Israel and Australia's war of words: How did we get here?
Canberra has been ramping up criticism of its ally over the devastating war in Gaza.
Australia was one of the first countries to recognise Israel in 1949 and has been one of its staunchest supporters.
Now the two are locked in a war of words and tit-for-tat visa restrictions in a dramatic escalation of their diplomatic row.
How did we get here?
Recognising Palestine
It started when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on August 11 that Australia would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly next month. The situation in Gaza has gone 'beyond the world's worst fears', he added.
France, Canada and the UK have also announced plans to recognise Palestine in September, dealing a major blow to Israel's long-held opposition to Palestinian statehood.
Visa ban
A week later, the Australian government cancelled the visa of Simcha Rothman, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's coalition who opposes Palestinian statehood and has called for Israel to annex the occupied West Bank.
Knesset member Mr Rothman had been scheduled to visit Australia at the invitation of a conservative Jewish organisation. His visa was revoked by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke just 24 hours before he was due to arrive.
'If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don't want you here,' Mr Burke told local media on the visa ban, which denies the Israeli legislator entry for three years.
It came in response to 'inflammatory remarks' made by Mr Rothman, including calling Palestinian children 'enemies' and his assertion that Palestinian statehood would lead to the destruction of Israel.
On the same day as his trip was cancelled, Israel retaliated by revoking the visas of Australian diplomats to the Palestinian Authority.
'I have decided to revoke the residency visas of Australia's representatives to the Palestinian Authority,' Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said in a post on X. 'I also instructed the Israeli embassy in Canberra to carefully examine any official Australian visa application for entry to Israel.' He also accused the Albanese government of 'choosing to fuel' anti-Semitism.
Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the move was 'unjustified' and said Israel was 'undermining international efforts towards peace and a two-state solution '.
Personal attack
Mr Netanyahu then lashed out at Mr Albanese, accusing him of 'betraying Israel'.
'History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews,' wrote Mr Netanyahu on X.
The Australian Prime Minister seemed unaffected by Mr Netanyahu's criticism.
'I don't take these things personally. I engage with people diplomatically. He has had similar things to say about other leaders,' he said during a media briefing.
Mr Burke was more stern in his response to Mr Netanyhau.
'Strength is not measured by how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry,' he said, in the harshest language used against Israel to date.
Simmering tensions
Despite the swift escalation, tension between Canberra and Israel has been simmering since last August, when Australia officially reinstated the term 'occupied Palestinian Territories', in line with UN Security Council resolutions.
Ms Wong said the decision reaffirmed their commitment to a two-state solution.
But as Israel's aggression in Gaza escalated in recent months, with images of starving children flooding social media and mounting deaths of people seeking aid, so did Australia's criticism.
'The situation in Gaza has gone beyond the world's worst fears,' Mr Albanese said in July.
'Gaza is in the grip of a humanitarian catastrophe.
'Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food cannot be defended or ignored.'
