‘My Dad Would Have Never Quit That Show': Isaac Hayes III on what ‘South Park' Meant to His Father
Chef, famously played by soul music legend Isaac Hayes, was a key part of the show's formula when South Park debuted, and his songs — from 'I'm Gonna Make Love to You, Woman' to 'Chocolate Salty Balls' — provided the earliest examples of the show's musicality. Hayes was also the biggest name involved at the start (no one knew who Trey Parker and Matt Stone were back then).
Given Chef's critical contributions to the show's early success and how beloved the character was by South Park fans, his death — and Hayes' controversial departure from the show — were all the more upsetting.
The story behind Hayes' exit from South Park begins with the Season Nine episode 'Trapped in the Closet,' which aired in November 2005. It mercilessly skewered Scientology and exposed some of the religion's more science-fiction-like lore that few members of the public — and even some of the church's own members — knew much about. Hayes, however, was a Scientologist (he joined the church in the early 1990s). As such, Chef doesn't appear in the episode, and Hayes wasn't informed of the episode's content ahead of time. According to Stone and Parker, this was intended to give Hayes plausible deniability.
The episode wasn't out of the norm for the series. Two seasons earlier, South Park did an equally vicious skewering of Mormonism, and the show mocked Christianity and Judaism — the childhood religions of Parker and Stone — since its inception. But just four months after 'Trapped in the Closet' aired, Hayes quit the series. His statement read, in part, 'There is a place in this world for satire, but there is a time when satire ends, and intolerance and bigotry towards religious beliefs of others begins.'
Little more than a week later, Parker and Stone ran the episode 'The Return of Chef.' To voice Chef, they used clips of Hayes that had very clearly been edited from older South Park episodes. The episode concludes with Chef's death — he's set on fire, falls from a bridge and is mauled by mountain lions. While a 'Let's remember Chef how he was' speech follows his on-screen demise, the gruesome death came off as petty and upsetting — even to South Park fans.
Still, the door seemed open for Hayes' return, as Chef was resurrected at the end as 'Darth Chef,' a teaser for a story Parker and Stone would never explore, as Hayes didn't return to South Park before passing away in August 2008 from a stroke.
A full decade after Hayes quit South Park, his son, Isaac Hayes III, told The Hollywood Reporter that Hayes had suffered a stroke in January 2006 before he quit, and that he didn't leave the show. 'Isaac Hayes did not quit South Park; someone quit South Park for him,' Hayes III maintained. He explained that the initial stroke took away his father's ability to speak as well as some cognitive comprehension. 'He was in no position to resign under his own knowledge,' Hayes III continued. 'At the time, everybody around my father was involved in Scientology — his assistants, the core group of people. So someone quit South Park on Isaac Hayes' behalf. We don't know who.'
With South Park about to return for its 27th season next week, I recently reached out to Hayes III to talk more in-depth about his father's controversial exit from the show as well as what the animated series meant to his dad and to the soul legend's legacy.
Do you know how your father came to play Chef? It was such a random thing for him at that point in his career.
I know Matt and Trey had thought about who they could ask to play Chef, and they just reached out. They didn't think he would accept it, but he was like, 'Okay, I'll do it.' It was pretty simple. I thought it was cool because, what typically happens with great success stories is, you're just trying things. You don't know what's going to work, and before you know it, you put together something that's amazing and then it becomes this part of the cultural zeitgeist and everybody thinks it's this big master plan, but no.
From your perspective, I'm curious what you think this meant to him, to have this revival in an area completely different from his music.
It gave him a second fan base. He's known primarily for his music and that's extremely important, but it's funny because, the older you get, you realize that most people always have different chapters — like a first, second, third act or whatever. Like John Travolta, he was hot, he wasn't, and he was hot again. Or like Jason Bateman in the 1980s, and then he was gone and in the 2000s he came back and he is bigger than ever. There are those highs and lows, and, for my dad, this was definitely an American pop-culture high that he was a part of that was really powerful.
