What Greater Reading council could like if expansion goes ahead
Liz Terry (Labour, Coley), the leader of Reading Borough Council, has suggested incorporating Calcot, Tilehurst Parish, Theale and Pangbourne into the council's jurisdiction.
These areas are currently governed by West Berkshire Council.
Moving them over to Reading council would create a 'Greater Reading' borough of more than 200,000 residents.
The proposal is a counteroffer to the creation of 'Ridgeway Council', which would merge South Oxfordshire, Vale of White Horse and West Berkshire Council.
Ridgeway Council has been invented as Oxfordshire County Council could be abolished in 2028.
In order for the Greater Reading proposal to go ahead, Reading Borough Council's policy committee would have to agree to call for a boundary review in a submission to Angela Rayner, the Labour secretary of state for local government.
But what would a Greater Reading council look like?
Geographically, not a great deal would change. Calcot and Tilehurst Parish are already in the Reading urban area, with the M4 separating Theale.
Although Pangbourne is a settlement of its own, it is only divided from Purley by a few fields.
Notably, the Greater Reading proposal would not include Earley, Woodley and Shinfield, all suburbs that are in Wokingham Borough Council's jurisdiction.
Politically, Greater Reading would see more representation from opposition parties.
Reading has been a Labour stronghold for more than a decade, with the council being controlled by Labour since 2012.
The Conservatives have been on the retreat since the all-out election in 2022, with Labour taking seats from the Tories in Caversham Heights in 2022 and 2023 and Emmer Green in 2024.
But if the five West Berkshire council wards that Reading Borough requested are incorporated into 'Greater Reading', the Conservatives would gain five seats and the Liberal Democrats would gain three.
Assuming these wards are added as they are currently constituted, the Greater Reading council would have 57 councillors representing 22 wards.
Labour would retain control with 33 councillors, requiring 29 councillors for a majority.
Assuming voting habits in Tilehurst Parish remain, the Conservatives would pip the Green Party to be the leaders of the opposition.
Meanwhile, Liberal Democrat representation would double to six.
You can see the current representatives of the five wards Reading Borough Council is asking for below:
Tilehurst & Purley (three-member ward)
Cllr Paul Kander - Conservative
Cllr Jane Langford - Conservative
Cllr Janine Lewis - Liberal Democrats
Tilehurst South & Holybrook (two-member ward)
Cllr Biyi Oloko - Conservative
Cllr Richard Somner - Conservative
Our Summer Sale is LIVE! Get 6 months of trusted local news for just £6! Subscribe now 👇https://t.co/AU8vrFOzzu pic.twitter.com/RNKQkgZYjM
— Reading Chronicle (@rdgchronicle) July 3, 2025
Tilehurst Birch Copse (two-member ward)
Cllr Joanne Stewart - Conservative
Cllr Clive Taylor - Labour
Pangbourne (one-member ward)
Cllr Matt Shakespeare - Liberal Democrats
Theale (one-member ward)
Councillor Alan Macro - Liberal Democrats
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Record number of police officers sacked amid drop in force numbers
A record number of police officers were sacked from forces in England and Wales in the past year, new figures show. Latest Home Office data reveals 426 officers were dismissed or had their contracts terminated in the 12 months to March. This is up 17% year on year from the previous record of 365 and more than double the number fired at the start of the decade, when 164 officers were dismissed in 2019/20. The latest 12-month period also saw 4,806 officers voluntarily leaving policing: the second-highest number since records began in 2006 and down slightly from the peak of 5,151 in 2023/24. The figures come as ministers have sought to tighten rules on standards to improve confidence in policing, while they have also faced warnings from forces that funding falls short to keep its existing workforce. A total of 146,442 full-time equivalent (FTE) police officers were in post at the end of March 2025, down almost 1% from 147,745 at the same point last year, which was the highest in modern times. Last month, plans for an average 2.3% rise in police spending per year faced backlash from police leaders, who warned a projected £1.2 billion shortfall will continue to grow and leave forces facing further cuts. Acting national chairwoman of the Police Federation, Tiff Lynch, had said: 'We will lose 10,000 experienced officers a year to resignation by the end of this spending review period, driven out by poor pay and unacceptable working conditions.' Chairman of the National Police Chiefs' Council Gavin Stephens added that the amount 'falls far short' of what is needed to fund Government plans and to maintain the existing workforce. Ministers have committed to recruiting 13,000 more neighbourhood policing officers by 2029, with 3,000 extra recruits to be in post by April 2026. Reacting to the figures, the Conservatives said the falling police numbers were a 'devastating blow' to neighbourhoods dealing with rising crime and anti-social behaviour. The figures cover the last three months of the former Conservative government, and the first nine months of Labour in power. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Labour has let down policing and has let down the public. 'We need police to catch criminals, respond to 999 calls, investigate crime and patrol our streets. 'Labour has massively increased our taxes, squandered the money, and now they're reducing police numbers. The public are less safe as a result of Labour's incompetence.' The Home Office has been contacted for comment.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Why Cyber Resilience Must Be A Local Priority
