logo
How summer camp became an American obsession

How summer camp became an American obsession

Yahoo10 hours ago

Summer camp. It's where kids go every year to make friends, find their long-lost twin, or even evade a slasher wreaking havoc on the campers and counselors. At least, that's what pop culture would lead you to believe: For the outsized space they take up in our consciousness, going to camp for the summer isn't actually all that common.
'It has never been the case that the majority of American children went to summer camps,' says Leslie Paris, an associate professor at the University of British Columbia and author of the book Children's Nature: The Rise of the American Summer Camp.
'The first camps were founded by urban middle-class men,' she told Vox. 'They were concerned about white boys who they saw as not getting enough outdoor adventure and the kind of manly experiences they would need to be — in the minds of these adults — the nation's leaders for the next generation. They were worried about the effects of urbanization, and they were nostalgic for an earlier day when more boys had grown up in rural places.'
How did camp begin to be available for more kids? And if so few people actually attend, then why does summer camp have such lasting cultural influence? Those are just a few of the questions we posed to Paris on the latest episode of Explain It to Me, Vox's weekly call-in podcast. Below is an excerpt of the conversation with Paris, edited for length and clarity.
You can listen to Explain It to Me on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get podcasts. If you'd like to submit a question, send an email to askvox@vox.com or call 1-800-618-8545.
How did camp expand beyond the audience it was originally created for?
The YMCA movement became involved, and by the turn of the century the movement started really ramping up. Not only because more YMCA camps were founded, but because different organizations got involved and more groups of American adults thought this camp idea would be great.
By the turn of the century, you've got small numbers of women leading groups of girls out into the wilderness. Many of the women who started camps were college-educated and saw leading girls and giving them adventures as a kind of passion.
Then there were urban organizations that began to say, 'This would be great for impoverished working-class kids who never get out of the city at all,' and began sending groups of kids out into the country, often for shorter stays than at private camps.
In the early 20th century, you've got a bunch of new movements: the Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts, the Campfire Girls. And then there are different ethnic and religious groups: Jewish Americans, Catholic Americans, who think, Let's start camps for our own kids, and they do that as well.
By the early 20th century there's a bevy of different kinds of camps organized for a wider variety of kids to give them an experience of the outdoors.
You write in your book that 'this triple nostalgia — for the American past, for camp community, and for individual childhood experience — is critical to understanding why camps have figured so influentially in American culture and in former campers' lives.' I'd love for you to talk about that a little bit more.
One of the things I talk about in my book is that camps were a place where children learned nostalgia, that camps taught them a version of the American past. I think many of us are familiar with a use of Indigenous cultural practices that was often quite superficial, but that was meant to introduce non-Indigenous children to one aspect of the American past. Camps were often a place where children were exposed to ideas about what the American past had been, and then as more generations of children attended camps, they themselves brought those kinds of nostalgic memories with them, throughout their lives.
When they had a chance, many of those former children sent their own kids to camp. So this became a kind of a nostalgic cultural practice that for many adults reminded them of the first time that they had an adventure away from their parents, away from their families.
It's so interesting you talk about Indigenous culture and how that's been used at camp. It makes me think of that scene in where Wednesday's at camp. Why does camp feature so prominently in pop culture if so few of us went?
You could ask, Why are so many children's novels premised around an orphan? I think the fact that the kid is an orphan in these novels allows them to go off and have adventures and do things that many kids raised in families would not necessarily be at liberty to do.
And I think camps have often represented that space, a space that's at least ostensibly protected, where kids have more free play and can have exciting adventures and develop peer relationships that are outside of the norm. And that piece lends itself really well to popular culture.
Camp is so specific. How did you choose this as an academic subject?
I knew that I wanted to work on American childhood, which was still a pretty small field in the 1990s, when I started this project. There wasn't a major scholarly book about the history of summer camps at the time and it seemed like a wonderful way to write about something that would be fun to work on. One of the things that I look at in my book is how camps illuminate the ways in which childhood was being transformed in the late 19th and early 20th century.
That's so interesting. I imagine that changes at summer camp also reflect changes in American childhood overall. I'd love to hear in broad strokes about some of those changes. How have we seen camp and therefore childhood change over time?
One of the main changes that I look at is the rise of the idea of protected childhood. That childhood should be a time apart and children should be protected from the adult world. The late 19th, early 20th century is the same time when you see laws restricting children's labor. There's an emphasis on child protection that's emerging during this period, and camps are one of the early sites of this new idea that children are deserving of spaces apart, time apart, and also that they're deserving of vacations.
Although many of the elite kids who attended more expensive private camps were certainly going to have vacations whether or not they went to summer camp, some of the working-class kids at the turn of the 20th century who attended summer camps had never been on a vacation outside of the city.
Summer camp has become this huge business these days in the United States, $3.5 billion annually. How did that happen?
The camp industry has had to be nimble and change over time, especially since the 1970s, which was a time when many camps struggled and a number failed.
The camping industry underwent some structural changes. One of these was the rise of specialty camps: Basketball camp, computer camp, gymnastics camp, dance camp, theater camp — camps that were focused on a really specific interest emerged in the late 20th century.
Another issue was that many families who could afford private camps were starting to juggle more different opportunities. The cost of travel by plane was going down, so more families were thinking, Maybe at some point this summer we'd like to take the kids on a trip. There was also a rise in [divorce] and families had to negotiate custody. So even camps that used to have a nine-week schedule increasingly considered moving to a two-session schedule.
Modern summer camps have retained many of the same elements as some of the earliest camps, but they've also adjusted to the increasing complexity of some of their clients' lives, and in that way the camp industry has continued to be able to thrive.
And there's another issue, which is that camps have also always provided child care, and this has been important for parents since the very beginning. It's been a boon for parents who could relax knowing that their kids were away, especially families trying to juggle complicated child care arrangements in the summer when there was no school.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

