
Glasgow Times reporter wins prestigious award
The winners and runners up were announced at a ceremony in Glasgow on Wednesday, June 11 as their work was celebrated for showcasing powerful storytelling and highlighting the everyday realities for those seeking safety.
READ NEXT: I Kissed A Boy stars talk Dannii Minogue, favourite Glasgow spots and representation
(Image: Images supplied) Donald took home the top prize for his article on Oleksii Koliukh, 31, and his wife Ana Bohuslavska, 31, who came to Scotland when Russia invaded their home near Ukraine's capital, Kyiv.
The couple, who live in Pollok, spoke to Donald about their struggle to find permanent work. To stay longer in the country, Oleksii and Ana were in the process of applying under the Ukraine Permission Extension Scheme, which lets them live, work, and study in the UK for another 18 months — but it doesn't offer a path to stay permanently.
Donald's article reported on the couple's experience, whilst highlighting the issues refugees experience as they try and find a safe space to call home.
You can read the full article HERE
The judges of this years entries were Alison Phipps, chair of UNESCO-RIELA at the University of Glasgow, Larry Bottinick from the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Nick McGowan-Lowe from the National Union of Journalists, Elahe Ziai from IMIX, and Johannes Gonai from Pachedu.
READ NEXT: Inside the TRNSMT-inspired rave for Glasgow teenagers
Hamish Morrison, reporter for the Glasgow Times' sister title, The National, also scooped up the top prize in the news category for his article on Hyab Yohannes.
Yohannes, a refugee who fled Egypt against the threat of organ-harvesting kidnappers, compared the riots which spread across England last August to the horrors he left behind in Africa.
You can read Hamish's full article HERE
The Scottish Refugee Council said: "In an increasingly polarised world, accurate, responsible reporting on refugee and asylum issues is crucial. Last summer, racist riots swept across the UK, creating fear in refugee and migrant communities.
"Good journalism can help counter toxic narratives and harmful misconceptions about forced migration. That's why we team up with the National Union of Journalists each year to host the Media Awards.
"Thanks so much to everyone who entered work, every person who shared their story and every journalist who helps amplify the voices of people from refugee backgrounds."
The full list of winners and runner ups can be found by visiting, scottishrefugeecouncil.org.uk/media-awards-2025-winners/
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on the Trump-Putin summit: European leaders must help Zelenskyy resist a carve-up
In recent weeks, as Russia continued its assault on Ukraine in frank disregard of White House deadlines and demands, there was hope in Kyiv and European capitals that the scales might finally be falling from Donald Trump's eyes. Last month, Mr Trump noted that although his conversations with Vladimir Putin repeatedly led him to believe that a ceasefire deal was in reach, the Russian president then routinely went on to 'knock down a building in Kyiv'. More bluntly, he has accused Mr Putin of stringing him along with 'bullshit'. It was ostensibly on those grounds that the US president set an 8 August deadline for Mr Putin to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine, on pain of 'significant' sanctions. Yet instead of being punished for ignoring this injunction too, Mr Putin has been rewarded with a summit with Mr Trump in the United States, and apparently allowed to veto any suggestion that Volodymyr Zelenskyy should also attend. Suddenly, and alarmingly, it feels a little like February again, when Mr Trump and his vice-president, JD Vance, treated Mr Zelenskyy with outrageous disrespect in the White House, and appeared disposed to pursuing a peace agreement on Mr Putin's terms. There are conflicting accounts of discussions between Mr Putin and the US presidential envoy, Steve Witkoff, last week. But there is no evidence that Mr Putin has any intention of compromising on his maximalist goals in Ukraine, including the annexation of eastern regions, demilitarisation and the abandoning of Ukraine's aspiration to Nato membership. Morally and practically speaking, the Ukrainian president's absence on Friday will mean that any 'deal' struck by Mr Trump and Mr Putin in Alaska lacks all legitimacy. But Kyiv understandably fears a carve-up in which Ukraine is pressured by Washington and Moscow to unilaterally surrender land in its east, and make other concessions, in exchange for a pause in the fighting. This would be, of course, to reward Mr Putin's illegal invasion and betray a nation whose fate is tied up with Europe's security as a whole. The very fact of Friday's summit, from which European leaders are also excluded, is already a wholly unearned diplomatic win for Mr Putin. Mr Trump is driven by mercantilism and ego: he may be persuaded that if Ukraine could be bullied into accepting the unacceptable, opportunities relating to Russian oil and gas could be unleashed, and the Nobel peace prize he covets become a genuine possibility. After frantic mediation, it emerged on Monday that Mr Zelenskyy and European leaders may take part in a joint call with Mr Trump on Wednesday. The Ukrainian president has already made it clear that there will be no concession of further territory to Russia's occupying forces. In the lead-up to Alaska, and afterwards, Europe must ensure that his words are lent weight by a unified and robust stance on what would constitute a just peace, as opposed to one imposed against Ukraine's will. Ultimately, that will need to include credible security guarantees for Kyiv from Europe and the US, and an agreed sanctions regime to be enacted should Russia renege on its commitments. But the first priority must be pressuring Mr Putin to agree to a ceasefire immediately in order that meaningful negotiations can begin. Until last week, that appeared to be the approach Mr Trump had decided to adopt. It was the right one. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘You spit, we hit': Trump just took over DC with vow to stop ‘thugs' from abusing cops. He already pardoned hundreds of them
