Is Russia recruiting migrants to carry out attacks on European soil? Germany may have uncovered a ‘smoking gun'
In May last year, a 25-year-old Afghan asylum seeker called Sulaiman Ataee walked onto a German market square, drew a hunting knife, and plunged it into the far-Right activist Michael Stürzenberger.
In the 25 seconds of mayhem that followed in Mannheim, one policeman was fatally stabbed in the neck and six people who tried to intervene suffered knife wounds. Mr Stürzenberger survived – just.
Ataee was shot, arrested and charged with murder. His trial began in February.
Ataee, investigators later concluded, had become interested in the Taliban and been influenced by 'radical influencers and pseudo-Islamic scholars' on the Telegram messaging app.
Now, new evidence suggests his attack may not only have been an act of Islamist terror – but part of a Russian subversion operation designed to sow chaos on Europe's streets in order to destabilise the West and undermine its support for Ukraine.
It is a campaign that spans the vandalising of French Holocaust memorials and using foam to block exhaust pipes of cars in Germany, to the petrol bombing of a Latvian museum and arson in east London.
Russian subversion, sabotage and assassination programs long predate the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. But the war has seen a surge in suspected attacks, especially since last summer. And while, previously, Russian agencies have focused on disrupting military supplies or gathering intelligence, many more recent operations seem designed to stoke social and political tensions, undermine public trust and boost far-Right parties opposed to sending aid to Kyiv.
That in turn raises questions about a string of similar attacks that followed Mannheim.
ZDF (Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen), a German broadcaster, has found that the phrases 'Michael Stürzenberger stabbed' and 'Michael Stürzenberger attack' were used in internet searches in Russia before the attack took place.
There is also evidence of Russian internet users trying to access a webcam feed of Mannheim's town square, the scene of the attack, shortly before it occurred.
The revelations could confirm suspicions that have long been circulating in the German intelligence community.
Earlier this year, a senior German intelligence official told the Russian investigative journalists Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan that German agencies believed Russia had instigated a string of attacks by asylum seekers to inflate support for the pro-Kremlin Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which opposes support for Ukraine, ahead of this year's election.
To Soldatov, the latest revelations about the attack in Mannheim amount to something of a smoking gun and strengthen the theory espoused by the intelligence official.
The new evidence 'fits a pattern that we see and hear from many corners,' he says. 'Sabotage tactics are not only about blowing stuff up – it is about raising the costs of providing support to Ukraine, including political costs. You don't need to have a sophisticated group of agents on the ground but if you can get someone to write something on a wall inciting hatred or blaming the Ukrainians, you can create costs.'
The stabbing in Mannheim was the first of five knife attacks committed by immigrants ahead of the vote in February.
In August 2024, a 26-year-old Syrian refugee killed three people and wounded eight more in a knife rampage through the city of Solingen.
On Dec 22, a 50-year-old Saudi-born doctor drove a car into Magdeburg Christmas Market, killing six.
A month later, a 28-year-old man from Afghanistan was arrested following the murders of a two-year-old boy and a 41-year-old man in the Bavarian city of Aschaffenburg.
Then, on Feb 13, just 10 days before the election, a 24-year-old Afghan asylum seeker injured at least 30 people when he drove a car into crowds in Munich.
All those attacks were carried out by foreign nationals. With the exception of the Magdeburg attack, the perpetrators were all under 30.
The last four attacks have not, to date, been publicly linked to Russia except by the German official who spoke to Soldatov and Borogan.
Ataee's links to Russian intelligence have not yet been established. Statements by investigators to the German press suggest he believed he was speaking to Islamists on Telegram, but have made no mention of Russia.
Nor is the significance of the strange Russian internet activity obvious. Internet searches are not of themselves proof of conspiracy. Even assuming Russian complicity, there are multiple possible explanations.
Could a low-level Russian intelligence officer have been googling to see whether a mission had been carried out? Was Ataee being handled by an agent, or agents, who failed to cover their tracks? Or did they want to be caught?
A few weeks before the attack on Stürzenberger, a Berlin metal factory belonging to defence manufacturer Diehl went up in flames.
It was, police said, an accident. Later, an (unnamed) allied country's intelligence service handed Germany's federal intelligence service, BND, a dossier showing it was arson and that Russia was behind it.
And last month The Telegraph revealed that German security services had found what appeared to be a calling card: internet users in Russia had run searches in the weeks before and after the incident on what fire engines and fire safety protocols were in place at the factory.
The sloppiness of the job was, a European security source suspected, deliberate.
'Russians are not as stupid as to leave that breadcrumb trail, sometimes they simply want us to find out they have flexed their muscles. It's part of the hybrid warfare,' the source, who had knowledge of the investigation into the incident, told The Telegraph in March.
