Federal judge blocks Trump administration from dismantling Voice of America
ADVERTISEMENT
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to stop its efforts to dismantle Voice of America (VOA) and other US-backed news outlets, including Radio Free Asia.
US District Judge Royce Lamberth
ruled
that the government had illegally forced VOA to cease operations for the first time since the broadcaster was set up during World War II.
The US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) — which runs VOA — put nearly all 1,300 of the broadcaster's employees on administrative leave in March, while 500 contractors were informed that their contracts would be terminated at the end of last month.
This followed an
executive order
by US President Donald Trump on 14 March mandating that several federal entities, including USAGM, be "eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law". The White House accused the VOA, which was established to counter Nazi propaganda, of being "anti-Trump" and "radical".
In his ruling on Tuesday, Lamberth said the Trump administration must "take all necessary steps" to restore employees and contractors to their jobs and resume radio, TV and online broadcasts. He ordered the government to do the same for Radio Free Asia and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, which are also operated by USAGM.
The Trump administration had likely violated numerous federal laws, including the International Broadcasting Act and Congressional Appropriations Acts, Lamberth said.
The US government acted "without regard to the harm inflicted on employees, contractors, journalists, and media consumers around the world", he wrote in his ruling.
"It is hard to fathom a more straightforward display of arbitrary and capricious actions than the defendants' actions here," Lamberth wrote.
Related
Federal judge blocks Trump's efforts to dismantle Voice of America radio service
Trump Media reports a loss of hundreds of millions for last year
Lawyers representing VOA employees said the ruling was a victory for press freedom.
VOA journalist Patsy Widakuswara, who is named as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, said the order was "just a small step forward, as the government is likely to appeal."
USAGM and the White House have not yet commented on the ruling.
Tom Yazdgerdi, president of the American Foreign Service Association, said that the news outlets were "trusted sources of truth in places where it is often scarce".
"By upholding editorial independence, the court has protected the credibility of USAGM journalists and the global mission they serve," he said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
US-China trade talks on export controls to resume for a second day
Top U.S. and Chinese officials will resume trade talks for a second day in London on Tuesday, hoping to secure a breakthrough over export controls for rare earths and other goods that have threatened a fresh rupture between the two superpowers. Investors are hoping for an improvement in ties after the relief sparked by a preliminary deal agreed in Geneva last month gave way to fresh doubts after Washington accused Beijing of blocking exports that are critical to sectors including autos, aerospace, semiconductors and defence. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday that the U.S. was likely to agree to lift export controls on some semiconductors in return for China speeding up the delivery of rare earths. U.S. President Donald Trump said the talks were going well: "We're doing well with China. China's not easy." Trump's often erratic policymaking on tariffs has roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. The second round of U.S.-China talks, which followed a rare phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping last week, comes at a crucial time for both economies. Customs data published on Monday showed that China's exports to the U.S. plunged 34.5% in May, the sharpest drop since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. While the impact on U.S. inflation and the jobs market has so far been muted, tariffs have hammered U.S. business and household confidence and the dollar remains under pressure. The two sides, led at the talks by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, with the Chinese contingent helmed by Vice Premier He Lifeng, are meeting at the ornate Lancaster House in the British capital. The talks ran for almost seven hours on Monday and are set to resume after 0900 GMT on Tuesday, with both sides expected to issue updates later in the day. The inclusion of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the U.S., is one indication of how central rare earths have become. He did not attend the Geneva talks, when the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors, and its decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended global supply chains and sparked alarm in boardrooms and factory floors around the world. Kelly Ann Shaw, a former White House trade adviser during Trump's first term and now a trade partner at the Akin Gump law firm in Washington, said she expected China to reaffirm its commitment to lift retaliatory measures, including export restrictions, "plus some concessions on the U.S. side, with respect to export controls measures over the past week or two". But Shaw said she expected the U.S. to only agree to lift some new export curbs, not longstanding ones such as for advanced artificial intelligence chips. In May, the U.S. ordered a halt to shipments of semiconductor design software and chemicals and aviation equipment, revoking export licences that had been previously issued.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
LA imposes downtown curfew as Newsom criticises Trump
