Seemingly harmless, symptomless virus may actually cause Parkinson's disease: study
Now, scientists have discovered that a virus that has flown under the radar for years might be a potential contributor to the neurodegenerative disorder.
'We wanted to investigate potential environmental factors – such as viruses – that might contribute to Parkinson's disease,' Igor Koralnik, the lead author of the study and chief of neuroinfectious diseases and global neurology at Northwestern Medicine, said in a press release.
Advertisement
3 Researchers at Northwestern Medicine have discovered that a virus that has flown under the radar for years might be a potential contributor to the neurodegenerative disorder.
Laura Brown
'Using a tool called 'ViroFind', we analyzed post-mortem brain samples from individuals with Parkinson's and from those who died of other causes. We searched for all known human-infecting viruses to identify any differences between the two groups.'
What they found was that the Human Pegivirus (HPgV) — a blood-borne, symptomless virus from the same family as hepatitis C — was present in the brains and spinal fluid of 50% of people with Parkinson's but not in those without it.
The findings — published Tuesday in the journal JCI Insight — could be a major breakthrough in unlocking some of the factors that lead to this tricky disease and provide new insight into a virus that was previously considered benign.
Advertisement
'HPgV is a common, symptomless infection previously not known to frequently infect the brain,' Dr. Koralnik said.
'We were surprised to find it in the brains of Parkinson's patients at such high frequency and not in the controls. Even more unexpected was how the immune system responded differently, depending on a person's genetics.'
'This suggests it could be an environmental factor that interacts with the body in ways we didn't realize before.
Advertisement
'For a virus that was thought to be harmless, these findings suggest it may have important effects, in the context of Parkinson's disease. It may influence how Parkinson's develops, especially in people with certain genetic backgrounds.'
3 What they found was that the Human Pegivirus (HPgV) — a blood-borne, symptomless virus from the same family as hepatitis C — was present in the brains and spinal fluid of 50% of people with Parkinson's but not in those without it.
C Davids/peopleimages.com – stock.adobe.com
Blood samples from more than 1,000 people enrolled in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative, a project launched by The Michael J. Fox Foundation, showed that people with HPgV had unique immune system 'signals' — patterns that appeared both in the bloodstream and the brain.
Advertisement
'With the blood samples, we observed similar immune-related changes, mirroring those found in the brain,' Dr. Koralnik said.
'People who had the virus showed different signals from the immune system than those who didn't, and this pattern was the same, no matter the genetics. But as we followed each person over time, we saw a more complicated picture.'
In people with a Parkinson's-linked mutation in the LRRK2 gene, the immune system reacted to the virus differently than in those without the mutation — suggesting the virus may interact with certain genes to help set the disease in motion.
3 Blood samples from more than 1,000 people enrolled in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative, a project launched by The Michael J. Fox Foundation.
Getty Images
'We plan to look more closely at how genes like LRRK2 affect the body's response to other viral infections to figure out if this is a special effect of HPgV or a broader response to viruses,' added Dr. Koralnik.
Now, the team wants to go bigger, examining more brains to determine how often HPgV sneaks past the blood-brain barrier.
'One big question we still need to answer is how often the virus gets into the brains of people with or without Parkinson's,' said Dr. Koralnik.
