City of Howell hires PR firm to revamp image after incidents involving racism
A public relations firm out of Holland, Michigan, has a big task ahead of them to rehabilitate the city of Howell's image after multiple instances of racist behavior make headlines.
In December 2024, the city announced it was working on hiring a PR firm to rehab its image. The move came after a couple of racist incidents relatively close together, including reports of a Nazi demonstration outside a performance of the play "The Diary of Anne Frank."
"I hope that they give us some meaningful communication plans to help us tell our story," said City Manager Erv Suida.
During the hunt for a PR firm to help, the city experienced another racist incident with another reported Nazi demonstration, this time outside of the Historic Howell Theater.
"One of the things we all have to realize is that there seems to be a rise in racism and antisemitic rallies," Suida said. "We don't want to focus around those groups. We've had the White Lives Matter group that has been here and around other communities in Michigan. We want to make sure that we're responding appropriately, but we don't really want to give them that much attention."
The city hired Burch Partners to undertake the project. The city shelled out about $20,000 for three months of work, and then any additional help they get, like crisis communication, will be billed at an hourly rate.
Suida tells CBS News Detroit that the firm will work behind the scenes to better prepare city officials to respond to situations and better tell the city's story.
"One of the things about a good communication plan is how do we communicate with residents and our businesses so they'll definitely see a change in that we want to be more proactive, more outreaching and more transparent," said Suida. "We have a great story we plan on telling that story over the next couple of years, and I think if they can help us do that, then it's money well spent."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Musk and Trump's relationship: A timeline from campaign cash to 'disgusting abomination'
The world's richest man has played a uniquely prominent role in President Donald Trump's second administration. In less than a year, Elon Musk has been a top Trump campaign donor, a senior advisor to the president, the head of the newly created Department of Government Efficiency and, suddenly, a vocal opponent of legislation that could be key to Trump's agenda. Musk's prominence has been highly controversial with Americans, with only 38% of Economist/YouGov's May 30-June 2 poll respondents saying they would like Musk to have an influence in the administration going forward. How did we get here? Take a look back and the dramatic rise and fall of their partnership: Skid marks: President Trump's fast start has hit some speedbumps Musk, the CEO of Tesla, bought Twitter in 2022 and reinstated Trump to the platform after he was banned following the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riots. Musk became a growing ally to Trump over the next couple of years. Then, on July 13, 2024, Trump was shot in an attempted assassination at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, and Musk officially endorsed him for president shortly after. Federal Election Commission records show Musk gave $238.5 million to his America PAC, which backed Trump's campaign. His contributions included $1 million daily payments to lucky voters in swing states who signed an online petition in support of the Constitution. The move raised legal questions, drew criticism from former Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz, and prompted former Republican officials to press former Attorney General Merrick Garland for an investigation. During the campaign, Trump said he would establish a government efficiency commission headed by Musk if he won the election. Musk joined Trump at an October rally, jumping around on stage in a highly memeable moment. Shortly after winning the election, Trump announced Musk and former Republican presidential contender Vivek Ramaswamy would lead the new "Department of Government Efficiency", also known as "DOGE" with the mandate to slash federal government spending, waste and regulations. But Ramaswamy ultimately decided to run for governor of Ohio in 2026. Musk was at Trump's inauguration in Washington, D.C., and joined by fellow billionaires Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg. Musk delivered a speech at one of the inauguration events, during which he attracted controversy by giving a one-armed salute that some said appeared to resemble a Nazi-style gesture. "It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured," Musk said before making the gesture. Musk's DOGE took a machete to federal spending, though he didn't cut nearly as much as he set out to. By some calculations, the workforce reduction efforts totaled in more than 100,000 layoffs, though the Trump administration is facing ongoing legal challenges to the swift cuts. At an April 30 Cabinet meeting, Musk appeared to bid farewell while joking about wearing lots of hats. Musk said at the meeting it was "an honor to work with your incredible Cabinet," and thanked the group. He had said at the time that DOGE was running more independently on its own and that he would spend less time in Washington as his companies needed him. (Tesla's earnings were down 71% in the first quarter of 2025.) On his way out, he participated in a seemingly friendly press conference with Trump in the Oval Office on May 30. But by his last day as a government employee, Musk had also appeared to diverge with Trump on a major piece of legislation going through Congress. Just days after the White House sendoff, Musk appears to have embarked on a "kill bill" campaign on his X account. Trump's tax and domestic policy bill he has dubbed the "Big Beautiful Bill," is under consideration in the U.S. Senate. But some Republicans have major concerns about the bill, like the deficit and health care and now, Musk. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk said in a June 3 post on X. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. "It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." Contributing: Joey Garrison, Riley Beggin, Bart Jansen; USA TODAY. Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump and Elon Musk: How did we get to 'KILL BILL' fallout
