No. 1 seed Duke's opening-week offense in March Madness was a display of elite efficiency
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Baylor coach Scott Drew knew beating No. 1 seed Duke would be a tough task considering the Blue Devils' elite efficiency rankings at both ends of the court.
'The analytics showed they didn't have any weaknesses,' Drew said Sunday after a 89-66 loss to Duke in the second round of the NCAA Tournament.
And the Blue Devils have lived up to that heading into the Sweet 16.
Sure, the point margins are impressive enough. But the underlying data for teams still alive in the Sweet 16 can indicate which teams fit the profile of those that reach the Final Four or cut down the nets, and the Blue Devils have been absolutely dominant — notably at the offensive end behind junior Tyrese Proctor going on a sudden outside-shooting tear.
'First of all it helps when Tyrese is on the heater he was on,' graduate guard Sion James quipped.
'But we've built this throughout the year. This isn't something that just kind of came on. We've been building toward this for the season. And now we're hoping for the next few weeks that we can keep it sustained.'
Profiles of a winner
Going back to the 2001 tournament, 16 of 23 national champions were ranked inside the top 25 in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency for KenPom entering March Madness, with six owning top-10 status at both ends.
Take a step back, and more than half of the Final Four teams (51 of 92) were inside the top 25 at both ends, with 18 of those being top 10 in both areas.
As for the others, slightly more than half of the remaining teams held at least top-10 status at one end of the floor to offer one commonality.
The tiers
That creates three tiers of Sweet 16 teams for this week:
—Five favorites who entered the tournament with top-25 rankings for both ends: the Blue Devils, fellow 1-seeds Florida, Houston and Auburn; and 2-seed Tennessee. Of that group, the Blue Devils are top 5 at both ends, while the Gators and Cougars are in the top 10.
—Six teams that ranked in the top 10 to offer elite play at one end of the court: 2-seeds Alabama and Michigan State; 3-seeds Kentucky and Texas Tech; and 4-seeds Purdue and Maryland. Of that group, the Spartans were the only top-10 defense and also flirted with joining the aforementioned top tier by entering the tournament ranked 27th offensively (118.1 points per 100 possessions).
—Five outliers: 4-seed Arizona, 5-seed Michigan, 6-seeds BYU and Mississippi; and 10-seed Arkansas. Of that group, BYU and Arizona were slightly outside of the top-10 offensively, while Michigan flirted with top-10 status defensively.
Duke's start
The Blue Devils entered the tournament ranked third in KenPom's adjusted offensive efficiency (128.0 points per 100 possessions) and fourth in defense (89.8). They have started their push for a sixth national title with home-state romps against Mount St. Mary's and Baylor as the headliner in the East Region, led by an offense exceeding its own elite season-long performance.
Duke has scored on 79 of 123 possessions (64.2%) through two games and is averaging 1.48 points per possession. By comparison, UConn began its blowout-filled march last year to a second straight NCAA title by averaging 1.29 points per possession and scoring on 59.7% of its possessions in the opening weekend.
Defensively, Duke has allowed 0.927 points per possession, a slight downtick from its regular-season numbers.
When it comes to this year's Sweet 16 teams, Duke's effective field-goal percentage — which factors in the added value of 3-point shots — was 67% through two games, according to Sportradar, with the Crimson Tide (61%) as the next-best team. The Blue Devils also have a Sweet 16-low eight turnovers through two games while posting a nearly 5:1 assist-to-turnover ratio.
And Duke's 67-point victory margin through two games is 24 points better than Houston's as the next closest team, with the Blue Devils standing as the only member of the Sweet 16 to win both tournament games by at least 20 points.
Tournament tests
The other 1-seeds offer statistical profiles close to Duke, but they also have faced something the Blue Devils haven't: a test.
The Gators entered the tournament ranked No. 1 in adjusted offensive efficiency (128.6) and No. 10 in defense (92.4), while the Cougars were the inverse by ranking 10th in offense (123.2) and second in defense (87.8). And No. 1 overall seed Auburn was slightly outside of that group by ranking third and 12th, respectively.
Yet all three have encountered a bit more resistance, notably with Florida having to take over down the stretch to end UConn's two-year title reign and Houston fending off Gonzaga in Round 2.
There's value in that, too, beyond the numbers.
