Maurice Regan hoped a newspaper article would give rival John Magnier a 'heart attack', court told
US-based Regan appeared in the Four Courts this morning before Justice Max Barrett giving evidence of his involvement in bids for the estate when it was put to him by Paul Gallagher SC, for the Magnier side, that he sent the WhatsApp message. Regan replied: 'All is fair in love and war.'
Magnier wants the court to enforce a €15-million 'handshake deal' he claims he sealed at his home on 22 August 2023 with Richard Thomson-Moore, an heir to the 751-acre, 17th Century estate.
The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group – the estate trustees – seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed.
The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any deal. They subsequently preferred to sell the estate to Regan for €22.25 million.
Thomson-Moore has told the court that while a 'price' was agreed with Magnier for Barne, a 'deal' was not.
The trustees who hold the estate initially decided to remain loyal to the Magnier offer and felt Regan's higher offer could be seen as 'provocative'. After the exclusivity period had ended, the trustees decided to go with Mr Regan's offer.
Today at the High Court, Regan, who is not a party to proceedings, was questioned about the message sent in October 2023 to another man with some knowledge of the deal's progression.
Gallagher said that Regan sent a link to the man of a newspaper article referencing Magnier and Regan and followed this up by saying 'hopefully, it will give him a heart attack'.
Gallagher said the message referred to Magnier to which Regan said 'yes, we were at war, according to him [Magnier] and… all is fair in love and war'.
The row between the two businessmen has been described as a 'war' by witnesses in the case.
Regan told Martin Hayden SC, for Barne Estate and Thomson-Moore, that he rejected being described as a 'dark force' in the deal by Gallagher at a previous hearing when claiming Regan was funding the defendants in the litigation.
Advertisement
After agreeing on €15M, Barne and the Magniers entered into an exclusivity agreement stipulating that Barne would not permit itself or its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Magnier between 31 August to 30 September 2023.
Regan said a description of him as a 'dark force' trying to breach the exclusivity agreement was a 'cheap shot' and that he had been a victim of 'derogatory remarks' that were going to be in the press 'forever'.
Regan described Gallagher's remarks as 'very hurtful' to him, that he did not know why they were made. He added he 'just wanted to buy a farm… and here I am today'.
He said he never knew anything about the exclusivity agreement when bidding on the farm and that nobody told him it was in place. He denied funding the Thomson-Moores defence and said that he had last April given Barne Estate Ltd a commercial loan from one of his companies against the farm.
Regan said he was 'blocked' out of bidding for the farm and that 'multiple offers were ignored for a long time' making him think that 'something is going on'.
Regan told Hayden he admired the Thomson-Moores as a nice family and would not have 'misled' them in the selling process, as claimed by Magnier in his evidence.
Regan told Gallagher that the signed exclusivity imposed obligations on the vendors of Barne but not on him and that he did not attempt to induce any breach of the agreement.
At one stage during the evidence Regan had to clarify to Gallagher that he was using 'light humour' when he said that the silence from Barne on his offers made him wonder if Richard Thomson-Moore had actually been 'kidnapped'.
Regan said approaches to the joint estate agents handling the deal was an attempt to make himself 'relevant' regarding the sale and to get 'back in the game'.
Gallagher put it to Regan that his contact with certain individuals with knowledge of the deal was 'highly improper'.
'Me being blocked out at a higher price than a lower price is improper,' said Regan.
Regan said legal letters sent to the joint estate agents handling the sale were not meant to 'frighten' or 'threaten' but his concern was that his bids were not getting to the trustees of the estate.
Hayden asked if any of the defendants or anyone from the Magnier side had at any point written to Regan to say he should desist in his bidding and was told 'no'.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Happy hour over as tough 15% Trump tariffs hit EU wine and spirits in hours and Harris holds NI talks
EUROPEAN wine and spirits face a 15 per cent US import tariff as Donald Trump's new levies kick in on Friday. The European Union was tonight pushing to get more exemptions as the 1 EU wine and spirits will be slapped with new 15% tariffs Credit: Getty A trade deal between Brussels and Washington was Brussels defended the trade deal, insisting it is half the 30 per cent threatened. EU officials had hoped some sectors would be exempted from the tariffs. READ MORE IN TARIFFS But they admitted European wine and spirits are set for the tough import tax for the time being. The EU Commission's trade spokesperson Olof Gill said booze will be battered by the levies until a different deal is agreed in talks expected to continue in the autumn. He said: 'It is not our expectation that wine and spirits will be included as an exemption in the first group announced by the US tomorrow. And therefore that sector will be captured by the 15 per cent ceiling.' After the EU-US trade deal was agreed in Scotland at the weekend, key wine producing countries had issued pleas to spare the cherished sector. MOST READ IN THE IRISH SUN And Gill vowed: 'The Commission remains determined to achieve and secure the maximum number of carve-outs, including for traditional EU products such as wine and spirits.' Worried wine-makers said the tariff, even if temporary, will badly hurt the sector. Putin unleashes another night of hell on Kyiv as Trump warns Kremlin on 'dangerous ground' after threatening war with US Ignacio Sanchez Recarte, secretary general of wine producers group CEEV, said the tax will 'cause significant economic losses not only for EU wine producers but also for US businesses involved throughout the supply chain'. He added: 'When combined with the currency shift in the USD/EUR exchange rate, the overall financial burden on the sector could reach 30 per cent. 'Investments will be halted and export volumes will decline while waiting for the final agreement.' ISLAND FEARS Tanaiste Simon Harris this evening held talks with the leaders of the Northern Ireland Executive on trade deals with the US. A focus of the talks was the prospect of two different tariff rates being applied on the island, which Harris has warned will pose 'huge complexities' for businesses. Exports from Northern Ireland into the US are subject to a 10 per cent levy, under a separate deal made between the UK and the US. The talks with Northern Ireland politicians come ahead of a trade forum of business stakeholders in Government Buildings in Dublin on Friday. The forum has been called to map out Ireland's response to the announcement that 15 per cent tariffs will be applied on EU goods. A spokesperson for Mr Harris said: 'With a lower tariff rate of 10 per cent announced for the UK, the Tanaiste will seek the views of stakeholders as to the scale of the challenge that would be posed by two different rates.'
