Supply of life-saving medical products could be delayed by government freeze: 'This is a huge mess to untangle'
These problems are in line with what officials have said are unintended consequences of sweeping government freezes and cuts, though they remain unaddressed thus far.
Now, experts say that the consequences of the USAID freeze are disrupting the medical product supply chain and driving up prices for life-saving treatments.
As Reuters reported, USAID typically spends about $600 million annually on medicines, equipment, and diagnostic tests to help people in disadvantaged countries. However, the agency has now been cut off from spending, and there are far-reaching implications.
Medication and medical supply orders, which are usually made months in advance, are now on hold. Patients receiving continuous treatments can no longer receive necessary care.
Meanwhile, the global health supply chain is experiencing ripple effects from the foreign aid freeze. Experts say that a considerable backlog is already forming and that treatment prices will increase because of the order disruptions.
Fitsum Lakew Alemayehu, African Union liaison manager at WACI Health, told Reuters, "There will be a huge backlog. In Africa, millions have been on those treatments."
"This is a huge mess to untangle," said Health Response Alliance's CEO Tom Cotter.
The news of halted foreign aid for essential medical treatments is concerning in the short term and the long term. There will be immediate effects for the people who cannot continue with the treatments they started.
When you're choosing health and beauty products, which of these factors is most important to you?
Cost
Brand name
Ingredients
Packaging
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Even if the funding freeze lasts only 90 days during a review period, as President Donald Trump initially indicated, production, delivery, and potentially legal issues will still need to be resolved before medicine and supply delivery can continue as in the past.
This news is also concerning because of the rise in vector-borne illnesses worldwide. Our planet's steady overheating is creating ideal conditions for mosquitoes to breed and thrive.
These insects are adapting to the rising temperatures, increasing the disease risks for people worldwide, especially in poor regions without access to readily available medications.
Companies that supply medical products are closely monitoring the halted foreign aid situation to help patients continue to gain access to the medications they depend on. Yet much is currently uncertain as HIV clinics close, emergency food aid halts, and research stops.
Given this uncertainty, communities must take preventative action to protect vulnerable people's health and curb our worsening climate conditions.
Although some diseases are unpreventable, there are simple actions individuals can take to protect themselves from other conditions.
For example, you can keep disease-carrying mosquitoes out of your yard and garden with naturally repelling plants like lavender and marigolds. Fortunately, there are many alternatives to toxic chemicals that you can use to keep mosquitoes away and reduce your disease risks.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
27 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
The AIDS Crisis Offers a Warning About Trump's Research Cuts
During a sweaty night in Houston 33 years ago, on Aug. 19, 1992, I spoke to the Republican National Convention and, via television, to millions of others. My speech, 'A Whisper of AIDS,' took 13 minutes of the four or five years I was told I had left. I had AIDS. Everyone said it would kill me. However, I did not die. Thanks to incredible medical research, AIDS was converted from certain death to possible life for those with access to new drugs. Today about 1.2 million Americans live with HIV/AIDS and 50,000 or so are added to this total each year. Thanks to drugs many people can't afford, an AIDs diagnosis is no longer a death sentence. Medicaid is redemptive. Federal resources save lives. And I am alive to bear witness to the danger that still lurks in our communities, to the enormous cost already paid in money and lives, and to the tremendous advancements we are making against this disease. If we're willing to learn, our experience with AIDS offers some lessons. For example: Science, if persistently supported, can generate miracles. Science has kept me alive all these years. Science has virtually eradicated vertical (mother-to-child) HIV transmission for a few pennies per person. The miracles are within reach. But if scientific funding is stopped, so are the miracles. The Trump Administration has gutted America's AIDS eradication program and HIV research initiatives. Republicans have simultaneously provided a historic tax cut for wealthy Americans. The unpleasant truth is that these policies are a reflection of a broader belief that some lives are more valuable than others. As the philosophy goes: Infants in, say, Sudan can be allowed to die because their lives aren't as important as American's. And funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which feeds hungry families and school kids, can be cut because their lives don't matter as much as wealthy Americans need a tax break. Burdening the poor with greater poverty while lightening the tax load of the most wealthy, to paraphrase Bill Gates, smacks of the richest people in the world killing the poorest children in the world. The dilemma we faced with the AIDS crisis, and we face again today with President Donald Trump's reckless dismantling of domestic and international programs, is that those setting the rules believe they themselves will not be impacted. What it will take to change