logo
Tech's top venture firm tried to stay above politics, then a partner created a furor

Tech's top venture firm tried to stay above politics, then a partner created a furor

Time of India20-07-2025
Academy
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
Roelof Botha arrived this month at the annual Allen & Co. conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, to meet and mingle with tech and media moguls. A controversy brewing back home followed him to the exclusive retreat.Botha, the managing partner of Sequoia Capital, a storied Silicon Valley venture capital firm, was repeatedly asked at the event about a colleague, Shaun Maguire , two people with knowledge of the matter said. Maguire -- perhaps Sequoia's most outspoken partner -- had posted on the social platform X on July 4 that Zohran Mamdani, the progressive Democrat running for New York City mayor, came from a "culture that lies about everything" and was lying to advance "his Islamist agenda."Maguire's post was immediately condemned across social media as Islamophobic. More than 1,000 technologists signed an open letter calling for him to be disciplined. Investors, founders and technologists have sent messages to the firm's partners about Maguire's behavior. His critics have continued pressuring Sequoia to deal with what they see as hate speech and other invective, while his supporters have said Maguire has the right to free speech.In Sun Valley, Botha listened, but remained neutral, the people with knowledge of the matter said.For half a century, Sequoia has tried to maintain that neutrality, even as rival venture capital firms such as Andreessen Horowitz and Founders Fund started taking political stances. But as Maguire has increasingly made inflammatory comments, including saying that diversity, equity and inclusion "kills people," Sequoia is now in a place that its leaders never wanted to be: smack in the middle of the culture wars.It's a tricky moment for the vaunted venture firm, which backed Apple, Nvidia and Google when they were startups. For decades, Sequoia kept its partners in the background while shining the spotlight on the founders of the startups it invests in. Yet those values have become harder to adhere to as the venture industry has ballooned, and many investors have cast off traditions.While Maguire is unusual at Sequoia for his outspokenness on X, he is not an industry outlier. Venture capitalists such as Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel have openly talked about their thinking, sometimes with the intent of influencing national politics.Publicly, Sequoia has said nothing about Maguire. Behind the scenes, one senior partner at Sequoia, Doug Leone, appeared to defend Maguire, according to email correspondence reviewed by The New York Times."Sequoia is backed into a corner and only has bad options," said Paul Biggar, CEO of the advocacy group Tech for Palestine, who also founded CircleCI, a software development startup. "People are speaking up because everyone sees what they've supported, and directionally that's only going to get worse for them."Sequoia declined to comment. In an interview with Fortune in March, Botha described the firm as having a "spirit of institutional neutrality" while allowing individuals to hold their political differences.In a nearly 30-minute video posted on X last week, Maguire again called Mamdani "an Islamist," and a "wolf in sheep's clothing." Maguire also tried drawing a distinction, saying "Islamists are not all Muslims" and apologized "to any Muslim that is not an Islamist and to any Indian that took offense with this tweet."Mamdani's campaign did not respond to a request for comment.Founded in 1972, Sequoia was known for years for its stellar track record with investing in startups. The firm reaped billions of dollars when young companies that it bet on burgeoned into large businesses and went public or were acquired for enormous sums.By the 1990s, Sequoia had established itself as a top venture firm on Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park, California, with investments in companies including Cisco, the telecommunications hardware provider. It also invested in PayPal, YouTube, Instagram, WhatsApp and Zoom , among others. For startups, Sequoia's stamp of approval meant they were a player.Throughout, Sequoia's partners tried to stay out of the limelight. But over time, more investors arrived in Silicon Valley seeking startups that would blossom into the next Google or Airbnb. To stand out, some venture capitalists at firms such as Andreessen Horowitz and Founders Fund started blogging and posting on social media, aiming to be thought leaders. Talking about third-rail political issues became more common.In 2016, Michael Moritz, a senior partner at Sequoia and the firm's most prominent Democrat, penned an editorial in The Financial Times criticizing Donald Trump . In 2020, Leone, a Republican, donated to the reelection campaign of Trump, but denounced the president in a statement to the press after the Jan. 6, 2021, uprising at the Capitol.Those moments, along with similar ones over the years, paved