Cops Can't Barge Into History Sheeters' Homes For 'Surveillance': Court
The Kerala High Court has held that the police have no right to knock on the doors of suspected persons or history sheeters or "barge" into their homes at night under the guise of surveillance.
The ruling by Justice V G Arun came on a plea by a man accused of threatening police officers from discharging their duties when they asked him to come out of his home late at night as part of night check on rowdy history sheeters.
Allowing the plea, the court quashed the FIR against the man and all further proceedings in connection with it, saying that "under the guise of surveillance, the police cannot knock on the doors or barge into the houses of history sheeters".
The court said that police officers should understand that the concept of home "transcends its physical manifestation as a dwelling and encompasses a rich tapestry of existential, emotional and social dimensions".
"In other words, every man's house is his castle or temple, the sanctity of which cannot be vilified by knocking on the door at odd hours. A person's right to life encompasses the right to live with dignity and dignity is non-negotiable," it said.
The court further said that under the Kerala Police Manual only 'informal watching' of history sheeters and 'close watch' over those leading criminal existence were permitted.
"Undoubtedly, neither of those expressions permit domicile visits at night," it added.
It also pointed out that under section 39 of the Kerala Police Act all persons are bound to comply with the 'lawful directions' of a police officer for discharge of his functions.
"Knocking on the doors of a history sheeter at midnight and demanding him to come out of the house cannot by any stretch of imagination be termed as a lawful direction," the court said.
Consequently, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted for the offence of threatening a police officer to obstruct him from discharging his duties under the Kerala Police Act for refusing to abide by the direction to come out of the house at night, the court added.
"If, as alleged, the petitioner had used derogatory language or threatened the police during the course of such refusal, his action may invite some other offence, but definitely not the offence he is presently charged with," it said.
The petitioner had claimed that he was implicated in the case to divert the enquiry ordered by the High Court into his complaint alleging police harassment.
The police had claimed that as part of their night check duty on rowdy history sheeters, officers had gone to ascertain if the petitioner was at home.
However, when he was asked to open the door of his home, he refused to do so and also abused and intimidated the officer, it had alleged.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Rapper Vedan's arrest stalled by Kerala High Court amid sexual assault allegations
The Kerala High Court has prevented the arrest of rapper Vedan, who was accused in a rape case registered by Thrikkakara police on the basis of a complaint by a doctor. The complainant argued that the Chief Minister had received more complaints against Vedan, opposing the anticipatory bail arrest has been put on hold for now as the state police should inform the court whether more cases have been registered against Vedan. Vedan's counsel informed the court that the relationship between the accused and the complainant was consensual. The High Court asked the complainant how a consensual physical relationship could be considered Kerala High Court also observed that it cannot be considered rape every time there is a rift in the relationship. The complainant informed the High Court that there were several MeToo allegations against Vedan. The complainant also claimed that Vedan had apologised on social media at that time. The High Court said that the complainant's claim was based on information received through social media. The court cannot take a decision based on information on social media alone. A decision can only be made by considering the High Court will consider Vedan's anticipatory bail application today in the case registered by the Thrikkakara addition to this, two more women have reportedly filed complaints against rapper Vedan (Hirandas Murali), accusing him of sexual assault. The complaints were sent by e-mail to Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. One of the complaints alleged that the assault took place in 2020, while the second incident is said to have taken place in 2021.- EndsMust Watch
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Punjab and Haryana HC directs training of deputy commissioners, magistrates on SARFAESI Act, warns of contempt for delays