'If you're going to make a deep run in March, you've got to catch some breaks, and you've got to win some games like this to be able to push through and stay alive,' Florida coach Todd Golden said. 'Theoretically, beating a team like UConn, that's used to winning this time of year, in the fashion that we did should be really good for us moving forward.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
42 minutes ago
- USA Today
2025 NBA mock draft: A consensus survey shows the latest predictions from experts
The 2025 NBA Draft is less than two weeks away and we are finally starting to get a consensus of when each player could hear their name called. To get a sense of where prospects stand as of right now, For The Win has surveyed all of the leading mock drafts to provide a general consensus. For this exercise, we're using my latest mock along with other mainstream mocks from the following publications (sorted alphabetically): Our scoring methodology was based on a trade value chart from ESPN's Kevin Pelton. Meanwhile, for more prospect coverage, here is our latest NBA mock draft at For The Win. Note: These rankings do not reflect our personal opinions or team fit but rather where experts currently have each prospect slated. The best takes and the sharpest bets on all the hoops storylines you need to know. Sign up for our Layup Lines newsletter, hitting your inbox on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. 1. Cooper Flagg TEAM:Duke POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-9 DRAFT AGE: 18.5 2. Dylan Harper TEAM: Rutgers POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 19.3 3. Ace Bailey TEAM: Rutgers POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-10 DRAFT AGE: 18.9 4. V.J. Edgecombe TEAM: Baylor POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-5 DRAFT AGE: 19.9 5. Tre Johnson TEAM: Texas POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 19.3 6. Kon Knueppel TEAM: Duke POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-7 DRAFT AGE: 19.9 7. Jeremiah Fears TEAM: Oklahoma POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-4 DRAFT AGE: 18.7 8. Khaman Maluach TEAM: Duke POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 7-2 DRAFT AGE: 18.8 9. Derik Queen TEAM: Maryland POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 6-10 DRAFT AGE: 20.5 10. Egor Demin TEAM: BYU POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-9 DRAFT AGE: 19.3 11. Kasparas Jakučionis TEAM: Illinois POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 19.1 12. Noa Essengue TEAM: ratiopharm ulm (Germany) POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 18.5 13. Carter Bryant TEAM: Arizona POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 19.6 14. Collin Murray-Boyles TEAM: South Carolina POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 20.1 15. Nolan Traoré TEAM: Saint-Quentin (France) POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-3 DRAFT AGE: 19.1 16. Cedric Coward TEAM: Washington St. POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 21.8 17. Nique Clifford TEAM: Colorado St. POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 23.4 18. Jase Richardson TEAM: Michigan St. POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-3 DRAFT AGE: 19.7 19. Asa Newell TEAM: Georgia POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-11 DRAFT AGE: 19.7 20. Thomas Sorber TEAM: Georgetown POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 6-10 DRAFT AGE: 19.5 21. Liam McNeeley TEAM: Connecticut POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-7 DRAFT AGE: 19.7 22. Danny Wolf TEAM: Michigan POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 7-0 DRAFT AGE: 21.2 23. Joan Beringer TEAM: KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana (Slovenia) POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 6-11 DRAFT AGE: 18.6 24. Rasheer Fleming TEAM: Saint Joseph's POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-9 DRAFT AGE: 21.0 25. Will Riley TEAM: Illinois POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 19.3 26. Walter Clayton Jr. TEAM: Florida POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-3 DRAFT AGE: 22.3 27. Drake Powell TEAM: North Carolina POSITION: Wing HEIGHT: 6-6 DRAFT AGE: 19.8 28. Maxime Raynaud TEAM: Stanford POSITION: Big HEIGHT: 7-1 DRAFT AGE: 22.2 29. Noah Penda TEAM: Le Mans Sarthe (France) POSITION: Forward HEIGHT: 6-8 DRAFT AGE: 20.5 30. Ben Saraf TEAM: ratiopharm ulm (Germany) POSITION: Guard HEIGHT: 6-5 DRAFT AGE: 19.2 SECOND ROUND 31. Ryan Kalkbrenner 32. Hugo González 33. Adou Thiero 34. Yanic Konan Niederhäuser 35. Hansen Yang 36. Alex Toohey 37. Chaz Lanier 38. Bogoljub Marković 39. Kam Jones 40. Tyrese Proctor 41. Johni Broome 42. Koby Brea 43. Jamir Watkins 44. Javon Small 45. Hunter Sallis 46. Sion James 47. John Tonje 48. Eric Dixon 49. Rocco Zikarsky 50. Micah Peavy 51. Ryan Nembhard 52. Alijah Martin 53. Vlad Goldin 54. RJ Luis Jr. 55. Kobe Sanders 56. Tamar Bates 57. Payton Sandfort 58. Amari Williams 59. Brice Williams 60. Michael Ružić


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Five questions facing Michigan State basketball heading into 2025-26 season