Back in 1949, Australia, under prime minister Ben Chifley, played a considerable role in the creation and recognition of Israel. It could be on the way to playing a similar role for Palestine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US imposes sanctions on two more judges and two deputy prosecutors at ICC
The US has imposed sanctions against four International Criminal Court (ICC) officials on the basis that any attempt to "investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute" American or Israeli officials constitutes a threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Two judges and two deputy prosecutors at the international court have been targeted by the US for sanctions. Middle East Eye revealed last week that the two deputy prosecutors sanctioned today, Nazhat Shameem Khan and Mame Mandiaye Niang, had prepared arrest warrants for Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on apartheid charges. However, the prosecutors had not yet filed the applications for the warrants despite them being complete, due to the threat of US sanctions. The US also issued sanctions against two ICC judges, Kimberly Prost and Nicolas Guillou. Gillou authorised the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defence Yoav Gallant, while Prost authorised the ICC's investigation into US personnel in Afghanistan. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions against the officials, saying all four are engaged in the ICC's efforts to investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute nationals of the US or Israel, without the consent of either nation. He accused the ICC of being "a national security threat" in a statement and said he was taking measures to protect the US. "The US has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicisation, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty and illegitimate judicial overreach," Rubio said. "The Court is a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare against the US and our close ally Israel." Rubio added it was a policy of the US government to take any necessary actions to protect American troops, US sovereignty and their allies from the ICC's "illegitimate and baseless actions". Rubio then urged countries which support the ICC to resist the claims of what he called a "bankrupt institution", claiming that many of these countries' freedom was acquired through "great American sacrifices". The State Department Press Office told MEE that the US and Israel are not party to the Rome Statute and have not consented to the ICC's authority. It added that the ICC had been abused as "a tool of political and legal warfare" against American soldiers and US national interests, including targeting Israel with "baseless and illegitimate" arrest warrants. The State Department also said that since assuming leadership for the Office of the Prosecutor in May, Shameem Khan and Niang have "continued to support the ICC's lawfare against Israel, including asserting ICC jurisdiction over Israel, and have upheld the ICC's arrest warrants targeting Israeli personnel". ICC Deputy Prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang in The Hague on 22 August 2023 (Piroschka van de Wouw/ AFP) The State Department further said it does not "preview deliberative sanctions actions", but as long as the ICC continues to present a threat to Americans and allies that have not consented to ICC jurisdiction, "all options are on the table". Fears over sanctions The international justice director at Human Rights Watch, Liz Evenson, told MEE the sanctions showed "complete disregard for victims of serious crimes" and called on the EU to use its blocking statute to protect the organisation. "The Trump administration, by sanctioning the ICC deputy prosecutors and two additional judges, is again showing complete disregard for victims of serious crimes across the globe in a misguided effort to shield US and Israeli officials from justice," she said. Deputy prosecutors at the ICC have the power to submit arrest warrant applications to pre-trial judges for examination If the arrest warrants are filed, it would be the first time that the crime of apartheid will have been charged at an international court. The sanctions are the latest attack on the ICC. Since President Donald Trump's executive order was issued in February, the US has now sanctioned nine individuals at the ICC. Karim Khan investigation: Former ICC judges criticise handling of complaint against prosecutor Read More » The US administration sanctioned ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan in February, and he went on leave in May amid a UN investigation into sexual misconduct allegations against him, which he has denied. A major Middle East Eye investigation in early August uncovered extraordinary details of an intensifying intimidation campaign targeting Khan over his investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes. The campaign has involved threats and warnings directed at Karim Khan by prominent figures, close colleagues and family friends, as well as fears for the prosecutor's safety prompted by a Mossad team in The Hague and media leaks about sexual assault allegations. The campaigns took place against the backdrop of Khan's efforts to build and pursue a case against Netanyahu and other Israeli officials over their conduct of the war against Hamas in Gaza and accelerating Israeli settlement expansion and violence against Palestinians in the illegally occupied West Bank. Khan had prepared cases against Ben Gvir and Smotrich before he went on leave in May, numerous sources in the court with knowledge of the matter told MEE previously. In June, the US sanctioned four ICC judges over arrest warrants targeting Netanyahu and Gallant. Two of those judges approved Khan's application for arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders last November. "ICC member countries should strongly condemn these blatant attacks on the rule of law and take all necessary steps to ensure the court can continue its critical work for justice. For the EU, this means using its blocking statute, which aims to shield European companies from the effects of extraterritorial sanctions," Evenson from HRW said.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Hezbollah urges Lebanon to 'take step back' from plan to disarm group