Dara Warn is the CEO of INE, a global leader in enterprise cybersecurity training and certifications. The volume of cyberattacks on state and local governments is growing louder, and the stakes couldn't be higher for our communities. Consider the direct impact: In March, Union County, Pennsylvania, saw sensitive personal information of thousands of residents exposed by ransomware, and in February, a cyberattack in Mission, Texas, disrupted police operations. Spring brought a surge of cyberattacks targeting local government agencies across the country, with new incidents reported from coast to coast. The growing frequency and geographic spread of these breaches underscore just how widespread and urgent the threat has become. These aren't isolated incidents. They are unmistakable symptoms of a pervasive crisis that erodes public confidence and directly compromises the very essence of safety and security within our communities. The time for robust, collaborative cybersecurity measures is now. My time in cybersecurity has revealed a troubling reality. We've seen massive investments in cyber defenses from corporations and federal entities. Yet, it's our state and local governments—the foundational pillars of our communities, touching everyone's lives—that have emerged as increasingly vulnerable points in our nation's digital fabric. This escalating risk isn't merely a technological hurdle—it's a profound challenge to the security and resilience of the places we call home. The Perfect Storm Of Vulnerability Local governments have a unique set of factors that make them irresistible to cybercriminals. They possess incredibly valuable data: Social Security numbers, financial records, health information and critical infrastructure access. Yet they often operate with constrained budgets, aging systems and limited cybersecurity expertise. Malware attacks involving remote access trojans against state and local governments increased by 148%, while "ransomware incidents were 51% more prominent during the first eight months of 2023 than they were during the same period a year earlier," according to the Center for Internet Security. What makes these emerging threats particularly severe is their direct assault on the critical infrastructure and services that underpin public safety. The potential consequences are immediate and far-reaching: • A cyber compromise of emergency dispatch systems could directly result in delayed responses. • Exploiting industrial Internet of Things (IoT) vulnerabilities in water treatment facilities would place public health systems in jeopardy. • The disruption of essential government services would leave citizens without vital access. These attacks represent more than financial loss—they directly threaten the basic services communities depend on for safety and well-being. The Economic Reality Adding to the escalating threat landscape, a recent shift in federal cybersecurity policy has placed the onus squarely on state and local governments. Proposed 2026 budget cuts eliminate hundreds of positions at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and reduce funding for cyber defense and education training. This reduction in federal support, coupled with increasing regulatory requirements, has created a widening resource gap that many of our jurisdictions are already struggling to bridge. Budget constraints compound this challenge. When economic uncertainties reduce revenues, cybersecurity training programs—the very investments most crucial at such times—are often the first to be cut. Yet, the financial impact of a successful cyberattack on a small municipality can be devastating. While the average cost of ransomware recovery in 2024 stood at $2.73 million (even before factoring in ransom payments), a sum that might be manageable for a Fortune 500 company could force a small town into financial crisis. Supporting Our Cybersecurity Professionals The vital backbone of local government essential services rests on the shoulders of IT and information security professionals. They work to keep systems operational, networks secure and ensure regulatory compliance. They represent the primary defense against increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. Their critical work encompasses keeping systems operational, fortifying networks and upholding regulatory compliance. Against a backdrop of increasingly sophisticated cyber threats, they stand as our foremost line of defense. There are encouraging signs that state and local government leaders are beginning to recognize the importance of a robust cybersecurity framework. According to a 2024 survey by the Public Technology Institute, 72% of local government IT officials claim their budgets are adequate to address current cybersecurity threats, up from 64% the previous year. Additionally, 67% of local governments reported having a dedicated cybersecurity leadership role in 2024, compared to just 52% in the previous year. Still, significant challenges remain. Research shows that the top three barriers to effectively defending against cybercrime are the inability to pay competitive salaries to cybersecurity employees (58.6%), an insufficient number of cybersecurity staff (53.1%) and a lack of funds (52.8%). These are all budget-related constraints that many local governments continue to face. A Path Forward: Strategic Investment In Training Addressing the cyber challenge demands a strategic, proactive approach to cybersecurity readiness. For local governments, this means recognizing that cybersecurity training for your IT and technical staff is a