Net zero jobs plans are fundamentally flawed, Miliband warned
Ed Miliband has been urged to slash taxes on the North Sea to prevent the loss of tens of thousands of jobs.
Researchers at Robert Gordon University (RGU) said oil and gas jobs were disappearing faster than new clean energy roles were being created as a result of the slower-than-expected deployment of wind farms.
It threatens the loss of tens of thousands of skilled British jobs by the end of the decade.
The RGU report warned that the offshore wind sector may only generate 29,000 jobs by 2030, while some 58,000 disappear from oil and gas – the equivalent of 200 jobs lost every week for the next five years.
Paul de Leeuw, director of RGU's Energy Transition Institute, said: 'You have to wait pretty well to the back end of this decade before there's enough capacity in the renewables sector to take all the people coming out of oil and gas.
'So there is a very valid, very real concern in oil and gas, in the world-class supply chain and the absolutely fantastic workforce, and they're saying 'actually, we're quite happy to work on the renewable agenda, but the jobs are simply not there'.
'It's a timing issue.'
To avoid heavy job losses, RGU said Mr Miliband, the Energy Secretary, needed to either attract a larger share of turbine manufacturing to the UK or reverse his ban on new North Sea drilling licences to temporarily boost oil and gas production.
Mr Miliband has promised a 'just transition' in the North Sea, saying offshore wind jobs will replace those lost on oil and gas rigs.
He is targeting between 43 and 50 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind capacity by 2030 as part of his clean power plans. The Government argues this will not only deliver energy security but also provide lasting employment for North Sea workers.
However, based on the industry's current trajectory, new jobs will not be created fast enough to match the decline in oil and gas.
In a worst-case scenario, researchers said the overall number of people working in offshore energy could fall by one fifth to 125,000.
It comes after energy consultancy BloombergNEF warned the Government was on course to miss its offshore wind deployment target by 10GW.
RGU said Mr Miliband could miss his wind power targets and still avoid job losses, but only if he attracted a larger share of turbine manufacturing to the UK or reopened the North Sea.
Prof De Leeuw said: 'Getting to the Government's target for offshore wind capacity would be an absolutely heroic achievement, especially in just the next five years.
'So if you might not get there, you want to keep your options open. We think you need to keep oil and gas going for just a bit longer, to buy more time for the cavalry to arrive in the form of renewable energy jobs.'
The RGU report predicted demand for between 125,000 and 212,000 offshore energy workers – including both those in oil and gas and those in renewables – by 2030.
This depends on various factors, including the amount of offshore wind capacity that is built, the share of turbine manufacturing that is done domestically, and the level of oil and gas production.
In nearly every scenario where Mr Miliband hits his upper target for offshore wind generation, or 50GW of capacity, the number of North Sea jobs either increases or stays more or less the same.
But in most scenarios where only 40GW or 30GW are delivered, large numbers of jobs are lost.
BloombergNEF recently warned that Mr Miliband was on course to deliver just 33GW by 2030, with Ørsted's decision to cancel the massive Hornsea 4 project also viewed as a sign of industry turbulence.
Significant job losses are less likely if more money is spent on building wind farm equipment in Britain, RGU said. However, this may be beyond the Government's control.
Another way to ensure jobs are not lost in almost every scenario is to ensure oil and gas production stays at 700,000 barrels per day or more, compared to a current forecast of between 500,000 to 600,000 barrels per day.
This would only be possible if controversial developments such as the Rosebank and Jackdaw fields went ahead, as well as other schemes.
Prof De Leeuw suggested ministers could try to grow domestic turbine manufacturing by making supporting investments in factories, perhaps through the National Wealth Fund and state-owned Great British Energy.
But he warned the Government 'doesn't have all the levers' to ensure that happens, whereas the windfall tax on oil and gas producers and the ban on new licences were within its control.
While stressing the North Sea was still in 'managed decline', he added: 'It is very hard for the Government to make the renewables agenda go faster.
'But what they do have is all the levers on how to manage the decline in oil and gas, and particularly around what they do with the tax regime and the fiscal levers.'
Asked whether Mr Miliband should reverse the ban on new drilling licences, a key pledge in Labour's election manifesto, he replied: 'You have to get investor confidence to the highest point.