the way for others at Sequoia to speak more openly about their politics, two people with knowledge of the firm said.Sequoia hired Maguire, 39, who co-founded a cybersecurity company, in 2019 on the recommendation of Patrick Collison, CEO of Stripe, a payments startup that is one of the venture firm's largest investments. Maguire had chafed at hot-button issues before; he once claimed he was not promoted at another venture firm for "being a white man."At Sequoia, Maguire tied himself to Elon Musk. Maguire helped land the firm its investment in SpaceX, Musk's rocket company, which has soared in value. Maguire also led Sequoia's deals with other companies run by Musk, including the tunneling firm the Boring Co., X and artificial intelligence startup xAI.People who know Maguire described him as warm and friendly in person and said his relative youth -- Botha, by contrast, is 51 -- made him relatable to younger entrepreneurs.But Maguire also developed a reputation -- or perhaps notoriety -- as a prolific user of X, where he has more than 275,000 followers. In dozens of posts daily, he has commented on political issues and progressive causes. After Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Maguire, who is a self-described "Jew and a Zionist," defended the Israeli government's response while raising alarms on what he saw as a rise in antisemitism."With every single person I meet, the first thing through my brain is: 'Would they want to kill me if they knew I was Jewish?'" he posted on X three days after the attack.Silicon Valley noticed. Founders, investors and other tech workers messaged Sequoia's partners and other employees about Maguire's behavior, two people familiar with the matter said.This month, Maguire posted about Mamdani after the Times published an article about how the mayoral candidate, a Muslim of South Asian descent who was born in Uganda, wrote that he was Asian and African American in an application to Columbia University. (He was not admitted to the school.) Mamdani had just won New York City's Democratic mayoral primary on a progressive platform, emphasizing affordability and other cost-of-living issues, and had defended the rights of Palestinians.In response to Maguire's post, technologists and startup founders circulated the open letter calling for Sequoia to commission an independent investigation into his behavior. The letter claimed to represent roughly 1,000 startups, with signatures from more than 1,100 people, though not all the names on the list could be verified. At least one company that signed the letter was funded by Sequoia."This was not a misstep," the letter said of Maguire. "It was a deliberate, inflammatory attack that promotes dangerous anti-Muslim stereotypes and stokes division."In a post on X, Maguire referred to his "enemies" and said, "I'm going to play nice for now, but am ready to embarrass any of you should you escalate."A counterletter supporting Maguire garnered more than 1,000 signatories, including Bill Ackman, a billionaire financier who supports Israel, as well as startup founders whose companies are backed by Sequoia. The letter described Maguire as a "principled thinker" who has "helped build careers, fund companies and elevate voices across divides."Others have sent private messages to Sequoia employees urging them to stand by Maguire, two people with knowledge of the matter said.Sequoia insiders have trod carefully. On July 10, Pat Grady, a partner at the firm, posted a statement on X sympathizing with both the Muslim community and Maguire. It was reposted by Alfred Lin, another partner."I do not agree with everything my partners say," Grady wrote. "Aggressive truth-seeking and a healthy conflict of ideas is a hallmark of Sequoia. These are key ingredients in making the partnership great."In emails with a concerned founder this month, which were reviewed by the Times, Leone wrote that Maguire's posts did not condemn Muslims. Leone also echoed a point Maguire has made publicly, distinguishing between "Islamists" and "Muslims."On Monday, the signatories who called for Maguire to be disciplined asked that tech workers reach out to Sequoia's financial backers and clients -- including the University of Michigan, Duke University and the University of Texas system -- to speak with the firm."If we, the global technology industry, are serious about building a more inclusive future, it starts with holding power accountable," the letter said.Botha, the managing partner of Sequoia Capital, a storied Silicon Valley venture capital firm, was repeatedly asked at the event about a colleague, Shaun Maguire, two people with knowledge of the matter said. Maguire -- perhaps Sequoia's most outspoken partner -- had posted on the social platform X on July 4 that Zohran Mamdani, the progressive Democrat running for New York City mayor, came from a "culture that lies about everything" and was lying to advance "his Islamist agenda."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Mortgage Lenders Are Ignoring Trump's Rollback on Home Appraisal Reviews
Why Mortgage Lenders Are Ignoring Trump's Rollback on Home Appraisal Reviews

