California Dems propose legislation to ban face masks for law enforcement officers — and not protesters or criminals
As Republicans have pushed for mask bans to crack down on shadowy protesters and criminals, a pair of Democratic lawmakers in California want to prohibit law enforcement officers from wearing face coverings following the federal crackdown on Los Angeles anti-ICE protests.
State Sens. Scott Wiener and Jesse Arreguin, who represent San Francisco and Oakland, respectively, announced on social media that they would be introducing the 'No Secret Police Act' to ban most law enforcement members from covering their faces when interacting with the public.
The bill would also require officers to display identifying information on their uniforms, like name tags on their helmets.
Advertisement
4 Two Democratic lawmakers announced a bill that would ban law enforcement from wearing face coverings while interacting with the public.
Toby Canham for NY Post
4 The legislation was dubbed the 'No Secret Police Act'.
AFP via Getty Images
'We're seeing the rise of secret police — masked, no identifying info, even wearing army fatigues — grabbing & disappearing people. It's antithetical to democracy & harms communities. The No Secret Police Act can help end the fear & chaos this behavior creates in communities,' Wiener wrote on X.
Advertisement
'The recent federal operations in California have created an environment of profound terror. If we want the public to trust law enforcement, we cannot allow them to behave like secret police in an authoritarian state,' Wiener told The San Francisco Standard.
The legislation wouldn't affect SWAT members and officers who need to wear medical masks during certain disasters, including wildfires that frequently rock the Golden State. Certain types of riot gear, like the ones donned by many cops handling the LA protests, would also still be permitted under the bill so long as the officer's face is still visible through the face covering.
4 Officials would still be permitted to wear certain masks during disasters, like gas or medical masks.
Toby Canham for NY Post
4 Some states have also moved to ban criminals and protesters from wearing face coverings.
AFP via Getty Images
Advertisement
In Los Angeles, protesters have come prepared to the demonstrations with their own face coverings, ranging from medical masks to protect against tear gas to keffiyehs, a traditional Palestinian scarf commonly worn during anti-Israel protests.
Some of the masked protesters were photographed and filmed setting cars on fire or hurling items at officers. The coverings make it harder for cops to identify and track down the violent suspects.
In New York City, calls for a mask ban on protesters increased after anti-Israel encampments spurred chaos on many college campuses in the city and across the United States. A NYC council member introduced a bill to forbid full-coverage ski masks from being worn in public.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, meanwhile, belabored on publicly advocating a mask ban statewide for months despite encouraging it behind closed doors. She eventually relented while trying to finalize the state budget in April and included a new law that tacks on an additional fine for anyone who wears a mask while committing a crime.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
No Tax on Overtime, Tips Changed in Senate Bill: What To Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's no tax on tips and overtime pay policy was one of his most popular pledges during the 2024 election campaign, and lawmakers in Congress are working to make his plans a reality. The promise is included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the sprawling budget bill that outlines Trump's economic agenda, which has been amended by Senate lawmakers this week. While the total removal of these income tax requirements is not on the table, Republicans have proposed letting workers deduct their reported tip and overtime income from their federal income taxes—with the House and Senate considering slightly different ways of implementing the policies. Why It Matters Nixing federal income taxes on overtime and tipped income was one of Trump's top policy promises during his 2024 election campaign, an idea that has also been embraced by Democrats. It could affect millions of workers across the U.S. What To Know The Senate Finance Committee's proposal would limit tax breaks on tipped income and overtime pay. The House version allowed deductions on income up to $160,000 annually. The Senate plan offers the same $25,000 deduction, but would begin to phase out for single filers earning, with a modified adjusted gross income, $150,000, and couples over $300,000. The list of occupations that will be permitted to deduct tips from their federal income taxes would need to be published within 90 days of the rule becoming law: it is expected to include most service workers. Stock image of money and a receipt on a restaurant table. Stock image of money and a receipt on a restaurant table. GETTY For overtime pay, Senate Republicans also propose a $12,500 deduction for single filers, doubled to $25,000 for joint tax returns. This would also phase out at the same levels as the tips policy. Both plans would still be subject to FICA taxes, which pay for Social Security and Medicare, and both would be in place from 2025 to 2028. What People Are Saying Javier Palomarez, founder and CEO of the United States Hispanic Business Council, told Newsweek the policy could "unintentionally amplify tipping fatigue." "If consumers perceive that service workers are receiving an additional government benefit, they may become less inclined to tip, or tip less, especially amid growing backlash to the seemingly common tipping prompts, e.g., at counter-service or self-checkout. Consumers' mindsets could shift, viewing the policy as a substitute for their personal responsibility to tip generously." Republican Mike Crapo, Idaho Senator and U.S. Senate Finance Committee chairman, said the bill "delivers additional tax relief to middle-class families still recovering from record inflation under the [Joe] Biden administration. "It powers the economy by permanently extending critical pro-growth provisions and introduces new incentives for domestic investment, providing certainty for American job creators to spur domestic economic activity and invest in their workers." The University of Colorado's Nicole Lazzeri, a teaching assistant professor of accounting at the Leeds School of Business, told CU Boulder Today: "When you look under the hood, it gets a little more complicated. The current version of this proposal—the one included in what's been dubbed the "Big, Beautiful Bill"—doesn't actually remove all taxes on tips. "It lets workers deduct their reported tip income from their federal income taxes, but tips would still be subject to payroll taxes—that's Social Security and Medicare, the 7.65 percent that's taken out of every paycheck. So yes, it would help some workers. But not as much as it might seem. What Happens Next If enacted, the changes would take effect from 2026 through 2028. The modified bill will first be debated by the Senate and return to the House for a final vote before Trump can sign it into law.
