GOP Lawmaker Slammed For Baffling Excuse For Avoiding Town Halls — And Experts Have Thoughts
Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) recently gave quite the curious explanation for why she does not plan to host town halls.
During a Sunday segment of Fox News' 'Sunday Night in America with Trey Gowdy,' host and former Republican congressman Trey Gowdy asked Foxx how she would handle 'tough town halls' amid pushback from voters on GOP efforts to 'reduce the size and scope of government.' (Foxx later in the segment expressed her support for Elon Musk, President Donald Trump's billionaire adviser, and the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which has proposed major cuts in government and the dismantling of federal agencies.)
'I always tell people if they want me to have a town hall, please come to my office and sit down and talk with me. I'm happy to answer your questions and talk with you personally,' Foxx told Gowdy in response to whether she'd host a town hall.
'I don't do town halls because I think it's just an opportunity for people to yell at their member of congress,' she added. GOP lawmakers have notably been facing furious constituents during public forums in congressional districts across the country.
But people deserve to have the opportunity to hold their representatives accountable — and getting a meeting with a member of congress isn't so simple, according to experts. Liz Barber, director of policy and advocacy at the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina, emphasized that it's 'next to impossible to simply get a call through to a representative's office right now, let alone a spot on their calendar.'
'Layer real life considerations, like time off work, transportation and child care, and it is nearly impossible to think that this is a real option for most people,' Barber said.
She also pointed out that elected officials get to choose whom they have personal meetings with, which can often result in a lack of 'equal access,' and that representatives might primarily meet with those who agree with them — or with people who have influence.
'When a public official only answers questions behind closed doors in a meeting, their constituents don't get to know what was shared, making it harder to hold representatives accountable to their promises and positions on any issue,' she said.
Laurel Harbridge-Yong, professor of political science and associate director and fellow at the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern University, said that while legislators might prefer one-on-one dialogues for a variety of reasons, it would be challenging to realistically execute, and it could cause elected officials to only hear from 'constituents with the most resources' — those who would be able to accommodate taking off work mid-day, or potentially traveling to Washington, D.C.
'This means legislators would learn less from constituents who lack the resources to secure a one-on-one meeting,' she said. 'This would exacerbate the skew in representation toward the interests of the well-resourced.'
Republican lawmakers have been relentlessly booed and heckled by voters at contentious town hall events, where attendees have aired their grievances over government layoffs, Musk's influence in the Trump administration, Department of Veteran Affairs layoffs and proposed future cuts, among other issues.
Foxx represents North Carolina's 5th Congressional District, which has a total population of nearly 750,000 people — including nearly 50,000 veterans, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
People on X, formerly Twitter, slammed Foxx for the reasoning behind her reluctance to host town halls.
'Fun Fact: Constituents don't get mad at you when you do a good job,' one X user wrote.
Foxx's remarks shows that elected officials like her 'are afraid and know their policies are not as popular as they think!' wrote another.
Here's why else town halls are important and what you should do if your officials won't hold a meeting:
Party members have been advised by Republican leaders to avoid town halls, and GOP lawmakers, like House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), have publicly claimed that those sounding off at members of congress at these events are actually paid protesters — and not constituents.
But several clips and interviews from town hall events highlight attendees who identify as Democrats, veterans and local Republican voters.
'It is good policy and a sign of a healthy democracy for elected officials to have public meetings with constituents, and a refusal to do so will not silent people or their outrage,' Barber said about the importance of town halls overall.
'They also allow for community members from diverse backgrounds to hear from each other, share perspectives, and collectively hold their representatives accountable,' she continued, before adding: 'Once elected to office, politicians should not forget that their power and their responsibilities lie with the people who elected them.'
U.S. Army veteran Jay Carey, a Democrat, was escorted out of a town hall event hosted by Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-N.C.) last week, after he shouted at Edwards: 'Do your job!' and 'I'm a veteran, and you don't give a fuck about me.'
He's since told Asheville Watchdog that he doesn't regret his expletive-laden remarks at Edwards. 'I do feel that the days of being cordial and respectful are over, because we're not being respected.'