Mint

time4 hours ago

  • Mint

Why Mortgage Lenders Are Ignoring Trump's Rollback on Home Appraisal Reviews

At one midsized US mortgage lender, almost a quarter of customers who dispute property appraisals find that the value of their home had been miscalculated. It's an industrywide issue that has historically penalized minority groups, and now President Donald Trump has offered lenders the chance to ignore his predecessor's attempts to make it easier for homeowners to question the valuations assigned by property appraisers. Trump has scrapped some of the guidelines, part of his team's vow to stamp out what it sees as initiatives that support diversity, equity and inclusion. Many financial professionals agree that home appraisals can be unreliable, and that Black homeowners and other minorities are often put at a significant disadvantage. This can be especially damaging given that home ownership is the top wealth-creation tool in the US — and an appraisal is a key determinant of how much, if anything, someone can borrow. With their decision to end some of the requirements related to home valuations, however, Trump and his cabinet members may have little impact on lenders' practices. That's because there's fresh evidence that the changes the Biden administration put in place are supported by the industry. Some of the country's biggest lenders, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and U.S. Bancorp, said they would make no policy changes as a result of the rollback. New American Funding, which also isn't planning to change its approach, was the only financial institution of more than 10 contacted by Bloomberg to disclose information about disputed home valuations. The Tustin, California-based mortgage lender, which provided roughly $14 billion of mortgage loans last year, said an average 2.5% of its customers request new valuations each month. Of those contested, roughly 22% are found to need an adjustment. New American didn't share a breakdown of borrowers' requests by race. 'The changes have made it much easier for the borrower,' said Michelle Rogers, New American's chief valuation officer. 'It's more transparent and the borrower knows they can initiate it.' The appraisal directives were put in place following a deep dive by the Biden administration into prejudices in the business. One of Trump's housing regulators, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner, said rolling them back was part of an attempt by the president to put an end to the 'obsession' with DEI. The administration also has vowed to make deep cuts to the federal apparatus that enforced fair housing and fair lending laws, from slashing Consumer Financial Protection Bureau staff to gutting the Justice Department's Civil Rights division. A HUD official who spoke on background said the department's recent reforms simply reverted its stance to the way things were before Biden-era regulators imposed their standards. Lenders aren't being barred from letting borrowers dispute their appraisals, said the official who declined to be identified. The White House hasn't responded to a request for comment. Black homeowners have long reported having their homes valued more highly after taking down all evidence of their race. Research from the Brookings Institution and the federally controlled housing finance agencies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has shown that home appraisals can be affected by racial bias, which in turn affects the value of homes in entire neighborhoods. Brookings found, for example, that homes in neighborhoods where the majority of residents are Black are valued between 21% and 23% lower than comparable homes in white neighborhoods, with appraisal bias as one of several contributing factors. Economists at Freddie Mac reported in 2021 that greater percentages of homes in majority Black and Latino census tracts were undervalued compared with those in white census tracts, leading them to conclude that there was a 'valuation gap' between homes in different neighborhoods. The appraisal problem for minority borrowers also is a problem for lenders, since having low appraisals can prevent a homeowner from qualifying for a mortgage refinancing or a new home loan. That means the lender loses out on valuable business. Banks also suffer when appraisers make mistakes in the opposite direction, valuing properties too highly, because it means the bank can't safely rely on the value of a property as collateral for a loan. The reforms that the mortgage industry recently adopted to try to make the appraisal process fairer originated with a Biden administration task force called PAVE , which was formed in 2021. The group consisted of public officials from 13 different agencies, and its goal was to produce a report with recommended changes to a suite of different mortgage industry standards. PAVE recommended more training for home appraisers and higher standards for appraisers seeking to qualify for professional licenses. Those changes were handled by the Appraisal Foundation, a nonprofit organization that serves as the regulator for home appraisers. A spokeswoman for the foundation declined to comment on the Trump administration's recent changes, but said that new education and licensing standards put in place last year are still in effect. PAVE also called for an industrywide requirement for mortgage lenders to let borrowers request 'a reconsideration of value' if they disagreed with an appraiser's determination. Last year, regulators began requiring mortgage lenders to decide how they would standardize their procedures and to explain them clearly to their customers. In a rare win for the government, the policy received support from the Mortgage Bankers Association. Federal housing regulation includes a web of rules issued by different agencies, including HUD and also Fannie and Freddie. The new home-appraisal guidance went into effect for all of the housing agencies. But so far, the Trump administration has only rolled back the policy for mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration, which help low- to moderate-income families attain home ownership. On July 17, Senator Raphael Warnock, a Democrat from Georgia, proposed a bill that would make mortgage lenders' ROV policies required by law. It also would expand public access to data on mortgage appraisals by forcing a federal housing regulator to more regularly share details. While fair-housing advocates support the proposal, the bill also has backing from a more unlikely source: the National Association of Mortgage Brokers. The group represents more than 500,000 mortgage brokers across the US. Its president, Jim Nabors, called the proposed bill 'critical' for ensuring fairness for homebuyers and added: 'Our entire board of directors and membership applaud Senator Warnock.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Post-Assad Syria sees fresh violence as Druze, SDF clash; Israel raids southern border
Post-Assad Syria sees fresh violence as Druze, SDF clash; Israel raids southern border

