
By dragging the US into Iran, Trump risks giving Tehran the final showdown it wants
In the feverish rhetoric of this new age of chaos, Donald Trump has upped the temperature dangerously close to delirium with a threat to kill the supreme leader of Iran – not yet, but maybe – and Trump knows where he's hiding.
Iran has, inevitably, hit back with a counter threat that if the US joins Israel in its attacks, then there will be all out war in the Middle East.
Trump's language has meandered from peace maker to cowboy growl in his own reality TV show as Israel has taken the best window of opportunity it has ever had to launch its long-planned campaign to destroy Iran 's nuclear weapons programme and, it hopes, also topple the regime of the Islamic Republic.
From the US military and strategic perspective he may have been advised by hawks in the Pentagon, are there are plenty among his republican critics who agree – that now is the best time to join in hitting Iran.
His efforts to try to negotiate a deal with Iran to end its nuclear programme were derided by his former national security adviser John Bolton.
'It wasn't that we didn't give diplomacy as a chance. Diplomacy had no chance, given Iran's objectives,' said Bolton.
Bolton, now a vocal critic of Trump, has advocated for regime change in Iran for years. But there are MAGA supporters inside Trump's tightest circle who are genuinely opposed to using the US military to interfere in foreign nations.
Attempts at regime change and democracy building by force in Iraq and Afghanistan were red letter failures for many of Trump's supporters. They see no upside in another military adventure in the Middle East.
'The deliberate targeting of Iran's nuclear facilities not only constitutes a grave violation of international law and the UN Charter but also risks exposing all people in our neighbourhood to a possible hazardous leak. This is not an act of war against our country, it is war against humanity," said Ali Bahreini, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva.
He criticised the failure of states to condemn Israel's attacks. 'We are hearing almost nothing from those self-proclaimed champions of human rights," he said.
That's not surprising. No one wants to see Iran get hold of nuclear weapons and very few human rights advocates would rue the fall of a regime that hangs its critics with cranes.
Trump has been a long advocate of peace. He loves a macho leader, like Vladimir Putin, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Kim Jong Un – but he's always shown what appears to be genuine revulsion at war.
He famously refused to attack Iran during his last presidency when its forces downed an American drone, insisting that killing people over the incident was disproportionate.
Trump may be excited by the idea that Iran doesn't have the capacity to make good on its threats to spread war across the Middle East. That has encouraged him to call for 'TOTAL SURRENDER' – a demand that even Netanyahu hasn't made.
On top of that there's the ad hominem kill threat against Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader.
'We know exactly where the so-called ' supreme leader ' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,' he said.
Residents of Iran's capital Tehran have been told to flee – that's 12 million people and Israel has threatened to attack its enemies anywhere, and everywhere.
The sabre-rattling is more confident with every air strike that kills an Iranian commander, wipes out a nuclear facility, blows up an air defence operation and takes out missile silos.
The US has the bunker buster bombs which are, perhaps, necessary to hit the nuclear facilities buried half a mile under ground at Natanz.
Iran's proxy Hezbollah has been crippled in Lebanon and Syria. It poses a threat in Iran and so do the Houthis of Yemen. But they would be no match for the conventional firepower of the US airforce and navy.
Trump may be calculating that joining Israel's operations would annihilate Iran's capacity to counter attack effectively. He could, in theory, stop Iran from setting the Middle East aflame.
But Iran's Revolutionary Guards and its powerful Quds Force are experts at insurgency.
They funded and led operations that helped drive the US out of Iraq. They have agents and sleeper cells across the Middle East. They were pioneers of the shaped charge IEDs that can tear the heaviest armour into backing foil.
And they are not afraid to die for their cause.
Iran's leaders call America the Great Satan and refer to Israel as Little Satan.
