logo
Why your phone habits leave you feeling so bad

Why your phone habits leave you feeling so bad

Fast Company3 days ago

For those who've been in the situation where we unlock our phone and start futzing around on our home screen, only to find ourselves looking up at the clock an hour later with a sense of shame and regret, fear not: science has your back, according to research published and presented at the human-computer interaction conference CHI.
Researchers at the University of Washington, Columbia University, and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University in Taiwan followed 17 U.S. Android users for seven days. They captured a screenshot every five seconds, then paired those 34,000-plus images with real-time intention surveys, daily regret ratings, and follow-up interviews. An AI model automatically labeled each screenshot and categorized them into seven activity types, including direct messaging, search, or browsing an algorithmic feed.
This data allowed researchers to map user reactions and their levels of regret for each type of phone activity.
'There are all of these products that people say they value and choose to use every day, and yet they also talk about how frustrated they feel by some of their own usage habits,' says Alexis Hiniker, an academic at the University of Washington and one of the coauthors of the paper. 'They'll talk about deleting things or trying to quit—we were trying to dig into what's going on there.'
The findings suggested we're a pretty regretful bunch. Inside social apps, viewing algorithm-recommended posts and reading comment threads topped the regret rankings, even beating subscription-feed browsing. In contrast, direct communication and active search were the activities users regretted the least.
Time played a role too. Longer sessions, and those that drifted from initial intentions (often from 'send a message' to 'just scrolling'), pushed regret scores higher, though still lower than sessions that began as pure browsing.
'Habit-driven social media checking was pretty regrettable for a lot of people,' says Hiniker. 'They didn't necessarily mind if they were using social media to do something totally unproductive, just to help them relax or just enjoy themselves. But they felt a lot better when that was an intentional choice and they chose to go there for some entertainment, as opposed to not really thinking about what they're doing and just picking up their phone out of habit.'
The findings reflect poorly on big tech companies, which have made fortunes by shifting people from purposeful engagement with one another to mindless scrolling, pushing users toward algorithmically dictated feeds—the type most disliked by users.
But Hiniker believes there's hope for platforms that take a different path. 'We desperately need social platforms that really are trying to support people in engaging with others, rather than extracting as much of their attention as possible and directing them to this recommended and sponsored content that they never chose to follow,' she says.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Piracy Is Piracy": Disney Sues Midjourney for Massive Copyright Violation
"Piracy Is Piracy": Disney Sues Midjourney for Massive Copyright Violation

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"Piracy Is Piracy": Disney Sues Midjourney for Massive Copyright Violation

Disney and NBCUniversal — a pair of media behemoths behind franchises ranging from "Star Wars" and "Toy Story" to "Minions" and "Shrek" — are suing AI company Midjourney, accusing it of enabling copyright infringement on a massive scale through its AI image generator tech. In the lawsuit, which was filed in a California district court today, the two Hollywood juggernauts accused the firm of ignoring its previous requests to stop violating their intellectual property rights. "Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism," the scathing complaint reads, as quoted by the Wall Street Journal. It's a major escalation in the fight between copyright holders and AI firms, a battle that has been brewing for years. Per Axios, it's the "first legal action that major Hollywood studios have taken against a generative AI company." And it's not just the use of image generators; generative AI writ large has triggered a barrage of lawsuits, with media companies accusing the likes of OpenAI and Google of training their large language models on their materials without fair compensation. Those disputes have turned into a major pain point for the AI industry, despite surging enthusiasm for the tech. Considering the sheer size of both Disney and Universal — Disney is the third largest media company by market cap in the world — Midjourney could soon be in a world of hurt. Disney, in particular, has a long track record of closely guarding its enormous cache of intellectual property. "Our world-class IP is built on decades of financial investment, creativity and innovation—investments only made possible by the incentives embodied in copyright law that give creators the exclusive right to profit from their works," said Disney's chief legal compliance officer, Horacio Gutierrez, in a statement. "We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity," he added. "But piracy is piracy, and the fact that it's done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing." The lawsuit explained in an example how Midjourney users could easily request a picture of the Disney-owned "Star Wars" character Darth Vader in a "particular setting or doing a particular action," and the AI "obliges by generating and displaying a high-quality, downloadable image." That kind of loose approach to copyright has been an open secret for quite some time. In January 2024, noted AI critic Gary Marcus and film industry concept artist Reid Southen warned in a piece for IEEE Spectrum that tools like Midjourney and OpenAI's DALL-E3 could land them in a "copyright minefield." The pair found that it was "easy to generate many plagiaristic outputs, with brief prompts related to commercial films," including well-known Marvel superheroes, Nintendo's Super Mario, and Disney's Darth Vader. Disney and Universal are framing their legal action as a way to "protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us," said NBCU executive VP and general of counsel Kim Harris in the statement. Given the lack of a clear legal precedent, it'll be fascinating to watch the lawsuit unfold over what's likely to turn into a years-long courtroom battle. More on Midjourney: Self-Styled "AI Artist" Furious That People Are "Blatantly Stealing My Work"