First Post

time4 hours ago

  • First Post

Post-Assad Syria sees fresh violence as Druze, SDF clash; Israel raids southern border

New outbreaks of violence overnight into Sunday rocked Syria at two distinct flashpoints, straining a fragile ceasefire and calling into question the ability of the transitional government to exert its authority across the whole country. read more Bedouin fighters rest in the shade of a house as Syrian government security forces block them from entering Sweida province, in Busra al-Harir village, southern Syria, Sunday, July 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Ghaith Alsayed) Syria was shaken by renewed violence overnight into Sunday with fresh clashes reported in two volatile regions, further undermining a fragile ceasefire and raising concerns over the interim government's ability to assert control nationwide. In the country's north, pro-government forces engaged in skirmishes with Kurdish-led troops who currently hold sway over much of the area. Simultaneously, armed confrontations broke out between state forces and Druze militias in the southern province of Sweida. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The renewed fighting comes as the transitional authorities attempt to uphold a tenuous truce in Sweida, following previous clashes with Druze fighters last month. They are also working to enforce a pact with the Kurdish-led, US-supported Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to reintegrate large parts of north eastern Syria into the national fold. Interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, who rose to power after leading an unexpected rebellion that unseated long-time ruler Bashar Assad in December, has faced persistent challenges in stabilising the country. His leadership—marked by Islamist affiliations and support from aligned militant factions—has drawn scepticism from opposition groups as well as ethnic and religious minorities. On Saturday, state television reported violent encounters between government forces and Druze militias in Sweida province. According to the state-run Alikhbaria network, an unnamed security source confirmed that the ceasefire had collapsed after Druze fighters attacked Syrian security personnel, resulting in at least one fatality. The Defense Ministry has not released any official comment. The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that, along with one security officer killed, a Druze fighter also died in the violence, and at least nine others were injured. The group said the confrontation took place in the Tal al-Hadeed area—an important high ground that borders neighbouring Daraa province. State media says that aid convoys continue to enter Sweida city as a part of a tense truce after over a week of violent clashes in July between Druze militias and armed Bedouin clans backed by government forces. However, humanitarian conditions remain dire, and residents of Sweida have called for the road into the city to be fully opened, saying the aid that has come in is not enough. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The clashes that displaced tens of thousands of people came after months of tensions between Damascus and Sweida. The fighting led to a series of targeted sectarian attacks against the Druze minority, who are now skeptical of peaceful coexistence. Druze militias retaliated against Bedouin communities who largely lived in western areas of Sweida province, displacing many to neighboring Daraa. Elsewhere, in the northern Aleppo province, government-affiliated fighters clashed with the SDF. The Defense Ministry said three civilians and four soldiers were wounded after the SDF launched a barrage of rockets near the city of Manbij 'in an irresponsible way and for unknown reasons.' SDF spokesperson Farhad Shami on the other hand said the group was responding to shelling by 'undisciplined factions' within government forces on Deir Haffar, an eastern city in the same province. The eastern part of Aleppo province straddles areas controlled by the government and by the SDF. Though the two are slowly trying to implement a ceasefire and agreement that would integrate the areas under Damascus, tensions remain. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The Ministry of Defense's attempts to distort facts and mislead public opinion do not contribute to security or stability,' Shami said in a post on X, formerly Twitter. In Quneitra province, in the south, the Israeli military announced it conducted another ground operation in the area that borders the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights. It said its troops questioned several suspects they accuse of involvement in weapons trafficking in the village of Hader, and raided four areas where they found weapons being trafficked. Since Assad's ouster, Israel has conducted numerous strikes and military operations in southern Syria, saying its forces are taking out militant groups that they suspect could harm Israelis and residents in the Golan Heights. Damascus has been critical of Israel's military activity, and the two sides have been trying to reach a security arrangement through U.S.-mediated talks. Syria has repeatedly said it does not intend to take military action against Israel. Those talks intensified after Israel backed the Druze in Sweida during the earlier clashes. Israel struck military personnel near the southern city and most notably launched an airstrike targeting the Defense Ministry headquarters in the heart of Damascus. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies

