Editorial: Science Council of Japan must not become government tool
A law has been passed to turn the Science Council of Japan from a special organization operating independently of the government into a special corporate entity, effective October 2026. There remain concerns that the operational independence of the council could be threatened. It is only natural that the council and academic organizations across Japan have joined in calling for the legislation to be amended or repealed.
With the transition, a new mechanism of government oversight has been included, whereby auditors and evaluation committee members appointed by the prime minister will review the council's activity plans and operations.
If the government interferes with policy proposals or research directions, academic freedom will be shaken.
Government influence may also extend to the selection of members when the new organization is launched. Experts appointed by the prime minister will be included in the committee responsible for selecting members.
It will also become possible to dismiss members in the science council's general meetings. Manabu Sakai, the minister of state for special missions in the Cabinet Office, stated in the Diet that dismissal could occur if "specific ideologies or partisan claims are repeatedly made." If political opinions become grounds for dismissal, there is a risk of infringing on freedom of thought and belief.
In the first place, reform of the council stemmed from government intervention in personnel decisions. In 2020, a problem erupted over then Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga's refusal to appoint six people to the science council. Without explaining the reasons, the government proceeded with an organizational review as if to reproach the council for its opposition; an act that invited distrust.
The Science Council of Japan was established as a response to the fact that many scientists were coerced into cooperating with the government and military during World War II.
In 1950 and 1967, the council issued statements that it would not engage in research for war or military purposes. In 2017, it similarly expressed a cautious stance toward government-promoted research with potential military applications and has repeatedly made recommendations from an independent position.
The government's argument is that "to spend government funds, a certain level of involvement is necessary." But if the new organization panders to the government or is used to endorse government policies, questions will be raised about its very existence. Its international reputation will also suffer.
Academic freedom and its results are foundational supports for the interests of humanity. The council cannot fulfill its role as an academy providing scientific views as long as there is room for political intervention.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7 hours ago
80 Years On: Thai Man Wants to Return Soldiers' Remains to Japan
Long, Thailand, Aug. 3 (Jiji Press)--A Thai man who built a memorial to Japanese soldiers killed by members of a Thai resistance group during World War II hopes that their remains will be returned to their home country. The memorial in the Long district in Phrae Province, northern Thailand, was built by Puchong, 83, a local man whose father was a member of the Free Thai resistance group, which fought against Imperial Japan. During World War II, Japan allied with Thailand, using the Southeast Asian country as a base for operations in India and Burma, now Myanmar. Thais dissatisfied with the alliance formed the anti-Japanese group, which expanded its presence in the country with support from the Allied forces. According to Puchong, whose father was a senior member of the group in the province, the two Japanese soldiers died in a gunfight with Free Thai fighters in the Wiang Ta subdistrict in Long about two years before the end of the war. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.]
Yomiuri Shimbun
12 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
New Reciprocal Tariffs Set: United States' Inward-Looking Stance Causes Concern
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has decided on new tariff rates for its 'reciprocal tariffs.' How should Tokyo deal with Washington's increasingly inward-looking stance? Japan must strengthen its cooperation with other countries and regions. Trump signed an executive order setting new reciprocal tariff rates last Thursday. The order imposes tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on about 70 countries and regions with whom the United States has trade deficits, which it views as problematic. Japan and the European Union will be subject to a 15% tariff, while Syria will face the highest rate of 41%. Other countries not included in the executive order will be subject to a 10% tariff. The tariffs will take effect on Thursday. After World War II, the global economy developed with the United States playing a leading role to promote a free trade system. The United States had one of the most open markets in the world before the second Trump administration began, with an average tariff rate of just over 3%. The world's largest economy has now unilaterally built high tariff barriers. Although the tariff rates have been reduced from the levels initially announced in April, the measures are certain to have a negative impact on the global economy, and this is a cause for serious concern. In negotiations between the United States and other countries and regions aiming at reducing tariff rates, the United States has been conspicuously overbearing. While imposing high tariffs of 20% on Vietnam and 19% on Indonesia, despite their relatively small economic sizes, the United States has insisted on the principle of eliminating tariffs on its own exports. It must be said that trust in the United States, which openly embraces an 'America First' policy, has been severely damaged. The Trump administration's agenda has not progressed entirely as planned. Negotiations with China, the largest source of the U.S. trade deficit, have been rough going. This may indicate the limitations of the high tariff policy. If the costs of high tariffs are passed on to consumers and prices rise again in the United States, public dissatisfaction in the country will inevitably grow. With China in mind, Japan plans to establish manufacturing bases of important products for its economic security in the Unites States in order to build a mutually beneficial relationship. It is necessary to repeatedly explain to the United States that promoting such cooperation between Japan and the United States is the path the two countries should pursue. The new tariff measures will take effect on Thursday, but concern remains that Trump will continue to brandish high tariffs in the future. It is important for Japan and other countries to work together to prevent the collapse of the free trade system. Reducing dependence on the United States while mutually expanding markets could be an effective countermeasure. Automobile tariffs, which are Japan's top matter of interest, are not included in the executive order. The lack of a timeline for reducing them to 15% is a cause for concern. The Japanese government should repeatedly urge the early implementation of the reduction. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 3, 2025)
a day ago
Japan PM Ishiba Unlikely to Announce View on WWII Soon
News from Japan Politics Aug 2, 2025 22:35 (JST) Tokyo, Aug. 2 (Jiji Press)--Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has decided not to announce his view on World War II on Aug. 15, the 80th anniversary of his country's surrender in the war, sources said Saturday. Ishiba had also considered announcing the view on Sept. 2, the date when Japan signed the surrender document in 1945, but no such announcement is likely to be made that day, senior officials of the government and Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party said. Ishiba is still seeking an appropriate time to announce his view, which would be based on the results of a review of the war. But some expect that it would be difficult to make such an announcement, which could intensify calls for his resignation that emerged within the LDP following the party's rout in the July 20 election for the House of Councillors, the upper chamber of parliament. Japan had issued a prime minister's statement to mark each of the 50th, 60th and 70th anniversaries of the country's surrender in the war. The tradition could be broken by Ishiba. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