Monday marked the beginning of a Trump takeover of Washington D.C.'s law enforcement capabilities and what many Democrats fear could be step one of full federal control over the District of Columbia. At the White House, Donald Trump was flanked by top officials including FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi as he announced that the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), the city's main police force, would be brought under federal control. From behind the podium, the president recalled images of police officers facing abuse by protesters he'd watched on TV screens over the years, clearly evoking anger in him and leaving a city braced for Trump to fulfill a long-awaited desire to 'send in the troops.' He then passed around images of individuals arrested over the weekend, and promised that, going forward, police officers would be unhinged in their treatment of criminals and, likely, dissenters: They'll be able to do 'whatever they want', Trump vowed. 'You spit, and we hit.' It was about as explicit a lean into the 'strongman' image as one could ask for. But the president's fixation on clashes between protesters and law enforcement has one glaring exception: January 6. The violent siege of the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters in 2021 lasted for several hours. In the end, protesters left the building after police officers from neighboring counties in Maryland and Virginia arrived to quell the chaos. A deployment of more than 6,000 National Guard troops was finally authorized at 6 p.m., hours after the chaos began and hours after the worst of it ended. Dozens of officers were injured, several died after the attack including one who sustained injuries during it, Brian Sicknick. Survivors recounted vicious abuse from protesters, especially Black officers who recounted racial slurs and threats of violence. But the Capitol is not where the January 6 story ends. As Trump supporters left the Capitol that day, they fanned out across the entire District of Columbia, some returning to homes and hotels in the region and others spreading mayhem across the city. Businesses were boarded up as far as southeast D.C. and scattered evidence of vandalism was seen around residential areas and various neighborhoods the next day. It was the city's most violent day in decades. But on the campaign trail last summer, Trump vowed his first act would be to pardon all of them. True to his word, and despite the pleas of even some Republican supporters, on the day Trump was sworn in he pardoned some 1,500 people who participated in the siege on the U.S. Capitol and were either convicted or facing charges. MPD officers were part of the initial response as well. Some of the officers who responded that day are now under the command of the same administration that pardoned hundreds of Jan. 6 offenders, including some charged with violence against MPD and Capitol Police officers. One of those rioters, Julian Khater, was charged with spraying officer Sicknick with a chemical repellant during the attack; a colleague later testified that Sicknick looked 'ghostly pale' afterwards. Even so, the MPD's union chief told Fox News on Monday that his outfit 'completely agree[s]' with Trump that crime in D.C. is 'out of control.' He and union officials pointed to an MPD commander under investigation for allegedly falsifying crime data, and claimed that it was a lie that crime in the District of Columbia was decreasing. The Justice Department touted that data as recently as January, days before Trump took office. For Trump, Monday was 'Liberation' day. "Crime, Savagery, Filth, and Scum will DISAPPEAR. I will, MAKE OUR CAPITAL GREAT AGAIN!" he wrote on Truth Social ahead of the press conference he'd teased all weekend. But city officials are adamant that the trends mapped by the data are real, and that all types of crimes including some of the most stubborn categories such as carjackings were dropping in frequency across the board. 'Any comparison to a war-torn country is hyperbolic and false,' D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser told MSNBC on Sunday. 'There are very specific things in our law that would allow the president to have more control over our police department. None of those conditions exist in our city right now. 'We had one of the lowest crime levels and shootings that we've had in a July in recent history. So, not only are we going down year to year, we're seeing the trends go in the right way in every crime category.' There's no question: Trump has been looking for an excuse to do this. A Rolling Stone investigation published earlier this year cited two sources with knowledge of the president's conversations as saying that Trump was speaking to aides just after taking office in January about identifying the earliest possible moment when it would be appropriate to send in federal troops for crime suppression efforts. Anger felt by some city residents (among whom Trump supporters are still a slim minority) on Monday was embodied by restauranteur José Andrés, who tweeted at the president: '[Y]ou didn't have the power to call the National Guard on January 6 but now you do? Washington DC is not only our nation's capital…it's a beautiful