‘Deport To India': Indian-Origin Democrat Ro Khanna Faces Racist Abuse From Trump Supporters
‘Deport To India': Indian-Origin Democrat Ro Khanna Faces Racist Abuse From Trump Supporters

News18

time5 hours ago

  • News18

‘Deport To India': Indian-Origin Democrat Ro Khanna Faces Racist Abuse From Trump Supporters

Ro Khanna's remarks on 'economic patriotism' sparked attacks from Trump's immigration hardliners and prompted a flurry of racist abuse online. Ro Khanna, a Democrat and Congressman of Indian origin, faced a wave of racist abuse on social media after outlining what he called a new vision of 'economic patriotism" for the United States. Several far-right accounts targeted him with calls to 'deport him back to India" and 'denaturalize" him, accusing him of favouring mass immigration and questioning his American identity. The abuse began after Khanna posted a thread urging Democrats to move beyond political revenge and instead focus on a national economic revival. He said the party must choose between 'a transformative vision" and being 'consumed by revenge and dripping hatred for MAGA." Khanna laid out proposals including federal funding for factories, a $1 billion capital fund for towns like Johnstown and Orangeburg and the creation of 1,000 trade schools to build the next generation of skilled workers. And @StephenM while we may not agree on much, can you at least reject this? My parents will be happy that their son born in Philadelphia in 1976 should not be deported 🙂 — Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) August 3, 2025 Stephen Miller, who currently serves as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor, responded to the California representative's remarks, rejecting the idea that economic renewal could happen without immigration control. He said Khanna and the Democrats supported the 'mass importation of the entire third world to our cities" and asked whether Khanna supported any limits on immigration. Miller cited Census Bureau data estimating that 53.3 million foreign-born people now live in the US, nearly 16% of the total population. In reply, the California Democrat said he supports a secure border and legal immigration, adding that his parents had migrated to the US lawfully. Behave like an American and we'll spare you— Ciro (@akvias_) August 3, 2025 He referenced a recent meeting with Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum, Republican Congressman Don Bacon and the US ambassador to Mexico, where they discussed legal pathways for undocumented immigrants working in farms and hotels. Khanna noted that such an approach had previously received support under Trump. Behave like an American and we'll spare you— Ciro (@akvias_) August 3, 2025 The thread triggered a stream of abuse from anonymous accounts, some calling for Khanna to be deported and stripped of his citizenship. One user wrote, 'You have an accent and want to import more Indians." Another posted, 'Behave like an American and we'll spare you." Khanna responded to one such comment by tagging Miller and writing, 'While we may not agree on much, can you at least reject this? My parents will be happy that their son born in Philadelphia in 1976 should not be deported." The exchange came at a time when US President Donald Trump's administration has ramped up immigration enforcement. In July, ICE officers raided a cannabis farm in Camarillo, California, arresting over 200 undocumented workers. One person reportedly died in the incident. In Los Angeles, a recent court ruling limited ICE's ability to detain individuals based solely on appearance or location. According to internal targets, ICE is aiming to carry out up to a million deportations this year. Khanna's comments come amid debate within the Democratic Party following its defeat in the 2024 presidential election. A section of the party has called for a pivot away from anti-Trump messaging toward concrete economic proposals. Khanna's push for a new 'economic patriotism" has found support among moderates and younger voters but has also drawn sharp criticism from the right. Miller, at the time of writing this report, has not yet publicly responded to Khanna's request to denounce the racist messages. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store