CDC continuing cruise ship inspections despite staffing cuts
"This work has not stopped as the VSP is primarily staffed by [U.S. Public Health Service officers]," a CDC spokesperson told Food Safety News.
Those commissioned officers were not among those who were released from the CDC amid the Trump administration's reduction of the federal workforce.
The inspections are being carried out by half the number of inspectors, though, Food Safety News reported on Wednesday.
The USPHS has a dozen inspectors to conduct safety inspections of cruise ships while they are docked at U.S. ports, which is down from 24 inspectors.
Cruise ship firms fund the CDC's Vessel Sanitation Program through fees charged to their passengers and no taxpayer dollars pay for the service.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. recently announced he would fire 10,000 of the agency's staff, and the CDC has released 2,400 people.
The staffing reductions caused some media outlets to incorrectly report the Vessel Sanitation Program had been eliminated, but the reductions do make the work more challenging.
"It really compromises everything and makes it difficult for them to travel globally and do those inspections in Europe or wherever it might be," Erik Svendsen, director of the CDC's Division of Environmental Health, Science and Practice, told USA Today.
Svendsen is among CDC staffers who are on administrative leave until June and will not be employed afterward.
He said USPHS officers board cruise ships to complete the health inspections that help ensure the vessels are safe for passengers.
Officials for the Cruise Lines International Association trade organization said its members are continuing to follow established safety guidelines as required by the Vessel Sanitation Program.
"Our current understanding from the CDC is that the Vessel Sanitation Program, which is voluntary and funded by the cruise industry, will continue to operate," CLIA officials told USA Today in a prepared statement.
"Additionally, public reports have noted that the program is administered and staffed primarily by commissioned U.S. Public Health officers, so we expect some programmatic activities to continue in some capacity," the statement said.
The CDC says about 12.5 million passengers embarked from ports in North America in 2022 and face an elevated risk of contagious diseases.
"Traveling on cruise ships exposes people to new environments and high volumes of people, including other travelers," the CDC says.
"This exposure can create the risk for illness from contaminated food or water or, more commonly, through person-to-person contact."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Walks Back on Key Campaign Pledge: Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump appears to have walked back on a key campaign pledge he made last year regarding in vitro fertilization (IVF), according to a Sunday report from The Washington Post. The newspaper reported that the Trump administration has moved away from plans to improve access to the reproductive healthcare policy due to legal constraints. Newsweek could not verify the report and has contacted the White House outside of normal business hours to comment on this story. Why It Matters IVF is a key reproductive treatment for women finding it difficult to become pregnant. The White House previously said that it can cost up to $25,000 per cycle and that 1 in 7 couples struggle to conceive. Trump made a pledge on the campaign trail to cover IVF for all women and couples seeking it, telling NBC News last August: "Under the Trump administration, we are going to be paying for that treatment. Or we're going to be mandating that the insurance company pay." Trump also called himself the "fertilization president" at a Women's History Month event in March, promising "tremendous goodies" for women. What To Know Upon returning to the White House for a second term earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order on February 18 expanding access to IVF and making it more affordable for patients. The order, which addressed the importance of starting families, also directed agencies to safeguard access to IVF and directed his domestic policy council to submit policy recommendations about IVF by May 19. The executive order came amid growing legal concerns over reproductive rights in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. That ruling allowed some states to enact abortion bans that, in some cases, threaten access to IVF by defining life as beginning at conception. It also came amid concerns about falling birth rates in the U.S. The fertility rate is now projected to average 1.6 births per woman over the next three decades, according to the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO) latest forecast released this year. That is below the replacement rate of 2.1 births per woman required to maintain a stable population without immigration. As of August, there have been no further updates from the White House regarding IVF policies. The Post, citing two people with knowledge of internal discussions who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations, reported that White House officials said they were still interested in expanding IVF but that there were legal constraints with making it an essential health benefit without congressional approval. Expanding access to IVF would come at odds with Trump and other conservative's opposition to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, the insurance plan that allows access to health care. The Post reported that White House officials are backing away from proposals discussed internally to mandate IVF coverage for the roughly 50 million people on the Obamacare exchanges. The first Trump administration tried to repeal the ACA. Using it to cover IVF by making it an "essential health benefit" would require insurers in the marketplace to cover it and would lead insurance companies to raise premium costs, which could hurt the GOP in next year's midterms, the newspaper reported. Kaylen Silverberg, an outside adviser to the administration, told the Post that the White House had approached him about fertility methods that use holistic health instead of IVF. Silverberg added that officials had asked him about restorative reproductive medicine, a method of treating infertility by improving overall health via lifestyle changes. Implementing that would fall "very short" of Trump's initial promises, Silverberg told the newspaper. