What Greater Reading council could like if expansion goes ahead
Liz Terry (Labour, Coley), the leader of Reading Borough Council, has suggested incorporating Calcot, Tilehurst Parish, Theale and Pangbourne into the council's jurisdiction.
These areas are currently governed by West Berkshire Council.
Moving them over to Reading council would create a 'Greater Reading' borough of more than 200,000 residents.
The proposal is a counteroffer to the creation of 'Ridgeway Council', which would merge South Oxfordshire, Vale of White Horse and West Berkshire Council.
Ridgeway Council has been invented as Oxfordshire County Council could be abolished in 2028.
In order for the Greater Reading proposal to go ahead, Reading Borough Council's policy committee would have to agree to call for a boundary review in a submission to Angela Rayner, the Labour secretary of state for local government.
But what would a Greater Reading council look like?
Geographically, not a great deal would change. Calcot and Tilehurst Parish are already in the Reading urban area, with the M4 separating Theale.
Although Pangbourne is a settlement of its own, it is only divided from Purley by a few fields.
Notably, the Greater Reading proposal would not include Earley, Woodley and Shinfield, all suburbs that are in Wokingham Borough Council's jurisdiction.
Politically, Greater Reading would see more representation from opposition parties.
Reading has been a Labour stronghold for more than a decade, with the council being controlled by Labour since 2012.
The Conservatives have been on the retreat since the all-out election in 2022, with Labour taking seats from the Tories in Caversham Heights in 2022 and 2023 and Emmer Green in 2024.
But if the five West Berkshire council wards that Reading Borough requested are incorporated into 'Greater Reading', the Conservatives would gain five seats and the Liberal Democrats would gain three.
Assuming these wards are added as they are currently constituted, the Greater Reading council would have 57 councillors representing 22 wards.
Labour would retain control with 33 councillors, requiring 29 councillors for a majority.
Assuming voting habits in Tilehurst Parish remain, the Conservatives would pip the Green Party to be the leaders of the opposition.
Meanwhile, Liberal Democrat representation would double to six.
You can see the current representatives of the five wards Reading Borough Council is asking for below:
Tilehurst & Purley (three-member ward)
Cllr Paul Kander - Conservative
Cllr Jane Langford - Conservative
Cllr Janine Lewis - Liberal Democrats
Tilehurst South & Holybrook (two-member ward)
Cllr Biyi Oloko - Conservative
Cllr Richard Somner - Conservative
Our Summer Sale is LIVE! Get 6 months of trusted local news for just £6! Subscribe now 👇https://t.co/AU8vrFOzzu pic.twitter.com/RNKQkgZYjM
— Reading Chronicle (@rdgchronicle) July 3, 2025
Tilehurst Birch Copse (two-member ward)
Cllr Joanne Stewart - Conservative
Cllr Clive Taylor - Labour
Pangbourne (one-member ward)
Cllr Matt Shakespeare - Liberal Democrats
Theale (one-member ward)
Councillor Alan Macro - Liberal Democrats
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Apple adds fresh $100 billion to US investment pledge
STORY: TRUMP: "...this is the largest investment Apple has ever made in America." U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that Apple will spend another $100 billion in U.S. investments... with CEO Tim Cook standing by his side in the Oval Office. TRUMP: 'The company is also unveiling its ambitious new American manufacturing program, which will bring factories and assembly lines across our country all roaring to life. // And Apple will massively increase spending on its domestic supply chain for the iPhone and will build the largest and most sophisticated smart glass production line in the world." The move brings the technology giant's total investment commitment to the country to $600 billion over the next four years. COOK: 'American innovation is central to everything we do. Our products are designed here. We are hiring and growing here, and we support 450,000 jobs with thousands of suppliers and partners in all 50 states.' The decision comes as Trump pursues an aggressive tariff and trade agenda aimed at moving some manufacturing back into the United States. Related videos 2.6 million people to be stung by savings tax Budget 2025 predictions: When is it and which taxes will Labour raise? Labour urged to come clean on exit tax This superb FTSE 100 passive income stock now generates a stellar 8.1% dividend yield! But it could take decades to set up the kind of production capabilities in the U.S. that currently exist overseas, if it's even possible at all, says Craig Moffett, founding partner and senior research analyst at Moffett Nathanson. "It's certainly not realistic to think that they can start making iPhones in the United States. I will offer what I think is a really telling example, which is about a year ago when they were ramping up production of the iPhone 16 Pro, they needed to increase production in China. In the span of less than a month, they were able to add 50,000 employees at the rate of about $3 per hour in order to ramp up production. They were able to do that in what... literally about two weeks, There's simply no possibility that you could do something like that in the United States at any price." Apple said the new investment will include an expansion of its partnership with Corning that will lead to the production of glass in the U.S. for every iPhone and Apple Watch sold around the world. The technology giant said in February it would spend $500 billion in U.S. investments for a massive factory in Texas for artificial intelligence servers while adding about 20,000 research and development jobs across the country. Apple has also been shifting production of its devices bound for the U.S., sourcing iPhones from India and other products such as Macs and Apple Watches from Vietnam. Shares of Apple closed up five percent on Wednesday. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘One in four councils could lose money' under Government's funding proposals
