logo
State Department human rights report scaled back, omits details on abuses in politically allied countries

State Department human rights report scaled back, omits details on abuses in politically allied countries

CNN2 days ago
The US State Department on Tuesday released a pared-down version of its annual report meant to catalogue human rights concerns in countries around the world.
The report covers the 2024 calendar year – before the Trump administration took office – and sources told CNN it was largely completed before the US president began his second term. However, it underwent significant revisions in the subsequent months.
There were notable changes between the previous report released April 2024 – covering 2023 – and the one released Tuesday. For some countries like El Salvador whose leaders are political allies of the Trump administration, there was far less criticism and detail about reports of their human rights abuses.
In traditionally allied countries like Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, the latest report alleged a deteriorating human rights situation in 2024, noting that 'significant human rights issues included credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression.' Trump administration officials have lambasted European nations with allegations of free speech backsliding.
Asked about the perception that the State Department watered down reports for countries that work closely with the administration, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said, 'obviously, President Trump is someone who has been working with a lot of countries' and said the reports should be viewed 'as an indication of our point of view in general, that there's no country that is singled out for condemnation or singled out for praise.'
Breaking with precedent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not provide a written introduction to the report nor did he make remarks about it.
The latest report was stripped of many of the specific sections included in past reports, including reporting on alleged abuses based on sexual orientation, violence toward women, corruption in government, systemic racial or ethnic violence, or denial of a fair public trial. Some country reports, including for Afghanistan, do address human rights abuses against women.
'We were asked to edit down the human rights reports to the bare minimum of what was statutorily required,' said Michael Honigstein, the former director of African Affairs at the State Department's Bureau of Human Rights, Democracy and Labor. He and his office helped compile the initial reports.
The report itself acknowledges that it was adjusted, saying the country reports 'were streamlined for better utility and accessibility in the field and by partners, and to be more responsive to the underlying legislative mandate and aligned to the administration's executive orders.'
'We minimize the amount of statistical data in the report. In the age of the internet, the underlying data are generally available,' an appendix to the latest report said.
'For purposes of focus and streamlining, the reports select illustrative examples of alleged abuses and in most instances follow up only on high-profile unresolved allegations from previous years,' it said.
A senior State Department official said that 'US policy on promoting respect for human rights around the globe, or in any particular country has not changed.'
The release of the report comes after significant changes were made to the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor – which housed the teams that prepare the annual, congressionally-mandated reports. Many of the staff who worked on the reports, including drafts of the ones released Tuesday, were fired last month. The bureau's focus has been shifted to 'advancing the Administration's affirmative vision of American and Western values.'
The report on El Salvador, where the US deported Venezuelan migrants earlier this year, is much shorter than the one released last year. The latest one claims 'there were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses' in 2024.
However, it notes that 'there were several reports the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings during the year' and that some suspects arrested under suspicion of gang affiliation 'died in prison prior to conviction or completing their sentences.'
The report from the previous year – which was four times as long – describes 'significant human rights.' These included 'credible reports of: unlawful or arbitrary killings; enforced disappearance; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by security forces; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic and sexual violence, and femicide; substantial barriers to sexual and reproductive health services access; trafficking in persons, including forced labor; and crimes involving violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex persons.'
Asked about the change to the El Salvador report, Bruce said she would not speak 'from country to country' and referred people to the report itself.
The report on Israel includes a far less extensive documentation of reports of human rights abuses, leaving out any reference to 'significant human rights issues,' which is in the 2023 report.
The latest report mentions Hamas and Hezbollah only in a very sparse section about reports of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Last year's report, however, noted allegations of 'extensive and in many cases unprecedented conflict-related abuses' and war crimes committed not only by Hamas, but also Israel, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and other Palestinian militant groups.
There is no reference to allegations of torture of Palestinian detainees by Israeli government officials – which were included in the previous year's report, but the report says that the Israel Security Agency and police 'used violent interrogation methods.' There is also no mention of the criminal trial of Prime Minister Netanyahu on charges of bribetaking, fraud and breach of trust, which were ongoing at the time.
The latest country report on Afghanistan is also far shorter than last year's. However, it still describes reports of 'significant human rights issues' and 'widespread disregard for the rule of law and official impunity for those responsible for human rights abuses.'
The report notes a 'significant deterioration in respect for women's rights' in 2024 due to edicts 'effectively removing them from public spaces.'
Despite such findings, the Trump administration sought to end Temporary Protected Status for Afghans in the US, citing 'notable improvements in the security and economic situation' in Afghanistan.
The latest report on Russia, while lengthier than others, was still shorter than the one released last year. It points to the death of Aleksey Navalny in a Russian prison in February 2024, noting the prison is 'known for harsh conditions and alleged torture.' It also cites vast human rights abuses inside Russia, including extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances perpetrated by government authorities. But the report does not include a full section on corruption, which was described as 'widespread throughout the executive branch' in last year's report.
The report also says there were credible reports that some Russian forces committed war crimes and crimes against humanity as they continued their invasion of Ukraine.
'Russia's forces and officials committed crimes against humanity, including but not limited to deporting thousands of civilians to Russia, including children. The government operated an extensive system of filtration and detention operations that sometimes included the use of forced labor,' the report says.
Not all of the reports were drastically changed from last year. The latest country report on China is very similar. It notes that genocide and crimes against humanity occurred against predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and members of other ethnic and religious minority groups in Xinjiang, the report says. It also concludes that the Chinese government did 'not take credible steps or action to identify or punish officials who committed human rights abuses' in 2024, which mirrors the findings from the previous year's report.
This story has been updated with additional developments.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kohberger's ‘living hell,' Trump wants more control of DC police and Zelensky on US / Russia summit
Kohberger's ‘living hell,' Trump wants more control of DC police and Zelensky on US / Russia summit