The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Husband handed just £325k of wife's £60MILLION family fortune in bitter divorce battle WINS bid to get more cash
A MAN who was awarded just £325,000 of his wife's £60 million fortune has now won a bitter divorce battle. The divorcee 2 Jenny Helliwell, 42, was said to have behaved "fraudulently" Credit: Champion News Service 2 Simon Entwistle, 42, was awarded just £325,000 after a 'painful' divorce battle Credit: Champion News Service Simon Entwistle, 42, a financial trader, was awarded just £325,000 at the High Court after a His claim of needing £36,000 a year for flights, and £26,000 for "a meal plan just for himself", was called "aspirational" by the judge. The judge added: "He said to me, 'I can't even cook an omelette,' well my answer to that is 'learn', it is not difficult." "You do not have to be a master chef to learn how to eat reasonably well." Read more News Now, a judge has found Jenny guilty of "fraudulent" behaviour by failing to declare £48m of her £66m personal fortune. The pair, who were together from 2016 until 2022, enjoyed an "opulent standard of living throughout their relationship." Simon reportedly "enjoyed the trappings of being married into a family of exceptional wealth". This included living in a £4.5m villa in Dubai, and a Parisian wedding ceremony that cost £500,000 in August 2019. Most read in The Sun The villa had been a gift from Jenny's father - Dubai-based British businessman Neil Helliwell. Simon's own assets were worth around £800,000, including a flat in Teen Mom star Ryan Edwards begs judge not to force him to expose top-secret MTV contract and NDA in nasty divorce When the couple split in August 2022, Jenny hired lawyers to order Simon to leave their home with just 48 hours' notice. It sparked a legal battle that would see Simon asking for £2.5m of his wife's fortune, estimated to be worth £60m. Jenny had offered him £500,000, and then £800,000 to avoid a However, the original judge awarded just a £400,000 payout following a pre-nuptial agreement that stated the pair would keep their own assets. This came to £325,000 after he was made to pay his wife's legal fees. During an appeal, Simon claimed he was a victim of "gender prejudice", and that the agreement had been invalidated by Jenny failing to disclose around £48m in assets when he signed the document. His lawyer said: "Had the positions been reversed, it is very unlikely that he would have... so ungenerously assessed the needs of a wife after a six-year relationship." A judge has ruled that this amounted to "fraudulent" behaviour, invalidating the agreement. While Jenny did disclose around £18m in assets, she failed to disclose an additional £47m. It included around £8m of beachfront land in Dubai, and a £1.6m property in Wimbledon. This meant that Simon did not sign the agreement with full knowledge of his partner's wealth. She did not make any findings on the gender prejudice argument. The case will now be returned to the High Court, to be judged as if the agreement didn't exist. Lady Justice King said: "Since the husband in the instant case was deliberately deprived of information which it had been agreed that he should have, in my judgment, the agreement cannot stand."
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish whiskey exporters may be forced to look at other markets if 15% tariff rate applies
Some Irish whiskey exporters may be forced 'to reorientate their focus away' from the US if a 15 per cent tariff rate applies as part of the recently agreed EU-US trade deal, the head of the Irish Whiskey Association (IWA) has warned. 'With a higher tariff, the costs associated with exporting will increase and we could see price on shelf go up also,' IWA director Eoin Ó Catháin said. 'I don't think a 15 per cent tariff would exclude people from exporting per se, but it may see certain companies re-orient strategy towards other markets,' he said. Mr Ó Catháin was responding to reports that the EU had so far failed to secure a carve out for the sensitive wine and spirits sector. READ MORE '[It is] not our expectation that wine and spirits will be included in the first group [of exemptions to be] announced by the US tomorrow, therefore those products will be captured by the 15 per cent ceiling,' said Olof Gill, EU trade spokesperson, adding that negotiations continued. The statement comes as US trading partners are rushing to finalise tariff deals ahead of president Donald Trump's deadline of August 1st. Last weekend, the EU agreed a deal for tariffs of 15 per cent on most exports to the US. The European Commission also signalled on Thursday that a planned EU-US joint statement fleshing out their trade deal could be delayed, saying that 'more time is required' to finalise the text. EU officials had previously expected the joint statement to be issued on Friday. However, the commission said it still expects the US to implement the 15 per cent tariff rate and a number of agreed exemptions as of Friday, though it said this was dependent on Trump signing an executive order. 'The Irish Whiskey Association notes media reports today which indicate that our products will face a 15 per cent tariff when exporting to the USA from August 1st,' Mr Ó Catháin said. 'We understand that negotiations will continue past this deadline, and a return to the zero-for-zero remains a priority for the spirits sector in both the USA and the EU,' he said. 'The application of this tariff will increase costs for both exporters and consumers, and will have knock-on effects on the hospitality and tourism sectors in the USA,' he said. 'The zero-for-zero trade arrangement, which removed tariffs on our products in 1997, worked well for over three decades. It has never been more important to return to this as soon as possible,' he added. Meanwhile Trump said on Thursday he would delay the higher rate of reciprocal tariffs on Mexico by 90 days. Following a call with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, he said he would extend 'the exact same Deal as we had for the last short period of time'. 'The complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border,' he wrote.– additional reporting by The Financial Times
