Gilbert Burns in 'concussion protocol,' wants Daniel Rodriguez for UFC return
Burns (22-9 MMA, 15-9 UFC) is currently dealing with the physical aftermath of a first-round TKO loss to unbeaten Michael Morales at UFC Fight Night 256 in May, which marked a fourth consecutive defeat for the one-time welterweight title challenger.
He hopes he's cleared by doctors in the coming months, however, and Burns said he's looking at a showdown with Daniel Rodriguez, who is on a three-fight winning streak after edging Kevin Holland on the scorecards at UFC 318 this month.
"I'm looking toward December," Burn told MMA Junkie. "I had a little concussion, I'm still not able to come back, so I've still got to get a few more things in the protocol to get able to get back to training. I've still got to take it easy a bit. It was a hard one, but I'm looking toward December. I just saw Daniel Rodriguez just got a nice win against Kevin Holland. He's ranked now. I think that should be a fun one. Me and Daniel Rodriguez in December, maybe January."
Burns said his concussion came with the knockout blow from Morales in the octagon. The 39-year-old said he's "feeling much better now," but it being intelligent with his recovery process and won't allow himself to do contact training until fully cleared.
"Let's see how the concussion protocol goes," Burns said. "That's one I'm looking forward to. With the brain you can't play it all. We've got to take it most serious. Most likely December or January. Let's see how it goes."
This article originally appeared on MMA Junkie: Gilbert Burns in 'concussion protocol,' wants Daniel Rodriguez next
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
10 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Giants' defensive line is determined to live up to the hype and high expectations
EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (AP) — Dexter Lawrence set out to quiet the chatter minutes after the first practice of New York Giants training camp. The veteran defensive tackle had already challenged his fellow players not to listen to the outside noise. 'They want to talk about our D-line and all this,' Lawrence said, 'but we haven't done anything yet.' Linebacker Brian Burns shared the same thought process a few days later, with a little more profanity tossed in, acknowledging what the formidable front looks like on paper. And while adding No. 3 overall pick Abdul Carter to a group already featuring Lawrence, Burns and Kayvon Thibodeaux has the potential to make this an elite pass rush, those involved are quick to insist they need to prove it first. "Everything looks good with the names that we have and the potential and this and that," Burns said. 'It's all on us. We can take this as far as we want to go.' Teammate Darius Muasau called it 'the best D-line in the NFL right now," which is lofty praise that can get tossed out there in the dog days of summer with camps in full swing and before any meaningful games are played. Even the exhibition season might not be an indication of what the unit can do. That will get tested in September with the gauntlet of opening at NFC East rivals Washington and Dallas and at home against defending AFC champion Kansas City, followed by then Justin Herbert and the Los Angeles Chargers. Coach Brian Daboll, among many others, is looking forward to seeing how Lawrence, free agent signing Roy Robertson-Harris, Thibodeaux, Burns and Carter handle hefty expectations. 'Hype doesn't get you anywhere,' Daboll said this week. 'Action does. So, whatever people think or they say, good or bad, the only thing that really matters is how we go about our business and ultimately producing when it matters.' Even tying for the worst record in the league last season at 3-14 — the 30th-ranked offense shouldered a bigger slice of that blame — only seven teams had more sacks than the Giants' 45. Lawrence set a career high with nine, Burns was next with 8 1/2 and Thibodeaux figures he should have had more than 5 1/2 with so many half-sacks part of his total. 'Probably would've been, you guys can do the math, maybe seven or eight if I were to finish those,' Thibodeaux said. 'Just making sure that I get everything I deserve this year.' Burns noticed a positive change in Thibodeaux at some point last season, which has continued into camp. Defensive coordinator Shane Bowen said Wednesday he routinely shows clips of the 2022 No. 5 pick running to the ball as an example to other players. 'K.T. has impressed me about how he handles himself in the building,' Burns said. 'He gets in early (and) he does his thing. All in all, he flipped that switch last year, so I expect big things from K.T." The organization — and bettors — expect big things from Carter, too. He's a heavy favorite at less than 3-1 on BetMGM Sportsbook to be AP Defensive Rookie of the Year after 12 sacks in 16 games in his final college season at Penn State, during which he also led the NCAA's Football Bowl Subdivision in tackles for loss. 'He's going to be put in positions to succeed, and that's just due to the guys we have on the line,' Burns said. 'Me, Dex, K.T., he's going to have 1 on 1s. He's going to have opportunities to show what he can do.' Bowen, going into his second season running New York's defense, is putting the onus on himself and his staff to find ways to get impact players on the field in the correct situations. That might mean Burns, Thibodeaux and Carter all lining up on an obvious passing down to show what they all can do. 'We've got to make sure we do a good job of finding ways to utilize them,' Bowen said. 'To have three guys that can roll and play and do different things for us, it really opens up the creativity for us." Nabers says he's 'fine' After not participating in all of team drills at practice Wednesday, top receiver Malik Nabers said he was fine and called it part of the plan devised by coaches and trainers. Asked if it was about managing his lingering toe injury, the second-year pro said it was about everything. It's unclear how much, if any, Nabers will play in the preseason opener Saturday at Buffalo. Hudson leaves With standout left tackle Andrew Thomas still on the physically unable to perform list and rehabbing to return from surgery in October for a Lisfranc injury in his right foot, James Hudson has been filling in that spot with the first-team offense. That is, until midway through practice Wednesday. Hudson left the field with training staff and did not return. Rookie Marcus Mbow, a fifth-round pick out of Purdue, took over in Hudson's absence. ___
USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
Michael Page against 'politics' of welterweight, embraces middleweight before UFC 319
Michael Page has a sound reason for remaining in the UFC middleweight division. Prior to handing Shara Magomedov his first-career loss at UFC Fight Night 250 in February, Page told MMA Junkie that his middleweight appearance would be a one-off and that he planned on going back down to welterweight. However, Page (23-3 MMA, 2-1 UFC) finds himself booked against former 185-pound title challenger Jared Cannonier (18-8 MMA, 11-8 UFC) at UFC 319 on Aug. 16 from United Center in Chicago. So how did he end up here? "It is what it is. It's kind of worked out how it's worked out," Page told MMA Junkie. "I would have preferred to get a fight in the welterweight division. As I've said before, it feels like there's a lot more politics going on in the welterweight division, and everyone's a bit more tentative about who they fight. I'm just not at that stage of my career to care enough. "I'm just like, 'Give me a good fight, and I'm in.' I expected after that last win I was going to get another good fight, and I was getting names that didn't really make any sense. So, middleweight it is. I'm happy to get such a high-level fighter, probably the highest-ranked fighter that I've had so far. So I'm excited. I'm happy with the fights that I've had." Page still hopes to get a U.K. vs. U.K. showdown against former UFC welterweight champion Leon Edwards some day but doesn't see the current landscape at 170 pounds getting any less tangled. "Now having confirmed that Islam (Makhachev) is coming up to welterweight to fight Jack Della (Maddalena), again, it feels like welterweight is just going to be a bit of a holdup," Page said. "Middleweight right now definitely seems way more exciting. Obviously I got Jared to focus on at the moment, but I may be staying here for a while until things start moving again at welterweight."
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mailbag: The 3 best ways to go about retiring from UFC (and actually staying that way)
How do you go about a UFC retirement in the right way (after so many examples of the various wrong ways)? What ever happened to the UFC's promise of AI rankings? And does Brock Lesnar's return to the WWE mean he might also show back up in the UFC at some point? All that and more in this week's mailbag. To ask a question of your own, hit up @benfowlkesMMA on X or @ on Threads. @justlikelasagna: Since there's been a few glaring failures recently, let's try something different. What does a successful ufc retirement look like for a fighter? I've given this topic a lot of thought and it seems to me there are three good ways to go about it. First is what we'll call the Khabib Nurmagomedov model. You have an incredible career, make a lot of money, then walk away at the peak of your powers, leaving us all stunned and skeptical. Except you don't totally turn your back on the sport. You become really active as a coach and mentor, letting your stable of fighters carry your legacy forward while also filling the void within through a vicarious joy in their success. This is trickier than it sounds, not only because step one is becoming one of the best to ever do it, but also because you're basically trying to get sober while still working as a bartender. Simply being in the gym that much is enough to push many people back into the ruthless arms of MMA competition. Next there's the Georges St-Pierre model. Again, it requires becoming one of the all-time greats and making so much money that you never really have to work again. But then you retire just as your prime is beginning to slip away and return only when your coldly analytical mind tells you that there's a very good opportunity to do something big, and for one night only. The important part here is that, once you've returned and achieved that thing, you immediately disappear again. Sure, it'll make the promoter mad, but screw him. He doesn't care about you and never has. Lastly, there's the Cole Konrad model. For those who don't know the name, he was the inaugural Bellator heavyweight champ and he held the title from 2010-12, before retiring from the sport undefeated and then getting a regular old job. Never lost a fight. Never competed again. Lives a nice, quiet life in Minnesota, working for a dairy company when last I heard (in this amazing article by our Uncrowned editor, Shaheen Al-Shatti). The good news about this one is that you don't even have to be an undefeated champ to make it work. Several fighters I know have done this, including my bro Danny Downes (shouts out to Danny Boy) and Brian Stann (shouts out to the greatest living American). The key to this strategy is turning your back on MMA entirely. Don't coach. Don't spar. Don't train fighters. Ideally you shouldn't even watch this sport anymore. As far as you are concerned, that was a whole other life and it might as well have been lived by a different person. Years from now when you're getting a haircut and the barber asks about your cauliflower ear, mumble something about high-school wrestling and leave it at that. Be free. @shadore66: Is summer the best season? It is right Summer is trash. Sorry to be the one to tell you. It's too hot (and only getting hotter, in case you haven't noticed). The afternoons are a sweaty mess. If you want to do anything fun or strenuous outside, you basically only have a couple hours in the morning and a couple hours at night to choose from. If you have kids it's even worse, because they're just … there. All the time. Bored and constantly asking what's for lunch. (My official position on this, now that my kids are 12 and 10, is that their lunch is none of my business.) Now fall? There's a season. A crackling crispness to the air. The sun is still present in our lives but without a sense of murderous malice to it. You can go for a leisurely hike in the afternoon