
Belfast Bride - Frank McNally on the Irish wife of man who dropped US atomic bomb on Nagasaki
But his role in
history
was far from funny.
Eighty years ago
this week, he was the bombardier who dropped the device known as
'Fat Man' on Nagasaki
, killing 70,000 people then and later.
He was nicknamed 'The Great Artiste' by colleagues in the US air-force, for his accuracy. They even had a plane so called in his honour which, with him in the crew, had also been part of the back-up at Hiroshima. It was said that he could 'hit a pickle barrel … from 30,000 feet'.
His name may have been doubly Celtic. Kermit is a Manx version of MacDermot. As for Beahan, that looks like a variant of the surname more usually anglicised as Behan.
READ MORE
But his wife, Teresa (aka Tess) Lavery was certainly Irish. And via both her husbands (Beahan was the second) - she became a footnote to history, literally or otherwise.
Belfast-born
of a dynasty that included the well-known publicans and the painter Sir John, Tess Lavery first wed the future historian Shelby Foote (1916 – 2005). They met when he was stationed at Kilkeel, Co Down, in the later years of the war.
In 1944, he borrowed an official vehicle without clearance to visit her in Belfast. That earned him a court martial and dismissal from the army, before he had seen any action.
The pair married in New York soon afterwards, despite mutual misgivings. On the way to the church, according to his biographer C Stuart Chapman, Foote began whistling Cole Porter's hit, Don't Fence Me In. The couple's obvious worries about each other led the priest to comment: 'I have never seen two people getting married look so solemn'.
For the bride, this only made things worse: 'On two separate occasions, the service had to be stopped because she cried so violently'.
A replica of the atomic bomb code-named Fat Man, dropped over Nagasaki, 9 August 1945. Photograph: History/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
It need hardly be added that the marriage didn't last long. Anxious to get back to the war, Foote soon afterwards enlisted for the Marine Corps, who was desperate enough for recruits to ignore his previous misdemeanours.
In the event, he never saw combat with them either. But he was a man who didn't want to be married, really. The condition 'galled' him, he later admitted.
Lavery filed for divorce in early 1946. Her husband didn't contest. And as Stewart Chapman notes: 'If Foote lost a wife, he gained a vocation'.
Having reluctantly given up on war, he became a journalist and wrote a first novel, published in 1946, earning enough from it to make him a full-time writer.
A few years later again, he embarked on a 20-year project that became a three-volume, 3,000-page history of the American Civil War. Its narrative style drew praise and criticism and established him as one of the best-known historians of the 20th century, although he continued to see himself primarily as a novelist.
Lavery's marriage to Beahan is less well documented but lasted until his death in 1989 and produced two children, Kermit Jnr and Patrick. Her new husband was lucky to have survived the war.
[
Atomic bombings anniversary: Japanese politicians consider a once-unthinkable question
Opens in new window
]
Survivors moving along the road after the atomic bombing of Nagasaki, Japan, in August 1945. Photograph: EPA/US national archives
In 1942 alone, planes in which he was a crew member were shot down or forced to crash-land four times. But for good or bad, Beahan would be forever defined by his role in
the two atomic bomb missions of August 1945
.
He was part of a support team for the first. For the second, he was the man charged with dropping the bomb on the city of Kokura, the original intended target.
In a bleak irony, Kokura was saved by smoke and dust from an earlier, conventional US air-bombing, which prevented Beahan from recognising a target.
The crew settled instead for Nagasaki, although that too presented problems. It was at first clouded over and the crew were reluctant to rely on radar, which could be notoriously inaccurate. The plane's fuel was running dangerously low, meanwhile. It looked for as if they might have to ditch the bomb at sea.
[
'As survivors of these weapons, we all agree that they can never be used again'
Opens in new window
]
Then Beahan spotted a sports stadium through a gap in the cloud cover. Moments later, according to Stephen Walker's book Shockwave: Countdown to Hiroshima: 'he yelled, 'Bombs away' – then corrected himself: 'Bomb away'."
He and the others had no idea where exactly it had fallen until later. 'In fact,' writes Walker, 'in one of the most bizarre coincidences of the war, Fat Man had detonated almost directly over the factory that once made the torpedoes used in the attack on Pearl Harbor'.
It also killed 40,000 people, with many more to follow.
Beahan had mixed feelings in later years about his involvement in the missions. He was neither proud nor inclined to apologise, believing the bombs had saved lives in the long run.
