, PacifiCorp, agreed to dam removal to rid itself of the river's aging and increasingly costly hydroelectric operations. The Portland-based utility and state of California paid for the work. PacifiCorp also owned Keno Dam, but because the dam provides flood control, unlike the others, it was transferred to the federal government's Bureau of Reclamation for continued operation, as part of the dam-removal agreement. In recent months, federal, state and tribal officials have been evaluating Keno Dam to see what might be done to make sure it's passable for salmon. The possibilities range from rebuilding the old fish ladder to removing the dam. Making changes, though, will be complicated by the facility's role in regulating river flows, and it could be years, if not decades, before there's a permanent fix. 'Restoration is not a flip-of-the-switch and everything-is-fine endeavor,' said Philip Milburn, district manager at the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, which has been contracted by the federal government to evaluate options for Keno Dam. 'It took hundreds of years for the basin to get to the way it is now, and it's going to take time to modify it to suit fish.' Above Keno Dam, where migratory fish haven't been for more than a century because of the dams, 350 miles of rivers, lakes and creeks are believed to be key for the struggling salmon population. Salmon spend most of their short lives at sea but they need freshwater to spawn. With the warming climate, the cold-water springs, higher elevations and nutrient-rich waters of the upper Klamath Basin are particularly important for reproduction, scientists say. The revival of the basin's salmon would be a boon for the commercial fishing industry and culinary world as well as for the many tribes that see the fish as a spiritual force in their communities. 'We haven't had the fish for a long time,' said Ray Jr. 'It harms the culture and the health of our people. We're becoming impatient.' New fish, but an old dam The apparent problem at Keno Dam became clear late last year, following what many federal, state and tribal officials considered an immediate success with the dam-removal project. The number of salmon swimming in the newly opened-up waters of the Klamath River, downstream of Keno Dam, was generally more than what was anticipated so soon. Roughly 2,000 chinook salmon were counted after the last of the dams was razed in August in surveys recently released by a multi-jurisdictional team of scientists. Sonar reports suggest the number could have been thousands more. The fish were part of the river's fall run, its most populous run. The salmon journeyed from the mouth of the Klamath River in California's redwood-filled north to the sunny rolling hills of Siskiyou County – a total of 190 miles to the first of the former dam sites. Beyond going the distance, the ability of the salmon to enter a new stretch of river hinged on navigating cloudy waters whipped up temporarily with the dam demolition as well as resisting the urge to stay in familiar territory. Salmon are built to return to their place of birth, though they sometimes 'stray' when it's in their interest. 'A lot of people expected it would take years for the fish to show up in these numbers,' said Mike Belchik, senior fisheries biologist for Northern California's Yurok Tribe, one of the primary tribes supporting the dam removal. 'That was wrong.' Coho salmon, steelhead trout and Pacific lamprey also have been documented in the footprint of the old dams. The fall-run chinook, once they got above the former dam sites, spawned either in the Klamath's main stem or in a tributary, such as Jenny or Shovel creeks, according to the surveys. This spring, newly born salmon began migrating to sea. (The adults die after spawning.) 'I don't know if the fish ran out of room or not,' Belchik said. 'Some of the habitats seemed fully occupied. But we're pretty stoked that so many went up there.' More than 500 adults were estimated to have gone as far as Oregon, with an unknown number making it to Keno Dam. At least a few were observed in the dam's fish ladder, which is a series of more than 20 step pools designed to help fish bypass the dam, but none were documented to have reached the top. While a lack of monitoring could explain the complete absence of fish above the dam, the challenges at the dam are unmistakable. One issue is believed to be a component called the trash racks. The vertical bars at the intakes of the fish ladder, which keep logs from clogging the passageway, were too narrow for salmon, an obstruction that federal officials at the Bureau of Reclamation have since worked on. But the larger problem, according to Oregon wildlife officials, is that the fish ladder at Keno Dam dates to when the dam was built in 1967 and simply doesn't work well. The openings between the pools where fish pass are too small. The gates controlling the flow of water are faulty. The ladder is located too far from where fish approach. 