Tied up, starved, forced to kneel: Inside the ICE hellhole Florida jail treating migrants worse than dogs
Florida immigration jails
. A report from human rights groups says that three
ICE detention centers
in Florida have terrible conditions, where migrants were allegedly tied up, starved, and treated badly.
There are claims that migrants at Miami's ICE jail were forced to kneel and eat from styrofoam plates "like dogs" while shackled and had their hands tied behind their backs, as quoted in a report by the Guardian.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
others
Finance
Data Science
Degree
Management
Operations Management
Data Analytics
Others
MCA
Cybersecurity
Leadership
Design Thinking
healthcare
Project Management
Artificial Intelligence
Healthcare
Public Policy
CXO
PGDM
Product Management
Technology
MBA
Digital Marketing
Data Science
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
16 Weeks
Indian School of Business
CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Human rights advocates demand accountability.
Advocacy groups
say that these jails are too full, inhumane, and a growing stain on the conscience of the country.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The Best Method for a Flat Stomach After 50 (It's Genius!)
Lulutox
Undo
A series of alleged abuses at Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE)-operated jails in the state since January have been documented by advocacy groups Human Rights Watch, Americans for Immigrant Justice, and Sanctuary of the South based on interviews with detainees, including the incident at the federal detention center downtown.
What exactly happened inside the Miami detention center?
Live Events
The report claimed that for hours, dozens of men had been crammed into a holding cell and denied lunch until roughly 7:00 p.m. They were still chained, and the food was on the chairs before them. According to Pedro, one of the prisoners, "we had to eat like animals."
There is a lot of overcrowding, medical neglect, and physical abuse, and things have gotten worse since Trump's immigration crackdown started in January.
The groups claim that guards frequently treat inmates in all three jails in a dehumanizing manner. Gender-appropriate care, showers, and sufficient food were denied to female detainees at the Krome North service processing center in west Miami, where they were forced to use restrooms in plain sight of the men being held there.
ALSO READ:
JD Vance plans summer holiday in the English countryside with family - crowds warn be ready for protests
According to some transferring detainees, the jail was so overcrowded that they were detained in a bus in the parking lot for more than twenty-four hours. In order to use the one toilet, which soon became clogged, men and women were confined together and only unchained when necessary.
"Others defecated in the toilet because they were on the bus for so long and were not allowed to get off," according to one man. "As a result, there was a strong fecal odor throughout the bus," as per a report by The Guardian.
How bad are conditions at Krome and Broward facilities?
They claimed that after the group was eventually admitted to the hospital, many of them slept on the chilly concrete floor for up to 12 days while cooped up in a freezing intake room they called la hielera, or the icebox.
According to the report,
Krome
had so many detainees and so little space that every room was used to accommodate new arrivals.
Detainees claimed they were frequently denied proper medical or psychological care at the
Broward
transitional center in Pompano Beach, where Marie Ange Blaise, a 44-year-old Haitian woman, passed away in April.
Some experienced hostile or contemptuous reactions from staff members, as well as delayed treatment for chronic illnesses and injuries. A "disturbance control team" allegedly brutalized inmates who were protesting the lack of medical attention for one of their number who was coughing up blood, and staff allegedly turned off a surveillance camera at the downtown Miami jail in April.
What's causing this crisis and who's being held?
The decision by Florida to swiftly construct the contentious "Alligator Alcatraz" prison in the Everglades, which would house up to 5,000 undocumented migrants awaiting deportation, was influenced by the extreme overcrowding in all three facilities.
In mid-June, there were 56,400 immigration detentions nationwide on average per day, with nearly 72% of those detained having no criminal history. Inhumane conditions within federal immigration facilities have gotten considerably worse since Trump's January inauguration and subsequent push to increase detentions and deportations, as evidenced by the documented abuses.
FAQs
What kind of abuse did migrants report inside the ICE jails?
They claimed they were shackled, denied food, and forced to eat on their knees.
Which Florida ICE jails were involved?
