Supreme Court agrees to hear next week plea on Nishikant Dubey's remarks on judiciary
NEW DELHI:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear next week a plea flagging BJP MP Nishikant Dubey's recent criticism of the apex court and Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna.
The matter was mentioned for urgent listing before a bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih.
The counsel told the bench that
and after the video of his remarks went viral, derogatory phrases were being used on social media for the top court.
"This is a very serious issue," the counsel said.
"What (do) you want to file? You want to file a contempt petition?" Justice Gavai asked.
The counsel, who has already filed a petition in the apex court, said the government was not taking action against Dubey.
The counsel said one of his colleagues wrote to Attorney General R Venkataramani seeking consent to initiate contempt proceedings against Dubey but no action had been taken till date.
"The issue is, at least give directions today to the social media platforms to remove this video," he said.
The bench said the matter would be listed for hearing next week.
On Monday, the top court told another petitioner that he did not need its permission to file a contempt petition against Dubey over his remarks.
Dubey launched a broadside against the Supreme Court on Saturday, saying Parliament and state assemblies should be shut if the apex court has to make laws.
He also took a swipe at CJI Khanna, holding him responsible for "civil wars" in the country.
The BJP MP's remarks came following the Centre's assurance to the court that it would not be implementing some of the contentious provisions of
Later, Anas Tanveer, a Supreme Court lawyer representing one of the litigants in the Waqf Act case, wrote to Attorney General R Venkatramani seeking consent to initiate contempt proceedings against Dubey over his "grossly scandalous" remarks "aimed at lowering the dignity" of the top court.
The BJP on Saturday distanced itself from Dubey's criticism of the Supreme Court, with party president J P Nadda calling the comments his personal views.
He also affirmed the ruling party's respect for the judiciary as an inseparable part of democracy.
Nadda said he had directed party leaders not to make such comments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's Russian arms deals ‘rubbed US the wrong way', but trends changing now: US Commerce Secretary Lutnick
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said a trade agreement between the United States and India could be finalised in the 'not-too-distant future', pointing to a growing alignment in strategic and economic interests. Speaking at the eighth US-India Strategic Partnership Forum in Washington, DC, Lutnick confirmed that 'you should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not too distant future.' He added, 'When they put the right person in India, put the right person on the other side of the table, and we've managed (that), I think.' His comments arrive as both sides rush to reach a deal before the 9 July deadline set by US President Donald Trump. The US had earlier threatened sweeping tariffs to rebalance what it called unfair trade arrangements, with the exception of China. However, Washington later paused those tariffs for 90 days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Shifting gears on defence buys Lutnick highlighted that one of the issues previously souring US-India ties was New Delhi's traditional preference for purchasing military equipment from Russia. 'There were certain things that the Indian government did that generally rubbed the United States the wrong way,' Lutnick said. 'For instance, you generally buy your military gear from Russia. That's a way to kind of get under the skin of America if you're going to buy your armaments from Russia. I think India starting to move towards buying military equipment from the United States, which then goes a long way.' Live Events However, Lutnick made it clear that this is changing: 'I think India [is] starting to move towards buying military equipment from the United States, which then goes a long way. And these kind of things—just creating that relationship—being a part of BRICS, which is, 'oh, let's move to not support the dollar and dollar hegemony'—that's not really the way to make friends and influence people in America.' He praised India's openness to addressing these concerns directly. 'The President calls that out directly and specifically, and the Indian government is addressing it specifically. And that's how you move on to a really positive place. Put it on the table, address it straight on, resolve it straight on and get to a really good place. And I think that's where we are,' he said. India's historical reliance on Russia for defence equipment has long been a sticking point in its relations with Washington. With the backdrop of increasing US sanctions on Russian firms and growing pressure on global partners to reduce ties with Moscow, New Delhi's procurement strategy has drawn scrutiny. Lutnick acknowledged this history but stressed that things are changing. 'The President calls that out directly and specifically, and the Indian government is addressing it specifically. And that's how you move on to a really positive place,' he said. He urged transparency and direct engagement, saying, 'Put it on the table, address it straight on, resolve it straight on and get to a really good place. And I think that's where we are.' $500 billion trade goal set The US-India Strategic Partnership Forum, where Lutnick spoke, focused on scaling up trade and political engagement. Ahead of the summit, Lutnick was expected to 'share his insights on strengthening the U.S.-India strategic and economic partnership to achieve the goal set by President Trump and Prime Minister Modi for $500 billion in bilateral trade.' India's current trade with the US stands at approximately $191 billion. Both countries have agreed to negotiate the first phase of a broad bilateral trade agreement by September or October 2025. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal also confirmed progress, saying, 'Both countries are committed to work together, both countries desire to give preferential access to each other's businesses and we are working towards the bilateral trade agreement.' The aim is to more than double trade volume by 2030. Deals on a fast track—unusual, but urgent At the forum, Lutnick acknowledged that trade deals of this scale are typically slow-moving. But current urgency has created momentum. 'These kinds of deals used to take two or three years and we're trying to get them done in a month, which is just not the ordinary DNA of trading relationships between countries,' he said. He also applauded New Delhi's approach: 'I think India is trying hard to be one of the earlier countries, which I appreciate.' Lutnick, a known supporter of using tariffs as negotiation tools, clarified that lowering India's tariff barriers was 'absolutely on the table.' He said, 'Bringing them down to a level that is reasonable and appropriate so we can be great trading partners with each other, I think is absolutely on the table.' Modi-Trump rapport a factor The commerce secretary credited the personal connection between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump as a foundation for smooth negotiations. 