Associated Press
9 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Turkish court sentences opposition politician for inciting hatred, but orders his release
ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — A Turkish court on Tuesday sentenced a far-right politician to more than two years in prison for inciting public hatred and hostility, but ordered his release because of time already served. Umit Ozdag, the leader of Turkey's Victory Party, was detained in January over accusations that he insulted President Recep Tayyip Erdogan with comments that he made during a party meeting. A day later, Ozdag was formally arrested and charged with inciting hatred against migrants. He was blamed for last year's anti-Syrian refugee riots in the central Turkish province of Kayseri, during which hundreds of homes and businesses were attacked. Ozdag, a 64-year-old former academic, is an outspoken critic of Turkey's refugee policies, and has previously called for the repatriation of millions of Syrian refugees. During his trial, Ozdag acknowledged advocating the return of refugees, but strongly denied that he had incited violence against them. He maintained that his imprisonment was politically motivated and aimed at silencing him. The court sentenced him to two years and four months in prison, but ordered his release, ruling that he has already served a sufficient portion of the sentence. The trial took place amid a widespread crackdown on the opposition to Erdogan's Justice and Development Party. Officials from municipalities controlled by the main opposition — the Republican People's Party, or CHP — have faced waves of arrests this year. Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, viewed as the main challenger to Erdogan's two-decade rule, was detained in March over allegations of corruption. Many people in Turkey consider the cases to be politically driven, according to opinion polls. However, Erdogan's government insists that the courts are impartial and free from political involvement.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate releases Trump tax and Medicaid blueprint
Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) on Monday released the Senate's long-awaited version of President Trump's tax agenda, which would make the 2017 corporate tax cuts permanent, cut hundreds of billions of dollars in Medicaid spending and phase out renewable-energy tax cuts enacted under President Biden. The legislative text crafted by Senate Finance Committee Republicans represents the core of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and includes the populist tax breaks that the president campaigned on, including provisions to shield tipped income from taxation. But it includes several changes that puts Senate Republicans on a collision course with the House. The measure encompasses the most controversial sections of the bill, such as proposals to impose stricter work and eligibility requirements for Medicaid and to reduce the federal government's share of Medicaid spending in states. It would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, instead of the $4 trillion, the increase adopted by House Republicans. The debt-ceiling language is a major problem for Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has told his leadership he won't support the bill if it includes such a large extension of federal borrowing authority. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), an outspoken fiscal conservative, told reporters Monday evening that he would oppose the bill if it came to the floor in its current form because it doesn't go far enough to cut the $2.2 trillion annual deficit. 'We're not doing anything to significantly to alter the course of the financial future of this country,' he said. 'We're not seriously addressing our long-term deficit and debt issues.' With Paul and Johnson opposed to the measure, Senate Republicans can afford only one more defection from their caucus and still pass the bill. Crapo presented the newly drafted provisions in the bill to Republican colleagues at a meeting Monday evening. Two Republican aides familiar with the legislation drafted by the Finance panel say it will go further than House-passed language to tighten Medicaid eligibility requirements and to restrict states from using health care provider taxes to collect more federal Medicaid funding. 'It's still f'd up,' a GOP aide said of the Senate's changes to the House-passed Medicaid provisions. The text includes a provision that would require states to conduct eligibility redeterminations every six months for individuals enrolled in Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. The Senate Finance panel has also drafted a provision that would prevent states that didn't expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act from increasing the rate of health care provider taxes to gain more federal funding. And, beginning in 2027, the legislation would lower health care provider taxes in states that chose to expand Medicaid to 3.5 percent. Like the House bill, the Senate legislation imposes work requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries beginning at 19 years old. But the Senate version says adults with dependent children older than 14 will also have to prove they work, attend school or perform community service for 80 hours a month, while the House-passed version would exempt all adults with dependent children Several Republican senators have raised concerns about the Medicaid spending cuts endorsed by the House, including Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Josh Hawley (Mo.), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska). Hawley said he was not happy about the language in the bill to cap states' use of health care provider taxes to attract federal funding for rural hospitals. And he took a shot at the bill for extending the time for phasing out clean-energy tax credits enacted under President Biden. 