New York Post

time17 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Kohberger's ‘living hell,' Trump wants more control of DC police and Zelensky on US / Russia summit

Bryan Kohberger, the man convicted of slaughtering four University of Idaho students in 2022 is being hazed in prison and the guards are letting it slide, President Trump is planning to ask Congress for a crime bill that will allow the feds to control the DC Police longer and Ukrainian President Zelensky catches up with President Trump ahead of Friday's key meeting with Vladimir Putin.

Trump's deal with Nvidia puts our national security on sale to the highest bidder
Trump's deal with Nvidia puts our national security on sale to the highest bidder

Los Angeles Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump's deal with Nvidia puts our national security on sale to the highest bidder

One thing that can be said about Donald Trump's transactional approach to policy-making is that, as destructive as it might be to our economic health, it gives business leaders clear options to get what they want out of the White House. The latest case-in-point are the deals struck by chipmakers Nvidia and AMD to secure licenses to export their products to China. The White House named the price — 15% of their revenues from such sales — and the companies assented willingly. Never mind that the exports originally had been banned — by the Biden administration and Trump himself — because of national security concerns. Never mind that the U.S. constitution explicitly prohibits charging any tax or duty on exports. Never mind that a stack of U.S. laws, including the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, which Trump signed, don't provide a pay-to-play escape clause from export restrictions. Never mind that the exports may strengthen the domestic industry and even its military of China, a country that has been the consistent target of Trump trade policies. Despite all that, Trump treated the deals as a win for the U.S. Explaining his side of the conversation when Nvidia asked for relief from the export ban, he related, 'I said, 'If I'm going to do that, I want you to pay us as a country something, because I'm giving you a release.'' Under the circumstances, it shouldn't be surprising that some trade professionals and investors see something corrupt in the arrangements. Among them is Christopher Padilla, an export control official under George W. Bush, who told the Washington Post: 'Export controls are in place to protect national security, not raise revenue for the government. This arrangement seems like bribery or blackmail, or both.'' Nvidia, as it happens, has a written anti-corruption policy stating, 'We do not tolerate bribery or corruption in our business.' The policy bars 'promising, offering, providing, or authorizing the provision of money or anything of value ... to obtain, retain, or direct regulatory approvals, contracts, business, or other benefits.' When I asked Nvidia about the deal, the company referred me to the sole comment it has made in response to questions about it: 'We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets.' AMD didn't respond to my request for comment. These deals are unprecedented; as the Financial Times observed, citing trade experts, 'no US company has ever agreed to pay a portion of their revenues to obtain export licenses.' There's no question that Nvidia lobbied ferociously for a lifting of the export ban. The company made a $1-million contribution to Trump's inaugural committee. Its CEO, Jensen Huang, met directly with Trump to discuss the ban; media reports say that Trump initially demanded a 20% fee, but Huang negotiated it down to 15%. As has been the case with other Trump-negotiated trade deals, the details of this one are murky in the extreme. The terms haven't been reduced to writing. Indeed, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that its 'legality ... is still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce,' with an eye toward replicating it with other companies. Among the questions is how the fee would be paid, and how the money would be spent. Still, what's known has caused concern for export regulators, experts and legislators. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security,' tweeted Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), chair of the House select committee on the Chinese Communist Party, 'and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the Government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities.' The effect of this deal on other companies also raises the hackles of economists and trade experts. 