Hezbollah has called on Lebanon's leaders to reconsider their plan to disarm the group, warning it could destabilise the country if there is no similar step back by Israel. The Lebanese cabinet voted two weeks ago to endorse a US plan to disarm Hezbollah and other militants and assert a state monopoly on weapons. The contentious decision was made in the absence of Shiite ministers, highlighting deep divisions on the issue. After meeting Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun on Monday, US envoy Tom Barrack said Lebanese leaders had 'done their part' and that 'now what we need is Israel to comply with that equal handshake '. But Hezbollah does not expect that to happen, said the group's spokesman and head of media relations Youssef Al Zein. 'We hope we're wrong, but we don't expect that Barrack will return with a positive Israeli response,' he told The National. He accused the US and allies of 'applying what the Israeli entity wants as soon as possible – even at the cost of Lebanon's stability'. Mr Al Zein called on the Lebanese government to 'take a step back and re-evaluate, not only waiting for the Israeli response or approval, but a step back to rectify a decision that could put the country in an unstable position'. Iran-backed Hezbollah has repeatedly said it will not accept a disarmament plan until Israel withdraws from Lebanese territory and stops its attacks on the country – a commitment Israel has yet to make. Israeli military's chief of staff Lt Gen Eyal Zamir boasted last week that air strikes on Lebanon had breached a ceasefire about 600 times. Hezbollah is concerned that the US and allies are dictating the pace and substance of Lebanese decision-making on national security. But the group's opponents in Lebanon accuse it of prioritising Iran's interests at the cost of Lebanon's stability. Hezbollah claims the state itself has failed to enforce the ceasefire's obligations on Israel and that the Lebanese leadership 'justifies every step it takes on the basis of foreign pressure', Mr Al Zein said. Lebanon, a small nation with a historically weak and chronically underfunded national army, has long been under the sway of competing foreign powers. Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem has warned there would be 'no life' for Lebanon if the government confronted the group, accusing it of yielding to US demands on Israel's behalf. Iran has told Lebanese leaders that the group cannot be disarmed as the prospect of a new war with Israel grows, according to sources briefed on meetings of Iran's security chief Ali Larijani in Beirut last week. Hezbollah and its arsenal serve as Iran's first line of defence against Israel, which remains determined to neutralise the threat posed by the group. Mr Al Zein said Lebanon is being pressured to offer 'free gifts' to Israel, 'without any guarantees in return,' even as Israeli forces continue to occupy five strategic positions in southern Lebanon and conduct near-daily attacks despite the ceasefire announced last November. 'The Israeli military's chief of staff walked into Lebanese territory and bragged that they've killed more than 240 Lebanese citizens and conducted over 600 air raids since the ceasefire was declared,' he said. 'And not a single Lebanese authority responded to this.' Hezbollah maintains that it has shown willingness to abide by the ceasefire by disarming south of the Litani River. 'We've shown our commitment to the ceasefire through our actions,' Mr Al Zein said. Rather than insisting on Israel's withdrawal and an end to Israeli attacks, 'the Lebanese state has not committed to the ceasefire in the same way', he added.
Dubai Eye
2 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Trump administration imposes fresh sanctions on four ICC officials
President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday imposed sanctions on two judges and two prosecutors at the International Criminal Court, as Washington kept up its pressure on the war tribunal over its targeting of Israeli leaders. Washington designated Nicolas Yann Guillou of France, Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji, Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal, and Kimberly Prost of Canada, according to the U.S. Treasury and State Department. ICC judges issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli defense chief Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Ibrahim al-Masri last November for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict. Guillou is an ICC judge who presided over a pre-trial panel that issued the arrest warrant for Netanyahu. Khan and Niang are the court's two deputy prosecutors. The move comes less than three months after the administration took the unprecedented step of slapping sanctions on four separate ICC judges, saying they have engaged in ICC's "illegitimate and baseless actions" targeting the U.S. and close ally Israel. ICC, which had slammed the move in June, describing it as an attempt to undermine the independence of the judicial institution, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The ICC, which was established in 2002, has international jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in member states or if a situation is referred by the U.N. Security Council. The United States, China, Russia, and Israel are not members. It has high-profile war crimes investigations underway into the Israel-Hamas conflict and Russia's war in Ukraine, as well as in Sudan, Myanmar, the Philippines, Venezuela, and Afghanistan. The sanctions freeze any U.S. assets the individuals may have and essentially cut them off from the U.S. financial system.
