logo
This viral critic of the Davos elite is both admirable and annoying

This viral critic of the Davos elite is both admirable and annoying

Telegraph24-04-2025

The Dutch historian Rutger Bregman is best known as a gadfly to the global elite. He went viral online in 2019 when, speaking on stage at Davos, he criticised attendees of the World Economic Forum for avoiding tax and taking private jets to Switzerland to listen to Sir David Attenborough talk about climate change. When Tucker Carlson then invited him on Fox News, Bregman pointed out that his host was 'a millionaire funded by billionaires'. Carlson insulted him and pulled the segment. Bregman's own recording of that exchange went viral too.
Bregman's first book was Utopia for Realists (2017), which argued in favour of universal basic income and a 15-hour workweek, and was buoyed by a popular TED talk on poverty. Humankind: A Hopeful History, a feelgood book out in 2020 – when readers were desperate to feel good – argued that human beings are, at heart, A-OK.
Moral Ambition: Stop Wasting Your Talent and Start Making a Difference, translated from Dutch by Erica Moore, offers something of a corrective to that optimism, or at least the brand of optimism that's laced with complacency. Bregman told Big Think magazine last year that he saw 'influencers reading Humankind [who] started posting: 'My faith in humanity is completely restored. I'm going to work less and just enjoy my life.'' It alarmed him: 'I felt I had created a monster.'
The cold water he douses on readers of Moral Ambition, as its subtitle implies, is an injunction: don't just stand there, do something. Bregman faults his fellow progressives for armchair activism, citing the ineffectiveness of contemporary protest movements such as Occupy compared to the coordinated efforts, say, of the Montgomery bus boycott of 1955. He also urges activists to set aside differences if they want to reach bigger goals. Coalition-building requires compromise; otherwise, he warns, 'you end up with a movement that's 100 per cent pure, but zero per cent effective.'
Bregman urges educated professionals to move away from what the anthropologist David Graeber dubbed 'bulls--t jobs', in fields such as consultancy, and instead to pursue socially meaningful work. 'Of all things wasted in our throwaway times,' Bregman writes, 'the greatest is wasted talent.' He highlights the paths of altruists such as the abolitionist Thomas Clarkson, the civil-rights activist Rosa Parks, and Rob Mather, founder of a malaria-fighting charity. Some of the case studies are instructive at the everyday scale: people, we learn, are more likely to help when they're directly asked.
Bregman's ambitions are admirable. If even a small percentage of those who pick up this book are spurred to action, whether that's a charity run or a complete change in career, it's hard to disagree that it will have been worth his effort. (The idea resonated personally: I left what he would consider a bulls--t job in investment banking to write a book about the future of seduction that I hoped readers would find helpful.)
The delivery of the message, however, is irksome. Bregman, the son of a pastor, is too susceptible to sermonising, and like most pop philosophy-history-psychology writers in the Malcolm Gladwell mould, he's prone to hyperbole and gross oversimplification. Twenty-five years after Gladwell's The Tipping Point, the Big Ideas genre continues to sell healthily – especially to a type the writer Gavin Jacobson has dubbed 'Waterstones Dad' – but its formula of anecdotes and simplistic diagrams isn't ageing well.
Bregman opens his book by making the curious choice to upbraid a Buddhist monk, Matthieu Ricard, whose brain activity in an MRI scan saw him branded 'the happiest man in the world'. Bregman's beef with Ricard, formerly a molecular geneticist who researched colonic bacteria, is that he had ditched the Institut Pasteur in Paris for a monastic life in Tibet, thereby depriving the world of his potential contribution to science. (He somewhat redeems himself in Bregman's eyes by later setting up a nonprofit.) Yet Ricard is also a bestselling author, having written books on altruism, happiness, meditation and animal rights, and translated numerous Buddhist texts. When you consider that Bregman is telling us all this in a book of his own, and the ripple effects of books are not quantifiable anyway, you wonder: who's to say whether Bregman or Ricard has the greater moral ambition?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP senators break ranks on Trump's military parade - one compares it to North Korea
GOP senators break ranks on Trump's military parade - one compares it to North Korea

The Independent

time6 hours ago

  • The Independent

GOP senators break ranks on Trump's military parade - one compares it to North Korea