South Park was pretty much an overnight phenomenon, and Chef was one of the very few sane, positive characters on the show. But how did your father feel about the show and its material?
He tended to be the moral compass of the show, always helping the kids out. That's what I really liked about his character. They'd always come and ask him questions, and he'd always have the answers to these really uncomfortable things about masturbation and all kinds of stuff. My dad was comfortable with that, as opposed to sometimes being the gigolo of the town with all the ladies or whatever, which is also hilarious. That fit more into his persona of who he was as an artist, so he understood that as part of his character. But my father was an educator and a very smart guy, so I think, a lot of the stuff he would talk about, he probably knew or even had a deeper understanding of than what was conveyed in the script.
But did he find the material funny? Offensive? Weird? Did it match his sensibility?
It absolutely matched him. My father had an amazing sense of humor; he was a very cool guy. He was serious, but didn't take himself too seriously. He was never personally bothered by the material at all. Again, it gave him a new legion of fans, and it helped connect those people with his music.
Just in watching the shows, I don't ever think there was anything out of bounds. They definitely pushed barriers, don't get me twisted, but he understood that you're not supposed to take it so seriously. It's serious commentary not to be taken seriously, which is interesting.
Did you watch the show at the time?
Yeah, I watched the show. I was Chef for Halloween one year, and I won a costume party. It was great because your dad's part of this cool show that everybody's talking about. I don't think people understand how powerful animation is to people. I did voiceover myself. I've done voiceovers for shows on Cartoon Network.
Were you inspired by your dad's voice work?
Someone just said, 'You got a great voice, so you should do voiceover.' So I was like, 'All right, I'm going to try it,' and it worked out pretty good. I was this character called The Broodwich on Aqua Teen Hunger Force, and even that small character — I think I was on three episodes — there was a real connection that people have to shows that they love in animation.
Chef had a lot of songs on South Park. Did your dad have a favorite?
'Chocolate Salty Balls' was the hit. He was doing that in concert. He'd do that on the road. During a concert, out of nowhere he'd go, 'Hey everybody, have you seen my balls? They're big and salty and brown!'
Getting to your dad's departure from the show, what was his reaction to 'Trapped in the Closet?'
So, initially, the episode came out in November, and there was no reaction. There wasn't any upswell about that episode at all. It really wasn't a big deal at the time. That January, in 2006, my dad had a stroke, and during the course of his recovery, I think that March, they re-aired the episode. When it re-aired, that's when Scientology got upset.
At that time, my father was recovering from a stroke — literally learning how to talk, learning how to function. I visited my father. He was really struggling sometimes to even speak and say words. At the time, the people that were around him were largely Scientologists — his publicists and management. Those decisions about his involvement in the show, his leaving the show, were made by those people and not him. He would have never quit that show. He loved that show, and he was making a lot of money doing that show. So, I take issue with the way those decisions were made on his behalf because it put him in a position to actually have to go on the road and tour before he was ready to tour.
When did he start touring again?
Probably less than a year afterwards. Because South Park was such a breadwinner. It was a great show, and he was making money. So now that you don't have this income stream anymore, you have to find other ways to make income. Touring is a way to do that.
Imagine you walk away from a gig and all you got to do is sit in front of a mic and talk. And to go back on the road and start learning how to play and sing and perform and travel and stay up late and flights and all that kind of stuff. I took issue with that.
My dad loved Matt and Trey. He loved that character. He loved the show. He loved what it meant. He would have stayed involved all the way until right now. To this day, he would still be on the show. That's the part that frustrates me.
I don't think Matt and Trey knew that at the time, because, even his own family, we were not always allowed to be in that inner circle. Anybody that has a celebrity parent, sometimes the core team around them, Scientology or not, can be a barrier to their family and personal relationships.
My father was married at the time, so his wife was there. We entrusted her, and she was fine. She was involved in Scientology, I think. I can't say that she was all the way — I won't say that she was involved — but I know that she was just there for him. So I felt comfortable that his wife was around. At least somebody that has his best interest in mind was around. But, by no means those decisions were made on his own.
