French President Emmanuel Macron wax statue is stolen by Greenpeace activists
Greenpeace activists were photographed stealing a wax statue of French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris in an act of protest against the country's business ties with Russia.
The environmental group said its members "borrowed the statue of Emmanuel Macron from the Grévin Museum" on Monday, "believing that he does not deserve to be exhibited in this world-renowned cultural establishment until he has terminated French contracts with Russia and initiated an ambitious and lasting ecological transition on a European scale."
"Later in the day, they went to the Russian embassy in Paris, in front of the statue of Emmanuel Macron, to unfurl a banner denouncing current dealings with Russia," the group added.
Images showed two men hauling the wax figure of Macron through the streets of the French capital.
"There was no confrontation with museum security because we had planned everything carefully to ensure it happened quickly," a Greenpeace spokesperson told Reuters, noting that the activists entered the property as regular visitors before heading to the room where the Macron statue was located.
The news agency added that other activists were waiting in a getaway car outside the museum and that the group plans to return the statue at an unknown date.
On its website, the Grévin Museum said its statue of Macron is one of more than 200 celebrities on display who are "immortalized in wax."
"Discover the wax figures of some of the most important world leaders at the Grévin Museum!" it adds.
Photos previously taken at the museum showed the Macron statue standing next to one of former President Joe Biden.
"We do not deny the political, diplomatic, and financial support of France and Europe for Ukraine," Greenpeace France director Jean-Francois Julliard said to Reuters.
"But if we want to be coherent and consistent, we cannot, on the one hand, support Ukraine and, on the other, continue to import such massive amounts of gas, chemical fertilizers, and uranium."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
37 minutes ago
- E&E News
EU's top Russian LNG buyers refuse to back Brussels' gas ban
BRUSSELS — The European Union's two biggest buyers of Russian liquefied natural gas are refusing to endorse Brussels' plan to ban Moscow's gas, arguing they need more reassurances on the economic and legal consequences of the move before making a decision. France, the bloc's top buyer, told POLITICO it prefers a strategy of hunting for alternative supplies. Belgium, in second place, wants a report detailing the economic fallout before making a decision. 'What we're defending is a European strategy of diversification … which is already on the table,' French Energy Minister Marc Ferracci told POLITICO, referencing France's plan to replace Russian supplies with Qatari products. Advertisement The hesitation runs counter to the EU's other major Russian LNG importers: Spain and the Netherlands. Both told POLITICO they are eager to back the upcoming legislation, which would end Russian gas contracts, banning short-term purchases this year and long-term contracts by 2027. In theory, that would help the countries escape contracts which will otherwise will keep them buying Russian LNG for years.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Tusk's Coalition Closes Ranks After Polish Election Defeat
Poland's ruling coalition sought to turn the page on the crisis sparked by the defeat of its candidate in presidential elections, vowing to rejuvenate the pro-European Union alliance halfway through the parliamentary term. 'The coalition is in good shape,' Deputy Prime Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz, the leader of the Polish Peasants Party, told reporters Thursday following a meeting of leaders from the ruling alliance. 'Emotions were high but we found common ground.'
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
DOGE cut federal IT contracts. Don't count on the government to pick up the slack
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has wrapped up its cuts to federal job roles and completed its push against consulting firms. Next on the list: IT service providers supplying systems and services to federal agencies. Following a directive from DOGE, the General Services Administration (GSA) sent letters to Dell, CDW, and other IT vendors, asking for evidence that their contract pricing is competitive and that their services can't be performed by government employees. The GSA argues that federal tech needs are often less complex than what vendors deliver, and not everything needs to be outsourced. The move marks a shift toward bringing more digital services in-house. 'I'm fully in alignment with the need to in-house government capacity and government services,' says Merici Vinton, a former U.S. Digital Service official. But, Vinton adds, 'with the situation right now, I have not seen DOGE build anything or actually do anything in-house.' DOGE may have ambitious goals, but a working model could come from an unexpected source: one of former DOGE chief Elon Musk's least-favorite countries: the U.K. Before 2010, the U.K. government's digital services were fragmented. A 2010 report recommended a unified online platform. Two years later, the beta version of launched and has since won multiple awards. 'Digital is a core function of a modern state,' says Richard Pope, author of Platformland and one of the original architects of 'That's as true now as it was in the 2010s when was built by an in-house GDS team.' It's a model the U.S. could follow. Whether it will is another question. Ann Kempster, a U.K. consultant with experience delivering digital services both inside and outside of government, notes that while DOGE wants to mirror the U.K. model, it also laid off the very staff who could have made it work. 'They had things like the U.S. Digital Service and 18F, the internal consultancy, that were born out of Government Digital Service and all of the work that we did here [in the U.K.],' she says. Both teams were early casualties of DOGE's cost-cutting. 'They had that expertise in house, and they sacked them all. You have to wonder why they've done that.' A recent report from the Niskanen Center, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, echoes that concern, advising against slashing consulting contracts without first ensuring adequate in-house expertise. The U.S. is hardly alone in rethinking digital public services. 'It's a pattern that's visible around the world,' says Pope, 'from India and Ukraine, who have been investing heavily in digital public infrastructure, to Germany and South Africa, who have recently announced similar efforts to build state digital capacity.' Having governments, not outside vendors, build and maintain digital infrastructure is not just smart policy, Pope argues; it's essential. 'To outsource digital public services and infrastructure—things like data exchange, welfare systems, and healthcare—is to outsource the capacity to govern.' Vinton shares that concern, pointing to the federal government's deep reliance on contractors. 'The vast majority of systems are built, run, and maintained by vendors,' she says. 'I think that is a threat to our government capacity, our national security, and our economic security.' Still, she cautions, bringing services in-house won't work unless the government builds the teams to do it well.