For B-2 pilots, a 37-hour nonstop mission to Iran and back
For B-2 pilots, a 37-hour nonstop mission to Iran and back

Boston Globe

time8 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

For B-2 pilots, a 37-hour nonstop mission to Iran and back

In the real mission, flown in the early hours of Sunday morning in Iran, the pilots would 'feel the clunk' of their weapons bay doors opening, briefly changing the shape of the stealth plane and potentially exposing it to enemy radar. The B-2s that attacked Fordo were each carrying two Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs designed to disable the deeply buried target. When the two-person crews released their payload, weighing a total of 60,000 pounds, their B-2 most likely surged briefly upward, Basham said. Advertisement For the pilots, it was almost certainly a new feeling. Other bombers in the American arsenal, such as the B-1 and B-52, played big roles in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, dropping huge numbers of bombs in support of ground troops. But the B-2 — the most expensive plane in history, at $2.2 billion a copy — played a much more specialized role. Advertisement For some of the pilots, Sunday's mission was possibly the first time that they flew the B-2 in combat and dropped bombs. The strikes also marked the first use of the GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs in combat. In the hours after the strike US military and intelligence officials were still assessing the damage both to the site at Fordo and to the Iranian leadership's psyche. 'Our hope is that the lesson that the Iranians have learned here is look, we can fly a bunker-buster bomb from Missouri to Iran completely undetected without landing once on the ground, and we can destroy whatever nuclear capacity you build up,' Vice President JD Vance told Fox News in an interview Monday. 'I think that lesson is what's going to teach them not to rebuild their nuclear capacity.' The first 30-plus hour B-2 missions took place during the 1999 war in Kosovo. At the time, the idea of flying a combat sortie and returning home in time to pick up the kids from soccer practice was still novel and a bit surreal for those flying. 'It is kind of weird to get dressed in your own bathroom and then go into combat,' one B-2 pilot told The Wall Street Journal in the early days of the Kosovo war. Since then, B-2 pilots have flown combat missions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. The B-2 bombers, which were built to carry nuclear weapons, regularly fly deterrence missions in Europe and Asia from their Missouri base. The past 25 years have taught the Air Force and its pilots a lot about flying long missions. Today, staff doctors and physiologists at Whiteman Air Force Base specialize in helping B-2 pilots prepare their bodies to spend long stretches in the cockpit. Advertisement If they have sufficient notice, the pilots will try to adjust their sleep schedules so that their body clocks will be in sync with their mission. Each B-2 is flown by a two-person crew. The small cockpit has room for a toilet and space behind the plane's seats where a pilot can stretch out on a cot or a camping pad and take a brief nap. Both pilots are required to be in their seats during takeoff, landing, aerial refuelings, and for the duration of their time over enemy territory. The planes are also equipped with small heaters to warm food, but many B-2 pilots prefer simple meals like sandwiches on long missions. 'You learn to drink a lot of water,' said Basham, who flew combat missions into Kosovo. The missions most likely played out in similar fashion to the sorties that B-2 pilots flew in earlier wars. In those earlier missions in Kosovo and Iraq, pilots saw antiaircraft guns and missiles in the sky beneath them. This time, Pentagon officials said the Iranians did not get off a shot at the B-2s or the F-35 fighter jet escorts. In the earlier conflicts the B-2 pilots were dropping, at most, 2,000-pound precision-guided bombs. This time the B-2s each dropped two 30,000-pound munitions over their target. Basham could not help but wonder what it felt like to shed that kind of weight. 'It'll be interesting to hear from the pilots,' he said. This article originally appeared in .