city that 700,000 people call home. I'm proud to run a business and raise a family here. DC doesn't need federalized troops…it needs leaders who respect our fundamental founding principles of democracy, dignity, and respect.' Trump finally got his opportunity with the July attack on a man whose online nickname — 'Big Balls' — propelled him to both mockery and notoriety. The former DOGE staffer, who is still a federal employee, named Edward Coristine, was attacked while allegedly intervening during a carjacking attempt. According to police reports, Coristine was mobbed by a large group of teens during the attack and had his iPhone stolen in addition to being viciously assaulted. Groups of teenagers have become a major problem for city officials in recent weeks, with residents reporting large numbers of young adults and school-aged children attacking people on city streets, neighborhoods such as Navy Yard (where many congressional staffers live) and the Metropolitan Branch Trail, a paved route across the northeastern part of the city used by pedestrians and cyclists. In some cases, groups have numbered as high as hundreds of people and have required massive police responses. The only questions for Trump now are how far he takes this, and how much punishment he'll dole out on D.C. elected officials. Even as Bowser continues to avoid a public confrontation, Trump aimed harsh rhetoric at the city council on Monday. And it remains to be seen whether he'll try and take this effort national once again, after being largely stymied in his efforts to impose a sustained presence on the city of Los Angeles over ICE protests. A compliant Congress will likely make any Trump takeover of D.C., no matter how broad, a smooth process. But that same dynamic won't be found if the president tries to reimpose his will on America's blue states, where governors are raring for the chance to show that they have the backbones which their voters are demanding they show.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Zelensky could still attend Trump-Putin meeting, but rest of Europe is shut out
It's the bilateral summit every European leader wants to be for good reason. On Friday, Donald Trump is scheduled to meet Vladimir Putin in Alaska to discuss ending the war in concessions will likely be discussed, and Europe (not least Ukraine) doesn't want its borders to be redrawn through as things stand, there are no invites for the country being invaded, nor the continent it sits in."Brace ourselves for some pretty outrageous Russian demands," warns Lord Simon McDonald, a former head of the UK Foreign Office."It will be theatrical," he adds. "Putin is going to ask for things that nobody else would concede - with the possible exception of Donald Trump." Trump says he will try to get back territory for Ukraine in talks with Putin President Zelensky has said he won't agree to the giving up of any land, or even freezing the conflict along the current front argument is that it won't slow a Russian war machine that has waged a full-scale war for more than three and a half years. Concessions, he claims, would only speed it up."It's clear Putin wants a photo with the most influential people on Earth, which is President Trump, and he wants sanctions to be postponed, which he'll probably get," the EU's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, tells me."The question is, what is success for the US in the meeting?" she asks. "If President Zelensky is there, it would be a clear success."But if Ukraine's leader isn't at the Alaskan table, how might the Kremlin's proposals be challenged?"He could go," said the US president on that possibility. But Kyiv and Europe want it to go from a "maybe" to a "yes".Adding to their anxiety is the one-on-one format being a Kremlin idea the White House agreed to. A European scramble Brussels' European Quarter isn't its usual flurry of political activity during August, but these US-Russia talks have changed Monday, Kallas hosted a virtual meeting of foreign ministers where they called for an unconditional ceasefire before any deal. New sanctions for Moscow were announced as well.I asked Kallas what she thought Donald Trump meant by suggesting some land could be swapped."We have to ask President Trump," she says. "But it is clear an aggressor can't be awarded for aggression. Otherwise, we will just see more aggression around the world because it pays off."Europe is trying to do two things: rally around Ukraine, as well as muscle in on this American-led peace or not Zelensky does make the trip, the door for Europe has firmly remained shut since Trump retook office at the start of the the time his envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, said the bloc wouldn't be involved in any peace talks. It's a position the Europeans have been unable to change through relationship with the US has still improved, not least with significant increases in their defence spending. But Radoslaw Sikorski, Poland's foreign minister, believes they need a more central role."This is a matter of existential European security interest," he explains."We appreciate Trump's efforts but we'll be taking our own decision in Europe too."A simple ceasefire would not resolve the problem."German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has secured a remote sit down between European leaders, as well as Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump, this hope to be consulted on America's plan to end Russia's invasion, but ex-UK Foreign Office head Lord McDonald would be surprised to see a last-minute European invite for Friday."The end will be as protracted as the war has been long," he warned."The meeting is a milestone, but it doesn't actually mean it will lead anywhere."