Rand Paul has become the first Republican senator to break ranks on President Donald Trump's military parade, comparing it to North Korea. The parade, which officials estimate will cost a maximum of $45 million, will be held on June 14 to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday, which also happens to fall on Trump's 79th birthday. The Kentucky fiscal hawk told reporters in Washington, D.C. Tuesday that he's 'never been a big fan of goose-stepping soldiers in big tanks and missiles rolling down the street. So if you asked me, I wouldn't have done it,' Fox News Chief National Security Correspondent Jennifer Griffin reported on X. Paul said he's not sure what the actual cost of the parade will be, and then took his criticism a step further by comparing it to the military parades of strongman states. 'We were always different than the images you saw of the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that. And I don't, I'm not proposing that that's the image people want to project, but I'm worried about the image that it isn't necessarily the best image to show,' Paul said. Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana, another Republican who advocates for spending cuts, told reporters on Capitol Hill Tuesday in reaction to Trump's military parade: ' I wouldn't spend the money if it were me,' according to Griffin. 'The United States of America is the most powerful country in all of human history. We're a lion, and a lion doesn't have to tell you it's a lion. Everybody else in the jungle knows, and we're a lion. I would save the money, but if the president wants to have a parade, he's the President, and I'm not,' he said. Other GOP senators have also questioned the cost of the parade, including Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker of Mississippi and Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins of Maine. Still, their comments haven't gone as far as Paul and Kennedy's. Republican Senator Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin fiscal hawk, told Politico in an article published last Thursday, 'If it costs money, I won't go.' The parade will feature around 6,600 Army troops and military equipment such as a WWII-vintage B-25 bomber, a P-1 fighter and Huey helicopters used in the Vietnam War, according to Politico. Reuters reported that there will also be 25 M1 Abrams tanks, 28 Stryker armored vehicles, and four Paladin self-propelled artillery vehicles. There will also be 18 miles of fencing and 175 metal detectors installed, The Associated Press reported. According to NBC News, it may cost as much as $16 million to repair the streets of Washington, D.C. after the parade. But Trump said the cost of the event is 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it,' in a May 4 interview on NBC News' Meet the Press. 'We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it,' he said.

Hunter Biden quietly drops ‘revenge porn' lawsuit against Fox over airing of explicit images
Hunter Biden quietly drops ‘revenge porn' lawsuit against Fox over airing of explicit images

The Independent

time13 hours ago

  • The Independent

Hunter Biden quietly drops ‘revenge porn' lawsuit against Fox over airing of explicit images

Hunter Biden has dropped his lawsuit against Fox News over the broadcasting of sexually explicit images as part of a 2022 series entitled The Trial of Hunter Biden. Biden initially threatened to sue Fox in April last year, leading to the streaming platform Fox Nation removing the program. Biden subsequently sued Fox in July 2024, but dropped the lawsuit after just a few weeks. He launched yet another lawsuit in October, which he dropped late last week. 'We are pleased to move on now that Hunter Biden has finally voluntarily withdrawn this meritless case, which proved to be nothing more than a politically motivated stunt,' Fox told media outlets in a statement. Biden's initial lawsuit argued that Fox had crossed the bounds of New York 's Civil Rights Law Sec 52-b, which handles what's known as 'revenge porn.' In late October 2022, the show hit the airwaves after being promoted as showing 'how a possible Hunter Biden trial might look.' While Biden's attorneys haven't stated why they dismissed the suit, they recently failed in an attempt to move it to New York state court from federal court. In Friday's court filing, his attorneys said he was dropping the case 'with prejudice' meaning that he can't file it another time. Biden's July filing stated, 'Far from reporting on a newsworthy event, Fox sought to commercialize Mr. Biden's personality through a form of treatment distinct from the dissemination of news or information. Indeed, the entire miniseries is fictionalized and based on a nonexistent criminal case.' 'This entirely politically motivated lawsuit is devoid of merit,' Fox told Mediaite at the time. 'The core complaint stems from a 2022 streaming program that Mr. Biden did not complain about until sending a letter in late April 2024.' 'The program was removed within days of the letter, in an abundance of caution, but Hunter Biden is a public figure who has been the subject of multiple investigations and is now a convicted felon,' the network added. 'Consistent with the First Amendment, FOX News has accurately covered the newsworthy events of Mr. Biden's own making, and we look forward to vindicating our rights in court.' The Fox program investigated Biden's business deals in Ukraine and China during his father's time as vice president. It also reviewed his struggles with alcoholism and drug abuse. The show included intimate images of Biden with a number of women, with the images seemingly coming from his laptop that he dropped off at a Delaware repair shop in April 2019. Last year, Biden was convicted on federal gun charges and pleaded guilty to tax violations connected to his business deals abroad. It was, however, never alleged that he attempted to unlawfully lobby the government on behalf of foreign clients, as the Fox series suggested. Before Biden was sentenced, his father, then-President Joe Biden, issued a full pardon even after repeatedly saying he wouldn't do so.