How summer camp became an American obsession
How summer camp became an American obsession

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How summer camp became an American obsession

Summer camp. It's where kids go every year to make friends, find their long-lost twin, or even evade a slasher wreaking havoc on the campers and counselors. At least, that's what pop culture would lead you to believe: For the outsized space they take up in our consciousness, going to camp for the summer isn't actually all that common. 'It has never been the case that the majority of American children went to summer camps,' says Leslie Paris, an associate professor at the University of British Columbia and author of the book Children's Nature: The Rise of the American Summer Camp. 'The first camps were founded by urban middle-class men,' she told Vox. 'They were concerned about white boys who they saw as not getting enough outdoor adventure and the kind of manly experiences they would need to be — in the minds of these adults — the nation's leaders for the next generation. They were worried about the effects of urbanization, and they were nostalgic for an earlier day when more boys had grown up in rural places.' How did camp begin to be available for more kids? And if so few people actually attend, then why does summer camp have such lasting cultural influence? Those are just a few of the questions we posed to Paris on the latest episode of Explain It to Me, Vox's weekly call-in podcast. Below is an excerpt of the conversation with Paris, edited for length and clarity. You can listen to Explain It to Me on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get podcasts. If you'd like to submit a question, send an email to askvox@ or call 1-800-618-8545. How did camp expand beyond the audience it was originally created for? The YMCA movement became involved, and by the turn of the century the movement started really ramping up. Not only because more YMCA camps were founded, but because different organizations got involved and more groups of American adults thought this camp idea would be great. By the turn of the century, you've got small numbers of women leading groups of girls out into the wilderness. Many of the women who started camps were college-educated and saw leading girls and giving them adventures as a kind of passion. Then there were urban organizations that began to say, 'This would be great for impoverished working-class kids who never get out of the city at all,' and began sending groups of kids out into the country, often for shorter stays than at private camps. In the early 20th century, you've got a bunch of new movements: the Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts, the Campfire Girls. And then there are different ethnic and religious groups: Jewish Americans, Catholic Americans, who think, Let's start camps for our own kids, and they do that as well. By the early 20th century there's a bevy of different kinds of camps organized for a wider variety of kids to give them an experience of the outdoors. You write in your book that 'this triple nostalgia — for the American past, for camp community, and for individual childhood experience — is critical to understanding why camps have figured so influentially in American culture and in former campers' lives.' I'd love for you to talk about that a little bit more. One of the things I talk about in my book is that camps were a place where children learned nostalgia, that camps taught them a version of the American past. I think many of us are familiar with a use of Indigenous cultural practices that was often quite superficial, but that was meant to introduce non-Indigenous children to one aspect of the American past. Camps were often a place where children were exposed to ideas about what the American past had been, and then as more generations of children attended camps, they themselves brought those kinds of nostalgic memories with them, throughout their lives. When they had a chance, many of those former children sent their own kids to camp. So this became a kind of a nostalgic cultural practice that for many adults reminded them of the first time that they had an adventure away from their parents, away from their families. It's so interesting you talk about Indigenous culture and how that's been used at camp. It makes me think of that scene in where Wednesday's at camp. Why does camp feature so prominently in pop culture if so few of us went? You could ask, Why are so many children's novels premised around an orphan? I think the fact that the kid is an orphan in these novels allows them to go off and have adventures and do things that many kids raised in families would not necessarily be at liberty to do. And I think camps have often represented that space, a space that's at least ostensibly protected, where kids have more free play and can have exciting adventures and develop peer relationships that are outside of the norm. And that piece lends itself really well to popular culture. Camp is so specific. How did you choose this as an academic subject? I knew that I wanted to work on American childhood, which was still a pretty small field in the 1990s, when I started this project. There wasn't a major scholarly book about the history of summer camps at the time and it seemed like a wonderful way to write about something that would be fun to work on. One of the things that I look at in my book is how camps illuminate the ways in which childhood was being transformed in the late 19th and early 20th century. That's so interesting. I imagine that changes at summer camp also reflect changes in American childhood overall. I'd love to hear in broad strokes about some of those changes. How have we seen camp and therefore childhood change over time? One of the main changes that I look at is the rise of the idea of protected childhood. That childhood should be a time apart and children should be protected from the adult world. The late 19th, early 20th century is the same time when you see laws restricting children's labor. There's an emphasis on child protection that's emerging during this period, and camps are one of the early sites of this new idea that children are deserving of spaces apart, time apart, and also that they're deserving of vacations. Although many of the elite kids who attended more expensive private camps were certainly going to have vacations whether or not they went to summer camp, some of the working-class kids at the turn of the 20th century who attended summer camps had never been on a vacation outside of the city. Summer camp has become this huge business these days in the United States, $3.5 billion annually. How did that happen? The camp industry has had to be nimble and change over time, especially since the 1970s, which was a time when many camps struggled and a number failed. The camping industry underwent some structural changes. One of these was the rise of specialty camps: Basketball camp, computer camp, gymnastics camp, dance camp, theater camp — camps that were focused on a really specific interest emerged in the late 20th century. Another issue was that many families who could afford private camps were starting to juggle more different opportunities. The cost of travel by plane was going down, so more families were thinking, Maybe at some point this summer we'd like to take the kids on a trip. There was also a rise in [divorce] and families had to negotiate custody. So even camps that used to have a nine-week schedule increasingly considered moving to a two-session schedule. Modern summer camps have retained many of the same elements as some of the earliest camps, but they've also adjusted to the increasing complexity of some of their clients' lives, and in that way the camp industry has continued to be able to thrive. And there's another issue, which is that camps have also always provided child care, and this has been important for parents since the very beginning. It's been a boon for parents who could relax knowing that their kids were away, especially families trying to juggle complicated child care arrangements in the summer when there was no school.