Calling card or incompetence, the pattern is clear, say European security experts. Russia has stepped up a campaign of sabotage across Europe in the wake of its attack on its neighbour.
Russia and its ally Belarus have been blamed by Western officials for at least 59 incidents including cyberattacks, assassination plots and vandalism since the full scale invasion began, according to an investigation by the Associated Press, published in March.
James Appathurai, the Nato deputy assistant secretary general for innovation, hybrid and cyber, this year called for the alliance to move to a 'war footing' to deal with the wave of train derailments, graffiti stunts, arson attacks and assassination plots linked to Moscow of late.
Those operations are characterised by the 'Uberization' or 'gig economy' of sabotage – in which agents recruit third or fourth parties to carry out jobs on the cheap.
'It is extremely cheap. People who do it are not always in the know about what they are doing. And it is very difficult to counter,' says Soldatov.
The perpetrators are seldom, if ever, actual Russian intelligence officers. They may even have no idea who they are working for.
'We've seen they're mostly financially vulnerable, often coming from former Soviet states in Europe,' says Maxime Lebrun, deputy director of research and analysis at Hybrid CoE, The European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats.
'They're mostly contacted through Telegram by an intermediary and offered money and given quite precise instructions for their deeds. The Telegram accounts disappear shortly after.'
It is not only Germany that has been affected.
In May 2024, red hands were spray painted on the Paris Holocaust memorial. A month later, coffins draped with the French flag and bearing the words: 'French soldiers of Ukraine' were left at the Eiffel Tower. Russia has been suspected in both incidents.
'The caskets at the Eiffel Tower were brought by a team of Bulgarian individuals who had also committed the red hands operations on the Shoah memorial in Paris,' says Lebrun.
The attempts to sow discord ahead of the Paris Olympics are seen by some as the starting pistol of the current wave of subversion in Western Europe.
But the tactics on display in Germany and France have already been tested further east.
A remarkable look at the mechanics of the recruitment process came in 2023, when one would-be saboteur wrote down the disappearing Telegram messages so he could remember the instructions for his next job.
He mistakenly dropped the folded sheet marked 'Mission, Lielvārde Military Airfield' while on the job – which led Latvian investigators and news outlet Re:Baltica to one Sergejs Hodonovič, a 21-year-old from Riga who had been recruited while trying to buy cannabis on a Telegram group.
Hodonovic had carried out several 'jobs', including having graffitied the Nato Cooperative Cyber Defence Center of Excellence in Estonia.
The investigative site Re:Baltica revealed this year that Hodonovic was the last in a chain of at least four intermediaries, all operating on social media, that authorities believed led back to the GRU, Russia's military intelligence outfit. Each were in their twenties, and were being paid a few hundred Euros for every job completed.
The case cast light on the kind of people who tend to get recruited for such operations.
'They are not the smartest people. They usually have a kind of criminal background. It's a gig economy: it's about money – fast money. Some of them really don't know who they are working for,' says Inga Springe, a reporter at Re:Baltica who has covered this and other Telegram-sabotage cases.
Telegram recruitment was once the GRU's speciality. But since the war in Ukraine disrupted their networks, the SVR (foreign intelligence) and FSB (federal security) have also got in on the act. That, says Soldatov, makes attributing such operations to a single agency increasingly difficult.
All these operations are aimed at raising the literal and figurative costs of supporting Ukraine. There are also second and third objectives: to lay the blame on Ukraine – and to intimidate.
'There was an open manifestation of these tactics a month ago when the SVR, Russia's foreign intelligence service, announced they were expecting attacks on Russian emigres in Europe by the Ukrainians,' Soldatov says.
'We know what that means: it is intimidation against people like us, Russian political emigres. And it simultaneously lays the blame on Ukraine if anything happens.'
But that does not mean such operations will stop with a ceasefire, argues Soldatov.
Russia's intelligence community operates on the deeply held conviction that the collective West is a threat, a view that it held long before the current war.
The risks of the kind of operations seen across Europe in recent months and years are so low, and the potential benefits so large, that Moscow will have little reason to give them up, even in peace time.