Government facing ‘walk of shame' over Chinese embassy decision
Government facing ‘walk of shame' over Chinese embassy decision

Powys County Times

timea day ago

  • Powys County Times

Government facing ‘walk of shame' over Chinese embassy decision

Plans for a Chinese super-embassy in central London have become a 'walk of shame' for the Government, a former leader of the Conservative Party has said. Sir Iain Duncan Smith said response by the Government to the proposed embassy near the the capital's financial district had become 'Project Kowtow', as he criticised the Government for 'one denial after another (and) one betrayal after another'. Sir Iain referred to the warnings reportedly issued by the White House and Dutch government to Downing Street over the plans, which is set to be scrutinised by ministers. The worries stem from the close proximity of the proposed embassy's Royal Mint Court site to data centres and communication cables. The Sunday Times said the US was 'deeply concerned' about the plans, quoting a senior US official. In response, planning minister Matthew Pennycook said he could not give a full response as the matter was still to come before the department for a decision, and any verdict could be challenged by the courts. Sir Iain said: 'Beijing has a recent history of cutting cables and confirmed infrastructure hacks, including embedding malware capable of disabling all that infrastructure. 'Minister Peter Kyle yesterday on television said surprisingly that this was in the planning process and could be managed. Will the minister correct this record? The planning inquiry has concluded, no changes can be made to the Chinese planning application at all. 'I'll remind him the application contains nothing about cabling. Indeed to the inquiry, the Chinese have rejected only two requests, which he referred to actually, made by the Government in the letter from the foreign and home secretaries, despite ministers regularly saying that this letter, and I quote, should give those concerned, 'comfort'.' The Conservative MP said rerouting the cables would cost millions of pounds, and asked Mr Pennycook why the Government had denied the existence of cables until the White House confirmed it. He asked Mr Pennycook to deny reports by Chinese state media, saying the UK had given the Chinese assurances that it would allow a development 'no matter what'. He added: 'I see this as Project Kowtow, one denial after another, one betrayal after another. No wonder our allies believe that this Chinese mega embassy is now becoming a walk of shame for the Government.' Mr Pennycook replied because of the 'quasi-judicial nature' of his role, he could not comment on details of the application. He also said it would not be 'appropriate' for him to comment on the cabling or national security issues. He said he did not 'recognise the characterisation' by the Sunday Times of the embassy being raised in talks between the UK and China on trade. 'It is important to also emphasise that only material planning considerations can be taken into account in determining this case,' he said. 'But, as I say, I cannot comment in any detail on a case and it is not yet before the department.' Tory shadow communities secretary Kevin Hollinrake said Parliament had been treated with disdain by the Government. Mr Hollinrake said: 'Question after question, letter after letter, the Government has consistently treated Parliament with complete disregard on this matter. Stonewalling legitimate inquiries about national security, about ministerial discussions, and warnings about security bodies.' He added: 'Why won't the Government follow the examples of the US, Australian, and Irish governments which veto similar embassies that threaten their national security? 'The Government is on the verge of making a decision that will lead to huge risk, that will persist for decades. Will they change course before it is too late?' Mr Pennycook replied: 'No decision has been made on this case. No application is yet before the department.' Marie Rimmer, Labour MP for St Helens South and Whiston, said: 'China has a track record of aggressive state-backed espionage, and surely this country cannot afford to make a massive underestimation of what risk if this would go ahead?' She added: 'We cannot not say anything in this House. We must comment on what we see, and please understand that we must do so.' Meanwhile, former security minister, Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat, asked whether the Government believed the Chinese would treat a similar application in the same way. He said: 'Do you honestly believe that thr minister thinks that the Chinese would look at this proposal in the same way? 'Do we actually in this House believe that our economic security being threatened, as highlighted by the Americans and the Dutch, would go through a bureaucratic planning process with no ability to vary it because, frankly, them's the orders? 'I don't think that's the way China would do it, and it's certainly not the way we should.' Mr Pennycook replied: 'I'm very glad that we have a different and more robust planning system than the People's Republic of China.' Later in the session, Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) asked if the officer considering the case is 'cleared to receive top secret information'. Mr Pennycook replied: 'A planning inspector is assessing the case as part of a public inquiry. 'And I'm afraid, while I recognise why (Mr Jopp) has asked the question, it would not be appropriate for me to comment on national security matters.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store