I Went To The Amazon Prime Analyst Day. Here's What I Learned.
I Went To The Amazon Prime Analyst Day. Here's What I Learned.

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

I Went To The Amazon Prime Analyst Day. Here's What I Learned.

Last week, I attended Amazon's first-ever Prime Analyst Day in Seattle. It was a valuable opportunity to hear firsthand from senior executives who updated us on Amazon's latest innovations and strategic direction. Here are five key takeaways. Daniel Rausch, Vice President, Alexa and Echo, gave us a demo of the new generative AI-enabled Alexa. It's smarter, more intuitive and more personalized. 'Amazon's strategy is to help shoppers get things done,' Rausch told us. While the old Alexa was mainly about replenishment tasks, Alexa+ can help shoppers explore more – increasingly important for a marketplace selling millions of products. The first-ever Amazon Prime Analyst Day took place in Seattle in June 2025. Using the larger Echo Show displays, Rausch asked Alexa to help him find a cowboy hat for a Beyoncé concert. He then built a grocery list by asking for specific products as well as ingredients for a recipe. The fluidity of the conversation, the speed of the results, ease of modifications, and the visual cues made for an impressive experience. I've never been overly optimistic about voice commerce, but I think this could be a gamechanger. I asked whether Amazon felt their grocery offering was differentiated enough, especially given that competitors have raised their game in recent years. Do shoppers really understand the Amazon value proposition? The answer: price, selection, and convenience is Amazon's USP. I'd argue that in grocery it's difficult to achieve all three, but Amazon believes that it's well positioned to deliver on this. 'Over the past 20 years, grocery shopping has actually gotten more complicated,' said Meredith Bunche, Director, Amazon Grocery. 'Grocers offer so much choice today, and that has created a larger mental load for people who just want to get their groceries.' In fact, throughout the day, there was a strong emphasis on Amazon's ability to reduce the cognitive load for shoppers, busy families in particular. That's certainly a sweet spot for Amazon and perhaps one of the incentives to start consolidating grocery and non-food orders in same-day fulfilment centres. 'Customers may not realize they can buy a tomato on Amazon for same-day delivery,' said Sarah Mathew, Vice President, Global Delivery Experience. Perishables is an important category as it drives repeat purchasing, but Amazon's real strength is in everyday essentials. Think diapers, potato chips, pet food, toothpaste. This category grew twice as fast of the rest of the business in Q1, now representing 1 in 3 units sold in the US. Even though Prime isn't just about delivery perks these days, it's important that Amazon continues to improve on speed. Out of the 26 countries where Prime is available today, Jamil Ghani, Worldwide Vice President of Amazon Prime, mentioned Japan as an example of a fast delivery market, where most of Amazon's selection is available for one-day or same-day delivery, with everyday essentials among the most speed sensitive. Jamil Ghani, Worldwide Vice President of Amazon Prime Sarah Mathew noted how, contrary to popular belief, same-day delivery can be incredibly cost-effective. And it certainly powers that flywheel. 'Every time we get faster, we see customers come back more often,' she said. As with any subscription, retention is critical for Amazon Prime. Ghani noted how over 70,000 members have been with Prime since its initial launch in 2005. That is phenomenal loyalty and reminds me of a quote from Jeff Bezos: 'Our goal with Amazon Prime, make no mistake, is to make sure that if you are not a Prime member, you are being irresponsible.' This is why Amazon continues to invest in new benefits, particularly those with frequent usage like food delivery apps Grubhub in the US and Deliveroo in the UK. Ghani noted that there is a 'huge increase' in retention for those members who use a second Prime benefit. It's also why they've raised the annual fee just three times over the past two decades. In fact, when adjusted for inflation, the fee has only increased marginally ($131 versus the actual $139). Ghani doesn't like to call Prime a loyalty programme, as he told me on my Retail Disrupted podcast. He believes Amazon aspires for much more than a transactional relationship; in fact, Prime has become a utility for many households. 'You pay a little more to get a whole lot more,' Ghani said. One of things he is most excited about is live sports. 'It punches above its weight in terms of differentiation and longevity. Those members are shopping, not just coming to watch the game and moving on.' Ghani also noted how Prime is not a breakage model. 'The more a member uses Prime, the happier we are. We don't want to be a gym where we sign people up in January and everyone stops going in February.' And, finally, he confirmed that Prime is not a loss leader. High velocity events like Prime Day drive customer acquisition. Yes, there is churn but even those customers – the ones who trial Prime but don't go on to become members - are valuable. They are much more likely to continue shopping with Amazon, having had that experience. Amazon may not be invincible, but it certainly remains one of the most innovative, customer-centric businesses in the world. As Daniel Rausch put it, 'We know how to disrupt ourselves before someone else can.'

