‘If you ask a Pakistani ...': Army chief mocks Pak victory claim; credits ‘free hand' for Op Sindoor success
Operation Sindoor
.
While speaking at IIT Madras, Dwivedi said that narrative management plays a key role in war.
"If you ask a Pakistani whether you lost or won, he'd say, 'My chief has become a field marshal.
We must have won, that's why he's become a field marshal,'" he said.
— ANI (@ANI)
Dwivedi was referring to the Pakistan government's move to promote its Army chief, Asim Munir, to a five-star general and field marshal.
He also claimed that the Centre gave a "free hand" to the armed forces to execute Operation Sindoor.
"What happened on 22 April in Pahalgam shocked the nation.
On the 23rd, the next day itself, we all sat down. This is the first time that Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said, 'Enough is enough.' All three chiefs were very clear that something had to be done. The free hand was given — 'you decide what is to be done.' That is the kind of confidence, political direction, and political clarity we saw for the first time," Dwivedi said.
"That is what raises your morale. That is how it helped our army commanders-in-chief to be on the ground and act as per their wisdom," he added.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World
5minstory.com
Undo
Earlier, Chief of the Air Staff Air Chief Marshal AP Singh also attributed the success of Operation Sindoor to the 'political will' of the central government, asserting that the Indian Armed Forces carried out the mission without any external constraints.
'A key reason for success was the presence of political will. There was very clear political will and very clear directions given to us. No restrictions were put on us...
If there were any constraints, they were self-made. The forces decided what the rules of engagement would be. We decided how we wanted to control the escalation. We had full freedom to plan and execute,' Singh said at an event at the HAL Management Academy in Bengaluru.
India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7 in response to the April 22
Pahalgam terror attack
that killed 26 people. The armed forces targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, eliminating over 100 terrorists linked to groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen.
Pakistan retaliated with cross-border shelling, attempted drone strikes, and air defence measures. India's counterstrikes damaged radar installations, communication hubs, and airfields across 11 Pakistani bases, including the Nur Khan air base.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump courts Asim Munir as Pakistan Army chief's political challenges mount at home
While US President Donald Trump touts the Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir, here's a look at the challenges back home that might make Islamabad less attractive for Americans read more Earlier this month, it was revealed that Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir will be visiting the United States once again. Munir will be attending a farewell event for US Central Command chief General Michael Kurilla in Tampa, Florida. But what garnered attention was the fact that this would be Munir's second visit to the US in just two months, following the four-day military clash between India and Pakistan. During a last visit, the world saw a rare instance of Trump sitting with the Army chief of a country in the Oval Office, treating him like a head of state. The rise of the newly appointed Pakistani Field Marshal in the span of a few years has many people comparing him to the country's erstwhile dictatorial Army chiefs, General Zia Ul Haq, Ayub Khan and Pervez Musharraf, all of whom eventually toppled the then-governments and took the reins of Pakistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Amid all the speculations, America is treating Munir as what some call a 'de facto' leader of Pakistan. However, the Pakistani general is facing his share of challenges within the country, some of which are as follows. Political leaders are getting sidelined The speculations started to become rife soon after Munir received promotion in May to the ceremonial rank of Field Marshal — a distinction rarely granted in Pakistan. It is pertinent to note that there is only one other individual in Pakistani history who has previously held the title, General Ayub Khan. Khan eventually seized the government and became the President of Pakistan following a brutal 1958 coup. Hence, when Munir was appointed to the post, questions began to arise whether the country's President Asif Ali Zardari's seat is at risk. However, multiple Pakistani high-ranking officials have already dismissed the idea. While speaking to The Economist, ISPR Director General Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry called the claims 'completely baseless', saying, 'Talks about Field Marshal Asim Munir becoming the president of Pakistan are completely baseless.' Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi echoed the sentiment, labelling the rumour mill as a 'malicious campaign.' 'President Zardari enjoys a strong and respectful relationship with the leadership of the armed forces', and stated that 'Munir's sole focus is Pakistan's strength and stability, and nothing else," he said. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also addressed the reports, saying, 'Field Marshal Asim Munir has never expressed any desire to become the president, nor is there any such plan in the offing.' However, Sharif himself is not able to enjoy the same stature in the United States and China that Munir has received. