logo
White House proposes axing 988 suicide hotline services for LGBTQ youth

White House proposes axing 988 suicide hotline services for LGBTQ youth

Yahooa day ago

The Department of Health and Human Services' proposed budget for 2026 eliminates specialized suicide hotline services for LGBTQ youth and young adults.
The budget proposal, which the department published Friday, designates $520 million for 988, the suicide prevention line, and behavioral health crisis services, which is the same amount the Biden administration provided for 988. However, the 2026 budget proposal would end government funding for LGBTQ-specific counseling to 988 callers upon request.
When asked for comment, a spokesperson for HHS directed NBC News to the White House's Office of Management and Budget.
Rachel Cauley, a spokesperson for OMB, noted that the proposed budget would provide the same amount for 988 services as was provided in previous years.
'It does not, however, grant taxpayer money to a chat service where children are encouraged to embrace radical gender ideology by 'counselors' without consent or knowledge of their parents,' Cauley said.
'Radical gender ideology' is a political term adopted by conservatives and President Donald Trump's administration to describe the existence of transgender people and the trans rights movement, which it considers harmful to children.
The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline has existed since 2005, and, in 2020, during his first term, Trump signed legislation designating 988 as the new lifeline number by 2022. That legislation required 988 to provide LGBTQ youth and young adults who call the line with access to 'specially trained staff and partner organizations,' noting that queer and trans youth 'are more than 4 times more likely to contemplate suicide than their peers, with 1 in 5 LGBTQ youth and more than 1 in 3 transgender youth reporting attempting suicide.'
A senior administration official said the money for services for LGBTQ young people has not been cut, but rather reallocated to the general 988 services so that it doesn't go to 'radical grooming contractors,' using another term adopted by conservatives decades ago to falsely equate being LGBTQ or promoting LGBTQ inclusivity with sexually abusing children. The contractors who provide LGBTQ-specific services through 988 are mental health organizations based across the U.S. Most of them provide mental health care to the general population in addition to LGBTQ people.
The official said only the contract with 'radical gender' counselors is being terminated, and not the resources. However, under the proposed budget, when LGBTQ youth and young adults under age 25 call 988, there will not be an option for them to be connected to a counselor who is trained to provide support to LGBTQ youth. Currently, LGBTQ young people can also text 'PRIDE' to 988 to reach a counselor with such training.
The official did not respond to additional questions regarding what organization(s) 'radical grooming contractors' was referring to specifically.
The Trevor Project, a national suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization for LGBTQ youths, is among the contractors that make up a subnetwork of specialists who provide 988 services to LGBTQ young people.
'Attempts to discredit these life-saving services will not change the reality of what this administration is proposing: the elimination of a national suicide prevention program, run by seven leading crisis contact centers, that has supported over 1.3 million LGBTQ+ youth across the U.S. with best-practice crisis care,' Jaymes Black, the project's CEO, said in a statement to NBC News, referring to the number of contacts who have reached out to 988 for LGBTQ-specific support since the program's start in 2022.
'Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle — and our President — came together during the first Trump administration to create this specialized resource,' Black added. 'It's a shared acknowledgement that every young life is worth saving, and that risk, not identity, drives evidence-based and effective crisis intervention. We strongly urge the administration and Congress to rethink this proposal, and do what is best for ending the public health crisis of suicide among our nation's youth."
The other six contractors who provide 988 services to LGBTQ young people are Centerstone, Volunteers of America Western Washington State, Solari Crisis & Human Services, CommUnity Crisis Services, HopeLink Behavioral Health and La Frontera EMPACT. Centerstone did not answer NBC News' question about the proposed elimination to 988's LGBTQ-specific service, and the other organizations did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In April, The Washington Post reported a leaked HHS budget draft that proposed cutting funding for 988 services for LGBTQ youth. At the time, the White House wouldn't confirm the veracity of that draft or the information about the funding.
The budget proposal is the latest effort from the Trump administration to rollback services and protections for LGBTQ people, specifically transgender people. In the first few weeks of his second administration, Trump issued several executive orders targeting trans people, including declaring that there are only two unchangeable sexes; prohibiting trans people from enlisting and serving in the military; barring trans girls and women from competing on female sports teams in federally-funded K-12 schools and colleges; and barring federal funding from going to hospitals that provide transition-related care to minors.
Federal officials have also scrubbed agency websites of any mention of transgender or intersex people, including from the website for the Stonewall National Monument commemorating the site of the 1969 Stonewall Uprising, in which historians say trans people were crucial and became a turning point in the modern gay rights movement. At the start of June, which is LGBTQ Pride month, the Navy confirmed to NBC News that it would rename the USNS Harvey Milk, a fleet replenishment oiler named for the LGBTQ rights activist, Navy veteran and first openly gay man elected to public office in California.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom comes with too much baggage. Democrats need a new voice for 2028.
Newsom comes with too much baggage. Democrats need a new voice for 2028.