A ten-hour curfew for downtown Los Angeles took effect on Tuesday as officials attempted to stop vandalism and looting during protests over US President Donald Trump's immigration raids. The city's mayor Karen Bass said the curfew would run from 8 pm on Tuesday to 6 am on Wednesday local time, as she declared a local emergency. 'We reached a tipping point' after 23 businesses were looted, Bass said. The curfew will be in place in an area covering a just over 2.5 square kilometre section of downtown, including the area where protests have been raging since Friday. The city of Los Angeles encompasses roughly 2,295 square kilometres. The curfew doesn't apply to residents who live in the designated area, those who are homeless, credentialed media or public safety and emergency officials, according to Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell. McDonnell said 'unlawful and dangerous behaviour' has been escalating since Saturday, prompting the need to impose the curfew. 'The curfew is a necessary measure to protect lives and safeguard property following several consecutive days of growing unrest throughout the city,' said McDonnell. Meanwhile, California's Governor Gavin Newsom accused Trump of 'pulling a military dragnet' across Los Angeles, after the leader ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines despite Newsom's objections. Troops were deployed to protect federal buildings but are now also protecting immigration agents as they carry out arrests. The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said in a statement that the troops were providing security at federal facilities and protecting federal officers 'who are out on daily enforcement operations.' Newsom says Trump's immigration crackdown has gone far beyond simply arresting criminals and that 'dishwashers, gardeners, day labourers and seamstresses" are among those being detained. He said Trump's decision to deploy the California National Guard without his support should serve as a warning to other states as to the kind of disregard to federal laws the incumbent administration is willing to engage in. 'California may be first — but it clearly won't end here,' warned Newsom. Earlier on Tuesday, Newsom had asked a federal court to block the Trump administration from using the National Guard and Marines to assist in ICE raids across Los Angeles. The California Governor argued that this would only cause tensions to soar further and trigger further civil unrest. The Trump administration said Newsom was seeking an unprecedented and dangerous order that would interfere with its ability to carry out enforcement operations. A judge set a hearing for Thursday. Trump left open the possibility of utilising the Insurrection Act, which authorises the president to deploy military forces inside the US to suppress rebellion and domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. It's one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a US president. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' Trump told reporters at the Oval Office. He later called protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy' in a speech at the Fort Bragg army installation in North Carolina, where he marked the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Trump has described the unfolding chaos in Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. The US president has also pledged to 'liberate' the city. 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again,' Trump said. Trump has been under fire after the Pentagon revealed that his National Guard and Marine deployment cost $134 million (€117.4 million). Critics have slammed him for reckless government spending, after his administration had vowed to eliminate wasteful expenditure with the creation of agencies such as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But, the 47th US president argues that the deployment was absolutely necessary, saying that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' had he not ordered the deployment. Democratic members of California's congressional delegation accused Trump of creating a 'manufactured crisis' to advance his personal agenda. A federal appeals court agreed on Tuesday to allow the White House to continue collecting the extensive import taxes imposed by US President Donald Trump, as challenges to his prominent trade policy remain under appeal. The ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit builds upon a comparable decision it issued following another federal court's annulment of the tariffs on 28 May, which indicated that Trump had exceeded his presidential authority. Acknowledging that the disputes regarding Trump's tariffs present "issues of exceptional importance," the appeals court announced it would accelerate the proceedings and conduct hearings on 31 July. The case involves the 10% tariffs which Trump imposed in April on nearly all nations, as well as the bigger tariffs that he implemented and subsequently paused on countries with which the United States has trade deficits with. It also includes tariffs that Trump levied on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico in an effort to compel these nations to take further action against the unlawful influx of immigrants and synthetic opioids across the US border. In implementing the tariffs, Trump had invoked emergency powers under a 1977 law. But a three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade ruled he had exceeded his power. The tariffs upended global trade, paralysed businesses and spooked financial markets.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
ECB's Lagarde slams 'coercive trade policies' in Beijing visit
Lagarde, one of the world's most influential central bankers, is visiting Beijing this week for talks with local counterparts on the Chinese economy and expanding cooperation. Her visit came as high-level China-US talks in London ended with an agreement to lower tensions after US President Donald Trump launched his tariff blitz in April. In a speech at the People's Bank of China -- the country's central bank -- she urged all parties to find solutions "even in the face of geopolitical differences". Lagarde urged countries to protect the "multilateral framework" of international trade, which she said "so greatly benefited our economies". "Coercive trade policies are far more likely to provoke retaliation and lead to outcomes that are mutually damaging," she added. "All countries should examine how their structural and fiscal policies can be adjusted to reduce their own role in fuelling trade tensions," she said, calling for an end to "mutually damaging escalation of tensions". She warned that protectionism risked "eroding the foundations of global prosperity". Beijing and Brussels' trade policies have been slammed by Trump, who last month threatened to escalate tariffs on the European Union if it did not negotiate a swift deal. China, meanwhile, has sought to improve shaky relations with the bloc as a counterpoint to Trump. China and the European Union will host a summit next month marking 50 years since they established diplomatic ties. The two sides will discuss setting minimum prices for Chinese electric vehicles in Europe and opening a "green channel" for rare earth exports to the 27-nation bloc, according to official statements.
