Claim that emissions targets could lead to less food production
ICSA Rural Development chair Edmond Phelan was speaking following the Agriculture and Climate Change Conference, which was held at Dublin Castle this past week (Thursday, June 5).
'It is all very well defining success by hitting targets, but what happens when we look around and realise there are no farmers left on the land?' he commented.
'We cannot afford to lose the people, the communities, and the generations of farming knowledge that make food production possible in this country.
'There appears to be a complete lack of joined-up thinking when it comes to reaching our climate goals.
'Farmers are being squeezed from all sides – expected to cut outputs, and compete for land with energy production, solar farms, biomass, and rewetting etc. At the same time, sectors like aviation face little scrutiny,' he said.
The ICSA has questioned why Dublin Airport Authority is not held accountable, for instance, when it wants to increase passenger numbers by 25%.
'It all adds up to farmers becoming increasingly frustrated by a system that demands more and more from them, with little in return,' Phelan added.
'There is an excessive fixation on agricultural emissions, while the carbon being sequestered every day on farms – through hedgerows, grasslands, and soils – is being completely ignored.
'The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in particular, shows no real interest in acknowledging this reality. It's a clear case of not being able to see the forest for the trees, and farmers are expected to just accept that policy is being shaped without seeing the full picture.'
Food production
The farm organisation has said that food security must not be forgotten in the climate debate and that policymakers and the public cannot lose sight of the fact that there is a growing global population to feed.
'We need climate plans that reflect the complexity of land use, respects the role of farmers, and gives them real tools to be a bigger part of the solution,' Phelan stated.
'Farmers want to play their part, but that goodwill will evaporate if they continue to feel vilified rather than supported.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
5 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Policymakers warned that 3.8% drop in cattle numbers could double
The 3.8% drop in the national cattle herd in the last 12 months should be of concern to policymakers, says the Irish Cattle and Sheep Farmers' Association (ICSA). ICSA beef chairman John Cleary said the drop of more than 276,000 head of cattle is a warning to policymakers and could double next year if current trends continue. 'These numbers are not a surprise to farmers on the ground, but they should be a wake-up call for policymakers," he said. "According to Department of Agriculture figures, we've lost over 276,000 cattle in the space of a year. The national herd is declining at a worrying pace, and unless there is urgent intervention, the exodus from cattle farming will only accelerate,' he said. Mr Cleary said: 'What we are now witnessing is the cumulative impact of policies that just keep making it increasingly difficult to keep cattle. "Beef-sired cattle numbers are down over 92,000 head in just 12 months, and if this trend continues, we could see a decline of double that magnitude next year. This is not sustainable, and it signals real danger for the future of our family farms and rural economies. Mr Cleary warned that farmers are experiencing more restrictions, and with looming threats of CAP being dismantled and nitrates regulation tightening, herd numbers are dropping as a result. 'There is also the very real prospect that with fewer cattle in the system and reduced factory throughput, we'll see less competition, with smaller processors being squeezed out," he said. "That will inevitably hit farmers in the pocket through weaker prices. We cannot afford to let that happen.' Mr Cleary said that while live exports have increased and continue to play a vital role in balancing the market, they may not be a long-term solution. Over-reliance on live exports is risky. The real issue is that fewer calves are being born because fewer cows are being kept - and that is down to a policy environment that undermines confidence in the future.' He cautioned policymakers, saying current farmers are struggling to keep up with paperwork and policy swings, and young people looking to enter the industry are second-guessing their decision, watching the decline of the industry and stressors being placed on existing farmers. Concluding, Mr Cleary said, 'If policymakers don't act now to restore confidence and give farmers a reason to stay in business, the collapse of the national herd will become unstoppable - and with it, the collapse of rural economies across the country.'