He died in August 2008. Do you think him getting back on the road so quickly is what accelerated—
Yes. 100 percent.
And part of what I recall from Scientology is, they weren't big on modern medicine. They were more into holistic things. So even the medication that he was probably supposed to be taking, he probably wasn't taking. All of those factors, you know what I'm saying?
Which is why you have to be the biggest advocate for your health. My father was very big on holistic medicine and things like that, but at the same time, you have to be real and understand the science of what's going on — whether it could be your blood pressure, your heart, your kidneys. To this day, I think this had a major effect on me and how I view my health.
Did he ever talk to you about leaving South Park?
No, we never had conversations about it. Never.
What did you think about Matt and Trey's reaction? Even as a fan, the episode where Chef dies is very upsetting, so I'm curious how you feel about it.
Emotions were high at the time, and I think the way they handled it had to do more with Scientology than my dad. That was more of a big 'F you' to those guys as opposed to my father. But he was caught in that, and it wasn't a great way to end the character. You could tell a lot of thought wasn't put into it. It didn't really make sense. Even if the character was going to exit, it didn't make sense how the character exited.
What made you not talk about this until The Hollywood Reporter piece, and what made you want to talk about it then?
Because, after my dad's passing, you're learning more and more. But again, these people that are always around him all the time, were very guarded. It was weird. At the same time, I'm young, and I'm just concerned about my dad. Once I knew that he would be okay, I just let the course do what it does. My dad was still a person who acted and still performed outside of South Park. He still was doing movies, he still was doing other things. So, I didn't really talk about it. Plus, it's not my business, it's my father's business and that's how he was handling his business.
What made you want to tell The Hollywood Reporter at that time in 2016?
Because it's important for my dad's legacy — for people to understand what that show meant to him and what the fans of that show meant to him. That was more important than whatever the reason was for him leaving the show or people quitting on his behalf. I just felt it was important for people to know that he would never do that. Just setting the record straight. Because, why would he do that? It doesn't make sense. They make fun of everybody on the show. Why would he, all of a sudden, get offended about something that has nothing to do with his character and then quit? That didn't make no sense.
After that interview, did anybody from the church reach out to you?
No. I haven't had any connection with anybody from Scientology since before my father passed away.
Did Matt and Trey ever reach out to you about what you said?
No. I think they made a statement about how, once they heard what I said, they were like, 'Okay, I think that makes a little bit of sense,' and they understand it better.
With the dust of that time now having settled, what do you think about Chef as a part of his legacy today?
It's still a huge part. I mean, people still talk about that to this day. I saw this Reddit thread the other day where people were saying that they miss Chef and his parents.
I miss this family. byu/TylerSpicknell insouthpark
Reading the thread, it says you should come on as Chef's son. Would you want to do something like that?
I'm always open to that for sure. I mean, I'm a voice actor, and my father and I have similar voices. Anything's possible. I'm open to the idea, but I would think even more along the lines of, with technology, with A.I., that Chef himself could come back.