'We also aim to understand how viruses and genes interact; insights that could reveal how Parkinson's begins and could help guide future therapies.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Massive Study Links 6 Sleep Traits to Risk of 172 Diseases
The way we sleep can reveal a great deal about our overall health. But while many of us focus on the hours of shut-eye we get, new research suggests we should pay more attention to the timing and consistency of our bedtime. Researchers have now found that those with the poorest sleep rhythms may face a 2.8-times-higher risk of Parkinson's disease, and a 1.6-times-higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, compared to those with consistent patterns of wakefulness and sleep. The findings come from the sleep data of more than 88,000 people in the UK Biobank, and while the results can only reveal correlations, they could point future clinical research in new directions. Altogether, scientists at Peking University and the Army Medical University in China considered the health effects of six sleep traits: length, onset, rhythm, extent and efficiency of sleep, and frequency of wake-ups during the night. Related: During the average 6.8-year follow-up, 172 diseases were associated with these sleep characteristics, with many tied to just one trait. To make the findings more robust, the associations were successfully replicated using another large database: the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Across both analyses, sleep duration (as measured by wearable sensors) showed a relatively weak association with disease risk, despite the fact that in surveys, many participants expressed greater concern over how much they slept, rather than how they slept. Sleep rhythm, meanwhile, showed three times as many disease links as those associated with sleep duration and onset. In fact, it was associated with nearly half of the study's 172 diseases. The term 'sleep rhythm' essentially refers to cycles of wakefulness and sleep, from when a person goes to bed, to when they wake each and every day. A more robust and regular sleep rhythm seems to be tied to healthier outcomes. Senior author and epidemiologist Shengfeng Wang from Peking University argues it is "time we broaden our definition of good sleep beyond just duration." "The existing literature has disproportionately focused on sleep duration rather than other sleep traits," write the study authors, led by Yimeng Wang from China's Army Medical University. In the current study, the most erratic sleep rhythms, as opposed to the most consistent ones, were linked to type 2 diabetes, primary hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure, and depression – to name just a few. One of the strongest associations was with Parkinson's disease, which previous studies have also linked to sleep disorders. Sleep onset and sleep quality were also associated with several diseases. Those who went to bed after 12.30 am, for instance, were 2.6 times more likely to develop liver cirrhosis compared to those who went to bed before 11.30 pm. In addition, the least efficient sleepers showed a nearly 1.8-fold increase in respiratory failure compared to those who slept the most efficiently. The data is based on wearable sleep monitors as well as subjective reports, and that seems to be an important combination. Nearly a quarter of self-reported 'long sleepers' actually slept fewer than 6 hours a night. The findings indicate that purely relying on surveys, as previous sleep studies have done, may not be reliable. "For example, some participants with difficulty falling asleep or keeping stable sleep may have spent a long time in bed but have short real sleep," the researchers explain. "As evidenced by our analyses, this dramatic misclassification of sleep duration has introduced substantial bias to the estimation of effect size for a number of diseases, including stroke, ischemic heart diseases, cardiovascular disease, and depressive episode and recurrent depressive disorder." "Our findings underscore the overlooked importance of sleep regularity," concludes Wang. The study was published in Health Data Science. Related News Common Viruses May Wake Dormant Breast Cancer Cells, Study Finds Study Reveals The Shocking Amount of Plastic We Breathe in Every Day Researchers Identified New Blood Group After 50 Year Mystery Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
20 hours ago
- New York Post
Your heart may be older than you think — and the number could predict disease risk
Your heart may be older than you are, according to new research. A study from Northwestern Medicine found that most American adults have a 'heart age' that is several years older than their chronological age. The gap is wider among men than women, the researchers found, as well as in Black and Hispanic people and those with lower education and income, according to a university press release. To help people assess their own cardiac age, the researchers developed a free online tool that makes the calculation. Using guidelines from the American Heart Association, the PREVENT Risk Age Calculator determines a person's heart disease risk based on several factors, including blood pressure, cholesterol levels, smoking status, current medications and the presence of diabetes. 5 A study found that most American adults have a 'heart age' that is several years older than their chronological age. Wesley/ – The risk level is provided as an age rather than a percentage. 'Heart age, or PREVENT age, may be particularly useful for patients and clinicians and be more effective in preventing heart disease,' senior author Dr. Sadiya Khan, the Magerstadt professor of cardiovascular epidemiology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, who led the development of the PREVENT equations, told Fox News Digital. 'It translates complex information about the risk of heart attack, stroke or heart failure over the next 10 years into a number that is easier to understand and compare with one we are all familiar with — your actual age.' 5 To help people assess their own cardiac age, the researchers developed a free online tool that makes the calculation. dragonstock – The goal is for the tool to help doctors and patients discuss heart disease risk more effectively, helping to ensure the right therapies to prevent heart attacks, stroke or heart failure events, according to Khan. The researchers tested the tool on more than 14,100 American adults across the U.S., ranging in age from 30 to 79, who had no history of heart disease. The adults' data was obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which was gathered from 2011 to March 2020. 