Detention facilities in downtown Miami, Krome North, and Broward Transitional were all named.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Company advised by Trump sons said it hoped to benefit from fed money, then took it back
A public document filed by a company that just hired President Donald Trump's two oldest sons as advisers included a sentence early Monday that said it hoped to benefit from grants and other incentives from the federal government, which their father happens to lead. But when The Associated Press asked the Trump family business about the apparent conflict of interest, the document was revised and the line taken out. Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are getting 'founder shares' worth millions of dollars in New America Acquisition 1 Corp., a company with no operating business that hopes to fill that hole by purchasing an American company that can play 'a meaningful role in revitalizing domestic manufacturing,' according to the filing. The president has geared his trade policy toward boosting manufacturing in the U.S. The original version of the securities filing said the target company should be 'well positioned' to tap federal or state government incentives. That reference was taken out of the revised version. The Trump Organization didn't reply to a question about whether New America still planned to benefit from government programs or why the line was cut. But the outside law firm Paul Hastings that helped prepare the document sent an email to AP saying it was 'mistake' made by 'scriveners,' an old term for transcribers of legal papers. Kathleen Clark, an expert in government ethics, said any excuses are too late because the Trumps had already tipped their hand. 'They just deleted the language. They haven't committed not to do what they said earlier today they were planning to do,' said the Washington University law professor and Trump critic. 'It's an attempt to exploit public office for private profit.' New America is what's know as a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. It's a publicly traded company that exists solely to use its funds to acquire another company and take the target public. New America plans to raise money by selling new stock on the New York Stock Exchange at $10 a share. That will hand the two Trump sons a potential total of $50 million in paper wealth the moment the stock begins trading on the first day. The company hopes to sell enough shares to raise $300 million, which it then plans to use buying a yet unidentified manufacturer. A press release issued by New America saying it was focused on 'American values and priorities.' It made no mention of the aim to get government incentives. The filing to New America's potential new investors to the Securities and Exchange Commission was explicit about what it was looking for in a target company. It said, among other things, it wanted a company that can ride 'public policy tailwinds' by benefiting from federal or state 'grants, tax credits, government contracts or preferential procurement programs.'
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why Trump's tariff move isn't likely to shake India's oil ties with Russia
Donald Trump has made a lot of noise about India's oil trade with Russia, calling it profiteering and threatening to 'substantially raise' tariffs on Indian goods. But New Delhi isn't blinking. As reported by TOI, a senior Indian government official put it plainly, 'We will go solely by the interest of our consumers and opt for the best option price-wise. If Russian crude works out cheaper than what we can get from other sources, why should we penalise our consumers?' The Centre has so far not made any move to wean off Indian oil refiners from Russian crude, which comes at a steep discount compared to purchases from west Asia or US. It has not just helped keep domestic pump prices lower, but also benefited European countries, which have been major buyers of diesel and jet fuel from India, sources told TOI. The economic logic is straightforward. Russian oil has been cheaper than what's available from West Asia or the US. India's refiners are not just cutting costs—they're helping stabilise fuel prices at home. And here's the kicker: Europe benefits too, as Indian refiners export refined fuels like diesel and jet fuel, some of which reach European markets. Trump's pressure tactics and the political showmanship Trump's frustration is spilling over into tariff threats. His core accusation? 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine .' He followed that with, 'Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' No actual figures were given. But just last week, he'd already slapped a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods and floated a possible jump to 100 per cent unless India stops buying Russian oil. Trump's new deadline is August 7. If Russia doesn't agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine, he's hinted at secondary sanctions on countries that continue trading energy with Moscow. That includes India, China, and Brazil. But these threats are running into hard economic and political realities. Why Russian oil imports still makes sense for India After the West sanctioned Moscow in 2022, Russia started offering deep discounts on its oil. That's when India stepped in. It now buys around 1.7 million barrels a day of Russian crude, according to Bloomberg data. India isn't just stockpiling it. In the first half of this year, it exported 1.4 million barrels a day of refined fuels. About 40 per cent of that was diesel or gasoil, and 30 per cent was petrol and blending components. Refiners blend multiple sources of crude before producing fuels, so it's not always clear which exports came from Russian barrels. But the volume speaks for itself. And the trade hasn't slowed down. Over the weekend, at least four tankers delivered millions of barrels of Russian crude to Indian ports. India pushes back: No apologies, no shift in strategy India's Ministry of External Affairs had a sharp response. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' it said. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.' It also pointed out that the US and EU themselves continue to trade with Russia, even when there's no national compulsion. India's position has been consistent. The decision to buy Russian oil was triggered when traditional suppliers diverted their barrels to Europe. It was the US, in fact, that nudged India to continue those purchases—albeit within the G7's price cap. Energy Minister Hardeep Singh Puri told CNBC in July that the Russian crude trade helped global prices stay in check, saying India was advised by Washington to keep buying—'but within the price cap.' NSA Doval heads to Moscow National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is heading to Moscow this week. The visit is expected to offer clarity on how India plans to navigate what officials call a 'geo-economic trilemma': cheap energy, political pressure, and long-term security interests. India has not made any move to scale back Russian imports. If anything, officials are eyeing additional discounts in light of Trump's bluster. Even business circles in Delhi are calling out the former US president's rhetoric. A statement from trade research body GTRI summed it up, 'India's oil trade with Russia has taken place with full transparency and broad understanding with the US… Trump's decision to raise tariffs on India citing oil trade is not only unjustified—it ignores market realities, misrepresents trade data, and undermines a key strategic partnership in the Indo-Pacific.' The BRICS factor and Dollar alternatives This isn't just about oil. Trump has also slammed India's involvement in BRICS and the bloc's discussions around alternatives to the US dollar. He's claimed India has the 'most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers' and is using tariffs as leverage to open up Indian markets to US agriculture and dairy—an area where India has refused to budge. One official noted that despite discussions, India would not allow imports of genetically modified American corn and soybean. Nor would it revise its stand on farm and dairy tariffs, which Trump has repeatedly criticised. India's energy alternatives, but only if needed If forced to diversify, India could boost imports from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the US. In fact, last week saw India's largest refiner suddenly snap up several million barrels from the US and UAE—moves widely interpreted as precautionary, not strategic shifts. India had, during trade talks, shown interest in ramping up imports of American gas, fertiliser, and defence equipment to improve the trade balance. But there are limits. Modi has refused to open up sensitive sectors like dairy, even as the US pushes hard. Trump and Modi were once seen as political allies. That relationship has cooled. The current standoff is the latest in a string of Trump-led escalations over oil, trade barriers, and foreign policy. From threatening to block access to US markets over India-Pakistan tensions, to taking credit for peace deals India denies happened, Trump's combative posture has worn thin in Delhi. His latest push threatening penalties on anyone still paying for Russian oil reflects growing frustration with Putin's unwillingness to compromise. Trump's nuclear submarine move last week, reportedly in response to Dmitry Medvedev's rhetoric, only adds to the volatility. But India, for now, isn't shifting course. As one Indian official summed it up, 'We are guided by what's best for Indian consumers, not what's best for Washington politics.' And that might be the line that defines this whole saga.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Decision made': Israel to take full control of the Gaza Strip? IDF may enter hostage-held areas
In a major development, Israel may come up with a new plan for Gaza Strip that may include the possibility of taking full control of the Palestinian enclave and escalating military action in areas they have refrained from entering, according to local media reports. This signals a dramatic escalation in its nearly two-year-long war against the Hamas terror group. Quoting a senior source in Netanyahu's office, prominent Israeli journalist Amit Segal of Channel 12 reported, 'The decision has been made… we are going to occupy the Gaza Strip." The move comes amid a total breakdown in ceasefire negotiations and growing frustration within the Israeli leadership over the lack of progress on freeing hostages held by Hamas since the conflict's early days. "Hamas will not release hostages without total surrender. If we do not operate now, the hostages will die of starvation, and Gaza will remain under Hamas' control," Segal quoted the official as saying, according to a report from Fox News. A turning point in a protracted war The Israeli Security Cabinet is set to convene on Tuesday to finalise the next steps in Gaza. According to The Times of Israel, several ministers confirmed that Netanyahu has privately used the term "occupation of the Strip" to describe his intentions, a sharp pivot from the government's previous reluctance to re-enter densely populated zones. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top Audiologists Angry About New $160 Device That Makes Hearing Crystal Clear Again Top Trending News Today Learn More Undo A senior official quoted by the Ynet news site said bluntly, "The die is cast — we are going for a full occupation of the Gaza Strip." Currently, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) control around 75% of Gaza's territory. The new plan would see Israeli forces enter all remaining areas, including zones where hostages are reportedly being held, a controversial move that could risk the lives of captives and escalate civilian casualties. Divisions within Israeli leadership According to The Times of Israel, the reported shift has exposed internal cracks within Israel's military and political establishment. According to Hebrew media, IDF Chief of Staff Lt Gen Eyal Zamir opposes the occupation strategy. In response, a senior source close to Netanyahu allegedly said, "If the chief of staff doesn't agree, he should resign." The rift underscores the deep unease surrounding the operational and humanitarian implications of such a full-scale takeover, especially at a time when Gaza's infrastructure is in ruins, and humanitarian aid remains insufficient. US envoy's visit fails to halt escalation The decision to escalate comes just days after US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff visited Israel to promote a new peace framework. Despite assurances that negotiations were ongoing, both sides now appear to have abandoned diplomatic channels. Netanyahu's reported plan, if approved, could have sweeping consequences for Gaza's over two million residents, as well as for regional stability. Aid agencies have warned that continued fighting, especially in densely populated urban pockets, could trigger a humanitarian catastrophe.