Japan's surrender followed within days, and a minor side effect was to end the hopes of Teresa Lavery's first husband that he would ever see military action. According to Stuart Chapman: 'Foote was devastated that World War II was over'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Before Dorothy: Aunt Em origin story a fresh and vivid Wizard of Oz tribute
Before Dorothy Author : Hazel Gaynor ISBN-13 : 978-0008518714 Publisher : HarperFiction Guideline Price : £16.99 I love reading new fiction inspired by old fiction, but for the author there is danger as well as temptation in heading down an imaginative path first drawn by another writer. With Before Dorothy, Hazel Gaynor has made wise choices, both in her characters and their circumstances. The action of Before Dorothy begins in 1922, so the Kansas prairies Gaynor depicts are not that of L Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (published in 1900), but closer to the 1939 movie adaptation. By setting Before Dorothy before and during the Great Depression and Dust Bowl of the 1930s, the reader retains the visual cues from the film in this Aunt Em origin story. Baum's Aunt Em is a minor character, described as thin, gaunt and unsmiling, almost destroyed by the harsh reality of farming, whereas Gaynor has given Emily a complete history and a joyful and fully realised interior existence. The Emily of Before Dorothy is one of three sisters from an Irish immigrant family. She marries would-be farmer Henry Gale not long after her sister Annie marries his wealthy cousin, John. Several years later, John and Annie drown in a boating accident on Lake Michigan, and their orphaned child is given to Emily and Henry to raise: 'Dorothy had nothing and she now needed her Aunt Em to be everything.' Dorothy's fortune has gone too, for John Gale died bankrupt. READ MORE Gaynor's Kansas is a place where 'prosperity and ruin were as finely balanced as a circus performer on a high wire', and her descriptions – particularly of weather and nature – are so evocative you can almost feel the relentless heat and taste the dust. Wizard of Oz fans will enjoy this novel's many Easter eggs, including references to circus acts, a nasty neighbour, a toy lion and such knowing comments as Henry saying of John, 'I'm quite sure if you tapped his chest there would be an echo where his heart should be.' [ From the archive: There's no place like home: The Wizard of Oz, 80 years on Opens in new window ] This imaginative tribute is a fresh and vivid story of one woman's extraordinary adventure and the places that shape us. Even – perhaps especially – those that aren't home.

Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Sydney Sweeney's jeans ad: How did we get to a culture war over this?
Sydney Sweeney is standing at the fridge in light blue stonewashed jeans ripped at the knee. She's wearing jorts (jean shorts) while being interrogated on her front lawn. She's in a cafe toilet trying to hand-dry a wet patch on her belted, high-waisted jeans. She's hanging out with her girlfriends in baggy 1960s dungarees. It's obvious, isn't it? This conclusive evidence – images from the films Echo Valley, Reality, Anyone but You and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood respectively – proves it. The Gen-Z actor has been a sleeper agent for Big Denim all along. Now, she's been reactivated via a starring role in an advertisement for American Eagle Outfitters declaring 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans' and, oops, suddenly this narrative arc is less about fabric, more about fascism. READ MORE How did we get here? Is there any way back? Help! We're going to need suitable footwear and maybe some kind of industrial clothing. The ad's tagline indulges in a little light wordplay by riffing on the phrase 'great genes'. One video in the campaign shows Sweeney approaching a billboard and crossing out the word 'genes', replacing it with jeans. In another video, published on American Eagle's social-media channels, Sweeney is paid to say this: 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair colour, personality and even eye colour. My jeans are blue.' Congratulations, I guess? [ Humourless raging against Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle jeans ad is pointless Opens in new window ] Not everyone was a fan. The suggestion afloat on TikTok was that it was all a bit queasy. Lurking in the background were two Sweeney or Sweeney-adjacent fashion choices that had been previously logged and reported. Viral pictures once revealed that MAGA hats were sported by some guests at her mother's hoedown-themed birthday party. Then there was the white dress she wore in March 2024 while fronting Saturday Night Live (SNL) – this was a satin number so powerful it prompted conservative commentators to declare her breasts the 'death of woke'. Notably the American Eagle circus only really took off when the White House, not having anything better to do, got hold of the story and wrung every last drop out of it. They squeezed it dry, which you definitely should not do with denim, and used it to whip passing Democrats over their hapless heads. 