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Hence, Munir's rise to prominence is bound to increase animosities between the Pakistani leadership and the country's army. And if history is a witness, the cracks between the two never end well in Pakistan. The Imran Khan question On August 5, thousands of supporters of Pakistan's former Prime Minister Imran Khan rallied across the country to demand his release on the second anniversary of his imprisonment. The jail sentencing of the supremo of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf has been garnering international attention for a while. In the February 8 elections last year, Khan's party managed to gain significant seats in the parliament without him, despite the party facing a ban forcing the leaders to contest independently. However, they had to sit on the opposition due to all sorts of problematic efforts undertaken by the current Pakistani ruling regime. Last month, an independent news outlet, Drop Site News, released an explosive report which revealed that during his White House meeting in June, Munir was told by Trump that 'he needed to resolve the situation with Imran Khan.' Not only this, the sons of the Pakistani cricketing legend have been consistently lobbying with both British and American politicians to ensure the release of their father. Over the years, Imran Khan has gained significant popularity among Pakistani-Americans. Two sources familiar with the matter told Drop Site News that Trump told Munir of his commitment to settling the political standoff involving Imran Khan. The president told the Pakistani army chief that he had promised supporters he would get the Imran Khan situation resolved. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I have Pakistani friends who helped me win the election. I have many Pakistani friends also. You need to resolve this issue,' Trump said, addressing Munir directly, according to one source. A second source confirmed the substance of the quote to the independent news outlet. However, Munir might not be a fan of the idea. In the past, Khan has been critical of the Pakistani army chief and the country's ruling regime. Also, if Munir starts to go soft on Khan, he would create a space of animosity with Pakistan's current ruling regime. Hence, Munir will be stuck in a dilemma on how to approach the matter. The Baloch question One of the biggest challenges Pakistan is currently facing is the rise of militancy from within. Munir was often heard pledging to eradicate terrorism and insurgency from Pakistani soil. However, terrorist attacks within Pakistan have increased significantly. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan have been struggling with intense attacks. The proscribed Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) ended its ceasefire with the government in November 2022. In recent months, the security situation in Balochistan has also worsened, as militants, long involved in a low-level insurgency, have stepped up the frequency and intensity of their attacks. The outlawed Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), in particular, has adopted new tactics to inflict higher casualties and directly target Pakistani security forces. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This issue is Pakistan's own making. Neglecting the basic rights of Baloch civilians has led to the birth of several militant groups in the region. Hence, Munir also faces the challenge of ensuring stability in the region to attract the attention of the West for good. A hard task to achieve in Pakistan. The economic question Since 2023, Pakistan have been reeling through a historic financial crisis, which ultimately forced the country to seek aid from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). However, things are getting tough for Pakistan even after the country received aid from the global financial institution. Earlier this month, Pakistani news outlet The Express Tribune reported that the country has failed to meet three out of the five critical targets set by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the second review of its $7 billion bailout programme. The missed benchmark reflected the ongoing fiscal mismanagement in Pakistan, even as Islamabad touts progress on budget surplus goals. Citing the Ministry of Finance's fiscal operations summary, the report mentioned that Pakistan's provinces failed to meet the promised savings target of PKR 1.2 trillion in the fiscal year that ended in June. The shortfall was attributed to the increased provincial expenditures, which the federal government could not control. Hence, while America hopes to invest in Pakistan, its unstable economy and poor fiscal management system reflect how bad the bid would be. In the face of these challenges, Munir is trying to present a fictitious image of Pakistan to the American leadership. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hans India
29 minutes ago
- Hans India
PM Modi Promises Naval Chief 'Your Moment Will Come' After India-Pakistan Ceasefire
