logo
Telangana HC asks Centre to notify defence land zones by Dec

Telangana HC asks Centre to notify defence land zones by Dec

Time of Indiaa day ago

Hyderabad: The Telangana high court has directed the Union defence ministry to officially notify defence land zones in Hyderabad and Secunderabad by Dec 31, 2025, under the Works of Defence Act (WODA) of 1903.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Only after such notification, the court said, can authorities enforce construction restrictions around military establishments—even if the structures have local municipal permissions.
Justice T Vinod Kumar, who delivered the verdict, emphasised that public interest must prevail over private interests, especially in light of recent security incidents such as the Pahalgam attack.
The judgment came while disposing of a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India, challenging the Telangana govt's 2016 amendment that removed the requirement for a no objection certificate (NOC) from defence authorities for construction near military zones.
The court held that defence authorities do have powers to regulate construction near sensitive zones, but these powers must be exercised in line with WODA—by issuing formal notifications and adhering to due process. Until such notifications are issued, the court ordered that status quo be maintained on all construction near defence areas, including those with valid municipal permits.
However, Justice Kumar adopted a stricter stance on unauthorised buildings—those constructed without any municipal approval—and directed GHMC and HMDA officials to initiate action under their respective laws.
The court recognised that many builders had obtained permissions in good faith under the 2016 ministry of defence guidelines, which replaced the 2011 norms and reduced security zones from 100/500 metres to 10/100 metres, depending on the type of defence establishment.
These guidelines classify establishments into part A (10-metre limit) and part B (100-metre limit). The judge affirmed that the 2016 norms, though issued as internal circulars, are the currently applicable standard, but emphasised that they do not have statutory force until notified under WODA.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The Telangana govt defended its 2016 move, saying it allowed construction only after defence NOCs were obtained. It also argued that it is not obligated to enforce central defence rules unless officially notified. The court agreed, stating that the onus lies on the Centre to notify restricted areas before seeking compliance from state authorities or the public.
Deputy solicitor general Gadi Praveen Kumar informed the court that a request for notification under section 3 of WODA had already been sent to the defence ministry, which is expected to act soon.
The court also restrained builders from undertaking new construction in disputed areas until the ministry issues formal notifications, but protected post-2016 constructions with valid approvals from coercive action in the interim.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Irate HC intimates contempt against 2 chief secys
Irate HC intimates contempt against 2 chief secys

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Irate HC intimates contempt against 2 chief secys

Chennai: Expressing deep anguish and displeasure towards the attitude of Tamil Nadu chief secretary in disrespecting court orders, Madras high court initiated suo motu contempt of court proceedings against the officers who served as the chief secretary to the govt from Sep 19, 2023. "This court is expressing its deep anguish and displeasure towards the attitude of the chief secretary in disrespecting the court orders and executing them in true letter and spirit," Justice Battu Devanand said. "As the chief secretary, who is the head of the executive of the state, does not implement the court order and takes it lightly, this court cannot expect that his subordinate officers would implement the orders in true letter and spirit," the court added. The court passed the order on four petitions in which the court directed the govt to implement the scheme of compassionate appointment from 1972 to 2023. The high court passed the order while allowing the pleas moved by legal heirs of deceased govt employees against infirmities in implementing Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 2023. The court directed the state to consider the suggestion for feasibility to maintain a state-wise list of the dependants for compassionate appointment and to take steps to obtain a report from the committee within two months. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Fastest Selling Plots of Mysore from 40L | 40+ Amenities PurpleBrick Learn More Undo The court also directed the chief secretary that the action taken report be placed before this court within three months . On June 6, the court was informed that no such report was filed within the time prescribed by the court. Recording the submission, the court said, "After considering all these facts, this court is of the prima facie opinion that the chief secretary failed to comply with the order of this court in true letter and spirit." On several occasions, this court noticed that only after the filing of contempt cases and after issuing statutory notice for the appearance of the officers, the authorities choose to file appeals with delay condonation petitions. No doubt, it is the right of the respondents to file appeals. But it has to be filed within the time stipulated for the limitation of filing of appeals, the court said. The court then adjourned the hearing to June 20.