USA Today

time39 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Newsom comes with too much baggage. Democrats need a new voice for 2028.

Newsom comes with too much baggage. Democrats need a new voice for 2028. | Opinion 2026 midterm elections will indicate how much their popularity recovers after more than a year of Trump 2.0 in office, but Democrats need to begin strategizing now. Show Caption Hide Caption Karine Jean-Pierre talks exit from Democratic party in new book Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre talks about leaving the Democratic party in her upcoming book slated for release in October. The Democratic Party is facing low popularity following the failed Kamala Harris campaign and revelations about the cover-up of President Biden's decline. Potential Democratic presidential candidates like Pete Buttigieg and Gavin Newsom face challenges due to their association with the Biden administration and progressive policies. Republicans have a clearer path to 2028 with potential candidates like JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Ron DeSantis. Democrats' best hope for 2028 lies in a fresh candidate, distanced from the Biden administration and holding more moderate views. Despite the busy news cycle of President Donald Trump's young second administration, I can't help but look to 2028, which looks to be the first election where both parties have a new presidential candidate since 2016. Republicans seem to have some form of succession plan, with Vice President JD Vance looming in the wake of Trump's final term. But Democrats are in a much more difficult position, with numerous baggage and imperfect candidates. Democrats will need new voices, free from the baggage of Joe Biden's presidency and the woke era, to win America's trust. Democrats will have a ton of baggage to deal with in 2028 The Democratic Party as a whole is facing a record low in popularity in the wake of Kamala Harris' failed presidential campaign and more information about the cover-up of Biden's decline. The 2028 midterm elections will indicate how much the Democrats' popularity recovers after more than a year of Trump presidency 2.0, but the party needs to begin strategizing now. The people who were complicit in, or at the very least ignored, Biden's decline are the most politically stained. Anybody affiliated with the Biden administration is going to face questions of why they didn't speak up when they knew the president was not capable of fulfilling his duties. Democrats handed Trump a win: Biden didn't deceive Democrats about his decline. It's time to admit the truth. | Opinion As people like former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and California Gov. Gavin Newsom attempt to scramble to the center on cultural issues, they are bound to experience different sets of barriers that keep their electability in check. Buttigieg, due to his involvement with the Biden administration, is going to have to answer whether he knew about Biden's decline, and either how he could have missed it or why he didn't speak up. There is no good answer to any part of that line of questioning. For Newsom, he and other governors have the benefit of distance from the Biden administration, so they have plausible deniability as to what exactly they knew. Newsom also has a long-established record of very progressive policies. During his time as governor of California, he presided over violent racial riots in 2020, as well as higher rising violent crime rates than the rest of the nation. The more recent protests and riots in the streets of Los Angeles under his governorship won't help him to leave that image in the past. Newsom also has baggage on other social issues, including taxpayer-funded health care for illegal immigrants and his past full embrace of transgender ideologies, both of which he has attempted to walk back in recent months. Opinion: Newsom tries to use right-wing influencers to fix his image. Don't fall for it. Harris' troubles on the campaign trail of differentiating herself from Biden's decline and her own progressive record should be a warning to Democrats. These are going to be difficult mistakes to overcome as a presidential candidate. I know Republicans have issues, but Democrats need a new voice Republicans have a similar predicament in 2028, but they have politicians at the ready who are capable of winning the presidency. Vance represents a continuation of the MAGA movement, but if Republicans decide they are a bit tired of full-blown MAGA politics, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis are both likely to eye a presidential bid. Regardless of how the second Trump administration ages with voters, the GOP has options for 2028. Republicans have a clearer chain of succession than Democrats, even if Vance and Rubio will have to answer for any issues with the second Trump administration. Whitmer for president? As a Michigan taxpayer, here's why voters should stay away. | Opinion Still, Democrats have some hope. The Democratic Party is ripe for a surprise candidate to emerge in the next two years to pursue the presidency. While the political climate is different, Democrats need to look for an emerging candidate, similar to the one they had in 2008, when Barack Obama defeated Hillary Clinton in the primary and went on to win the White House twice. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Somebody as dissociated with the Biden presidency as possible has a strong advantage, as does someone with a more moderate record. Governors, or newly elected senators, are the best chance for the Democrats. I predict that the Democrats' nominee in 2028 is someone not yet on people's radars, and that would be the best possible outcome for them. The baggage that Democrats have will weigh them down in 2028. It is best if they find someone without those ankle weights. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.