Harbridge-Yong said that constituents should 'have a right to express their opinions and to share their concerns with their elected officials.'
While elections are a way for voters to make their voices heard, Harbridge-Yong pointed out that 'elections can come too late for a legislator to change their position on an issue,' and therefore town halls would ideally be one way a legislator could 'learn from constituents in time to adjust their votes and be good representatives of the public.'
However, she said that while constituents have the right to express their concerns or anger, it's important to note that 'doing anything that constitutes threats or harassment toward their elected official' is not acceptable in our democracy.
'Democracy is not always comfortable or polite, and a key part of the job for any elected official is understanding that you are a public servant working for all of your constituents, not just those who agree with you,' Barber said.
'Sometimes that means hearing voices of dissent and getting tough questions,' she added.
Harbridge-Yong said that you should call your congress member if your representative isn't hosting a town hall, because their office staff keeps logs of what issues and positions people are calling about.
'Vote in the midterm and presidential elections. And vote in the primary elections that choose the nominees for the major parties, especially if you live in a safe district or state where an incumbent is unlikely to lose even if they are unresponsive to constituent opinions,' she said.
Barber advised people to 'reach out in whatever ways you can,' such as calls, e-mails and visits to local district offices.
'Organize in your own communities and hold town halls to discuss the issues that matter to you and to brainstorm solutions together, even if your representatives don't attend,' she said.
'Democracy thrives on open discussion and sharing of ideas,' she continued. 'Follow the ACLU or other organizations that are taking actions on issues that you care about ― and vote.'
Kelly, Gallego Urged To Get Tougher On Trump In Arizona Town Hall
Voters Flood Town Halls With Fears Of Social Security Cuts, Putting Heat On GOP Over Musk And DOGE
Veteran Who Ripped GOP Rep At Town Hall Defends 'Necessary' Act: They Aren't 'Serving Us'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
44 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Uncle Elon's final report card
All good buddy comedies come to an end. For President Donald Trump and first friend "Uncle Elon" Musk, theirs wrapped up with the same explosive fanfare upon which it started. But now their shared enthusiasm for cutting government waste has morphed into animosity for each other so deep and personal that it's become a textbook case study in management gone wrong. In November, just after Trump's reelection, I asked management experts if Musk could mimic his track record of juicing everything he could out of his lean companies to make the government run more efficiently. They were reluctant to doubt Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency, but just as reluctant to think his efficiency tactics at Tesla and X meant he could single-handedly transform the government. I checked back in with some of them in March, six weeks into DOGE's chaotic tenure, after it dismantled USAID and axed tens of thousands of federal workers. They described his management as "clumsy," "wrongheaded," and full of "political recklessness." Now, the breakup of the bromance between two of the world's biggest, boldest personalities is surprising only in that it took so long to unfold and, once it did, moved with the speed that only two social media savvy, chronically online posters could propel. (Musk posted on X more than a dozen times lambasting Trump and his " Big Beautiful Bill" late last week, since deleting some of the most disparaging claims, and Trump suggested Musk might be suffering from "Trump derangement syndrome.") If DOGE is a cautionary tale in how not to manage, it's one from the furthest extreme, marked by a clash between the egos of two of the world's most powerful men that made politics extremely personal. Still there are business lessons to be gleaned even for those of us who run fewer than six companies and have fewer than 220 million social media followers. DOGE has proved "unsuccessful" up to this point, and is so far a "failed venture" for Musk and for the government, says Subodha Kumar, a professor at Temple University's Fox School of Business. It brought "disruption, a lot of delays, a lot of mistrust, and a lot of good people have left the organization," he says. "This kind of damage takes a long time to repair." To date, DOGE has claimed it found $180 billion in savings (Musk in May called DOGE "effective," but "not as effective as I'd like," as the original goal was to save $2 trillion). An analysis in April from nonpartisan research group Partnership for Public Service found that the department's actions could cost as much as $135 billion, an estimate of the costs of the firings, re-hirings, and lost productivity. Meanwhile, the four months Musk spent working taking a chainsaw to the federal government are wrapping up doused in drama that has spilled over to his other companies. After his 130-day post as a special government employee ends, Musk is pointing the blame for government waste back on Trump, skewering the spending bill for being too big and ugly, and endorsing a call to impeach Trump and replace him with Vice President JD Vance (that post has since been deleted). The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss. Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor The escalating tension is just the beginning of a fight that could get worse for Musk, and likely has little benefit for Trump, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor who has studied Trump for decades and advised presidents, tells me in an email. DOGE, he notes, overpromised savings and may actually cost US taxpayers more when it comes to rehiring costs, repairing systems, and weakened cybersecurity. As WIRED reported last week, DOGE is hiring, and even has reached out to technologists who formerly worked for the government. Musk's involvement with the DOGE proved tumultuous for his businesses from the start. His personal wealth ballooned by some $200 billion in 2024, surpassing $400 billion after Election Day. Once he got to work in the White House, his absenteeism from his companies — paired with a growing distaste for DOGE's actions among the electorate and protests targeting Tesla — led his net worth to drop alongside Tesla's market cap. Last Thursday, Musk's open beef with Trump further hampered his wealth, leading the Tesla CEO to lose $34 billion personally in a single day. Tesla stock, which has taken a beating as people turn on the company to protest Musk's government work, took its biggest tumble since March, closing 14% lower and wiping out $152 billion from the company's market cap. Musk is still the richest person in the world. For Musk, there's damage to the Tesla brand in need of repair. His next step could be "to portray himself as a purist who came in to offer his technical help and didn't realize how deep the corruption runs," says Michael Morris, a professor at Columbia Business School. "Musk could potentially portray himself as a wayward son of the tech industry." This might only work if the Trump administration continues to stumble, and if Musk also sees more success, like winning big with his robotaxi push. As Taylor Lorenz reported in User Mag Friday, some high-profile Democrats are already signaling that they would welcome Musk back into the fold. Trump over the weekend told NBC News Musk would face "serious consequences" if he donated to Democratic candidates (he did not specify what they would be). It's yet to be seen where Musk will find his next political alliances: On Friday, he ran a poll on X asking if a third political party should emerge to include the 80% of Americans in the middle of Republicans and Democrats, as he sees it. The president has threatened to go after Musk's government contracts — which total in tens of billions of dollars for SpaceX and Tesla. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Trump himself bought a Tesla just three months ago, and is now considering selling it. (Best of luck to him, the cars' resale values have tanked). As Trump and Musk part ways, it's clear that Musk's brazen, fully autonomous leadership style didn't work in the government world, as it eschewed transparency and collaboration in favor of a top-down approach. "The one-size-fits-all policy does not work everywhere," says Kumar. "You have to understand the culture of the organization and you have to work from inside rather than from outside." Back in November, experts told me it wasn't clear what authority Musk would actually wield in the newly-created position to implement massive spending cuts. Trying to employ tech-world leadership tactics from the White House created a rivalry between Musk and Trump for power and control, undercutting the alliance between the two and leaving DOGE far short of its savings goals. "The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss — with surging parallel drives for grandiosity," Sonnenfeld says. "Musk's tragic mistake was that he forgot his role — as a staffer and advisor to Trump, not the primary character he foolishly believed himself to be, and even now, continues to overestimate his own importance and indispensability."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
In the battle of Trump v Newsom, the president is winning the public
In the on-going Battle of Los Angeles, California governor Gavin Newsom may have the law on his side – but his adversary president Donald Trump has the most powerful imagery. The conflict began in Los Angeles on Friday, when mobs of protestors attacked agents of the US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who were trying to serve warrants on specific illegal immigrants at a Home Depot and also at a clothing store. On Saturday, during a protest in front of a nearby Department of Homeland Security (DHS) office, members of the crowd lit fires and threw rocks at federal officers, who defended themselves with tear gas and non-lethal ammunition. Later that day, president Trump authorised the deployment of 2000 members of the National Guard to protect the federal ICE agents; since then 700 American Marines have been added to the federal force. Governor Newsom and other leaders of the Democratic-dominated California have claimed that Trump's actions were not needed because local and state authorities had the situation under control. And yet on Sunday, following three days of violence and arrests, the Los Angeles Police Department