5 The risk level is provided as an age rather than a percentage. amazing studio – Women had an average heart age of 55.4, nearly four years higher than their average chronological age of 51.3. Men had an average heart age of 56.7, seven years higher than their chronological age of 49.7. More than 22% of women and 33% of men with a high-school education or less had a heart age that exceeded their chronological age by more than 10 years. 5 Men had an average heart age of 56.7, seven years higher than their chronological age of 49.7. lovelyday12 – The findings were published in JAMA Cardiology on Wednesday. The hope is that more information about heart health risk could increase preventive care, Khan said, as heart disease has been the country's leading cause of death for over 100 years. 'Many people who should be on medicine to lower their risk for heart attack, stroke or heart failure are not on these medications,' the preventive cardiologist noted. 5 The hope is that more information about heart health risk could increase preventive care, Khan said. Syda Productions – 'We hope this new heart age calculator will help support discussions about prevention and ultimately improve health for all people.' This may be even more important in younger people, Khan noted, as they are less likely to be aware of their heart disease risk. The calculator is not intended to serve as a substitute for in-person assessments by a physician. One limitation of the study, the researchers noted, is that 'the definition of optimal risk may influence the calculation of PREVENT risk age.' 'Alternatively, population-based percentiles of risk can provide a complementary approach to communicating risk, but these are influenced by suboptimal population health,' they wrote. 'This type of tool needs to be tested widely to determine if it is more readily understood,' Khan told Fox News Digital. Future studies are needed to measure the impact of heart age on healthy lifestyle changes, preventive therapies and patient outcomes, the team concluded.
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Your heart may be older than you think — and the number could predict disease risk
Your heart may be older than you are, according to new research. A study from Northwestern Medicine found that most American adults have a "heart age" that is several years older than their chronological age. The gap is wider among men than women, the researchers found, as well as in Black and Hispanic people and those with lower education and income, according to a university press release. To help people assess their own cardiac age, the researchers developed a free online tool that makes the calculation. Using guidelines from the American Heart Association, the PREVENT Risk Age Calculator determines a person's heart disease risk based on several factors, including blood pressure, cholesterol levels, smoking status, current medications and the presence of diabetes. The risk level is provided as an age rather than a percentage. "Heart age, or PREVENT age, may be particularly useful for patients and clinicians and be more effective in preventing heart disease," senior author Dr. Sadiya Khan, the Magerstadt professor of cardiovascular epidemiology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, who led the development of the PREVENT equations, told Fox News Digital. "Many people who should be on medicine to lower their risk for heart attack, stroke or heart failure are not on these medications." "It translates complex information about the risk of heart attack, stroke or heart failure over the next 10 years into a number that is easier to understand and compare with one we are all familiar with — your actual age." The goal is for the tool to help doctors and patients discuss heart disease risk more effectively, helping to ensure the right therapies to prevent heart attacks, stroke or heart failure events, according to Khan. The researchers tested the tool on more than 14,100 American adults across the U.S., ranging in age from 30 to 79, who had no history of heart disease. The adults' data was obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which was gathered from 2011 to March 2020. Women had an average heart age of 55.4, nearly four years higher than their average chronological age of 51.3. Men had an average heart age of 56.7, seven years higher than their chronological age of 49.7. More than 22% of women and 33% of men with a high-school education or less had a heart age that exceeded their chronological age by more than 10 years. The findings were published in JAMA Cardiology on Wednesday. The hope is that more information about heart health risk could increase preventive care, Khan said, as heart disease has been the country's leading cause of death for over 100 years. "Many people who should be on medicine to lower their risk for heart attack, stroke or heart failure are not on these medications," the preventive cardiologist noted. "We hope this new heart age calculator will help support discussions about prevention and ultimately improve health for all people." This may be even more important in younger people, Khan noted, as they are less likely to be aware of their heart disease risk. The calculator is not intended to serve as a substitute for in-person assessments by a physician. One limitation of the study, the researchers noted, is that "the definition of optimal risk may influence the calculation of PREVENT risk age." "Alternatively, population-based percentiles of risk can provide a complementary approach to communicating risk, but these are influenced by suboptimal population health," they wrote. For more Health articles, visit "This type of tool needs to be tested widely to determine if it is more readily understood," Khan told Fox News Digital. Future studies are needed to measure the impact of heart age on healthy lifestyle changes, preventive therapies and patient outcomes, the team concluded.