minds, as we learned in the AIDS epidemic, is a personal encounter with the truth—and with the repercussions of their actions. When a Republican Congressman who voted for Trump's budget learns that his mother's rural nursing home has been closed, and there's no other one within a hundred miles, then he may care. When his eight-year-old daughter is given a terminal diagnosis, and his prayers for a miracle are not answered because research has been starved of needed funds, then he may care. When the consequences are close enough, personal enough, painful enough, we begin to care. When we care enough about hunger, we can and will solve it—just like when we cared enough about AIDS, we were able to make huge strides. But right now, we simply do not care enough. The AIDS epidemic taught us that until we are personally touched by the truth, we're not likely to care; and until we care, we'll stand by, hands in pockets, looking the other way. Cuts in USAID programs alone will result in the deaths of 14 million people, maybe more, who might have otherwise lived. But if their deaths are in another place, somewhere we won't be bothered by seeing them, we just don't care. If we wait until we care enough, we'll learn the lesson of Pastor Niemoeller who said of Nazi Germany: 'They came after the Jews and I was not a Jew, so I did not protest. They came after the trade unionists and I was not a trade unionist, so I did not protest. They came after the Roman Catholics and I was not a Roman Catholic, so I did not protest. Then they came after me, and there was no one left to protest.' It's an old warning, one I cited in a speech to Republicans 33 years ago. If we wait too long, and if we refuse to care about the lives of others, we will all eventually feel the consequences. Then we will care.
Axios
13 hours ago
- Axios
Virginia health board moves to ban trans women from women's sports
The Virginia Board of Health unanimously voted on Monday to start drafting a rule banning transgender women from women's sports teams and locker rooms. The big picture: The decision adds the Youngkin-appointed board to the growing list of state and national bodies rolling back the protections and civil rights of transgender people. Since it's an unusual move from Virginia's health regulators, who historically haven't focused on athletics, it's unclear how the regulation would be implemented or enforced. Catch up quick: It comes after VCU Health ended gender-affirming youth care like hormone therapy, and the Virginia High School League banned trans athletes from K–12 sports. Meanwhile, the Trump administration says it's following through on its threat to pull federal funding from five Northern Virginia school districts refusing to change their transgender student policies. Zoom in: The Board of Health's vote on Monday was prompted by a petition for such a ban from three former and current collegiate swimmers from Roanoke College and Virginia Tech. Equality Virginia, a statewide LGBTQ+ rights nonprofit, tallied the petition's nearly 2,350 comments and found that 54% were in opposition and 45% were in support. Supporters called it a step toward "restoring fairness in competition." Some naysayers called it a "waste of taxpayer money" and a "distraction" from the "real issues." Between the lines: Legislation to ban trans athletes from girls sports in K–12 schools has repeatedly failed to pass Virginia's Democrat-controlled General Assembly.
The Hill
15 hours ago
- The Hill
Fewer Americans than ever confident in food safety regulations: Gallup
Confidence in the government's ability to ensure food safety in the U.S. has hit a new low — a drop driven largely by distrust among Democrats, according to a poll released Monday. Gallup's latest survey of consumer habits found that 53 percent of Americans said they have at least a 'fair amount' of faith in federal regulators maintaining a safe food supply. Confidence had hovered around 70 percent from 2007 to 2019, based on Gallup's previous findings, but it fell below 60 percent for the first time last year and continued to drop. The latest poll found that confidence among Republicans in the government's ability to maintain food safety held steady at 41 percent from last year to this year after President Trump's return to the White House, but confidence fell off among Democrats. About 74 percent of Democrats expressed confidence in federal food safety oversight in 2024, compared to 48 percent this year. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has heavily emphasized food as part of his overhaul of federal health care initiatives, but sweeping budget cuts across the federal government and has raised additional concerns at the FDA. Officials have maintained that none of the cuts impacted the number of inspectors or other food regulators. The Associated Press reported in April that the FDA had been struggling for years to ramp up inspections after the COVID-19 pandemic and that outside contractors were being hired to fill some inspector roles. The FDA, which has issued about 100 safety alerts and food recalls this year based on the agency's active database, penned a letter to food industry leaders last month urging better communication about product safety concerns. 'At the FDA, we believe that radical transparency in food safety and nutrition actions is key to reducing foodborne illness and chronic disease, setting a strong foundation for lifelong health,' FDA Commissioner Marty Makary wrote in the memo, specifically highlighting concerns about chemical contaminants in foods for infants and toddlers. The Gallup poll surveyed 1,002 adults July 7-21 across all U.S. states and the District of Columbia. It has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.