They may be relishing the thought of a final showdown, and Trump may be about to deliver it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘My mission is to make him so angry:' E Jean Carroll reveals plans for her $83m judgement against the president
E Jean Carroll, the woman who beat President Donald Trump in two separate court cases, has vowed to make him 'so mad' by spending her multimillion-dollar windfall on 'things that Trump hates.' In 2019, Carroll accused the commander-in-chief of raping her in the changing rooms of New York's Bergdorf Goodman department store in 1996, resulting in a civil case in 2023 in which he was found liable for sexual abuse and ordered to pay her $5m in compensation. She then sued him again for defamation after he repeatedly protested his innocence and denied knowing her, which resulted in a jury awarding her an astonishing $83.3 million payout in early 2024. A U.S. appeals court last week rejected Trump's attempt to overturn the first verdict. He is still appealing the second, claiming presidential immunity. Carroll, 81, is currently promoting a new book, "Not My Type," a title taken from the president's notorious slur against her. She told Newsweek that she's setting up a charitable foundation in her own name to manage the money and distribute donations to anti-Trump causes. 'My mission is to make him so angry and so mad by taking this $83.3 million and giving it to things that Trump hates. That's what I'm doing,' she explained. Carroll specifically said she would direct her capital to areas like 'women's reproductive rights, binding up the wounds that he's inflicting on democracy and shoring up voting rights.' The former columnist told Newsweek that she found it 'stunning' that Trump had won last November's presidential election after a year of blockbuster indictments and court hearings outlining his long track record of troubling behavior. She said the outcome left her with little choice but to conclude: 'People don't believe women when they're saying one thing and a very, very powerful man is saying something else.' Carroll said she retains 'complete, 100 percent faith' in the legal system as a corrective to executive overreach and corruption, but urged people, particularly women, to continue protesting against the administration in the streets. ' Women have the power. We just have to realize it. We hold, as they say, the purse strings,' she said. Shockingly, the writer also revealed that she is not taking any chances when it comes to her own safety, given the recent wave of political violence in America, and sleeps at night alongside a Mossberg shotgun she has nicknamed 'Aphrodite,' after the Greek goddess of love, and two guard dogs. Not My Type is about her experiences taking on Trump in Manhattan federal courtrooms, an experience she described as 'comedy gold' and which she said she was able to recollect thanks to the voice-accurate notes she recorded after each day's session as reminders, as well as the official court transcripts. Carroll described the transcripts as 'probably the most comedic script ever written since Jonathan Swift published Gulliver's Travels ' and said she relished observing and describing Trump's defense lawyers, particularly the fashion-conscious Alina Habba and the hulking Joe Tacopina, noting the latter was 'built like Popeye' with 'glittering eyes.' 'The whole thing to me was like a high comedy,' she said.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Buried in a mountain and fortified against bombs: Inside Iran's secret Fordow nuclear site out of Israel's reach
Deep beneath the hills of central Iran, Tehran has ramped up its production of enriched uranium. A recent report by the United Nations ' nuclear agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said they were 'seriously concerned' about the 'significantly increased production and accumulation of highly enriched uranium'. In 2018, as a deal brokered by Barack Obama that limited Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief was ended by Donald Trump, Tehran had just 150kg of uranium enriched to 3.6 per cent. That number has now soared to 409kg of uranium enriched to 60 per cent. Iran could convert this uranium into hundreds of kilograms of 90 per cent enriched, weapons-grade uranium in just a matter of weeks, according to analysis by the Washington, DC-based Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS). That is enough for nine nuclear weapons. Iran operates more than 30 facilities around the country that carry out different steps of the nuclear fuel cycle, many of which have been hit by the latest Israeli strikes, aimed at neutralising Iran's possible nuclear threat. But it is the most concerning of these plants, known as Fordow, that remains intact. It is buried deep underground and heavily fortified. It is also estimated to contain 2,700 centrifuges, vital for uranium enrichment. Below, The Independent looks at what we know about the Fordow site on the outskirts of the city of Qom and why Israel is so concerned by it. When was Fordow set up, and what is it? Fordow is Iran's second nuclear enrichment facility after Natanz, its main facility. From above, all that can be seen are five tunnels disappearing into a group of mountains inside a wide security perimeter. In addition to being an estimated 80 meters under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems, though Israel may have already struck these weapons. Though Fordow is smaller than Natanz, it has always been the main object of international concerns regarding Iran's uranium-enrichment programme. When Obama revealed the existence of the site in 2009, flanked by then French president Nicolas Sarkozy and British prime minister Gordon Brown, he described its size and configuration as 'inconsistent with a peaceful program'. Iran had told the IAEA just days before of its desire to build a new fuel enrichment facility, but by that point, the site had been under construction for years. The IAEA says they have imagery showing construction as far back as 2002. Why is it key to the Israel-Iran conflict? It is no coincidence that the first Israeli missiles to hit Iran in this latest exchange came shortly after an IAEA report expressed 'serious concern' about Tehran's uranium-enrichment programme. 