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Large majority of Germans want tighter controls on arms exports to Israel
BERLIN (Reuters) -Some 73% of Germans want tighter controls on arms exports to Israel, including 30% who favour a total ban, a poll showed on Wednesday, reflecting growing public unease over the government's Israel policy. Since Hamas' October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Germany has remained one of Israel's staunchest allies and its second largest arms supplier, despite Israel's increasing international isolation and rising criticism over its devastating war in Gaza. Between Hamas' attack and mid-May this year, Germany approved military equipment exports to Israel worth 485 million euros ($553.72 million), according to a response to a parliamentary inquiry published on Tuesday. The deliveries included firearms, ammunition, weapons parts, special equipment for the army and navy, electronic equipment, and special armoured vehicles. No lawsuit challenging German arms exports to Israel has yet succeeded, including a case brought by Nicaragua at the International Court of Justice. But Germany's stance shifted last week when new Chancellor Friedrich Merz criticised Israel's intensified airstrikes in Gaza, calling them no longer justified or comprehensible. His foreign minister, Johann Wadephul, warned of possible consequences - hinting at steps towards arms export sanctions. Three out of four Germans back Merz's criticism of Israeli actions in Gaza, according to a poll by public broadcaster ARD. The survey, conducted among 1,292 respondents on June 2-3, also found that 55% reject the idea that Germany bears a special responsibility to protect Israel due to the legacy of the Nazi-era Holocaust of European Jews. Thirteen percent of those surveyed believe Germany should stand unconditionally with Israel in the Middle East conflict, while 74% opposed such a stance. Additionally, 63% said Israel's military response in Gaza has gone too far, an increase of six percentage points since August, while 73% consider Israeli military actions unjustified. ($1 = 0.8759 euros)
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meet Elon Musk's Puppet Master: Russell Vought
Elon Musk may have 'left Washington' last week, but the Department of Government Efficiency won't miss a step. That's because Musk was never running DOGE in the first place. I'm not suggesting that Amy Gleason was in charge. Gleason, you may recall, is the government official whom the White House last February named as a sort of papier-mâché acting DOGE administrator as part of its legal sleight of hand to shield Musk from litigation. Gleason is a data expert who worked for Musk, not the other way around. No, I'm talking about Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought. The worst-kept secret in Washington is that Vought, from day one, was pulling Musk's marionette strings at DOGE. That lends some irony to news reports that Vought will inherit Musk's DOGE portfolio. In truth, that portfolio has been sitting atop Vought's desk since January. 'Elon Musk is the face of DOGE,' said Bloomberg Businessweek last month, 'but Russell Vought is the brains.' Am I saying Musk brought nothing to the table? I am not. Assembling and deploying DOGE's team of tech saboteurs—those hoodied 24-year-olds who tapped into government computer systems that were theoretically off-limits to them—was Musk's chief contribution. The wildly inaccurate DOGE scorecard of savings achieved looks like Musk's handiwork too. And it goes without saying that Musk enlivened the project with hateful rhetoric. I won't soon forget this tweet (which Musk took down after it caused an uproar): 'Stalin, Mao, and Hitler didn't murder millions of people. Their public sector employees did.' But when Musk took on this project, he knew nothing about how the federal government works and therefore would have been incapable of choosing DOGE's targets. Also, it's doubtful Musk had the first clue how to get around the obstacles that civil servants threw in his path. Then there's the matter of Musk's pill-popping and severely disordered personal life while campaigning for candidate Donald Trump last fall, as documented last week by The New York Times. According to the Times' Kirsten Grind and Meghan Twohey, Musk was 'using drugs far more intensely than previously known.' These drugs included ecstasy, magic mushrooms, and so much ketamine that the richest man in the world struggled to maintain bladder control. Per Grind and Twohey, it's 'unclear' whether Musk continued doing all this in the White House. But I wouldn't call it very unclear. Grind and Twohey note that Musk's behavior while in government was 'erratic … insulting cabinet members, gesturing like a Nazi and garbling his answers in a staged interview.' (Grind and Twohey wrote that before Musk showed up Friday in the Oval Office with a shiner.) We know from a January 2024 Wall Street Journal report by Grind and Emily Glazer that executives and board members at Musk's companies have for some time been worrying a great deal about Musk's consumption of these same drugs (and also LSD). Vought, on the other hand, is by all accounts extremely knowledgeable about how the government works, having previously worked as OMB director during Trump's first term, assuming the role in 2019 after his predecessor, Mick Mulvaney, became acting chief of staff. Before that, Vought was (among other things) executive director of the Republican Study Committee and policy director of the House Republican Conference. 