declared downtown Los Angeles an 'unlawful assembly' area. And on Monday the state of California sued the Trump administration, claiming that Trump 'illegally acted to federalise the National Guard,' in the words of Newsom. Typically a governor requests a president to federalise and mobilise the National Guard to deal with riots or natural disasters. For example, consider the Los Angeles riots of 1992. It was sparked by the acquittal of four white police officers who beat a black motorist named Rodney King and it led to more than fifty deaths and a billion dollars of damage; in response a Republican California governor Pete Wilson asked a Republican president George HW Bush to federalise the National Guard. Not since 1965, when president Lyndon B. Johnson sent the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators, has a president sent troops without a governor's request. While California officials might be able to make a legal case against the Trump administration, the state and the Democratic party risk losing in the court of public opinion. Viral photographs show masked rioters waving Mexican flags in front of burning cars and debris, supporting the Trump White House's inflammatory claims about an immigrant invasion. In a shrewd public relations move, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has released mug shots under the heading: 'ICE Captures Worst of the Worst Illegal Alien Criminals in Los Angeles Including Murderers, Sex Offenders, and Other Violent Criminals.' The rogues' gallery contains illegal immigrants from a number of countries including Vietnam, the Philippines, and Mexico, charged with offenses including attempted rape, assault with a deadly weapon, grand theft larceny, distribution of heroin and cocaine, wilful cruelty to a child and other serious crimes. Democrats recently succeeded in reversing the allegedly unlawful deportation to El Salvador of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant from El Salvador who was granted the right to remain in the US by a federal immigration judge. But on his return he was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of being an MS-13 gang member who has smuggled thousands of illegal immigrants, drugs, and firearms in the US. Democratic strategists might ask whether someone like Abrego Garcia should be the face of the Democratic party. At least, unlike some of the rioters cavorting in front of burning wreckage in LA, he does not wear a mask. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

an hour ago
GOP House Homeland chairman Green to retire from Congress early
NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- The House Homeland Security Committee's chairman, Republican Rep. Mark Green of Tennessee, announced Monday that he will retire from Congress once the House votes again on the sprawling tax and budget policy bill backed by President Donald Trump. In a statement, Green said he was offered a private sector opportunity that was 'that was too exciting to pass up' so he informed House Speaker Mike Johnson on Monday of his retirement plans. The move comes more than a year after Green announced he wouldn't run again in 2024, but changed his mind when fellow Republicans implored him to stick around. Green's next election would have been in 2026. Green voted for Trump's sweeping legislation when it passed the House last month. The bill is now in the Senate's hands, and would need to return to the House for agreement on any changes. Trump wants the bill on his desk for his signature by July 4. Green's delayed departure could help with the GOP's narrow margins in the House. Republican leaders need every vote they can get on their big tax bill, which they managed to pass last month by a single vote and will have to pass again once changes are made in the Senate. They now have a 220-212 majority. 'It was the honor of a lifetime to represent the people of Tennessee in Congress," Green said. "They asked me to deliver on the conservative values and principles we all hold dear, and I did my level best to do so.' Green's seat will be decided in a special election. The timing will depend on when he leaves office. Ahead of his 2024 reelection, Green had announced that February 2024 he would not run again. The decision was revealed a day after the impeachment of then-President Joe Biden's Homeland Security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. But many fellow Republicans had called on him to reconsider, and he jumped back into the running just two weeks later. He was unopposed in the Republican primary and then defeated Democrat Megan Barry — the former Nashville mayor who resigned in 2018 in scandal — by more than 21 percentage points in November 2024. Green, 60, has served since 2019 in the 7th Congressional District, which was redrawn in 2022 to include a significant portion of Nashville. The city was carved up three ways in the 2022 redistricting so Republicans could flip a Democratic district in Congress that had covered Music City, which they successfully did. Green previously served as an Army surgeon and in the state Senate and is from Montgomery County. Green flirted running for governor in 2017, but suspended his campaign after he was nominated by former President Donald Trump to become the Army secretary. He later withdrew his nomination due to criticism over his remarks about Muslims and LGBTQ+ Americans.