'The significantly increased production and accumulation of highly enriched uranium by Iran, the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce such nuclear material, is of serious concern,' the IAEA said in a 31 May report. Weeks later, Israel's ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter, told Fox News that their entire aerial assault on Iran 'has to be completed with the elimination of Fordow'. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu believes Iran's uranium enrichment programme and the prospect of Tehran acquiring nuclear weapons poses an existential threat to Israel. Several of Iran's other nuclear facilities have already been hit, including two centrifuge production facilities on Wednesday morning. Dozens of Iranian officials and nuclear scientists have also been assassinated. Can Fordow be destroyed? Herein lies Israel's problem. Israel is one of the most heavily armed countries on the planet with some of the most sophisticated weapons. The air superiority it has established over Iran effectively gives the IDF free rein to bomb at will, but it lacks weapons that can penetrate a bunker as deep as Fordow. In fact, experts believe there is only one weapon capable of damaging Fordow: the US-owned 30,000lb GBU-57/B Massive Ordinance Penetrator bomb. Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) and an expert in airpower, says the only means of destroying Fordow would be 'with multiple impacts into the same hole', using this US bomb. What's more, it can only be delivered, says Mr Bronk, by the US B-2 Spirit stealth bomber. Any successful operation would 'rely on the weapons being delivered and functioning perfectly,' he adds. So far, the US has not signalled an intentions to hit the nuclear site, and the Trump administration had been engaging Tehran in nuclear talks before Israel's latest attacks. However, the US president has not ruled a strike. US officials told CBS News that Trump is considering whether to join Israel in its attacks to stop the possibility of Iran enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels. Speaking aboard Air Force One, the US President was clear-eyed about his red line: 'Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. It's very simple.' Iran's leader, Ali Khamenei, was equally forthright in his response. If the US get involved, Washington will face 'serious, irreparable consequences', he said.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Keir Starmer chairs Cobra meeting as Donald Trump says he ‘may' strike Iran
But the US president, who left the summit a day early, told reporters outside the White House on Wednesday that he was considering strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. He said: 'I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Israel and Iran have exchanged fire over the past six days after air strikes which Tel Aviv said were aimed at preventing Tehran developing a nuclear weapon. Iranian officials insist the country's nuclear programme is peaceful, and claim Israel has caused hundreds of civilian casualties. Israeli jets continued to attack Tehran on Tuesday night, but the Iranian response appears to have diminished, with only 10 missiles intercepted by Israel's Iron Dome defence system during the night. Mr Trump said Iran had 'got a lot of trouble and they want to negotiate', adding it was 'very late to be talking' but 'we may meet'. On Tuesday night, the president had used his Truth Social platform to describe Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as an 'easy target'. He later posted the words 'Unconditional surrender', prompting Mr Khamenei to warn that any American military involvement would result in 'irreparable damage' to the US. Amid questions over potential American involvement in the conflict, Sir Keir convened his senior ministers for a meeting of the Government's emergency Cobra committee to discuss the deteriorating security situation in the Middle East. The Foreign Office has evacuated family members of embassy staff from Israel, but has not advised British nationals to leave the country. Sir Keir Starmer at the G7 summit in Canada (Stefan Rousseau/PA) The department said the evacuation was temporary and a 'precautionary measure', with staff remaining at the embassy in Tel Aviv and the consulate in Jerusalem. A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said: 'Our embassy in Tel Aviv and consulate in Jerusalem remain fully staffed and continue to provide consular services to those who require assistance.' Downing Street would not say whether British nationals should attempt to leave the country. A Number 10 spokesman would only say that the Government's 'key message' was to 'follow the advice of local authorities on staying close to shelter'. Britons have already been advised against all travel to Israel, and those already in the country have been urged to register their presence with the embassy. The Foreign Office has also said land borders with Jordan and Egypt remain open, and consular teams are in position to provide assistance to British nationals who choose to leave Israel by land. The Number 10 spokesman added: 'This is a fast-moving situation. We are keeping all our advice under constant review and the FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) continues to plan for a variety of developments, as you would expect.' Sir Keir had earlier insisted that Mr Trump was interested in de-escalation in the Middle East, saying 'nothing' he had heard from the president suggested Washington was poised to get involved. Asked whether the Prime Minister was confident that Mr Trump would not involve US forces in the conflict, a Number 10 spokesman said the UK's position was still that 'we want to de-escalate rather than escalate'.