'Other American semiconductor companies like Qualcomm and Intel may say, 'If we develop this cutting-edge chip and the government decides that it has some national security interest in that chip, we might have some of our revenue taken away as well,'' says Kyle Handley, a trade economist at UC San Diego, 'so they may decide not to do the R&D investments and the innovation and hire the workers to develop those things.' The revenue payback 'will certainly have a chilling effect,' Handley told me, because the government fee 'might make the initial investment appear uneconomical.' That's especially so if the administration tries to apply the arrangement to industries such as software or pharmaceuticals. The export charge could become a particular burden on startups — Nvidia plainly has enough money to pay the fee, but many other innovative companies wouldn't. Whether or how the export tax can be stopped is an open question. For one thing, it's unclear who would have standing to bring a lawsuit to stop it. Nvidia and AMD have accepted the deal, so they presumably wouldn't file a case. Companies that fear the imposition of export fees on their own products might have to wait until they could show concrete damage to their own interests in order to bring a case in federal court. As long as manufacturers such as Nvidia are willing to bow to Trump's demands, he may have a clear field. If a legal challenge does emerge, the administration has tried to characterize the export fee as something other than a tax in order to circumvent the constitutional prohibition. Nvidia developed the H20 chip at the heart of its deal specifically to address an export ban the Biden administration imposed on the company's sales to China in 2023. The Chinese government, however, isn't enamored of the chip. Chinese regulators have been pressuring domestic companies to avoid the chips out of cybersecurity concerns, including suspicion that the chips could contain hidden code that could subject them to outside control. (Nvidia has denied that the chips contain any such back-door exposure.) The chips also are outmoded for some AI applications compared to the company's top-of-the-line Blackwell series, which are still subject to a U.S. export ban. As my colleague Queenie Wong reported, Trump seems to think that he and Nvidia's Huang had put something over on the Chinese. Trump called the H20 chip 'obsolete' and said Huang was 'selling a essentially old chip.' But others say the H20s may yet be preferable to Chinese-designed chips for Chinese firms, although Chinese products are consistently improving. 'The H20 is a potent accelerator of China's frontier AI capabilities, not an outdated AI chip,' as 20 former government trade officials told Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who oversees trade policy, in a July 28 letter. 'If the U.S. backs off of export controls to China, we believe that China's next generation of frontier AI will be built on the backs of the H20,' the officials wrote. The chip 'will not simply power consumer products or factory logistics; they will enable autonomous weapons systems, intelligence surveillance platforms, and rapid advances in battlefield decision-making.' How the export deal may affect Nvidia's top or bottom lines is murky, though its immediate effect doesn't seem all that significant. In May, the company announced a $4.5-billion writedown of unsold H20 inventories in the first quarter ended April 27 because of the U.S. ban on H20 sales. But it still recorded $23.3 billion in operating profit for the quarter on sale of $44.1 billion. For its last full fiscal year ended Jan. 26, Nvidia reported a pre-tax profit of $84 billion profit on sales of $130.5 billion. In stock market terms, Nvidia is the world's most valuable company, with a market value of $4.4 trillion; its price-earnings multiple is a robust 58.4. With a gain in share price so far this year of nearly 35%, it's one of a handful of AI-related companies that has kept the market buoyant despite investor concerns about a developing economic slowdown due in part to Trump's trade policies. But the company is looking ahead to further incursions into the China market over the long term. 'The China market is about $50 billion a year,' Huang told Taiwan-based technology strategist Ben Thompson in May, bemoaning the need to leave behind 'the profits that go with that, the scale that goes with that, the ecosystem building that goes with that' while the export ban was in place. So it made sense to allow Nvidia to extract revenue and profits from the cross-border trade. China is sure to power ahead on AI technology with or without Nvidia's chips, Huang said — 'anybody who thought that one chess move to somehow ban China from H20s would somehow cut off their ability to do AI is deeply uninformed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store