Get more Cracked directly to your inbox. Sign up for Cracked newsletters at Cracked News Letters Signup.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indianapolis Star
2 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
This isn't the first time Trump's been parodied on 'South Park'
Whether you're a long-time "South Park" fan or just have heard of the show in passing, you've probably heard about that episode by now. The Season 27 premiere of "South Park" started off with a fiery take on President Donald Trump's widespread attacks on media. The episode, which aired on Wednesday, July 23, shows a character with Trump's face on a cartoon body crawling into bed, naked, with Satan. The episode referenced Paramount's $16 million settlement with the president, Trump's claims that he'll receive $20 million worth of ads on the network and the cancellation of CBS' "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert." In response to the episode, the White House told USA TODAY on Thursday, July 24, that the scene was a "desperate attempt for attention," calling the series a "fourth-rate" show. During a panel about the show at San Diego Comic-Con on Thursday evening, July 24, "South Park" creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone sarcastically said they were "terribly sorry" for the episode. Though Trump himself is not often depicted directly in the series, like the recent episode, Parker and Stone have used the popular character Mr. Garrison to represent the president through several seasons. In the series' 20th season, Mr. Garrison, who previously was an elementary school teacher, wins the 2016 U.S. presidential election against Hillary Clinton. Becoming President Garrison, the character continues to serve as a parody for Trump until 2020. President Garrison takes on Trump's swooped, blonde hair, sends out fiery social media posts and is obsessed with hosting Make America Great Again rallies. Here's a look at some of the key moments the president has been featured, or parodied, in "South Park." White House, 'South Park' trade barbs: What to know about the feud "Where My Country Gone" highlights the U.S.-Mexico border wall that Trump wished to build long before he took office in 2017. The episode aired in September 2015, ahead of the 2016 presidential election. In the episode, Mr. Garrison (not yet President Garrison) begins to promote the idea of building a wall along the U.S.-Canada border to eliminate the number of illegal Canadian immigrants entering the country. Can 'South Park' take on Trump 2.0? They're walking a tightrope In "Oh, Jeez," Mr. Garrison is elected as president in the 2016 election. The character, renamed to President Garrison, continues to serve as a parody of Trump in the series until Season 24, when Trump lost the 2020 election. The episode aired on Nov. 9, 2016, the day after the election. In the next episode, "Members Only," President Garrison begins his duties. He gets a Trump-style toupee, tours the Pentagon, is given a book of "military secrets" and gets in a heated phone call with Boris Johnson, the former prime minister of the United Kingdom. "Put It Down" highlights the United States' relationship with North Korea and references Trump's presence on social media. In the episode, which aired in September 2017, President Garrison posts aggressive tweets about North Korea, specifically about a nuclear missile fired by the country, which causes car accidents by drivers who are distracted by the posts. "Doubling Down," references the decreasing popularity of Trump during his first presidential administration. The episode aired in November 2017. During the episode, President Garrison insults a world leader on the telephone in the White House while his advisers discuss low approval ratings. "Splatty Tomato," again, parodies Trump's approval ratings following the 2016 election. The episode aired in December 2017. Throughout the episode, President Garrison pops up, scaring characters and asking them about his approval ratings. The characters compare Garrison sneak attacks to characters in "Stranger Things" and "IT." At one point, the character Tweek is riding his bicycle around town when he sees a collection of balloons that read, "Make America Great Again." The balloons then pop, revealing President Garrison, who asks Tweek about his ratings. "The Pandemic Special" was the premiere of Season 24. Airing in September 2020, the episodes satirize the United States' handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and civil unrest amid the Black Lives Matter movement. President Garrison makes minor appearances in the episodes, notably using a flamethrower to encourage citizens to vote in the 2020 presidential election. "Spring Break" parodies the insurrection of Jan. 6, 2021. In the episode, Mr. Garrison, who freshly lost the 2020 presidential election, goes on a trip with his boyfriend to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The episode aired in March 2023. During the trip, Mr. Garrison starts to slink away to Make America Great Again rallies, despite his boyfriend's pleas not to. The episode ends with Mr. Garrison leading a chant that results in his supporters rushing the U.S. Capitol. Old and new episodes of "South Park" are now available for streaming on Paramount+ with a paid subscription. A Paramount+ Essential subscription is $7.99 a month with ads, and a Paramount+ Premium subscription is $12.99 a month without ads. Contributing: Brian Truitt and Brendan Morrow, USA TODAY


Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
‘South Park' Season 27 Media Reactions To The Donald Trump Episode
"South Park." South Park's Season 27 premiere episode — where creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone take on President Donald Trump — has media outlets buzzing. While there aren't enough episodes for critics to release a season review for South Park Season 27 plenty of online outlets are sharing their observations of Episode 1, called Sermon on the 'Mount. After the series' premiere was delayed two weeks over Skydance's pending acquisition of Paramount Global — as well as Paramount Global's negotiations with Parker and Stone to bring South Park to its Paramount+ streaming platform — Episode 1 finally premiered on Comedy Central on Wednesday. Paramount Global and Stone and Parker finally reached a deal early Wednesday that is worth $1.5 billion over five years, and Season 27 Episode 1 premiered on Paramount+ early Thursday morning — along with South Park's first 26 seasons. The logline for South Park Season 27 Episode 1 reads, 'When the residents of South Park face their possible demise, Jesus returns to give them an important message.' However, upon Jesus' visit to South Park Elementary, it sets off a chain of events that extends to the White House, where Parker and Stone go hard after President Donald Trump with scenes involving Satan and lots of nudity — South Park animation-style and via a live-action deepfake. In addition, the episode works in pointed observations about Paramount's $16 million lawsuit settlement with Trump and even manages to work in a reference to 'Epstein's list.' In her take on the Season 27 premiere, Liz Shannon Miller of Consequence wrote that 'creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone did a lot, but perhaps the most important thing they did was remember what punching up looks like. 'Taking aim at President Trump in a way that seems actively tailored to piss the current administration off, Sermon on the 'Mount plays like a direct dare to Paramount to cancel the show, or for our government to make Parker and Stone's lives very unpleasant the next time they try to go through airport security,' Miller added. 'And by doing so, the pair have created a piece of subversive political art that feels like a true reflection of today.' SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA - JULY 24: (L-R) Matt Stone and Trey Parker attend Paramount+'s South Park In ... More San Diego event during 2025 San Diego Comic-Con on July 24, 2025 in San Diego, California. (Photo byfor Paramount+) What Did Other Outlets Say About The 'South Park' Season 27 Premiere? Alan Sepinwall of Rolling Stone also lauded Trey Parker and Matt Stone's gutsy episode, even if their criticism was leveled by using South Park brand humor. 'At precarious moments like this, certain things need to be said out loud, even if they're being packaged with juvenile d--- jokes,' Sepinwall wrote in Rolling Stone. 'When so many of their peers are too scared to offer even a mealy-mouthed version of criticism, Parker, Stone, and South Park just went for it. Motivations don't matter.' While President Donald Trump and conservatives were at the center of Episode 1's mockery, Parker and Stone have been known to be an equal opportunity offenders. As such, Sepinwall wrote that viewers shouldn't be surprised if a future episode lampoons the left. 'Desperate times mean you can't afford to interrogate the credentials of everyone who takes your side, even if it's only temporary,' Sepinwall writes in Rolling Stone. 'Parker and Stone can be so politically elusive that it wouldn't be shocking if the next episode had a subplot about AOC [Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez] in a bikini contest, so the duo can once again insist that their chief goal is to play devil's advocate to whatever the conventional wisdom of the moment is.' In his assessment of the South Park Season 27 premiere for The Guardian in the U.K., Stuart Heritage wrote that there could be greater implications for Paramount. 'Sermon on the 'Mount is a grand dare. If Trump could get $16 million by suing Paramount over an editorially acceptable edit on a news [program], then it stands to reason that he will try to go after a cartoon that depicts him trying to insert his microscopic p---- into Satan," Heritage wrote in The Guardian. 'And if he does sue, will Paramount risk destroying its already damaged reputation by capitulating yet again?' While media outlets celebrated the South Park Season 27 premiere, it managed to attract one major criticism — from the White House. 'This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a statement to media outlets (via Variety). 'President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history – and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' South Park Season 27 is available on streaming on Paramount+ along with Seasons 1-26.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Avatar: Fire & Ash' Trailer Leaks Online: James Cameron Returns With Fiery Stunner
