
Time is running out to use the tax loophole that lets parents stash £36,000 into an Isa
With the end of the tax year just around the corner, many parents are keen to maximise tax allowances and save for their children's future, particularly given speculation that Isa allowances could soon be cut.
But if your child has a Child Trust Fund, you might be able to take advantage of a quirk in the system that could see you stash away up to £36,000 for your child tax-free – far exceeding the usual £9,000 annual Junior Isa limit.
However, you'll need to act quickly as there's very little time left to make the most of this tax tip.
This Telegraph Money guide will cover:
Who is eligible for the children's saving trick?
How to do it
Is switching to a Junior Isa worth it?
Who is eligible for the children's saving trick?
According to stockbroker AJ Bell, the strategy involves using both a Child Trust Fund and a Junior Isa. This means that to be eligible your child must already hold a Child Trust Fund.
Child Trust Funds were set up by the Government for children born between September 2002 and January 2011. They currently hold £10.5bn worth of savings, according to the National Audit Office, and many people, now adults, don't realise they have money stashed away.
Junior Isas replaced them in 2011, and those with the old accounts have the option of transferring their balance across to the Isas – you can't hold both simultaneously.
Up to £9,000 can be paid into either a Child Trust Fund or a Junior Isa each year. However, while the annual allowance for Junior Isas renews on April 6 at the start of a new tax year, the annual allowance for Child Trust Funds renews on your child's birthday.
This means that if your child's birthday falls before the end of the tax year on April 5, you could potentially save £9,000 before their birthday, another £9,000 just after their birthday, and then transfer the funds to a Junior Isa to take advantage of its allowance.
Isas are one of Britain's favourite ways to save because anything inside an Isa, whether savings or investments, grows free of savings, capital gains and dividend tax. Withdrawals are also tax-free.
How to do it
Let's say your child's birthday is March 28, and they hold a Child Trust Fund. If you have the money available, you could pay £9,000 into their account on March 27, followed by another £9,000 on March 29 after your child's birthday when the allowance resets.
You could then transfer the pot to a Junior Isa on March 31. If the transfer completes in time (some providers may take a couple of weeks to complete the process), this gives you a brand-new allowance of £9,000 to use before the end of the tax year, bringing your total contribution to £27,000.
Come April 6, you'll be able to use the new Junior Isa allowance of £9,000, meaning you'll have stashed away a total of £36,000 for your child completely tax-free.
Of course, there are a few caveats to be aware of. First, you'll need to be able to afford to put away £36,000 over the next week or so. Second, whether you can take advantage of this loophole in full depends on the date of your child's birthday.
If your child's birthday falls just before the end of the tax year in April, it's unlikely you'll have enough time to make two contributions to the Child Trust Fund and transfer the account to a Junior Isa before the start of the new tax year.
Even if your child's birthday is in March, you may find that transferring the CTF to a Jisa takes you beyond the start of the new tax year, in which case you won't be able to pay in the Jisa allowance of £9,000 before April 6. But even so, making this switch still gives you a chance to tuck away £18,000 now, and a further £9,000 in the new tax year.
Is switching to a Junior Isa worth it?
Whatever your situation, if your child currently has a Child Trust Fund, it may be worth transferring those funds to a Junior Isa, where there is more choice of accounts and options are generally more competitive.
One question you need to ask yourself is whether to open a Junior cash Isa or a Junior stocks and shares Isa.
The younger your child is, the more likely it is that their savings will ride out the volatility of the stock market and deliver better returns over a long period of time.
Charlene Young, pensions and savings expert at AJ Bell, said: 'Even if a family cannot make full use of the £36,000 loophole, many young people who have Child Trust Funds but are still under 18 would benefit from a transfer to a Junior Isa anyway, where the charges will likely be lower, and they'll have a much wider investment choice.'
The money must be locked away until the child turns 18, at which point the Junior Isa is automatically rolled over into an adult Isa. The child can access their money if they wish to or continue saving for their future.
Ms Young said: 'Although Junior Isa rules state that accounts must be set up and managed by a parent or legal guardian, anyone can pay money into it as a gift.
'This makes them especially useful for grandparents looking to make use of gifting allowances with frozen inheritance tax thresholds until 2030, and the prospect of unused pensions being brought into the value of their estates, too.'
If your child already holds a Junior Isa, it's not possible to use a Child Trust Fund. Instead, there is still time to use up this tax year's allowance of £9,000, before the new £9,000 allowance kicks in on April 6.
These savings can soon add up. A parent managed to save the full £9,000 Isa allowance every year into a Junior cash Isa paying a 1.5pc interest rate, then by the time the child turned 18, the account would be worth £187,170.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
40 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. On Monday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury, with reports suggesting greater police spending would mean a squeeze on other areas of her department's budget. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' The Government has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86 billion package for science and technology research and development. Last week the Chancellor admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, amid the Whitehall spending wrangling. Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's office is concerned that Wednesday's announcement will include no new funding or projects for London. The mayor had been looking to secure extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line on the Underground, along with the power to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. A source close to the mayor said on Monday that ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.'


North Wales Chronicle
40 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut
Ms Reeves' £1.25 billion plan unveiled on Monday will see automatic payments worth up to £300 given to pensioners with an income less than £35,000 a year. It followed last year's decision to strip pensioners of the previously universal scheme, unless they claimed certain benefits, such as pension credit. Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, warned ministers they risked making a 'similar mistake' if they tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip. Leeds East MP Richard Burgon called on pensions minister Torsten Bell to 'listen now' so that backbenchers can help the Government 'get it right'. In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving Pip is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so Pip claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the Pip daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on Pip and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.'


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury (Jacob King/PA) On Monday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury, with reports suggesting greater police spending would mean a squeeze on other areas of her department's budget. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' The Government has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86 billion package for science and technology research and development. Last week the Chancellor admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, amid the Whitehall spending wrangling. Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's office is concerned that Wednesday's announcement will include no new funding or projects for London. Mayor of London Sadiq Khan (Lucy North/PA) The mayor had been looking to secure extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line on the Underground, along with the power to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. A source close to the mayor said on Monday that ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.'