'President Donald Trump is the only person in our administration elected by the full United States of America and so does PM Modi in India,' he said, noting that this similarity creates a 'pretty unique' understanding. 'This relationship is very strong and positive, making way for an easy path to trade negotiations because we start from a very positive place,' Lutnick added. Praise for Modi from US lawmakers The admiration didn't end there. Rich McCormick, US Congressman and co-chair of the India Caucus, described Modi as 'the most influential politician ever in India, probably the most influential person in India since (Mahatma) Gandhi.' He also praised Modi's grassroots connection: 'People who knew him before he became the Prime Minister talked about him staying and sleeping on the floor when they came to visit.' McCormick added that India's economic trajectory now mirrors American values: 'They're on the right track, as a matter of fact, in some ways, I think they're almost more American than we are right now, in that capitalistic mindset.' Soft diplomacy from the Second Lady Second Lady Usha Vance, who visited India in April with Vice President JD Vance and their children, also shared a personal anecdote. Recalling their visit to the Prime Minister's residence, she said, 'Our son was just so taken by everything and then taken by the entire cart of mangoes that was available for him to eat that he announced to the Prime Minister that he thought he could maybe live there.' She added, 'They've been all over the place and had wonderful opportunities to see the world, but this was really special to them.' (with inputs from ANI)
News18
an hour ago
- News18
'Trade Deal With India Soon': US Commerce Secretary Praises PM Modi, His Ties With Trump
Last Updated: US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick praised PM Narendra Modi and expressed optimism about a forthcoming US-India trade deal. Howard Lutnick, US Secretary of Commerce, on Tuesday praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi and said he was optimistic for a trade deal between India and the United States. Speaking at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum Annual Leadership Summit in Washington, DC, Lutnick also said President Donald Trump deeply admires and respects India. 'We have a great relationship between our countries. I'm optimistic for a trade deal soon that will benefit both nations," Lutnick said at the Summit. 'President Donald Trump is the only person in our administration elected by the full United States of America, and so is Prime Minister Modi in India. If you think about the world, how many other leaders have actually been elected by their country? Very, very rare, so that connection is pretty unique because it's rare," he said. 'So their (Trump and PM Modi's) relationship is very strong and very positive. That gives me an easy path to trade negotiations because we start from a very positive place," Lutnick added. Also speaking about Donald Trump's 'America First' doctrine, Lutnick said, 'The President thinks America first, but he does not think America only or America exclusively." 'First, he's got to take care of home, so we're big and strong. But then he's going to take care of his allies. He is going to make sure he takes care of India, which he deeply, deeply admires and respects, and we are going to have a great, great relationship together," the US Commerce Secretary said. First Published: June 03, 2025, 07:56 IST
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Jaipur royal family wants state to return 140-year-old Town Hall: SC to decide whether claim justified as per 1949 merger covenant
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine whether a pre-Constitution Covenant facilitating merger of Jaipur princely state with Dominion of India decide the ownership right of the royal family over 145-year-old Sawai Man Singh Town Hall, or Old Vidhan Sabha now proposed to be converted into a Heritage Museum? Or are the jurisdiction of the courts, including the SC, is ousted under Article 363 of the Constitution from entertaining any dispute arising from treaties and Covenants entered between any ruler of an Indian state and to which the government of the Dominion of India or any of its predecessor governments was a party. The state's Oct 2022 decision to convert the building, used as state assembly from 1952 till the 1990s, as heritage museum alarmed the royal family members of the attempt to erase their ownership over the property, which according to them was acknowledged in the March 1949 Covenant signed between government of India and United states of Rajasthan. Under the agreed terms of the Covenant, the princely states of Banswara, Bikaner, Bundi, Dungarpur, Jaipur, Jaisalmer, Jhalawar, Jodhpur, Kishangarh, Kota, Mewar, Pratapgarh, Shahpur and Tonk merged with Dominion of India. Under the Covenant, the title of the private properties of the princely state rulers would continue to vest in them. For the Jaipur royal family, senior advocates Harish Salve and Vibha D Makhija said Article 363 - which bars the jurisdiction of the courts, including that of the SC - to entertain any dispute arising from treaty or Covenant needs to be given a restrictive meaning as it cannot extinguish titles of royal families over their private properties. A partial working day bench comprising Justices Prashant K Mishra and A G Masih was initially reluctant to entertain the petition as it apprehended that this would enable the heirs of erstwhile rulers of princely states to lay claim over huge tracts of land and villages owned by them earlier. But Salve said it pertains to only a few properties mentioned in the Covenant and not for widening the title rights over villages. When the bench issued notice to the Rajasthan govt, its additional advocate general Shiv M Sharma and advocate Kartikeya informed the court that it would honour the pendency of the case before the HC and not precipitate the issue. The state govt's Oct 2022 decision to convert the Town Hall into a heritage museum had forced the royal family members to file a civil suit seeking possession of the property. Though the suit was entertained, the trial court refused to stay the proposed conversion into a museum. The state moved the HC questioning maintainability of the suit in the face of clear bar under Article 363. The royal family members moved HC for interim injunction against the museum. The HC rejected the plea for status quo. When they challenged the HC order, the SC too refused to stay on the proposed museum but ordered an expeditious decision on the suit. On Apr 17 this year, the HC on state's appeal ruled that the royal family members' suit against the state under the Covenant is barred under Article 363.
