Main defendant charged with murder of private Seán Rooney sentenced to death
In a statement, Tánaiste and defence minister Simon Harris said that he noted the sentence handed down, along with those handed to a number of the other defendants who had previously not been in court.
'I am disappointed and share the disappointment of Pte Rooney's family at the lighter sentences imposed on a number of those convicted today,' he said.
'Seán Rooney made the ultimate sacrifice in the noble pursuit of peace. This is a difficult time for his family and his colleagues, especially those who were injured that night. All our thoughts are with them at this time.'
Pte Rooney, who was 24 and from Newtowncunningham, Co Donegal, was killed while on UN duty when the armoured vehicle he was driving from south Lebanon to Beirut came under fire in December 2022. Several others were injured in the attack.
Previously, the Irish Government expressed its concerns about the lack of progress in the case against those charged with his killing.
Mr Harris said that raising these issues was a 'central focus' of his visit to Beirut last March.
'I appreciate, therefore, the efforts of the court to bring forward the hearing date forward from September to today,' he said.
During my visit to Beirut, I left the Lebanese ministers in no doubt as to the absolute determination of the Irish Government to ensure that those responsible for Pte Rooney's death are brought to justice.
'I want to express my appreciation to my officials, members of the Defence Forces, Ireland's Ambassador to Lebanon, members of the Defence Forces, Ireland's Honorary Consul to Lebanon, and the Department's Lebanese lawyer, all of whom attended today's hearing along with a member of Seán's family.
'Finally, I appreciate that this is an incredibly difficult day for the family of Pte Rooney. None of us can fathom their unimaginable pain and grief and all my thoughts remain with them at this time.'
While capital punishment is a legal sanction in Lebanon, reports suggest there has been a moratorium on executions since 2004.
Read More
Mother of slain Irish soldier Sean Rooney permitted to sue United Nations
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Irish influencer ‘unaware of Central Bank probe' into promotion of unregulated offshore trading platform T4Trade
Irish influencer Jonathan Finlay has said he is 'not aware of any ongoing investigation by the Central Bank into his affairs' or his promotion of an unregulated trading platform.
Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Crime by offenders on bail rises 20% as prison overcrowding hits crisis levels
Recorded crimes committed by people already on bail for other offences has jumped by 20% in the last two years. Cork City and Dublin's north inner city show the sharpest rises in urban areas, with a large number of county divisions also experiencing significant increases. Senior sources said the increases were part of a wider "crisis in the criminal justice system", reflected by a severe, and worsening, overcrowding crisis in the country's jails. The latest figures show new records were set on Wednesday, with prison numbers hitting 5,581, more than 900 more that can be accommodated in Irish jails. Consequently, prison overcrowding reached a new high of 120% overcapacity. Cork Prison has experienced one of the worst increases in overcrowding during 2025, and is now 132% over capacity. Prison sources are most concerned about potential violence and security issues at older prisons with small cells, like Mountjoy Prison, and Cloverhill Remand Prison, which has larger cells but with up to four inmates in them. Cloverhill also has a high number of inmates, including homeless people, with serious or severe mental health issues. 'Gardai are doing their job, arresting and prosecuting offenders and the courts — and there have been a large number of extra judges appointed — are doing their job by convicting them or remanding them to prison, but the prisons are overflowing and have no space to hold them,' a senior justice source said. That means those sent to prison are either processed, placed in a holding cell for an hour or whatever, and then released back out. Or, if they have to be held — say it's a serious charge or conviction — other prisoners have to be released, on temporary release. The source added: 'We have reached the stage, and have for a while, where there is a crisis in the criminal justice system.' Prison sources have previously said use of temporary release has already passed its maximum safe usage, with numbers topping 600 on Thursday. In a case reported in the Irish Examiner on Thursday, a man who spat phlegm in a garda's face in Cork was jailed for five months, but was turned away from prison. The man was jailed for five months at Midleton District Court. However, due to overcrowding in Cork prison, he was back out. A second justice source said judges and gardaí knew prisons were full when bail was being considered. The source said: 'But if it's a repeat shoplifter or a homeless guy or an addict constantly causing trouble, what are they going to do on bail? They will continue.' Official figures on the number of crime incidents, where at least one of the suspected offenders was on bail at the time, reveals: 42,603 incidents in 2024, compared to 39,250 in 2023 and 35,478 in 2022 — an increase of 20% in two years; 2,211 incidents in Cork City in 2024, up 31% on 2022 (1,691); 9,718 incidents in Dublin North Central in 2024, up 31% on 2022 (7,397); Meath/Westmeath division saw a 72% increase, from 1,121 to 1,927; Kerry reported a 34% rise, from 565 to 755; Louth/Cavan/Monaghan had a 24% increase, from 1,686 to 2,092. All but two divisions experienced a rise in incidents in the last two years.
Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Daniel O'Connell personified the perpetual importance of an independent Bar
On July 27, 1813, in the Court of King's Bench in Dublin, Daniel O'Connell rose to defend John Magee, publisher of the Dublin Evening Post, against a charge of criminal libel. His speech that day demonstrated how a skilled barrister could transform an oppressive legal system into an instrument of political change. The case of The King v. John Magee remains one of the most memorable examples of O'Connell's extraordinary ability to use his legal expertise in the service of justice and reform. The charge against Magee arose from his publication of a review criticising the departing Lord Lieutenant, the Duke of Richmond. The article condemned Richmond's errors in governing Ireland and compared him to the worst of his predecessors, who were described as 'the profligate unprincipled Westmorland, the cold-hearted and cruel Camden, the artful and treacherous Cornwallis'. More significantly, it challenged the fundamental principle of British rule in Ireland — 'a principle of exclusion, which debars the majority of the people from the enjoyment of those privileges that are possessed by the minority'. This was no ordinary libel case. As O'Connell understood, it was unavoidably a political case, and it demanded a political speech. The prosecution was designed to suppress dissent and maintain the exclusion of Ireland's Catholic majority from political participation. Attorney General William Saurin made this clear in his opening, describing Magee as a 'ruffian' whose purpose was 'to excite [in the minds of the population] hatred against those whom the laws have appointed to rule over them, and prepare them for revolution'. O'Connell faced formidable obstacles. The law of criminal libel was so broad that, as he later observed, 'every letter I ever published could be declared a libel' and the libel law could 'produce a conviction with a proper judge and jury for The Lord's Prayer with due legal inuendoes'. More damaging still was the composition of the jury — hand-picked to ensure conviction. With characteristic boldness, O'Connell confronted this unfairness head-on, telling the jurors: 'Gentlemen, he [the Attorney General] thinks he knows his men; he knows you; many of you signed the no-popery petition... you would not have been summoned on this jury if you had entertained liberal sentiments'. Rather than being cowed by these disadvantages, O'Connell turned them into weapons. He began by meeting Saurin's personal attacks, describing the Attorney General's speech as a 'farrago of helpless absurdity'. When Saurin had stooped to calling Magee a ruffian and comparing him to 'the keeper of a house of ill fame', O'Connell lamented how far Saurin fell below the standards of the great Irish barristers such as Curran and Ponsonby: 'Devoid of taste and of genius, how can he have had memory enough to preserve this original vulgarity — he is, indeed, an object of compassion; and, from my inmost soul, I bestow on him my forgiveness and my bounteous pity'. O'Connell was even able to use Saurin's own words against him. When the Attorney General accused Magee of Jacobinism, O'Connell recalled Saurin's defence of himself against the same charge in 1800, when Saurin, then anti-union, had declared that 'agitation is ... the price necessarily paid for liberty'. O'Connell's response was devastating: 'We have paid the price, gentlemen, and the honest man refuses to give us the goods'. What made O'Connell's defence truly remarkable was how he transformed a hopeless legal case into a powerful platform for political reform. His bold claim: 'the Catholic cause is on its majestic march — its progress is rapid and obvious... We will, we must, be soon emancipated' is electrifying even now. What must it have sounded like in his voice, in that court, in that trial, in those times? His confidence in his legal position was equally striking. When Saurin threatened to crush the Catholic Board, O'Connell declared: 'I am, if not a lawyer, at least a barrister. On this subject, I ought to know something; and I do not hesitate to contradict the Attorney General ... the Catholic Board is perfectly a legal assembly — that it not only does not violate the law, but that it is entitled to the protection of the law' Perhaps the most significant moment came not during the trial itself, but at the sentencing hearing on November 27, 1813. When Saurin attempted to use Magee's publication of O'Connell's defence speech as grounds for increasing Magee's sentence, O'Connell delivered what may be his most important statement on the role of the legal profession. In the face of personal threats of contempt and possible imprisonment following his denunciation of the Attorney General, O'Connell stood firm, delivering an impassioned defence of the importance of an independent Bar: 'It is the first interest of the public that the Bar shall be left free... the public are deeply interested in our independence; their properties, their lives, their honours, are entrusted to us; and if we, in whom such a guardianship is confided, be degraded, how can we afford protection to others?'. This was not merely professional self-interest, but a profound understanding of the Bar's constitutional role. In a system designed to exclude the majority from political participation, an independent legal profession became the last protection of individual rights. O'Connell grasped the fact that, without fearless advocates willing to challenge authority, the law would become merely an instrument of oppression. That is why, as the Taoiseach, Micheál Martin, put it when addressing the O'Connell 250 Symposium in Trinity College Dublin on Tuesday last, The Bar of Ireland has always been rightly proud of the fact that O'Connell was such a distinguished member of the Bar. Two hundred years later, the existence of a fearless independent Bar, practising advocacy and giving legal advice to the highest professional standards, remains an essential guarantee of the rule of law and the protection of individual rights. The many, often insidious, efforts that exist, whether prompted by powerful commercial, bureaucratic or political interests, to degrade or diminish the Bar are always, above all else, an attack on the rights of citizens and on the rule of law. O'Connell's performance in The King v. John Magee exemplifies the best traditions of forensic advocacy at The Bar of Ireland. Faced with a corrupt system, a biased tribunal, and impossible odds, he refused to bow his head or moderate his principles. Instead, he turned the forms and processes of an unjust and oppressive system against itself, using a political prosecution against dissenting speech as the means to condemn the oppressor and amplify the dissent. In an age when legal systems worldwide face challenges to their integrity and especially to the independence of barristers and advocates, O'Connell's example reminds us that the law's highest purpose is not merely to maintain order, but to secure justice. His defence of John Magee shows the difference a single barrister, armed with skill, courage, and unwavering principle, can make. Seán Guerin SC. Picture: Conor McCabe Photography. Seán Guerin SC is Chair of the Council of The Bar of Ireland