For new grads looking for green jobs, corporate sustainability may be the only safe bet
For new grads looking for green jobs, corporate sustainability may be the only safe bet

Fast Company

time42 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

For new grads looking for green jobs, corporate sustainability may be the only safe bet

In just the first week of his administration, Trump signed a flurry of executive orders prioritizing domestic oil and gas and (once again) withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris Agreement for climate change mitigation. Since then, additional attacks on existing environmental policies have included the administration's cuts to sustainability research funding and its defunding and dismantling environmental agencies like NOAA and FEMA. Most recently, House Republicans voted to pass a budget reconciliation bill that will gut Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, the largest investment in climate change mitigation and adaptation in U.S. history. This comes at a time when young people really want to get involved and take action against climate change: A 2024 LinkedIn survey found that 61% of Gen Z workers say they want to get a green job within the next five years. But while sustainability fields like environmental justice, nonprofit work, climate policy, and climate research are under very significant threats right now, sustainability experts say that young people pursuing corporate sustainability jobs will likely have more luck. Why are corporate sustainability jobs better protected? Some major companies have dropped their sustainability goals: For example, Walmart says it will likely miss its 2025 and 2030 emissions reduction goals, and companies such as Kraft Heinz and Coca-Cola have dropped some sustainability goals. Banking giants such as Citigroup, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and Wells Fargo all dropped out of the United Nations-backed Net-Zero Banking Alliance, which aims to reduce the carbon footprints of banks around the world. But according to PwC's 2025 State of Decarbonization report, only 16% of companies are reducing climate commitments, while 37% are strengthening them. Additionally, the number of companies making commitments continues to grow, with nine times the number of companies reporting targets compared with five years ago. In 2023, 93% of Russell 1000 Index companies published a sustainability report, displaying a public commitment to keeping sustainability goals. According to Steven Cohen, program director of Columbia University's master of science in sustainability management program, these commitments aren't just going to disappear. 'Investors are driving the sustainability field first, because they want to know about the environmental risks incurred by corporations,' he says. Additionally, 'even though the U.S. reporting requirements are being reduced, [requirements from the EU or states like California] are not being significantly reduced.' However, even without pressures from the EU and states like California that have stricter climate regulations compared with the rest of the country, Cohen says that public sentiment against climate change is enough to drive companies to stick to their goals. 'People know that the planet is getting hotter. They know that environmental damage is being done, and they want to figure out ways of maintaining the economy without destroying the planet,' he says. 'Lots of people are interested in it, so there's lots of employment.' Cohen says that since around 80% of the students in Columbia's sustainability management master's program go into the private sector, they are not particularly worried about factors like the Trump administration's repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act having an impact on their employment. 'The job market for graduates is holding up pretty nicely, I'd say,' he says. For those interested in entering the sustainability world after graduation, Cohen recommends developing 'any skills that will help you with management and understanding the impacts' of climate change. He particularly recommends learning how to measure the impacts of environmental pollution and remediation. 'Those are objective conditions, and we'll continue to be focusing on that.'