while a hearty stew takes shape in the slow cooker. There's football on TV. Both kinds! It's the absolute best. Of course, ask me in late February and I'll tell you I long for the slow, sun-scorched days of summer. But right now it's August and my upstairs office is effectively unusable due to heat, so I'm angry and bitter. @SLefkaditis: Ιs UFC's AI ranking system dead? How close would it be to Tapology's? (which seems... great?) It's been a while since we've heard UFC CEO Dana White go off on the UFC's own rankings. The last thing I remember hearing on it was that he'd contacted Mark Zuckerberg, who had agreed to put some of Meta's best people to work on solving the UFC's rankings problem. Since then … nothing. It's important to note that Tapology's new ranking system is not AI. It's an algorithm they created and tweaked and crafted to automatically rank every UFC fighter based on pre-selected data points. That's different than just asking AI to tell you who the top 15 featherweights are, which is something AI could absolutely do, even if it would mostly just be guessing based on who knows what. The thing about an AI rankings system, whether it's the UFC partnering with Meta to create it or some other AI company, is how would it really be any different than the UFC matchmakers and executives just coming up with their own list? Maybe they want the veneer of AI so they can continue blaming someone else whenever people get mad about the rankings, but isn't that part of what rankings are for? We're always going to argue over them. It's never going to be perfect and unassailable with unanimous agreement all across the board. Plus, it's not like the UFC has ever been handcuffed by the rankings. The little numbers next to a fighter's name are mainly useful as a talking point on broadcasts or as a marketing tool on fight posters. It never stops the UFC from making whatever fight it wants, so who cares? Whether it's AI or an algorithm or a man behind the curtain, we're still going to argue and it's still not going to matter that much. @Jietzsche: Do you have any latest inside info on the UFC's new tv rights negotiations.. which platform does it seem most likely to be? No inside info, but I was intrigued by today's news that the WWE has struck a deal with ESPN. All those PLEs will move from Peacock to the worldwide leader, though some other WWE content will stick around. It really forces me to decide if it's still worth keeping my Peacock subscription even though now the main thing left for me there is old '30 Rock' episodes. (But my god, they're still so funny every time.) This means TKO has now done big deals with both Netflix and ESPN, two of the frontrunners for the UFC's new broadcast rights deal. It also means that WWE fans will need no fewer than three different subscriptions to follow all the action. And that, my friends, is likely a preview of what UFC fandom will look like by this time next year. @NeedXtoseePosts: Do we think it's possible now Brock is now back under the TKO umbrella and WWE are willing to use him - Lesnar vs Jones in an "exhibition fight" at the White House to save the trouble of drug testing. Brock Lesnar is almost 50 years old, dog. He didn't really love this sport even in his prime, and he never really got comfortable with being hit in the face. Plus, remember all that stuff I said about how maybe it wouldn't be the best look for the UFC or MMA to headline a White House event with a guy who can be easily seen and heard freaking out on various police videos? Let's just say that pitting him against a dude who's named a whole bunch of times in a federal sex trafficking lawsuit doesn't help. @Beastin364: Saw your tweet about Martin Buday getting cut off a win. Be honest though do you really want to see him fight again? Me personally I don't think anybody will miss him in ufc I see your point and I don't totally disagree with you. Buday went 7-1 in the UFC, with a three-fight winning streak to close out his contract (he was not cut, by the way, just not signed to a new deal), but he also wasn't anyone I really looked forward to watching. The same could be said about many (most?) current UFC heavyweights. The fact that he was good enough to beat other fighters the UFC might have had more interest in promoting probably only hurt his chances to stick around. He wouldn't lose but also wouldn't let us have much fun. My point was, doesn't this highlight the degree to which MMA is not like other sports? A tennis player who wins almost all his matches doesn't get pushed off the tour just because he's boring to watch. Buday is, by pretty much any objective measure, a good heavyweight fighter. Nobody goes 7-1 in the UFC if they suck. So when the UFC decides, nah, got no use for the guy here, not at any price? And when the public's response is, sure, that's fine by us? I'm just saying, it tells you that this is only a legit sport between when the cage door closes and opens. Outside of that, it has more in common with performing arts or pro wrestling. We should at least be honest with ourselves about that. @steviefenn: Would the ufc be better served having fewer cards but with more high profile and well known fighters? The build up to fights would be better and the product would be less diluted. Thanks. I hear this a lot and I think the key phrase is 'better served.' It depends what we think that means. Because I can tell you that, for the UFC and its parent company, it is better served by whatever makes the most money right now in the present moment. And between site fees paid by various city or state governments and broadcast rights fees paid by TV partners like ESPN, the UFC makes money simply by putting on fights. Any fights. Regardless of quality or fan interest or name recognition on the card. It's a volume business right now. No one at the UFC is even thinking about doing less if it would mean making less. One could argue that it's not great for the long-term health of the business or the sport to keep churning out APEX cards that fans aren't into. And yes, I agree that the overall product could be better if there were fewer events and a higher standard for each one. But that's fan experience we're talking about, and it's not where the UFC's focus is. Not at all.