'To provide fish passage that meets current state of Oregon and federal fish passage criteria, a new passage facility would be required,' wildlife officials wrote in an evaluation of the dam in 2023. The Bureau of Reclamation confirmed in a statement to the Chronicle that it was working on 'fish passage solutions' at the dam. The agency, however, declined a request for an interview about the details of the work and the timing. Fixing the dam for fish While the Bureau of Reclamation's acquisition of Keno Dam last summer meant that the agency wasn't able to address fish passage until recently, at least directly, state and tribal officials say there were other reasons the issue wasn't taken up sooner. One was uncertainty about whether the dam-removal project downriver would ever get done after years of delays. Another was skepticism that salmon would make it to Keno Dam even if the dams below came down. Furthermore, the focus on the removal of the four dams left little time and resources to figure out what to do with potential hurdles upstream. 'There just wasn't the capacity to do everything at once,' said Milburn, with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 'Now we're tackling the things that were sidelined during the initial project.' With two new grants from the federal government, Oregon wildlife officials have been tasked with identifying both short-term and long-term fixes for Keno Dam. The state recently received the first $100,000 of a $4.5 million grant for immediate repairs, such as making sure the trash racks on the fish ladder don't block salmon. State officials have also convened a group of experts to study and recommend a permanent solution over the next three years, with the second $1.9 million grant. The recommendation will be forwarded to the Bureau of Reclamation for consideration. According to the terms of the grant, the state-convened experts will evaluate such possibilities as constructing a more effective fish ladder at Keno Dam as well as dismantling the dam entirely, which could prove even more effective for fish passage. Oregon officials say any proposal that involves dam removal must include dam replacement, presumably with one that's more fish friendly, or building a similarly purposed structure, possibly an artificial reef to replicate what was on the river historically, as has been informally discussed. Maintaining the flood-control features of the 723-foot-wide Keno Dam is necessary to protect the area's farms, communities and infrastructure. The dam is located 12 miles southwest of the city of Klamath Falls, Ore. 'There are so many benefits from having that dam in place right now that I can't see removing it unless there is a very, very deliberate effort to make sure we're not causing harm to the economy and local folks,' said Gene Souza, executive director of the Klamath Irrigation District, a water agency that delivers supplies to growers in the basin on both sides of the state line. Souza and others have also pointed to the potentially huge expense of demolishing the dam and building another. A new fish ladder could be pricey, too, requiring a specialized, durable and high-maintenance facility, though no cost estimates have been worked up yet for any of the options. While Keno Dam appears to be the biggest hang-up on the river, the challenges for salmon are not likely to end there. Upstream is one more dam, Link River Dam in Klamath Falls. This facility, long owned by the Bureau of Reclamation, regulates giant Upper Klamath Lake, where the Klamath River begins, and provides water supplies for the agriculturally vital Klamath Project. The dam has a fish ladder that has been upgraded, unlike the one at Keno Dam, but salmon passage is not assured. Beyond Link River Dam, Upper Klamath Lake has been experiencing bouts of algae and poor water quality in recent years that could make fish navigation difficult. Above the lake, the Williamson, Sprague, and Wood rivers offer ideal habitat, but in the century that salmon have been absent, unknown obstacles may have emerged with human development. Restoration work in many of the basin's waterways, including reviving wetlands and reconnecting creeks, has been ongoing to help existing fish and improve water conditions as well as to prepare for the anticipated salmon. 'The last thing we want is a bottleneck in the upper watershed,' said Rob Lusardi, assistant professor of wildlife, fish and conservation biology at UC Davis, who has studied salmon reintroduction strategies in the Klamath Basin. 'I'm not saying that's the case… (but) anywhere we can improve fish passage is a goal worth pursuing.'