Nah, we changed our minds: EPA restores $1.6M UMaine PFAS grant
Nah, we changed our minds: EPA restores $1.6M UMaine PFAS grant

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Nah, we changed our minds: EPA restores $1.6M UMaine PFAS grant

Jun. 11—The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has reinstated a $1.6 million grant to the University of Maine to research and reduce the effect of forever chemicals on farms one month after canceling it for being inconsistent with EPA funding priorities. In May, EPA spokesman Mike Bastasch justified the grant withdrawal like this: "Maybe the Biden-Harris administration shouldn't have forced their radical agenda of wasteful DEI programs and 'environmental justice' preferencing on the EPA." UMaine filed an appeal for wrongful grant termination on June 5. A day later, the EPA informed UMaine that it had reversed its position, and insisted that agency leaders had made that decision on June 4, the day before UMaine's appeal. The EPA gave no reason for its reversal. But a week before it canceled the grant, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin told Maine Rep. Chellie Pingree, D-1st District, during a committee hearing that these PFAS grants were important and implied they would continue after the agency reorganized under the Trump administration. The EPA did not respond to questions about the grant reinstatement or the status of two other grants worth more than $3 million for other forever chemical research in Maine, ranging from developing rapid field testing to testing forever chemical levels in Wabanaki tribal waters and fish. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, are manmade chemicals found in a broad range of common household products, like nonstick pans and makeup, that pose a public health risk to humans through prolonged exposure. Even trace amounts of some PFAS can be dangerous to humans, with exposure to high levels of certain PFAS linked to serious health problems such as increased high blood pressure in pregnant women, developmental delays in children and increased risk of some cancers. Researchers involved in Mi'kmaq Nation and Passamaquoddy grants were happy to hear UMaine's grant had been restored and were hopeful their appeals would lead to reinstatement of their awards, too. As of Wednesday, however, their grants remained canceled. There is $1.45 million remaining on the restored award for UMaine to deliver "practical, science-based solutions" to reduce forever chemical contamination in livestock to produce safer food, a stronger farm economy and a healthier nation, according to a university statement. The grant also funds hands-on research learning for at least 10 students as part of UMaine's mission to produce the next generation of agricultural problem solvers and take a lead role in the new field of researching and reducing the effects of forever chemicals on agriculture. The EPA award will complement UMaine's new $500,000 state grant to research how forever chemicals move from soil into plants and livestock and eventually into the people who consume milk and dairy products. Both projects are led by UMaine professor Ellen Mallory. As of Monday, the University of Maine System has had 16 awards restored that the federal government had previously terminated, mostly at UMaine, according to a university spokeswoman. The current balance remaining on those reversed awards is $3.5 million. Over the last decade, Maine has spent more than $100 million as it became a national leader in the fight against harmful forever chemicals left behind by the state-permitted spreading of tainted sewage sludge on farm fields as a fertilizer. State inspectors have identified 82 Maine farms and 500 residential properties contaminated by the harmful forever chemicals in the sludge during a $28.8 million investigation of 1,100 sites. The state projects that it will install 660 water filtration systems at private wells near sludge-spread fields. So far, 20% of wells tested during the sludge investigation have exceeded Maine's drinking water standard. The Biden administration announced a stricter federal standard last year, but the Trump administration recently announced it planned to relax those standards and delay enactment. Copy the Story Link

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store