Taking serious note of repeated delays by district magistrates in implementing orders under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, the Punjab and Haryana High Court Wednesday directed the Chandigarh Judicial Academy to conduct orientation courses for deputy commissioners and chief judicial magistrates of Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh within a month. A division bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Ramesh Kumari observed that despite clear judicial directions, district magistrates and subordinate revenue officers often 'sit over files' for months, frustrating the very scheme of the SARFAESI Act. Section 14 empowers the district magistrate or chief judicial magistrate to assist banks in taking possession of secured assets once default has been established. 'It is surprising that time and again, this court is confronted with petitions where banks complain that orders under Section 14 have not been executed,' Chief Justice Nagu remarked, adding that the law envisages passing of such orders within 30 to 60 days and their execution without delay. 'Merely because the statute does not prescribe a specific time frame for execution does not mean officials can let files gather dust,' the bench noted. The court pointed out that a coordinate bench in May 2024 laid down detailed procedures for district magistrates to follow while dealing with Section 14 applications. Yet, several officials either remain unaware of the order or are 'intentionally not complying with it', the bench said. During the hearing, counsel for banks highlighted that higher-value cases—often running into hundreds of crores—faced the longest delays, allegedly due to political or extraneous considerations. 'Smaller borrowers' cases get decided quickly, but in cases involving ₹100 crore and above, district magistrates either delay passing orders or do not implement them,' the bench was told. Rejecting any distinction between high- and low-value cases, the Chief Justice said: 'Debt recovery cannot be based on the amount involved. Applications should be dealt with on a first-in, first-out basis.' To address the widespread non-compliance, the bench ordered the Judicial Academy to hold a training programme for all deputy commissioners, district magistrates, and chief judicial magistrates. 'After participation, it is expected that they will perform their statutory duty of passing orders within 60 days and ensuring their execution expeditiously,' the bench directed. The court also issued a stern warning: if any district magistrate or deputy commissioner is found failing to comply with their duty under Section 14 after undergoing orientation, it would amount to contempt of court. The bench further underlined that the powers exercised under Section 14 are 'ministerial in nature' and do not involve any adjudicatory function. Referring to Supreme Court rulings, including R D Jain vs Capital First Ltd. (2023) and NKGSB Cooperative Bank vs Subir Chakravarty (2022), the judges reiterated that district magistrates are not quasi-judicial authorities in such matters and must act swiftly to aid banks. The order comes amid mounting complaints from banks across Punjab and Haryana about delays in recovering secured assets, particularly in cases where local political influence or farmer unions resist execution. The bench concluded that fixing accountability and providing orientation were now essential to ensure the law serves its intended purpose.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Madras HC directs ED joint director to appear in contempt case over TASMAC liquor scam
CHENNAI: In a setback to the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the Madras high court on Wednesday directed the Joint Director of the Chennai Zone-I unit to appear before it in connection with a contempt petition filed by film producer Akash Baskaran. The contempt plea was moved over the ED's issuance of summons in relation to the alleged Rs 1,000 crore TASMAC liquor scam, despite an interim stay earlier granted by the HC. 'There is a limit to everything. The officer was present in the court when the stay order was passed. Despite that, he issued the summons,' a division bench of Justice M S Ramesh and Justice V Lakshminarayanan said. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai | Gold Rates Today in Chennai | Silver Rates Today in Chennai Responding to the submission of the counsel for ED, that the issuance of the summons was not intentional but just an oversight of the order passed by the court, the judges said, 'Let him appear so that he might not repeat this oversight again.' We judge asked you (ED) to file a counter in the contempt petition. You did not file even after repeated adjournments, we imposed Rs 30,000 cost. You refused to pay the cost and pleaded that you are moving an appeal against the order imposing cost, the judges observed. Senior advocate Vijay Narayan representing the petitioner pointed out that the ED even filed a petition seeking waiver of the cost imposed before this court. In the morning, additional solicitor general S V Raju appeared through video conferencing and sought time to file an appeal against the order imposing cost. Let the officer appear on September 17. You (ED) can file an appeal against this order also, if you want, the court said and adjourned the hearing to September 17. The issue pertains to an ongoing investigation into the alleged Rs 1,000 crore liquor scam involving TASMAC and its officials. In connection with the case, the ED conducted searches at properties linked to film producer Akash Bhaskaran and businessman Vikram Ravindran, during which documents were seized from Bhaskaran. Subsequently, pointing out that the ED lacks the power to lock and seal premises, the HC directed the ED to return the seized documents to Akash Bhaskaran and restrained the agency from taking any further action based on those documents. However, since the ED summoned Akash Bhaskaran despite the restraining order, the bench on July 23 censured the ED for violating the court orders. The court also granted liberty to the film producer to move a contempt of court petition against the ED if necessary. Subsequently, the producer filed a contempt petition against the ED. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