'There's a category of conservative activists who say, 'This is what should be done,'' Tom Fitton, president of the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch, told McKay Coppins of The Atlantic last month, 'and there's a much smaller group who actually know how to make it happen. Russ is one of them.' DOGE was carved out of an existing (and far more anodyne) White House office, the United States Digital Service, which is part of … you guessed it—OMB. According to The New York Times, Trump moved DOGE out of OMB to put it out of the reach of 'open records laws that could give the public insight into its operations.' It would not surprise me to learn that this was Vought's idea. Vought is also Mister Project 2025. He wrote the chapter in this notorious Heritage Foundation book about White House powers over the executive branch, having previously served seven years as vice president of Heritage's political advocacy arm, Heritage Action. According to David Graham's new book The Project: How Project 2025 Is Reshaping America, Vought is 'widely understood to be the driving intellectual force behind the project.' Trump disavowed Project 2025 during the 2024 campaign ('I don't know anything about it, I don't want to know anything about it'), but Vought's involvement alone is sufficient to call Trump a liar: Trump installed Vought as policy director of the platform committee at the Republican National Convention. Since January, Project 2025 has been (to the extent anything is) the Trump White House's blueprint for policymaking. A Project 2025 tracker maintained jointly by two nonprofits, the Center for Progressive Reform and Governing for Impact, checks off 31 recommendations just at OMB, which lies (per Graham) 'at the heart of Project 2025's plan to remake the government.' A somewhat more user-friendly Project 2025 tracker created by two tech nerds on Reddit follows 313 policy recommendations from the volume. Of these, it reports, 98 are done and 66 are 'in progress.' One of Project 2025's major aims is to radically downsize the federal government. 'The overall situation is constitutionally dire,' Vought wrote in it, 'unsustainably expensive, and in urgent need of repair.' In a subsequent interview with Tucker Carlson, Vought said OMB 'has the ability to turn off the spending that is going on at the agencies.' Not DOGE; OMB. In a February memo to the heads of executive branch departments and agencies, Vought and Charles Ezell, acting administrator for the White House Office of Personnel Management, called for 'the maximum elimination of functions that are not statutorily mandated' and explained how the layoff process in the federal government worked, imposing at least some semblance of order on Musk's mass firings. It was also Vought who expanded DOGE's budget during Trump's first weeks in office from an initial $750,000 to $14 million. Here's how Politico's Megan Messerly, citing four former Trump officials, explained the working relationship between Musk and Vought: Musk … provides the public face to the bureaucracy-slashing efforts and takes the heat for the budget-cratering, employee-firing and overall havoc-wreaking that has been unleashed on the federal government. Vought … brings the expertise, insider knowledge and ideology.… Musk's army makes very public incursions into agencies and ferrets through data using artificial intelligence … to identify allegedly wasteful spending while Musk handles the public relations campaign on X and amplifies their findings. Vought's OMB, meanwhile, brings the technical tools and expertise to figure out, one, whether the concerns DOGE raises are actually problems and two, what to do with them. If Vought was pulling the marionette strings, why did so many of DOGE's actions get overturned by federal courts? The Institute of Peace, for instance, reclaimed its headquarters in late May after DOGE tried to expel it, and even without judicial intervention, 70 Agriculture Department leases that DOGE tried to cancel got un-canceled. Wouldn't a longtime Washington pro know how to be more surgical in cutting government and avoid such reversals? Not if that Washington pro didn't care. Like Steve Bannon and other hard-core Trump believers, Vought is a fanatical advocate for maximum disruption. 'We are living in a post-constitutional time,' Vought has written, meaning that our current constitutional norms are so polluted by mainstream legal thinking over the past 100 years that we need to tear them down. In effect, Vought wants to repeal—not the industrial revolution, exactly, but certainly the governmental structures created to keep it from overpowering democratic governance. Firings are integral to this goal; so is demoralization. As Molly Redden, Andy Kroll, and Nick Surgey reported last October for Pro Publica, Vought was recorded saying in a private meeting: We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected. When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down so that the EPA can't do all of the rules against our energy industry because they have no bandwidth financially to do so. We want to put them in trauma. Mission accomplished. DOGE hasn't done much to reduce the budget deficit; indeed, according to CNN analyst Zachary B. Wolf, DOGE could easily end up netting out as a loss to the Treasury of about $45 billion. But if Vought were serious about eliminating red ink, he wouldn't be working so hard to pass a Big, Beautiful reconciliation bill that will more than double the budget deficit. Musk pointed out the folly of the reconciliation bill on his way out the door. That was reported as Musk criticizing Trump, but more notably it was Musk slighting Vought. Pinocchio was giving Geppetto a little back talk. Vought took it in stride because his goal is demolition, not solvency, and (setting aside adverse judicial rulings that the administration may or may not obey) the wrecking ball continues to swing. Vought didn't even bother to fold all of DOGE's cuts into the administration's proposed budget, he said last weekend on CNN, because he didn't think he had to. But isn't that impoundment, CNN's Dana Bash asked Vought. 'We are not in love with the law,' Vought replied. DOGE isn't going anywhere.