'What was in the [Labour] manifesto ... the world has moved on, but the policy has not. I do think there is room for selective licensing to keep activity going.'
The Government has been consulting on its plans for the North Sea, which include boosting employment through a variety of new sectors such as carbon capture and storage, hydrogen production and offshore wind.
It has also set up the Office for Clean Energy Jobs to ensure new roles are 'high-quality and paid fairly', and launched the so-called clean industry bonus to attract factory investments to coastal communities.
On Friday, a spokesman for Mr Miliband's department said: 'We have taken rapid steps to deliver the next generation of good jobs for North Sea workers in a fair and orderly transition as part of our plan for change, including by making the biggest investment in offshore wind and two first-of-a-kind carbon capture storage clusters.
'This comes alongside Great British Energy, headquartered in Aberdeen, which has already announced a £300m investment into British supply chains, unlocking significant investment and helping to create thousands of skilled jobs.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Big Take: What Poland's New President Means for the EU
Poland's election of a Trump-backed conservative nationalist president early this week is part of a larger shift to the right across the European continent: Much like in the US, conservative, nationalist and right-wing parties are gaining traction. On today's Big Take podcast, Bloomberg's Rodney Jefferson and David Gura discuss the growing cultural divide behind Europe's rising conservative movements and what their growth could mean for migration, climate policy and the future of the EU.


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
UK Home Sales Hit Three-Year High, Defying Slowdown Fears
Britain's property market saw its busiest month in over three years in May, defying expectations for a slowdown after a tax break for buyers expired. Property website Rightmove said home sales were up 6% year-on-year last month, which is one of the most active for home buying. It was the strongest May for sales in four years and the best for any month since March 2022.


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire
The United States on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution calling for an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent' ceasefire between Israel and the militant group Hamas in Gaza. The US was the only nation to oppose the resolution. Fourteen others, including the United Kingdom, voted in favor. There were no abstentions. Dorothy Camille Shea, the United States ambassador to the UN, said the US opposed the resolution because it did not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza. '(The resolution) is unacceptable for what it does say, it is unacceptable for what it does not say, and it is unacceptable for the manner in which it has been advanced,' she said in comments before the vote took place. The US 'has taken the very clear position since this conflict began that Israel has a right to defend itself, which includes defeating Hamas and ensuring they are never again in a position to threaten Israel. In this regard, any product that undermines our close ally Israel's security is a nonstarter,' she added. This is not the first time the US has vetoed a UN Security Council draft resolution on Gaza. In November 2024, it vetoed one calling for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire, on the grounds it would not have secured the release of hostages. The United Kingdom said it 'regrets' that the latest resolution 'was unable to reach a consensus.' 'The United Kingdom voted in favor of this resolution today because of the intolerable situation in Gaza,' the UK's Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York Barbara Woodward said following the vote. 'We are determined to see an end to this war, secure the release of the hostages held by Hamas and alleviate the catastrophic humanitarian situation for Palestinians in Gaza,' she added. Woodward described Israel's expansion of its military operations in Gaza and its severe restrictions on aid as 'unjustifiable, disproportionate, and counterproductive.' Israel in mid May launched a major new offensive in Gaza it says is aimed at destroying Hamas and freeing hostages, sparking condemnation from the United Nations and aid organizations who warn civilians are bearing the brunt of the expanded assault. The ambassador also said the UK condemned Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and demanded the militant group release all the hostages 'immediately and unconditionally,' saying 'Hamas can have no role in the future governance of Gaza.' The ambassador also restated the UK's position that 'a two-state solution is the only way to bring the long-lasting peace, stability and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve.' Meanwhile, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar thanked US President Donald Trump and the US administration 'for standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel and vetoing this one-sided resolution in the UN Security Council.' 'The proposed resolution only strengthens Hamas and undermines American efforts to achieve a hostage deal,' he added in a post on X shortly after the voting. The draft text had demanded 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties' and the 'immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale.' It also demanded 'the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups.' Israel launched the war in Gaza after Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups carried out a surprise attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages. It was the deadliest terror attack in Israel's history. The Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza said the number of people killed by Israel's offensive in Gaza in the wake of the October 7 attacks now exceeds 54,000, most of whom are women and children.