Map Shows States Where People Most Opposed to Christian Prayer in Schools
Map Shows States Where People Most Opposed to Christian Prayer in Schools

Newsweek

time15 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Map Shows States Where People Most Opposed to Christian Prayer in Schools

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new map shows which states have the most people opposed to Christian prayer in schools. Why It Matters There is a cultural and legal battle about prayer in schools, and other public forums, going on across the United States. For example, Texas lawmakers are considering requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments in classrooms meanwhile, the Supreme Court recently upheld a ruling that would not allow Oklahoma to launch the country's first religious (Catholic) public charter school. There are ongoing debates about prayer at school sporting events and time for prayer during the school day. What To Know The states that say they oppose allowing public school teachers to lead classes in prayers that refer to Jesus are Washington state, Oregon, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut. Washington, D.C. is also part of that list, according to a new analysis from the Pew Research Center. The study, released on Monday, is based on data from Pew's religious landscape survey conducted between July 17, 2023 and March 4, 2024. Conversely, the states that are in favor are North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan. In these states, there is no significant difference between those who are for or against: Montana, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Delaware and Maine. In total, just over half of U.S. adults say they are in favor of prayer in schools, made up of 27 percent who are strongly in favor and 26 percent who say they just favor it. Meanwhile, 46 percent oppose prayer in schools, made up of 22 percent who say they strongly oppose it and 24 percent who say they just oppose it. Advocates of prayer in school argue that it instils American values and that students should be allowed to practice their faith. Opponents argue against prayer in schools because it amounts to government endorsement of one religion, violating the First Amendment's separation of church and state. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump said during his first term 2020: "You have the right to pray, and that's a very important and powerful right. There's nothing more important than that, I would say." Rachel Laser, president of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said in May: "We will continue our efforts to protect inclusive public education. We call on this nation to recommit to church-state separation before this safeguard of democracy and freedom is further attacked." What Happens Next There are multiple legal battles ongoing across the country.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store