Inside Cursor's hiring strategy: no AI in interviews and a 2-day project with the team
Inside Cursor's hiring strategy: no AI in interviews and a 2-day project with the team

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Inside Cursor's hiring strategy: no AI in interviews and a 2-day project with the team

AI coding assistant Cursor, built by Anysphere, bans AI in technical screeners. Anysphere's CEO said programming without AI is a "great time-boxed test for skill and intelligence." Cursor's hiring process ends with two-days at the office, where candidates build real projects with the team. To get hired at Cursor, an AI coding assistant built by Anysphere, you can't use AI in your interview. "We actually still interview people without allowing them to use AI, other than autocomplete, for first technical screens," said Michael Truell, the cofounder and CEO of Anysphere, on an episode of Y Combinator's podcast published Wednesday. "Programming without AI is still a really great time-boxed test for skill and intelligence," Truell said, adding that those are core qualities he looks for in a teammate. There's another reason behind the rule: fairness. "We've hired lots of people who are fantastic programmers who actually have no experience with AI tools," Truell said. "We would much rather hire those people and then teach them on the job." That beginner's mindset can be a product advantage, offering fresh insights from first-time users, he added. The final step of Cursor's hiring process isn't a traditional interview. Shortlisted candidates are invited to the company's office for two days. They work on a real project alongside the team, join in for meals, and demo what they've built at the end. Truell said this setup helps them spot people who are genuinely passionate about the "problem space" — not just shopping around for a job. "You're probably not going to be super willing to do that if you're maybe just viewing it as a job and you're applying to a bunch of technology companies at the same time," he added. Cursor also looks for engineers who are eager to experiment. Truell said the company encourages carving out time for "bottom-up experimentation" — sometimes even sectioning off teams to build independently. Truell said in an episode of "Lenny's Podcast" published in May that early hiring at Anysphere was slower than it should have been. The goal was to build a world-class group of engineers and researchers — "a certain mix of intellectual curiosity and experimentation," he said. Anysphere, Cursor's parent company, raised $900 million at a $9.9 billion valuation last month, the company said last week. Business Insider's Eugene Kim reported earlier this month that Amazon is in talks with Cursor to adopt the AI coding tool internally. Cursor did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Anysphere isn't the only AI company banning the use of AI in job applications. Business Insider's Alistair Barr reported last month that leading AI startup Anthropic will not let candidates use AI when applying for jobs. "We want to understand your personal interest in Anthropic without mediation through an AI system, and we also want to evaluate your non-AI-assisted communication skills,"Anthropic wrote in a job posting for an economist. The requirement was listed across multiple roles, including technical ones like machine learning systems engineer. About a week later, the company behind Claude backtracked on this policy. "We're having to evolve, even as the company at the forefront of a lot of this technology, around how we evaluate candidates," Mike Krieger, Anthropic's chief product officer, said during an interview on CNBC in May. "So our future interview loops will have much more of this ability to co-use AI." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store