Prime Minister Narendra Modi delivered a telling remark to Naval Chief Admiral Dinesh Tripathi following the India-Pakistan ceasefire agreement, promising that the Navy's opportunity for decisive action would eventually arrive. The PM's comment came after he ordered the Indian Navy to abort a planned BrahMos missile strike on Karachi port during the intense May 10 confrontation. The three service chiefs leading India's armed forces—Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh, General Upendra Dwivedi, and Admiral Dinesh Tripathi—represent a unique blend of military expertise and fearless leadership. Air Chief Marshal Singh embodies the classic test pilot mentality, living each day to the fullest with an uncompromising attitude that remains undeterred by political sensitivities. General Dwivedi represents the quintessential infantry officer, most comfortable among his troops, displaying quiet determination that transforms into ruthless efficiency when circumstances demand. Admiral Tripathi stands as the epitome of naval aggression, firmly believing in the Navy's destructive capabilities and had prepared to devastate Karachi port until Pakistani military leadership desperately sought peace. These military leaders operate under a formidable national security framework headed by Prime Minister Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, and Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan. This quartet shares a remarkable ability to navigate extremely dangerous situations while possessing the courage to make critical decisions regarding national security, regardless of potential consequences. Their combined leadership creates an exceptionally effective strategic team. During the morning of May 10, while acknowledging the exceptional response of India's armed forces, PM Modi congratulated General Dwivedi and Air Chief Marshal Singh for their successful operations. He then turned to Admiral Tripathi with the memorable statement: "Humne aapke mooh se niwala cheen liya, aapko mauka phir milega" (I have snatched the morsel from your mouth, but your opportunity will come). This comment followed the decision to halt the Navy's planned BrahMos missile assault on Karachi port. Demonstrating remarkable resolve, the Prime Minister showed no concern about potential Pakistani retaliation against his home state Gujarat in response to the proposed Karachi operation, granting complete operational freedom to all three service chiefs while preparing for worst-case scenarios. While the military commanders might have harbored reservations, the PM displayed unwavering determination. Despite criticism from various defense analysts and state-funded research institutions who consider Air Chief Marshal Singh's recent Bengaluru statements exaggerated, the Air Force chief only discussed verified Pakistani aircraft, radar systems, and airborne early warning platform destructions during the May 7-10 conflict period. His account deliberately excluded additional substantial evidence available to intelligence agencies and defense planners. Classified information reveals that a hangar containing C-130 Hercules VIP transport aircraft suffered significant damage at Chaklala airbase in Rawalpindi on May 10, while two F-16 fighter jets were destroyed on the ground at Jacobabad airbase. The northern Pakistan Air Force command and control infrastructure was completely blinded after the Nur Khan (Chaklala) facility was struck at 2:30 AM on May 10. Air Chief Marshal Singh's public statements also omitted "partial kills" from his official tally. The devastating effectiveness of the Indian Army's M777 Excalibur precision shells and Warmate loitering munitions created such terror among Pakistani forces that troops abandoned their Line of Control positions and retreated in panic. The Indian Air Force's aggressive response compelled Pakistan to relocate all valuable PAF assets toward the western borders with Iran and Afghanistan for protection. The threat was so severe that an S-400 missile system was deployed to eliminate a large aircraft 315 kilometers inside Pakistani territory in Punjab province. The destroyed aircraft was identified as a Saab airborne early warning platform, though some IAF sources believe it could have been a Dassault Falcon 20 electronic intelligence aircraft. The Pakistani Navy's response revealed the extent of their fear, with virtually no ships or submarines venturing into operational waters to counter India's naval armada. Instead, all Pakistani naval vessels retreated toward Gwadar port, seeking safety from the anticipated Indian maritime offensive. While PM Modi's political opponents and academic critics suggest he terminated the military response due to alleged American intervention, the final Indian BrahMos strike actually hit Bholari airbase at noon on May 10, after which all designated mission objectives had been successfully completed. Given that Field Marshal Asim Munir served as Director General of Inter-Services Intelligence during the February 14, 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing and held the position of Army Chief during the April 22, 2025 Pahalgam Hindu tourist massacre orchestrated by Rawalpindi, intelligence assessments indicate Pakistan will likely attempt another terrorist attack in the Kashmir Valley or Indian mainland territory in the near future. Whether Munir receives promotion to Pakistan's presidency or the position of Field Marshal Administrator, indications suggest that the Indian Navy will ultimately receive its promised opportunity for decisive action. The strategic patience demonstrated by India's leadership, combined with the military's preparedness for comprehensive response, creates a formidable deterrent against future Pakistani adventurism. The PM's assurance to the Naval Chief reflects a broader strategic approach that maintains all options while carefully calibrating responses to achieve maximum effect with minimal escalation risks.