'It sounds like to me like we're going to keep the Biden 'green new deal' subsidies and we're going to pay for that by defunding rural hospitals. That's going to be hard argument to make in Missouri,' he told reporters. He said the language in the bill to require some people on Medicaid to pay higher co-pays is 'not good.' 'It sounds like to me like this needs some work,' he said. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated earlier this month that the House-passed bill would cut federal spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) by $863 billion over ten years. The agency projected that the number of uninsured people in the country would increase by 10.9 million over the next decade if the House proposals become law. Collins told reporters after meeting with colleagues to discuss the bill that its restrictions on states' use of health care provider taxes is a major concern but she declined to comment in more detail. The Maine senator, who faces a competitive re-election race next year, said she had plenty of consultation from the Senate GOP leadership but she acknowledged with mixed results. Asked if Crapo listened to her input in crafting the legislation, Collins laughed and replied: 'Sometimes yes, sometimes no.' The deeper cuts to Medicaid spending come in response to a large number of Republican senators, including Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who called for the legislation to further reduce the deficit. The House-passed bill would cut spending by $1.6 trillion over ten years but, according to the Congressional Budget Office, add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit. The Senate legislation does not include changes to cut spending on Medicare Advantage, an alternative to traditional Medicare offered by private companies. Senate Republicans had discussed achieving up to $275 billion in savings from that program, even though Trump had urged GOP lawmakers to stay away from the popular program. The text appears to eliminate the most stringent green energy tax credit provision in the House bill, deleting a measure that would have required climate-friendly energy sources to start construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment to qualify for the credits at all. And it adds some flexibility in how quickly green construction projects must be completed to qualify for tax credits. But in what could be a red flag for Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( the bill would terminate the clean hydrogen production tax credit on Jan. 1, 2026, if hydrogen energy production facilities are not under construction by then. Capito has said that the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub in her home state will not be under construction by that deadline. The Senate bill locks in existing federal tax brackets, boosts the standard deduction and maintains the termination of personal exemptions — all without sunsets. Different from the House version, the bill sets a lower increase for the child tax credit (CTC), raising it to $2,200 per child as opposed to the House's $2,500. Hawley called the child tax credit provided by the bill 'too low,' although he said the Senate's version is comparable to the House's because the Senate would index the benefit to inflation. The bill creates new deductions for taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest but doesn't make them fully deductible. Tips are deductible up to $25,000 through 2028. Overtime pay is deductible up to $12,500, or $25,000 for joint filers, through 2028. Auto loan interest is deductible up to $10,000, also through 2028. The Senate bill as drafted would keep the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions at $10,000 a year, rolling back the deal that Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) painstakingly cut with blue state Republicans to raise the limit on SALT deductions to $40,000 a year for households earning less than $500,000 annually. It would permanently extend the $10,000 cap, which is scheduled to expire at the end of this year. Members of the House SALT Caucus have repeatedly warned the Senate against reneging on their deal with Johnson and on Monday seethed at the change. 'Instead of undermining the deal already in place and putting the entire bill at risk, the Senate should work with us to keep our promise of historic tax relief and deliver on our Republican agenda,' co-chairs Reps. Young Kim (R-Calif.) and Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.) wrote Monday. Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) said the Senate softened the House-passed language cutting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by giving states an opportunity to get more federal funding if they reduce errors in paying out food assistance. Boozman said he's heard generally positive reaction to the Senate's changes to the House language. He said that while the House bill would cut federal SNAP funding by 5 percent 'straight off the top,' the Senate bill would let states avoid federal funding cuts by getting their error rate 'down to zero.' Updated at 8:32 p.m. Rachel Frazin, Nathaniel Weixel, Tobias Burns and Al Weaver contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