That is in the absence of a concerted European response, at least.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vox
38 minutes ago
- Vox
Trump is frustrated by his own success on immigration
is a senior correspondent at Vox. He covers a wide range of political and policy issues with a special focus on questions that internally divide the American left and right. Before coming to Vox in 2024, he wrote a column on politics and economics for New York Magazine. The primary cause of this unrest has been less visible, but no less disorderly or disruptive. Behind the tensions in LA lies a radical escalation in the Trump administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants. To accelerate deportations, top White House adviser Stephen Miller instructed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in late May to dispense with norms and legal niceties that had previously constrained its activities, according to a Wall Street Journal report. Since then, the agency has deprioritized the removal of immigrants implicated in crimes, opting instead to target undocumented workers at random. It has stopped drafting lists of immigrants suspected of being in the country illegally and started arresting day laborers at businesses like Home Depot and 7-Eleven en masse, ensnaring some US citizens in the process. One such raid ignited the LA protests. Under Joe Biden, ICE had generally refrained from raiding schools, churches, and hospitals. Now it is reportedly arresting new mothers in maternity wards and then denying them their right to legal counsel. Most alarmingly, some ICE agents have allegedly embraced violent and unconstitutional tactics, according to the Journal's report. A union organizer for Washington farmworkers was driving his wife to her job at a tulip farm, when ICE agents stopped him, smashed in his car windows, and pulled him from the vehicle, all without showing badges or identification. A Russian man with a pending asylum case was reporting for his scheduled check-in at an ICE office, when a team of agents arrested him and then allegedly beat him. And ICE has not merely been targeting undocumented immigrants, but also those who exercise their First Amendment rights on the undocumented immigrants' behalf. In Irvine, California, ICE sent a 'phalanx of military vehicles' into an Orange County suburb to arrest a man who had allegedly posted fliers warning neighbors that ICE was in their area. The Trump administration's decision to greenlight such tactics might seem like an act of desperation — unable to stem the tide of undocumented immigration by conventional means, the White House is resorting to radical ones. But the opposite may be closer to the truth: The Trump administration is escalating its war on migration because it is winning that conflict. Unfortunately, the fruits of Donald Trump's victory appear to be weaker economic growth and more social unrest. Related The LA protests reveal what actually unites the Trump right Trump's bid to deter immigration has been wildly successful Trump campaigned on a promise to end the Biden-era surge in unauthorized immigration and restore order at the border. He has largely done so. Border crossings were already slowing during Biden's final year in office, after his administration tightened rules around asylum last summer. But inflows have plunged even further under Trump. Through belligerent rhetoric and restrictionist policies, the president has successfully deterred both legal and illegal migration into the United States. Over the past two months, America witnessed the largest decline in its foreign-born workforce since the pandemic in 2020. This contraction was driven partly by a collapse in unauthorized border crossings. Between January 2022 and June 2024, US Customs and Border Protection encountered an average of 200,000 people per month at America's Southwest border. According to an analysis of government data from Deutsche Bank, that figure has fallen to just 12,000 people per month since Trump's inauguration. How Trump's success on immigration is fueling his radicalism Yet the Trump administration has found little satisfaction in this success. And for a simple reason: The slowdown in border crossings has made it more difficult for the president to exceed Biden's deportation numbers. When border control was encountering 200,000 migrants each month, it was easy for the government to rack up high deportation totals. Such new arrivals possessed fewer legal protections than longtime US residents and were already in the government's custody. Although many qualified for the asylum process, border control could swiftly expel those who did not. Trump's success in deterring border crossings has therefore reduced the pace of deportations. Headlines earlier this year spotlighted the fact that Trump was deporting immigrants at a slower rate than Biden. Shortly after Trump took office, Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy posted on X, 'In the first week, Trump removed 7,300 people. On average, Biden was removing 15,000 a week…These guys are terrible at everything.' Such unfavorable comparisons apparently displeased Trump. The Wall Street Journal suggests that it was Trump's failure to exceed 'the number of daily deportations carried out by the Biden administration in its final year' that led Stephen Miller to give ICE its new, draconian marching orders. Unable to generate flashy deportation statistics by turning away new arrivals at the border, the administration has opted to ramp up enforcement against law-abiding, long-time US residents throughout the country — and to do so in a violent and seemingly lawless manner. Trump's handling of immigration has been economically and socially destructive (but politically popular) If Trump's success at deterring immigration has brought him little contentment, it has brought his country little discernible benefit. The slowdown in new arrivals is hurting the US economy. Compared to native-born workers, immigrants are more willing to relocate to US communities that have labor shortages, or to enter industries suffering from chronic shortfalls of workers, such as construction, food processing, and childcare. The mass entrance of migrants into the US during the Biden administration therefore helped to mitigate supply chain disruptions and reduce inflationary pressures in key sectors. This immigration surge was also immensely beneficial for economic growth and the national debt. America has an aging population. As a result, we need immigrants to sustain the growth of our workforce and shore up funding for Medicare and Social Security. Partly for these reasons, the Biden-era surge in immigration increased America's projected economic growth over the coming decade by upwards of $8.9 trillion, while reducing its expected federal deficits by $900 billion, according to an analysis from the Dallas Federal Reserve. Trump's successful deterrence of immigration threatens to reverse these gains, slowing growth and exacerbating labor shortages in construction, agriculture, and other key industries. According to Deutsche Bank, the collapse of immigration under Trump 'represents a far more sustained negative supply shock for the economy than tariffs.' Although immigration restriction is bad for the economy, many have argued that it's beneficial for political stability and social peace. After all, large surges of immigration tend to induce nativist backlashes. And Biden's failure to avert a historically large jump in migration plausibly helped Trump return to the White House. For the moment, however, the collapse in border crossings appears to be increasing social tension and political unrest. The migration slowdown has translated into lower deportation figures, which has led the administration to embrace radical enforcement tactics, which have predictably sown mass protest and clashes between civilians and agents of the state. We are therefore getting all the economic harms of immigration restriction, without its theoretical benefits for social harmony.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Palm Beach County pastor. Here's what I learned by welcoming refugees.