critical investment in community infrastructure, just as essential as maintaining our roads, bridges or vital water systems. Effective cybersecurity requires comprehensive, ongoing training that constantly evolves with the threat landscape. This urgency is underscored by Verizon's "2024 Data Breach Investigations Report", which reveals that the human element is the common root cause of 68% of data breaches. This training must be deeply technical, highly engaging and continually updated to ensure defense strategies adapt as rapidly as new cyber threats emerge. Your technical teams, who are the frontline guardians of your community's digital infrastructure, need constant access to up-to-date, practical, hands-on training that prepares them for real-world scenarios. Taking Action Proactive local government leadership takes a tactical stance on cybersecurity readiness. Local government and business leaders should consider conducting comprehensive cybersecurity assessments to understand their current readiness. These assessments should inform strategic planning and budget allocation for the coming fiscal year. For jurisdictions where cybersecurity training has not yet been a top priority, the escalating threat landscape against local governments makes this a critical investment to prioritize now. Cybersecurity is fundamentally about service delivery and public trust. Those who invest in their cybersecurity capabilities demonstrate a commitment to protecting the communities they serve and maintaining the essential services citizens depend on every day. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kemi Badenoch plays down prospect of leadership coup after Tory reshuffle
Kemi Badenoch has played down the prospect of a coup after unveiling her revamped Conservative top team. The Tory leader said she was not 'paying any attention' to reports that backbenchers are already plotting to oust her, less than a year after she was elected. The New Statesman reported that many Tory MPs who backed Mrs Badenoch in the leadership contest have privately turned on her, and believe her core team of advisers are 'lightweights and sycophants'. Faltering Conservatives may seek to trigger a vote of confidence in their leader in November, once a grace period protecting her from such a move ends, the magazine said. The claims came to light a day after Mrs Badenoch reshuffled the senior Tory ranks, appointing former minister Sir James Cleverly as her shadow housing secretary. Asked about suggestions that Tory MPs were already plotting a coup, Mrs Badenoch told the PA news agency: 'I would say that if nobody put their name to it, then I'm not paying any attention to it. 'People have been saying that about every single leader, and it's usually the same one or two people who say it about every single leader.' Speaking during a visit to a housing development in north-west London alongside Sir James, Mrs Badenoch added: 'I've been elected to get the Conservative Party back on track, and I'm very focused on doing that. 'We lost to a historic defeat last year for many reasons, not least of all, house building, not doing as well as it could have done.' The New Statesman said Mrs Badenoch had criticised her predecessor Rishi Sunak for making an early exit from D-Day commemorations in France during the 2024 general election campaign, and that she believed the gaffe was central to the party's loss. The magazine also claimed to have seen a notebook containing her handwriting, which included affirming phrases like 'You are a serious person who does big things', and suggesting the Tory leader was 'the standard bearer of the right'. Mrs Badenoch's team denied that she had lost any such notebook. In his first full day in the job, shadow housing secretary Sir James accused the Prime Minister of being more interested in finding accommodation for asylum seekers than 'hard-working young people'. He said he was 'furious' when the Prime Minister 'blithely' said there are 'plenty of houses' around the UK for asylum seekers. Sir Keir Starmer insisted there was 'lots of housing available' to accommodate rising numbers of homeless people and asylum seekers when he was questioned by senior MPs earlier this week. Sir James told Times Radio: 'I was furious, I genuinely couldn't believe he said this, when the Prime Minister was at the Liaison Committee and blithely said, 'Oh, there are plenty of houses around the UK for asylum seekers'.' Sir James also said he understands the frustrations of local people when asked about demonstrations outside hotels believed to be housing asylum seekers. There has been a series of protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, since an asylum seeker was charged with sexual assault. His new role makes him the opposition counterpart to Angela Rayner in her housing, communities and local government brief, but not in her deputy prime minister post. Ms Rayner said on Tuesday that immigration was among issues having a 'profound impact on society' as she updated the Cabinet on her work on social cohesion. Sir James was also asked for his view on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) after Mrs Badenoch launched a review and said she was 'increasingly of the view' that the UK should withdraw. He would not say whether he agreed as he toured broadcast studios on Wednesday morning. Mrs Badenoch told broadcasters: 'James and I have always had the same position on the ECHR, and that is that if we need to leave, then we should leave, but it's not a silver bullet. 'That is why we have a commission on this very issue, which will be reporting at party conference. 'So I wouldn't bring someone into the shadow cabinet if they didn't agree with me.'