'Warped, moronic and dense liberal thinking' was the verdict of White House communications manager Steven Cheung. The Dems had gone out of their way 'to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful', weighed in JD Vance. This was just 'a normal all-American beautiful girl doing, like, a normal jeans ad', he said normally. Then Donald Trump (79), high on the confirmation that Sweeney (27) is a registered Republican, announced it was the 'hottest ad out there', adding for those who hadn't yet run to the nearest sink: 'Go get 'em, Sydney!' American Eagle, meanwhile, insisted in a social post that the ad 'is and always was about the jeans'. In perhaps its most controversial statement yet, it claimed: 'Great jeans look good on everyone'. [ Sydney Sweeney is selling her bathwater. What has become of us? Opens in new window ] American Eagle's stock has soared following the ad and reaction And so all humans faced a dilemma. Who did they have less faith in? Random, easily baited TikTokers who have never knowingly been strangers to the vomiting emoji? Or American Eagle and the Trump administration? Look, I don't want to sway anyone, but it seems relevant that the retailer's chief marketing officer, Craig Brommers, told trade media outlets before the launch that the ads would use 'clever, even provocative language' and the campaign was 'definitely going to push buttons'. Consider those buttons pushed, American Eagle, and enjoy that share-price bump while it lasts. As for Sweeney, the simplistic and familiar debate is an age-old one about whether a woman is a savvy, canny business supremo having the last laugh, or an unwitting naif lured into the grubby domain of the sort of men who love nothing more than politicising and commercialising women's bodies. The truth, as ever, is probably somewhere in-between. Sweeney, we're told, has captured the anti-woke zeitgeist in the US, but no one ever really captures the zeitgeist – it captures them. Even if becoming a favourite of Trump's doesn't derail her stellar career in the short term, it risks ultimately leaving some kind of 'so 2025″-style stain. If that happens, not even her own bathwater – which she recently used, apparently, to sell a line of soap – will be able to neutralise the odour. Fashion is fickle, and so is Hollywood. The zeitgeist will pass. Generation Alpha will be along in a minute. Like American Eagle's share price, what goes up must come down. So even if she distances herself from Trump, or successfully plays both sides of the political divide for a while, his toxic endorsement could – like a pair of skinny jeans on a hot summer's day – stick. And that would be a shame, for Sweeney is a compelling and talented actor. She can play sullen and diffident, or spirited and charming. She radiates the rich, spoiled-brat demographic effortlessly, but also inhabits working-class characters without straying into false notes. She does ice-cool pretty well, and raging hot-mess even better. Her standout role, for me, is in Tina Satter's 2023 film Reality (available on Prime Video), in which she plays the soon-to-be-jailed security intelligence whistleblower Reality Winner. All the dialogue is taken from a real-life FBI interrogation transcript and Sweeney, simultaneously projecting inner fear and outer calm, delivers her end of it with endearing nuance and subtlety. Sadly, for everyone who cares about great performances, there are dozens more who care only about great genes/ jeans, great frothing and great hoopla. Sweeney appears to both know this and be keen to profit from it. But, for the rest of us, what this torturous drama shows up is a shallow, combative culture that's been stuck in the political machine for too long and wound up shrink-washed.


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Séamus O'Reilly: I'm so sorry for my role in encouraging Netflix
The Netflix documentary has become its own genre, and one whose tropes are recognisable at a glance. They include the introductory quotes along the lines of 'We were a typical all-American family' or 'March 3rd, 1996, began like any other day'; the opening flash-forward to the story's climax quickly that segues into a trip back in time to the story's beginning; the establishing shots of interviewees preparing to be recorded, always adjusting mics or sipping water as the camera pulls focus; and drone footage of suburban landscapes overlaid with the placenames in huge block capitals. There are also – always, always, always – more episodes than are remotely necessary to tell the story, resulting in the grievous bloat that must help satisfy Netflix's viewership metrics. None of these is a novel observation, of course. People have bemoaned the cookie-cutter aesthetic of such documentaries for years. For so long, in fact, that it's eight years since Netflix released the first series of American Vandal, a hilarious school-set mockumentary that parodied its own style. Those of us who thought this might put an end to the trend have been disabused of this notion fairly regularly in the long years since. READ MORE One recent transmogrification of the Netflix-doc aesthetic is the anthology series Trainwreck, which began with Woodstock '99 , in 2022, and has since had entries on the Balloon Boy scandal, the Astroworld Festival disaster and, this year, the notorious poop cruise. Each kept many of the tropes on board but, crucially, averted the bloat by keeping each subject to a single episode of, often, less than an hour. That was until last week's premiere of Trainwreck: Storm