Hans India
29 minutes ago
- Hans India
Pakistan Bleeds Rs 1,240 Crore As Airspace Ban On Indian Flights Backfires
Pakistan's decision to prohibit Indian aircraft from using its airspace has resulted in catastrophic financial consequences, with the Pakistan Airports Authority hemorrhaging more than Rs 1,240 crore (PKR 4.1 billion) within just two months of implementing the restrictive measure. The Dawn newspaper reported these staggering losses based on an official statement from Pakistan's Defence Ministry, highlighting the severe economic impact of the aviation standoff. The airspace closure was implemented as Pakistan's retaliation against India's decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty following the devastating April 22 terrorist assault in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed the lives of 26 innocent people, predominantly tourists. The ban took effect on April 24 and has continued to inflict substantial economic damage on Pakistan's aviation sector. Defence Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif officially acknowledged the massive revenue losses from overflight charges during the period between April 24 and June 30. The prohibition affects all aircraft bearing Indian registration, including those operated, owned, or leased by Indian aviation companies and carriers. This comprehensive ban has created a significant disruption in regional aviation traffic patterns. The economic ramifications have been particularly severe for Pakistan's airport authority, with daily operations seeing the loss of between 100 to 150 Indian aircraft that would normally transit through Pakistani airspace. This dramatic reduction has slashed Pakistan's overall transit air traffic by approximately 20 percent, representing a substantial blow to the country's aviation revenue streams. Pakistan has chosen to extend this economically damaging restriction until August 24, 2025, despite the mounting financial losses. A Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) issued by the Pakistan Airports Authority confirms that the prohibition will remain active until 4:59 AM on August 24, specifically targeting Indian-registered aircraft and those operated, owned, or leased by Indian airlines and operators, including military flights. The aviation restrictions have created an asymmetrical impact on both nations' carriers. While Pakistani airlines continue to face reciprocal bans from Indian airspace, Indian carriers have successfully adapted by utilizing alternative international routes for their global operations, minimizing the operational impact on their business. The Indian Civil Aviation Minister of State has confirmed that India's corresponding NOTAM will remain effective until August 23, 2025. The Pahalgam terrorist incident that triggered this aviation standoff was orchestrated by The Resistance Front, a subsidiary organization of the Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba. The brutal attack resulted in 26 civilian casualties and prompted India to launch comprehensive retaliatory measures beyond just the Indus Waters Treaty suspension. India's response included the execution of Operation Sindoor, a precisely targeted military campaign that struck key terrorist infrastructure and training facilities located in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir. This multi-pronged approach demonstrated India's commitment to combating cross-border terrorism through diplomatic, economic, and military channels. The current aviation impasse represents a classic example of how diplomatic tensions can escalate into economically damaging trade wars, with Pakistan bearing the brunt of the financial consequences. The country's decision to maintain the airspace ban despite mounting losses suggests that political considerations are taking precedence over economic pragmatism. Aviation industry experts note that such airspace restrictions typically harm the implementing country more than the target nation, as demonstrated by Pakistan's substantial revenue losses. The restriction forces aircraft to take longer, more expensive routes, but the overflying fees that Pakistan is losing represent a significant source of income for its aviation infrastructure. The ongoing situation underscores the interconnected nature of modern aviation and how political decisions can have far-reaching economic consequences in the globalized world. Pakistan's persistence with this costly policy despite clear financial damage raises questions about the long-term sustainability of using aviation restrictions as diplomatic tools.