Bengaluru stampede: HD Kumaraswamy slams Karnataka government over premature nod for RCB celebrations
Bengaluru stampede: HD Kumaraswamy slams Karnataka government over premature nod for RCB celebrations

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Bengaluru stampede: HD Kumaraswamy slams Karnataka government over premature nod for RCB celebrations

Bengaluru: Union minister and JD(S) chief HD Kumaraswamy Saturday alleged that the Karnataka govt had "pre-planned" the RCB IPL victory celebrations and official permissions were granted hours before the final match had even begun. He said this raised serious concerns over political and bureaucratic accountability on the stampede. "The FIR on the stampede incident says permission was sought for the June 4 victory celebrations at the stadium even before the match started on June 3 (at Ahmedabad). The final started at 7.30pm (on June 3), but an application was submitted at 6pm for next day's celebrations ... did they dream about winning the match? Another application was submitted to the department of personnel and administrative reforms (DPAR) for the celebrations in front of Vidhana Soudha. .. who was behind it? Who put pressure on the police commissioner at 7.30am that day (June 4) for permission?" Kumaraswamy asked. He demanded that chief minister Siddaramaiah, his deputy DK Shivakumar, and home minister G Parameshwara take moral and administrative responsibility. "What was the need to felicitate the team within 24 hours of the team's victory? Was such a slipshod felicitation needed?" he asked. Echoing the criticism, Union minister and BJP's Bangalore North MP Shobha Karandlaje called the felicitation a misuse of govt space. "The grand stairs of Vidhana Soudha have been reserved for swearing-in or govt ceremonies all these years. You (Congress govt) used it for a private team (RCB)," she said. Holding the CM and DCM directly responsible, she said: "Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar have blood on their hands. They are trying to wash the blood and wipe it on police officers. Where are Congress general secretaries KC Venugopal and Randeep Singh Surjewala, who often come to the state for everything, hiding?" CMO counters, says permission was given only for Soudha venue The chief minister's office (CMO) Saturday said official permission for RCB victory celebrations was granted only for the Vidhana Soudha venue on June 4 and not before the IPL final. Responding to Kumaraswamy's allegations that the govt had "pre-planned" the event even before RCB's final match on June 3, the CMO said the request letter was received by the undersecretary, DPAR (executive). "Permission for celebrations was formally accorded only for the Vidhana Soudha venue and not for the cricket stadium, after getting the report from Vidhana Soudha DCP on June 4." the CMO said.

More water: High court rejects Punjab's plea against May 2 water order, says state free to approach Centre
More water: High court rejects Punjab's plea against May 2 water order, says state free to approach Centre

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

More water: High court rejects Punjab's plea against May 2 water order, says state free to approach Centre

Chandigarh: Punjab and Haryana high court dismissed the Punjab govt's plea to modify its May 6 order, directing the state to comply with the May 2 decision of the meeting —chaired by the Union home secretary—to release additional water to Haryana from the Bhakra Dams. However, the court said Punjab could refer the matter to the central govt for further consideration. "The state of Punjab is not left remediless, since it can always make a reference to the central govt in terms of Explanation – II to Rule 7 of 1974 Rules as per law...," the HC held. Regarding Punjab's ground of BBMB being incompetent to decide the issue once the matter was referred to the govt of India via a letter dated April 29 by Haryana, the HC held that the letter dated April 29 does not relate to any dissent by Haryana but contains a request to the chairman of BBMB to refer the matter to the central govt for execution of the minutes of the meeting dated April 28 of the technical committee of the board. "As such, this letter cannot be treated as a reference to the central govt. Consequently, Haryana's letter dated April 29 does not fall within the realm of 'material fact', non-disclosure of which is hence inconsequential," the HC held in its detailed order released on Saturday. Regarding Punjab's contention that the record of discussions/minutes of the meeting dated May 2, presided over by the Union home secretary, was non-existent, the HC clarified that since it was not a reference in terms of Explanation – II to Rule 7 of 1974 Rules, the very foundation for raising the said ground does not exist, and it is of no avail to Punjab. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Tired of High Power Bills? Plug in This Device elecTrick - Save upto 80% on Power Bill Learn More Undo In this case, the Punjab govt approached the HC seeking a recall or modification of its May 6 order, which directed the state to comply with the May 2 meeting decision on releasing additional water to Haryana from the Bhakra Dam. The state claimed that the direction in question was passed on account of concealment of material facts by BBMB in the petition. According to Punjab's plea, in case of any policy decision or where the rights of any state are affected, the matter is to be referred to the central govt through the chairman of the board. However, despite the matter being referred to the central govt for deciding the issue under Rule 7 of BBMB Rules 1974, and no decision thereupon being taken, the board again convened a meeting on April 30, wherein, without any adjudication by the competent authority, it decided the issue of releasing 8,500 cusecs of water to Haryana.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store