Philippe Gélie's Editorial: 'Israel-Iran, War And Peace According To Donald Trump'
The U.S. president's peace plan feels more sleight of hand than statesmanship.
Civilization has taken a strange path between the two thousand pages of Leo Tolstoy and Donald Trump's tweets. Today, war and peace are declared in a few concise sentences printed in capital letters. The president of the world's leading power seems convinced that he can bend reality to his will — even the most brutal reality, that of war.
The ceasefire, pulled out from under his red MAGA hat on the night of Monday to Tuesday, encountered a few hiccups at the start, but appears to be successfully enforced now that the master of the game has expressed his wrath against any violation.
It should be noted that, since his transformation into a 'peacemaker,' Trump has treated Israel and Iran as strictly equals, alternately promising them 'love, peace, and prosperity' or facing his wrath if they 'stray from the road of truth and righteousness.'
This development marks an unexpected decline in Israel's strategic advantage: only the day before, the warlord who felt triumphant after massive airstrikes against Iranian nuclear sites floated the idea of a regime change in Tehran, using the slogan 'Make Iran Great Again, MIGA!'
In the era of Donald Trump, slogans accompany battles, and can even influence their outcome. While the region seemed on the brink of escalation Monday evening, the American president fortunately declared that the Iranian response was merely formal, going so far as to thank the mullahs' regime for warning him.
In the process, Trump announced the strangest of ceasefires, in which he said one of the parties had agreed to endure enemy fire for 12 hours without flinching. All this to end the conflict within the deadline imposed by its new name: the 'Twelve-Day War,' as a reference, of course, to Israel's victory over the Arab armies in 1967 during the Six-Day War.
This peace negotiation looks a little bit like a magic trick: Is the Iranian nuclear issue resolved or merely glossed over? No one knows — not even Trump — what long-term results his quick fixes will yield. This criterion carries little weight compared to publicity stunts and instant celebrations. But, in the real world, it could come back to haunt us.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
New York mayoral vote floors Democratic establishment
The little-known state legislator, a proud "democratic socialist," is now favorite to win November's election and become a major voice in the battle between progressives and the establishment wing for the party's soul. Mamdani, just 33, was at a lowly one percent in the polls in February, but saw off three-term former New York governor Andrew Cuomo with a populist campaign that has Democrats nationwide taking notice ahead of next year's midterm elections. "The race shows Democratic voters are growing tired of the same old faces and they're willing to bet on newcomers," said political strategist Andrew Koneschusky, a top former Democratic Senate aide. "Looking ahead, we may see more competitive Democratic primaries and more upsets like this. That's bad news for establishment Democrats, but can be good for the party overall." Democrats have struggled to make their case as a credible alternative to Republicans since Kamala Harris's 2024 defeat to Trump -- seen in part as repudiation of identity politics and so-called "woke" ideology. But the man who would be his city's first Muslim mayor embraced his identity, courting the one million New York members of his faith where they live -- in the city's many mosques and community centers. 'Young Cardamom' He also presented himself as the candidate of generational change, reaching out to fellow millennials with a smart communications strategy dominated by short-form viral videos. He bested Cuomo, a towering figure in Democratic politics, by combining his social media savvy with a "go everywhere" street campaign that made his much less visible opponent look complacent. Born in Uganda, Mamdani is the son of renowned historian Mahmood Mamdani and filmmaker Mira Nair, who directed the classic "Salaam Bombay!" Curious voters wanting to learn more about his colorful back story shared old hip hop videos from his previous life as a musician, rapping under the moniker "Young Cardamom." Youth activist David Hogg, who was kicked out of the Democratic National Committee leadership after annoying the party's old guard in a row about aging candidates, maintains that likability was a key factor. He is "infectiously, and relentlessly positive in a way I have seen few politicians ever be," Hogg said, arguing that Mamdani's appeal went well beyond his policy proposals. But his platform was vital too, according to Koneschusky, who says Mamdani has demonstrated to Democrats slow to see the penny drop that, in the Trump era, economic populism works. Mamdani focused relentlessly on the cost of living crisis -- floating rent freezes, free buses and even government-run grocery stores. 'Death knell' "We've seen the effectiveness of an economic message time and again. It's what propelled Trump in last year's presidential election and it's what propelled Mamdani," Koneschusky said. "It's so blatantly obvious that this is where the Democratic message should be centered and yet the party can't seem to universally embrace this simple truth." Some analysts have cautioned against reading too much into the result -- a single primary victory against an establishment favorite with a lot of baggage. Cuomo is accused of having lied about his role in the Covid pandemic and mismanaging the crisis, and he resigned in disgrace over sex scandals. Others point out that Democratic nominees have lost around half of the last 15 New York City mayoral races, and that the city's denizens could easily change tack when it comes to the mayoral election itself. But political commentator Bill Kristol, chief of staff from 1989-93 to then vice president Dan Quayle, expects Democrats to still be feeling the aftershocks of the New York earthquake come the 2026 midterms, when seats in both chambers of Congress will be at stake. "It should be a death knell for an ossified Democratic establishment that needs to be put out of its misery," Kristol wrote in his daily newsletter for conservative outlet The Bulwark. "And it should be a wake-up call for non-socialist Democrats to show some of the audacity and the ability of Mamdani."