Five questions facing Michigan State basketball heading into 2025-26 season Michigan State basketball just came off one of their best seasons in recent memory, winning their first Big Ten Championship since the days of Cassius Winston and Xavier Tillman before going on to make the Elite 8 in the NCAA Tournament. However, the Spartans lost multiple key players this summer, with Jaden Akins, Jase Richardson, and Tre Holloman all moving on. Now, Tom Izzo and his staff will need to answer a lot of questions this summer and next season. We outlined five questions that his staff will need to tackle, among others, if they want to sustain the success we saw last year: 1. Will Jeremy Fears Jr. become a double-digit per game scorer? Jeremy Fears Jr. is the classic Tom Izzo point guard. He defends, he gets out and runs in transition every chance he gets, and he's ostensibly a pass-first player. That was perfect last year, but now, MSU will need to replace their top two scorers last year, and I think for this team to replace that production, Fears will need to average double-digits in scoring. Fears is kind of a mystery box at this point. He missed most of his first year after being shot in the leg. That also cost him a summer of development. We know that he has not looked very comfortable shooting the ball thus far in his career, but could that change with a full summer of training under his belt for the first time as a college player? If not, there are other ways to become more of a scoring threat, and he will need to find a few weapons on that end to keep defenses honest. 2. Is Coen Carr a legitimate two-way star? The development of Coen Carr was possibly the biggest storyline of last season for the Spartans. Carr went from being a rotation player to being arguably the best player on the team. The biggest development last year was on the defensive end, where Carr seemed to finally unlock his athleticism and how to use it to frustrate some of the top scorers in the country. The next step he will look to take is on the offensive end. He has shown some skill as a driver, which could be where his offense comes from next year, but what would really throw gas on the fire is if he can develop himself into a reliable three-point shooter. If he can even get to about 35-percent from three, I am expecting him to be a lottery pick next year, he's just that good. 3. How ready is Cam Ward? When I wrote an article about which players on this year's roster have the most NBA potential, I had Cam Ward all the way at No. 2, just behind Coen Carr. Now, will he show that potential this year? We have no idea, but it's one of the most interesting questions going into the season. In another article where I tried to project the rotation for next year, I hypothesized that Cam Ward will end up getting minutes this year. I think his talent will be too undeniable to keep on the bench. But how ready will he be? Will we just see him get a few minutes here or there when MSU has a sizable lead? Or, will he be someone who helps actually drive winning? We should start to hear some whispers about how he's doing soon. 4. Does Jaxon Kohler have another leap in him? Jaxon Kohler was sneakily the Spartans' second-best three-point shooter last year, hitting 37.3-percent of his shots from distance. That's a very encouraging sign, because MSU has seemed insistent on playing Kohler, who is a bit of a 'tweener', at the four spot instead of at center. If he's going to remain in that role, he will need to keep hitting those shots. Kohler jumped all the way from two points per game in 2023-24 to just under eight points per game in 2024-25. Does he have another leap in him? Or, will he lose some ground to the aforementioned Cam Ward and incoming transfer Kaleb Glenn? Like Fears, the Spartans really need to get double-digit scoring out of that position to replace what they are losing, and Kohler, as an offensive-minded big, theoretically should be able to increase his production. 5. Will this team be able to match last year's defensive output? Last year, in my opinion, we saw one of Tom Izzo's best defensive teams ever. We saw them shut down multiple teams and they were in the top-50 for scoring defense. However, MSU is losing some of their best defenders in Jaden Akins and Tre Holloman. Even Jase Richardson was a positive on that end as well. Tom Izzo is replacing them with Kaleb Glenn and Trey Fort, and Glenn has not been known for his defensive acumen. They are also losing Szymon Zapala and those minutes should go to Jesse McCulloch, a player who recently converted to center. I personally think the defense will take a step back this year, but you just hope it's not a major step back if they want to try and make another deep run. Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan state news, notes, and opinion. You can also follow Andrew Brewster on Twitter @IAmBrewster.


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Kansas City Chiefs part ways with defensive lineman during the last week of voluntary OTAs
Kansas City Chiefs part ways with defensive lineman during the last week of voluntary OTAs On Wednesday, the Kansas City Chiefs waived defensive lineman Siaki Ika and made a corresponding move, signing tight end Kevin Foelsch. The moves were officially announced on the team's transaction log. Ika was a 2023 third-round pick out of Baylor for the Cleveland Browns. He played in four games for Cleveland before being released ahead of the 2024 season. He spent time on the practice squads of the Browns and the Philadelphia Eagles before joining the Chiefs' practice squad in December and signing a Reserve/Futures contract following the Super Bowl. Kansas City added Foelsch, a young tight end on the Eagles and Carolina Panthers practice squads, in 2024. He was an undrafted free agent who has yet to find his stride in the league after a standout college career at the University of New Haven. He will be in tough competition for a potential spot on the final 53-man roster in a loaded tight end room. The Chiefs begin mandatory minicamp from June 17-19.