Area 51, the series' first two-parter. Storm Area 51 is based on the true story of the Facebook meme page that managed to incite thousands of disconnected internet users to mount a charge on Area 51 , the infamous US military facility – and long-rumoured harbourer of UFO artefacts – in Nevada. At the centre of all this is Matty Roberts, a shitposter who got bored one day and started a Facebook event called 'Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us'. Within weeks, hundreds of thousands of users – millions, even – tagged themselves as going, and of those who eventually made the trip we meet more than a few, a motley crew of internet-poisoned freaks who turn out to be a surprisingly variable group. There are your standard attention-seeking microinfluencers, some New Age hippie types, a solid contingency of tactical-gear-wearing conspiracy cultists, and several varieties of stoner burnout adrenaline junkies – one of whom is good enough to make that appellation charmingly literal by explaining that he was attracted to the cause because he reckoned 'there was probably going to be a lot of adrenaline at this event'. [ Irish actor Pauline McLynn joins Coronation Street Opens in new window ] The one thing they all have in common – and I can say this with authority, having watched two hours of their adventures in the desert in 2019 – is that they're dumb as rocks. Watching them mount their charge on Area 51 is at times like watching pigeons trying to work the Large Hadron Collider, a diverting event rendered meaningless by the fact that it takes place without purpose. Or even, one sometimes worries, without sentience. That a crowdsourced band of kooky misfits decide to swarm a heavily guarded secret military installation is objectively interesting. The fact that a good number of them do so out of a genuine belief in aliens is worthy of a documentary. That most of them did it for no reason other than to assuage a cosmic state of boredom is more compelling still. The issue, however, is that all of these people are profoundly irritating to spend time with. Hearing them out is a near-interminable slog. The show has been a big hit, but it's almost impossible to get through. As I'm a creature of the internet, it should be right up my street. Instead I find spending time – any time at all – with them prohibitively taxing. Were I not considering it for review, I would have turned it off in minutes. As such, my complete watch of its two episodes leaves me having gained nothing in particular save the knowledge that said watch will, now and forever, count towards its tally of views, making it 0.0001 per cent more likely that we'll get more like this in future. For this, and so much else, I'm truly sorry. More gripping by half is the new historical epic Chief of War ( AppleTV+ , Fridays), a lightly fictionalised retelling of the unification of Hawaii , produced, cowritten by and starring Jason Momoa . The date is sometime toward the end of the 18th century, before the modern nation of Hawaii had been established, and four separate kingdoms – Hawai'i, O'ahu, Mau'i and Kaua'i – exist in states of hot and cold war. Chief of War reminds us that few actors are capable of delivering a frowning silence so eloquently Momoa plays Ka'iana, a battle-hardened son of Maui's chief of war, now living in self-imposed exile in neighbouring Kaua'i, where he has renounced war and lives with his clan in modest obscurity, all but shunned by locals. Once a mighty warrior, he's reduced to subsisting via the raddest way imaginable: hunting giant sharks and wrestling them to death for their meat. Soon, of course, he's called back to his ancestral home, amid talk of a new threat from which he, the prodigal son, must now defend them. Here, too, we meet many tropes of genre: the reluctant hero, the returning native, the wearied winter soldier attempting to put violence – of the nonshark variety – behind him. And it's true that there's talk of duty, honour and family, of ancient prophecies and scheming foreign viziers, all of which quite often veers toward the prosaic. What elevates Chief of War is the attention it pays to so many other aspects of its presentation. For one thing, the entire show is delivered in the indigenous Olelo Hawai'ian language, which is pretty brave – and commendable – of Momoa and his cowriter, Thomas Pa'a Sibbett. Its central performances, too, afford its slightly off-the-peg characters much-needed extra depth. [ A Minecraft Movie review: Jason Momoa and Jack Black have a ball in a proudly silly family adventure Opens in new window ] If Momoa is more often cast now in breezy wisecracking roles – delivering, it must be said, decidedly mixed results – Chief of War reminds us that few actors are capable of delivering a frowning silence so eloquently. Elsewhere, the ever-dependable Temuera Morrison is given plenty of scope to suffuse his performance as Maui's stoical chief with a deep reserve of coiled, seething menace. Chief of War is also uncommonly sumptuous, from its beautifully lensed vistas and spectacular production design to its bloodily effective action set pieces and appropriately epic Hans Zimmer score. This is a big story, on a big canvas, and for all its genre trappings it's prepared to take bigger risks than one might expect. Two episodes in, I'd wager those risks may well pay off.