Irish Times
01-08-2025
- Irish Times
State seems to be suggesting even people of means should apply for legal aid, barrister for Diarmuid Phelan tells court
The State appears to have suggested that even people of means should make legal aid applications, which a barrister for law professor Diarmuid Phelan has argued is 'entirely contrary' to the spirit of the scheme. A judge will give her ruling in September as to whether the State should pay the 'enormous' legal costs for Mr Phelan following a trial that ended last January. Mr Phelan was acquitted by a Central Criminal Court jury of murdering a trespasser on his farm. The costs issue was raised on Thursday evening, on the last day of the Trinity term, before Ms Justice Siobhan Lankford. Law lecturer Mr Phelan, who has assets valued in the millions, instructed two senior and two junior counsel at his trial and did not receive legal aid. He also called expert witnesses who gave evidence following the close of the prosecution case. READ MORE Mr Phelan (56) went on trial in October 2024 after he pleaded not guilty to murdering Keith 'Bono' Conlon (36), a father of four, at Hazelgrove Farm, Kiltalown Lane, Tallaght, Dublin 24 on February 24th, 2022. Mr Phelan is a barrister, law lecturer and farmer who owns Hazelgrove, formerly a golf course. Opening the application on Thursday evening, Sean Guerin SC, who was one of two senior counsel representing Mr Phelan at his trial, told Ms Justice Lankford that the starting point - and also expressly the most important consideration - in awarding costs was the verdict. Counsel submitted Mr Phelan was entitled to his costs and the onus was really on the prosecution to show why he shouldn't succeed in the application. Mr Guerin said one of the prosecution's submissions was that Mr Phelan had the option of applying for legal aid but had chosen not to do so. The barrister said the State appeared to be suggesting that even people of resources should make a legal aid application, which he suggested was a complete misunderstanding of what the scheme was. Opposing the application, John Byrne SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), argued there was no presumption in favour of costs and one cannot simply say they had been acquitted so were entitled to their costs. He said a more complex and nuanced inquiry was required by the trial judge. Ms Justice Lankford asked both parties to articulate their views if she decided to award Mr Phelan his costs but confined it to legal aid costs. She noted there was quite a wide discretion in case law, where 50 per cent of costs had been awarded to applicants. Mr Guerin told the judge there was no warrant for doing so as those weren't the costs his client had incurred. He said legal aid was not a guide or a measure as to what are the appropriate costs in a case. Mr Byrne said the discretion seemed to be very wide and awarding legal aid costs was not something the court couldn't do, provided it set out the basis for it. Ms Justice Lankford said she hoped to deliver the court's judgement in September.
Agriland
31-07-2025
- Agriland
ICSA urges 'rethink' on antiparasitic prescription rules
The Irish Cattle and Sheep Farmers' Association (ICSA) has urged Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine Martin Heydon to rethink proposed prescription rules for antiparasitic medicines. ICSA Animal Health and Welfare Committee chair John Barron has said the delay in introducing prescription-only rules for antiparasitic medicines until December 1, 2025 must not be wasted. On Monday (July 21), Minister Heydon announced a further and 'definitive' extension to the transition period for the up-regulation of antiparasitics to prescription-only medicines (POM). The previous implementation date was September 1, which itself was an extended date. The minister said this adjustment represents his 'continued support for stakeholders' in completing the transition to digital prescribing through the National Veterinary Prescription System (NVPS), and ensuring alignment across the prescribing and supply chain network. The ICSA Animal Health and Welfare Committee chair is calling on Minister Heydon to use the extra time to "completely rethink how the regulation is being rolled out". 'Tweaking the timeline isn't enough - the whole approach needs a serious rethink,' John Barron said. Under the planned rules, routine antiparasitic treatments like wormers and fluke doses will require a vet prescription, issued through the new National Veterinary Prescription System (NVPS). Farmers will no longer be able to buy these products over the counter from their local co-op or licensed merchant without first going through a vet. 'The current plan is too centralised and doesn't reflect how farming actually works," Barron said. "We fully support the responsible use of veterinary medicines - that's not the issue. But it has to be done in a way that actually works for farmers, keeps costs down, and protects local supply channels. "This is about farmers being able to get essential animal treatments when they need them. If these changes go ahead as planned, farmers will face delays and higher costs. "On top of that, many licensed merchants and co-ops who have responsibly supplied these products for decades could be forced out of business entirely - which would be a travesty." The ICSA committee chair said DAFM should "properly engage with all stakeholders - not just vets - and come back with a solution that works in practice, not just on paper". 'This is a chance to get it right. That means keeping licensed merchants in the supply chain and finding a system that actually works for everyone. "This can't just be a delay to push through the same flawed plan. The minister must listen and go back to the table. We need a system that works for farmers, vets, and merchants alike," Barron said.