These words may confuse you: immigrants, migrants, illegal aliens, foreigners, newcomers. But here is a word I hope you know well: refugees. A refugee is seeking 'refuge' because he or she is fleeing political or religious persecution, and is forced to leave home and relocate to a shelter. The U.S. Refugees Admissions Program is on pause by President Donald Trump, who wants to determine if it's in the interest of our country. Trump closed the door on many already approved to come here, including former Afghan allies who once aided the United States, and refugee family members waiting to be reunited. Faith-based U.S. resettlement organizations are no longer able to provide housing, job placement or language courses. Shutting down congressionally mandated programs harms thousands of vulnerable refugee families that we have pledged to support. Among the agencies affected are Church World Services, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services and Catholic Relief. Under this order by President Trump the following refugees would not have been allowed to enter our country: Henry Kissinger, Madeline Albright, Albert Einstein, Gloria Estefan, Sigmund Freud, Marlene Dietrich, Anne Frank, Billy Wilder and Elie Wiesel. Refugees usually remain in United Nations-sponsored camps for 10-15 years. They are approved (vetted) on many different security levels, have thorough physical check-ups, take job training courses, English language classes and classes on adjusting on a new life elsewhere. Letters: Wake up, Floridians: Our politicians don't respect or represent us They must all have 'a sponsor' who will meet them at the airport, assist in finding a job, and secure housing. No refugee can come to the U.S. without a sponsor who agrees to walk beside them until they are independent, and able to care for themselves. Government-approved resettlement agencies pair a sponsor with a corresponding family. A sponsor receives no compensation, but funds are available by the sponsoring agency if there is an emergency. Opinion: Trump's mass deportations hurt Floridians like these. It's a shame to US values. Refugees agree to begin repaying the U.S. government for transportation costs within two years of their arrival in the U.S. As a Lutheran pastor, I led our congregation to welcome more than 200 refugees to Palm Beach County. All were successful and have given back more than they received. For more information about the history of refugees, I recommend an outstanding book, "They Are Us," available through Fortress Press. This book reminds us that the only natives here are the American Native Indians, and that we all came from beyond our borders and have a duty to be hospitable and welcoming to all who desire to make our country even greater. Rev. John Frerking, 35 year senior pastor at Faith Lutheran Church in North Palm Beach. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: What is a refugee? I'm a pastor and I'll tell you | Opinion
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Zelenskyy: Russia is simply lying to Trump
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said that US President Donald Trump has the leverage to end the war between Russia and Ukraine – but to do so, he must understand what game Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin is playing. Source: Zelenskyy in an interview with Axel Springer Global Reporters Network, as reported by European Pravda Details: Zelenskyy stated that Russia "is simply lying to Trump". "Most heads of state and government share my opinion, and I very much hope that America sees and understands this. That is the most important thing. How you respond to that is America's decision," he said. Zelenskyy stressed that Trump has the power to stop the war because "Putin understands nothing but strength, and America has that strength". He also emphasised that Trump is aware that the Kremlin is not entirely sincere about the war. Zelenskyy noted that Russia could only be victorious if the West abandoned Ukraine. In his opinion, an American withdrawal from the war would be an ideal scenario for Putin. When asked about the quarrel between the US and Ukrainian leaders in the Oval Office in February, Zelenskyy ironically replied that he did not believe that the incident had brought them closer together, while emphasising that it was now in the past. "Today we must do everything we can to ensure that the next meeting in the Oval Office is successful for both countries," he stressed. Zelenskyy said that the United States and Ukraine had resumed a constructive dialogue. He added that a personal, friendly meeting between the presidents took place in the Vatican in April. Background: Trump recently shared details of a recent conversation with Russian ruler Vladimir Putin, including his idea that Ukraine and Russia should be allowed to "fight for a while" because it would be easier to stop them later. He also compared the Russo-Ukrainian war to two children fighting like crazy. "Sometimes, and this is me speaking, maybe in a negative sense, you see two young children fighting like crazy. They hate each other and are fighting in the park, and you try to pull them apart; they don't want to be pulled. Sometimes it's better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart," he said. In response, Zelenskyy said that Putin is a murderer, not a child on a playground. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!