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Article 5: Trump reopens debate on NATO's mutual defence pledge
NATO's cardinal principle – that an attack on one member is an attack on all – came under renewed scrutiny on Wednesday as US President Donald Trump once again cast doubt on how it should be understood. Trump's remarks, made aboard Air Force One on the eve of a NATO summit in The Hague, reignited long-standing fears among European allies that the US may no longer be committed to the principle enshrined in Article 5 of the alliance's founding treaty. "There's numerous definitions of Article 5," Trump said. "You know that, right? But I'm committed to being their friend." Asked again on Wednesday about the clause, Trump appeared to strike a softer tone, telling reporters: "We're with them all the way." But the ambiguity left many NATO members unconvinced. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte responded quickly, saying he had "no doubt" about the US commitment to the alliance. "For me, there is absolute clarity that the United States is totally committed to NATO, totally committed to Article 5," Rutte told reporters before the start of the summit. A fragile cornerstone Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which was signed in 1949, states that any armed attack against one or more NATO members will be considered an "attack against all members". Each country agrees to take "such action as it deems necessary", including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain security in the North Atlantic area, the article adds. 06:54 The clause was designed to deter Soviet aggression in Europe and was never triggered during the Cold War. It was invoked only once, after the September 11, 2001 attacks, when NATO supported the US-led intervention in Afghanistan. The US has historically resisted language that would make the collective response automatic. "This vague wording leaves room for individual assessment and helps secure consensus among allies," said Olivier Kempf, a senior fellow at the Foundation of the Strategic Research. "When Trump says there are many interpretations of Article 5, he's technically right. It's a leap of faith. It only works because members trust each other." Undermining trust Trump has long criticised NATO, accusing European countries of free riding on US security guarantees. In March, he again questioned whether European allies would defend the US if roles were reversed. "If the United States was in trouble and we called them. We said, 'We got a problem, France. We got a problem. A couple of others, I won't mention. Do you think they're gonna come and protect us? They're supposed to. I'm not so sure," he said during a campaign rally. French President Emmanuel Macron hit back at the time, insisting France was a 'loyal and steadfast ally' and had every right to expect reciprocity. This week, Trump doubled down on demands for increased defence spending. He called the current 2% GDP target insufficient and pushed for a new threshold of 5%, including broader security spending. "NATO was broke," he said. "Then I said, 'You're going to have to lift it to 4% or 5%, and 5% is better.'" 'A great victory' Pressure from Trump appeared to pay off at the summit in The Hague as Washington's NATO allies duly agreed to massively hike defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. For Europe's leaders, it was the price to pay to ensure Trump would endorse a final declaration reaffirming NATO members' "ironclad commitment" to mutual defence. "The Europeans will sign anything, even if their insurance premium just doubled, because the world is more dangerous now," Kempf explained. "I think we're witnessing the birth of a new NATO, which means a more balanced NATO and a NATO which has more European responsibility," said Finnish President Alexander Stubb, whose country recently joined the alliance due to the increased threat from Russia. Trump appeared satisfied with the outcome. "This is a great victory for everyone," he said of the new defence spending deal, which he hailed as a "monumental win" for the US. And while doubts remain over his commitment, his closing remark – "I stand with Article 5" – may offer just enough reassurance to keep NATO's cornerstone intact. For now, the alliance's leap of faith appears to be holding.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Hezbollah hails Iran's 'divine victory' over Israel
In a statement, Hezbollah offered its "most sincere congratulations" to the Islamic republic, praising its "glorious divine victory". The victory, it said, was "manifested in the precise and painful strikes it launched" against Israel, as well as "the lightning response to the American aggression against its nuclear facilities". On Sunday, the United States struck Iranian nuclear facilities following days of Israeli strikes, but a classified intelligence report concluded the attacks had only set back Tehran's nuclear programme by a few months. "This is nothing but the beginning of a new historical phase in confronting American hegemony and Zionist arrogance in the region," Hezbollah said. Hezbollah, which fought a devastating war against Israel last year, expressed its "firm and unwavering support for the Islamic republic, its leadership and people," emphasising that "any surrender, subservience or concession will only increase our enemies' arrogance and dominance over our region". Israel launched a major bombardment of Iranian nuclear and military facilities on June 13, as well as targeted attacks on top scientists and commanders. The Israeli strikes killed at least 627 civilians and wounded more than 4,800, according to the Iranian health ministry. Iran's retaliatory attacks on Israel have killed 28 people, according to Israeli figures. Later Wednesday, hundreds of people rallied outside the Iranian embassy in Beirut, responding to a call from Hezbollah to celebrate "the culmination of the struggle and sacrifices" of the Iranian people "who triumphed over the Israeli-American aggression". Ahmed Mohebbi, 42, who was among the crowd, said: "We are very happy about this victory that Iran achieved, despite the hits it took and attacks by America and Israel to prevent it from continuing its nuclear programme. "Our steadfastness is a victory," he told AFP. The head of Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc Mohammed Raad said in a speech that Iran was "a regional deterrent force, like it or not." "It proved this with its steadfastness" and by standing up against "a tyrannical enemy who sought to impose its hegemony on the whole region," he said. Iran has backed Hezbollah since the group's founding in the 1980s, providing it with financial and military support. The group was severely weakened in its latest confrontation with Israel, which killed most of its top leadership and destroyed much of its arsenal.