The action-packed first trailer for James Cameron's next Avatar fantasy epic has leaked online — and the footage looks spectacular. Disney is rolling out the trailer for Avatar: Fire & Ash 'exclusively' in theaters in front of Fantastic Four: First Steps. And just like with Christopher Nolan's 'only in theaters' trailer for The Odyssey early this month, grainy unauthorized copies have begun to circulate. But give some credit to Disney here — the Fire & Ash trailer is, at least, a bit tougher to find than the trailer Nolan's Universal film was, with copies being taken down as fast as they pop up. More from The Hollywood Reporter Billie Eilish Reveals 3D Collaboration With James Cameron Is in the Works James Cameron to Write Movie Based on Joe Abercrombie Novel 'The Devils' After Finishing 'Avatar: Fire and Ash' Les Dilley, 'Star Wars,' 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' Art Director, Dies at 84 Needless to say, fan reaction has been effusive. Fan site The Sietch of Sci-Fi said the trailer 'looks incredible.' Another raved that the trailer was 'some of the most beautiful footage I've seen all year [and I was] struck by the real sense of doom and rage — fist fights inside of cosmic volcanoes, heroes terrified, huge aerial battles.' While another entertainment writer wrote, '[The trailer] started out as 'meh, more of the same' and ended with 'yup, another billion to James Cameron.'' And a film critic wrote: 'The visuals are (somehow) on another level. There is no doubt in my mind that this WILL be the biggest movie of 2025, and 'epic' doesn't feel like it does this trailer justice.' The trailer introduces two new tribes, the Wind Traders and the fire-hurling Ash People clan. The footage shows (trailer spoilers here — if that's a thing) plenty of intense arial fighting between Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and his Na'vi family, the Ash People clan and, of course, Colonel Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang, now sporting dramatic white, black and red warpaint, suggesting he might have made an alliance with the Ash People). At one point, a captive Kiri (Sigourney Weaver) is warned by a new villain, Varang (Oona Chaplin), 'Your goddess has no dominion here.' Sully — who warns, 'we cannot live like this' — is taken captive and paraded by the occupation forces. And Spider (Jack Champion) seems like he's in jeopardy quite a bit. The first Avatar, released in 2009, became the highest-grossing film of all time, raking in $2.9 billion globally. The first sequel, 2022's The Way of Water, charted as the third-highest-grossing movie of all time (with $2.3 billion), beating expectations and silencing doubters that the Oscar winner could pull off another Avatar blockbuster. At this point, few doubt Cameron's ability to generate massive box office returns with the Avatar franchise and confidence is high that Fire & Ash will deliver when its released as a major holiday tentpole on Dec. 19. While a run time hasn't yet been announced, Cameron has teased that Fire and Ash 'will be a bit longer' than The Way of Water. The last film was three hours and 12 minutes. 'In a nutshell, we had too many great ideas packed into act one of [Way of Water],' Cameron recently said. 'The [film] was moving like a bullet train, and we weren't drilling down enough on character. So I said, 'Guys, we've got to split it.' [Fire & Ash] will actually be a little bit longer than [Way of Water].' Cameron plans five Avatar films and has said he intends to direct them all, as well. Much of the footage, Cameron has said, has already been shot. Avatar 4 is set for Dec. 21, 2029, and Avatar 5 will arrive Dec. 19, 2031. Cameron also hopes to adapt the Charles Pellegrino books Ghosts of Hiroshima and Last Train From Hiroshima as soon as his Avatar schedule permits. The film would focus on the true story of a Japanese man during World War II who survived the atomic blast at Hiroshima as well as the explosion in Nagasaki. If it comes to fruition, it would mark Cameron's first non-Avatar film since 1997's Titanic. Fire & Ash cast members include Zoe Saldaña, Sigourney Weaver, Britain Dalton, Jack Champion, Trinity Jo-Li Bliss, Stephen Lang, Giovanni Ribisi, Edie Falco, Brendan Cowell, Matt Gerald, Kate Winslet, Cliff Curtis, Bailey Bass, Jemaine Clement and David Thewlis. The official description of Fire and Ash: 'Jake and Neytiri's family grapples with grief after Neteyam's death, encountering a new, aggressive Na'vi tribe, the Ash People, who are led by the fiery Varang, as the conflict on Pandora escalates and a new moral focus emerges.' Disney had no comment on the leak. Best of The Hollywood Reporter The 40 Greatest Needle Drops in Film History The 40 Best Films About the Immigrant Experience Wes Anderson's Movies Ranked From Worst to Best Solve the daily Crossword