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport, on August 3 in Allentown, Pennsylvania. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport, on August 3 in Allentown, Pennsylvania. AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson What People Are Saying Mark Shanahan, who teaches American politics at the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom, told Newsweek: "On the campaign trail, Trump said what he needed to say in order to win the 2024 presidential election. Being in office is very different. While he has been able to largely fulfil his campaign promises on foreign policy and issues such as immigration and the size of government through Executive Order, mandating IVF availability requires Congressional support, and with tight majorities in both chambers he's clearly decided it's a hill not worth dying on." Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman told the Post: "President Trump pledged to expand access to fertility treatments for Americans who are struggling to start families. The Administration is committed like none before it to using its authorities to deliver on this pledge." What Happens Next? Whether the White House unveils policies regarding IVF remains to be seen. Meanwhile, the administration has put forth other policies regarding reproduction. In the One Big Beautiful Bill, health care providers who carry out abortions and receive more than $800,000 in federal reimbursements are banned from getting Medicaid funding for a year.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Colorado kindergartners' vaccine rates lag in 2025
Vaccination rates among Colorado kindergartners stayed stubbornly low during the 2024-2025 school year, new CDC data shows. Why it matters: The stagnation comes as U.S. measles cases reach a 33-year high, and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. challenges long-standing vaccine norms ahead of the start of school. By the numbers: 4.2% of Colorado kindergartners were exempt from one or more vaccines — unchanged from last year and above the national average of 3.6%. Colorado's goal for herd immunity is 95% coverage for core vaccines like MMR, which protects against measles, mumps and rubella. Last school year, Colorado kindergartners' MMR coverage was 88%, Polio was 87.6% and DTaP was 87.4%. Only Hepatitis B topped 90%.
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Top medical organizations kicked out of CDC vaccine recommendations process call decision "dangerous"
The nation's top medical organizations are speaking out after U.S. health officials told them they will no longer have a role in helping establish vaccination recommendations. The organizations were notified via an email Thursday that their experts are being disinvited from the workgroups that have been the backbone of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, known as ACIP. In response, the impacted organizations — including the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases Society of America — released a joint statement about being excluded from the vaccine recommendation review process. "We are deeply disappointed and alarmed that our organizations are being characterized as 'biased' and therefore barred from reviewing scientific data and informing the development of vaccine recommendations that have long helped ensure our nation's vaccine program is safe, effective, and free from bias," the statement said. The workgroups typically include ACIP members and experts from medical and scientific organizations. At workgroup meetings, members evaluate data from vaccine manufacturers and the CDC, and formulate vaccination recommendation proposals to be presented to the full committee. The decades-long practice of allowing liaisons from the medical groups to help review vaccine data helped provide unbiased input for ACIP's consideration, the organizations said. "To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation's health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines," the statement continued, urging the administration to reconsider its decision. The statement was also joined by the American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Geriatrics Society, American Osteopathic Association and National Medical Association. Dr. William Schaffner, a Vanderbilt University vaccine expert who for decades has been involved with ACIP and its workgroups, told The Associated Press he's "concerned and distressed" by the CDC's decision, saying the move will likely propel a confusing fragmentation of vaccine guidance. For example, patients may hear the government say one thing and hear their doctors say another. The structure was created for several reasons, Schaffner said. The professional groups provide input about what might and might not be possible for doctors to implement. And it helped build respect and trust in ACIP recommendations, having the buy-in of respected medical organizations, he said. Workgroup members are vetted for conflicts of interest, to make sure than no one who had, say, made money from working on a hepatitis vaccine was placed on the hepatitis committee, Schaffner noted. This isn't the first change to the vaccine advisory panel, also known as ACIP, under the Trump administration. In June, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. removed all 17 members and replaced them with a group of new advisers, including several allies he has worked with closely over the years and some members with a history as vaccine critics. Last week, the ousted ACIP members spoke out against what the panel has become, in a commentary published in the New England Journal of Medicine. In the piece, the former members described a "seismic disruption" to the vaccine recommendation process in the U.S. under Kennedy's leadership.