Around a quarter of councils in England could lose money under the Government's proposed reforms to how local authorities are funded, analysis has found. A report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said the changes would create big 'winners and losers' as ministers attempt to address perceived unfairness in levels of core funding across the country. Sir Keir Starmer's own council, Camden in north London, will be hit by the reforms when taking inflation into account, the IFS added. The think tank said Camden, along with other inner London boroughs including Westminster, will have less money to spend on services even if they increase council tax by the maximum amount allowed. Whitehall will provide a minimum level of funding, a so-called funding floor, for council leaders during the changes, but the IFS said overall cash for inner London town halls would be 11-12% lower in 2028-29 in real terms. The paper said: 'Around one in four councils would see real-terms falls in overall funding under the Government's proposals, with around 30 on the lowest funding floors seeing real-terms cuts of 11–12%. Conversely, another one in four councils would see real-terms increases of 12% or more.' The changes, which will come into effect from next year, are being consulted on by ministers. The Government plans to create a new methodology to assess local authority needs relatively and factor in population and deprivation. It will also assess need for adult and children's services. Overall spending will fall for 186 councils and rise by the same total sum for 161. One in 10 will see a fall in overall funding, while one in 10 will see an increase of 10% or more. The overall Government spend on local authorities will not change. The changes will be phased in across three years, from 2026/27 to 2028/29. Kate Ogden, co-author of the IFS report and a senior research economist with the think tank, said: 'England has lacked a rational system of local government funding for at least 12 years – and arguably more like 20. It is therefore welcome that the nettle of funding reform is being grasped, and some councils will benefit substantially under the new system. 'But the changes will sting for those councils that are assessed to currently receive too high a share of the overall funding pot, and so which lose out from moves to align funding with assessed spending needs.' The proposals are criticised in the report as 'not particularly redistributive to poor, urban areas of England'. It cites South Tyneside and Sunderland councils being among those to lose out from the reforms as slow population growth is accounted for. The report added: 'It is somewhat surprising that, on average, councils in the most deprived 30% of areas would see very similar changes in overall funding over the next three years to those for councils in the middle 40% of areas.' It noted that rural areas, which feared being badly hit by changes, will benefit from a 'remoteness adjustment' which will compensate areas with higher needs due to being far from large towns. London will gain the least, with a cash-terms increase in funding of 8% in the next three years. Analysis by the London Councils collective has highlighted the risk of the funding 'dramatically underestimating' needs for local services in parts of the capital. It noted the city has the highest rate of poverty in the country when housing costs are factored in. Outside the capital, the East Midlands (22%) and Yorkshire & the Humber (19%) are set to see the biggest increases in funding, with the South East set to see the smallest at 13%. However, the proposals have been criticised by youth charity the National Children's Bureau, which said it was 'significantly concerned' about the way the Government plans to work out needs for children's services. Ms Ogden added: 'The Government should consider giving highly affected councils which currently have low council tax rates greater flexibility to bring their council tax bills up to more typical levels to offset funding losses. 'More generally, reform of council funding allocations is just one part of the financial sustainability puzzle. Efforts to reduce demands on, and the cost of providing, local services through reform and the use of new technology will also be vital.' A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded means the link between funding and need for services has broken down, leaving communities left behind. 'That's why we are taking decisive action to reform the funding system so we can get councils back on their feet and improve public services, with the IFS recognising that our changes will better align funding with councils' needs.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves must raise taxes to fill £51bn black hole, warns think tank
Chancellor Rachel Reeves must raise taxes immediately in order to plug a fresh £50bn hole in public finances, a UK thinktank said on Wednesday. According to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR), UK government finances have been hit by slowing economic growth, a weak jobs market and the cost of Labour's U-turns on welfare spending. NIESR recommended "a moderate but sustained increase in taxes" including reform of the council tax system to make up the shortfall. It also suggests that the government could raise revenue through changes to the scope of VAT, pensions allowances and prolonging the freeze in income tax thresholds, which is set to end in 2028. Reeves is now on course to miss her borrowing targets by £41.2bn, NIESR predicted in its report, facing an "impossible trilemma" of big tax hikes, spending cuts or a change to fiscal rules that she has said are non-negotiable. NIESR added that if she also wants to restore the £9.9bn of headroom maintained since last year's budget, she must raise taxes or cut spending by £51.1bn in the autumn budget statement. In its manifesto, Labour promised not to raise taxes such as income tax, VAT or national insurance on "working people". Read more: UK taxpayers 'subsidising' S&P 500, says LSEG boss NIESR nudged up its forecast for British economic growth for this year to 1.3% from its forecast of 1.2% in May. However, it cut its projections for all the following years up to 2030, largely due to the impact of US president Donald Trump's trade tariffs on the global economy. The forecasts are significantly weaker than those of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), whose projections underpin the government's tax and spending plans. NIESR expects 1% growth in 2028 compared with the OBR's 1.7%. Stephen Millard, NIESR's deputy director for macroeconomics, said the difference between those forecasts and NIESR's £41bn estimate of the shortfall probably lay largely in the think tank's lower forecasts for economic growth. It comes just a year after Rachel Reeves attacked the Conservative government for leaving an alleged £22bn black hole in the public finances. But shadow chancellor Mel Stride claimed the black hole was a result of Labour's 'economic mismanagement'. Stride said: 'Labour will always reach for the tax-rise lever because they don't understand the economy. Businesses are closing, unemployment is up, inflation has doubled and the economy is shrinking. And Labour are refusing to rule out more damaging tax rises on investment.' The news on Wednesday came as separate figures from HMRC showed almost 2.6 million people will be forced to pay tax on their savings this year, up by over 120,000 from 2024. The average saver who receives a bill will pay £2,300, according to analysis by stockbroker AJ Bell. Read more: Trending tickers: AMD, Novo Nordisk, Snap, Walt Disney, Super Micro and Glencore Will the Bank of England cut interest rates? How to reclaim overpaid pension taxError while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
