logo
Experts reveal what could happen to countries that get dragged into WW3

Experts reveal what could happen to countries that get dragged into WW3

Metro24-06-2025
Tensions in the Middle East have reached a boiling point after a tentative ceasefire between Israel and Iran failed today.
The truce was broken when both sides fired missiles at each other, prompting Donald Trump to have a meltdown on live television after the deal he brokered collapsed.
The US President ranted: 'They don't know what the f*** they're doing.
'We have to have Israel calm down because they went on a mission this morning.'
At least 974 people in Iran have been killed, and 3,458 others wounded. In Israel, at least 28 people have been killed and more than 1,000 wounded in the war.
On Monday, Iran launched a limited missile attack on al-Udeid Air Base, a large US military base in Qatar, in retaliation for the American attack on its key nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan.
Now, the world is watching amid fears of a wider conflict igniting across the region.
Metro has spoken to experts about what's next for the Middle East: what's at stake, how the conflict could pan out and if World War 3 is a possibility.
Talk of World War 3 is nothing new. For years, tense geopolitical moments have stoked fears that we are on the brink of a catastrophic conflict.
Guney Yildiz, visiting fellow at the London School of Economics' European Institute, told Metro that previous world wars have broken out at unexpected moments during periods of heightened tension.
He said: 'There's been talk of this 'World War Three' for over a decade now. I think when people are aware of this risk, it almost reduces the risk of accidents and miscalculations.
'Especially when everyone has so much at risk. It's unlikely that there will be a sort of 'Franz Ferdinand' moment, like there was in World War One.'
Jason Pack, host of The Disorder Podcast and Associate Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, pointed out that no Middle Eastern conflict has escalated into a world war. And there have been many.
'Two world wars have started in Europe,' he said.
'Arab-Israeli wars historically end when superpowers bring them to an end. Both the Suez War and the 1967 War were brought to an end by America.'
Mr Pack described the current situation in the Middle East as this: 'If you and I are opponents for 46 years and all we want to do is destroy each other, and then we agree to a ceasefire without undoing the underlying cause, it's like you and your wife saying that you want to get a divorce, and then the mediator says: 'Great, just put this aside for a week.'
'You might be able to put it aside for a week, but if you haven't solved the underlying issue. There is an opportunity now for a peace negotiation, but we haven't seen that materialise.'
However, not everyone shares this view. Dr Bamo Nouri, Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of West London, told Metro the world is 'nowhere near' the end of this confrontation.
'We are, at best, in a pause, shaped by calculation, not capitulation,' he said.
'To view Iran's recent actions as a final move or a sign of weakness fundamentally misunderstands how this regime operates. Iran's leadership sees its survival and regional influence as existential, and it has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to absorb losses, act through proxies, and play the long game.
'The quiet that follows an exchange of missiles should not be mistaken for peace. It is often the eye of the storm.'
So what's at stake for the countries involved, both directly and indirectly?
In short, its very existence. In recent weeks, Iran's alleged nuclear weapons facilities have also been brought up, though there is no evidence to suggest they have weapons of mass destruction.
But Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has faced years of challenge to his rule, beginning with the Women, Life, Freedom movement after the death of Mahsa Amini, a young Kurdish woman who was brutally beaten and murdered by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
Despite protests in recent years, both Mr Yildiz and Mr Pack agree that it's unlikely we will see a popular uprising to topple the government.
But from external powers? They say we'll have to wait and see.
For Israel, it appears the goal remains on destroying Iranian proxies and toppling the government, based on past comments from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Hamas, which launched the cross-border attack on October 7, is a proxy of Iran.
'The regime in Iran is a threat to our destiny, to our very existence, and to the fate of all humanity,' Netanyahu said last month.
'This is what will happen if it obtains nuclear weapons. If we lose this battle, the Western nations will be next.'
Netanyahu has repeatedly made claims that Iran is creating weapons of mass destruction, a claim which has not been proven, but was the basis of their barrage of missile attacks, which sparked the conflict two weeks ago.
In addition to destroying any alleged weapons of mass destruction, based on past comments from Israeli politicians, they also hope to topple the Ayatollah and the Islamic Regime to keep up their title of the 'only democracy in the Middle East'.
Mr Yildiz said one of the stakes for the US is oil in the region, but it's important to remember that the US itself is also a large producer of oil.
If the conflict were to deteriorate, Mr Yildiz believes the US elite would cash in.
'The US would make money out of higher oil prices, but that wouldn't be reflected for the average US consumer, who would pay loads more for the petrol they use,' he noted.
'Another layer to the US stakes is Russia. If the US is focused on Iran, talks with Russia and Ukraine to reach a ceasefire would become more convoluted. Iran and Russia are allies, so Russia would likely bring up the situation in the region when negotiating about Ukraine.'
The US is Israel's closest ally, so whatever stakes Israel has in this conflict, the US more than likely backs them.
For China, two issues are at stake: oil supply from Iran, through the Strait of Hormuz, and the Belt and Road initiative (China's plan for a 'New Silk Road').
If the Middle East is destabilised further, the cost of petrol in China will increase, placing pressure on an already tumultuous economy.
It would also hinder their efforts to connect China with the rest of the world through transportation and energy, through the Belt and Road Initiative.
Mr Yildiz added: 'If the region is unstable, they could use that opportunity of the US being distracted to focus on Taiwan.'
As usual, Russia is a wild card.
Not only do they have skin in the game with Iran, they also have ties to China and a tenuous relationship with the United States.
Dr Nouri explained: 'Russia, facing pressure in Ukraine, would likely double down on its strategic partnerships with Iran to preserve influence and challenge US-Israeli dominance.
'These shifts could shuffle alliances, encouraging new pragmatic alignments such as closer ties between Iran and Russia, or Turkey balancing between NATO and Eurasian blocs – further complicating the region's already fluid power dynamics.'
But some experts have also pointed out that Russia, which has supplied Iran with weapons before, is preoccupied with Ukraine, so it might not become as involved as they were with conflicts such as the Syrian War.
What does the EU have at stake if the conflict spreads?
Mr Yildiz had choice words for Ursula von der Leyen and co. More Trending
'The EU is a bloc of a very strong economy, which is punching well below its weight in international politics,' he said.
'They're divided – one group of states talks about sanctioning Israel, and others say Israel is doing their dirty work against Iran. They have little to offer the region.
'Before, it was democracy, liberalism, and human rights, but now that will have little impact due to their own inconsistencies.
'The EU is a bystander, but instability in the region does still affect them greatly.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: UK must prepare for 'wartime scenario' on home soil, security review warns
MORE: Brit, 18, on first ever solo flight stranded alone in Doha after wave of cancelled flights
MORE: Yvette Cooper seems more scared of red paint than Gaza's bloodshed
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer and European allies travel to Washington with Zelensky for crunch talks
Starmer and European allies travel to Washington with Zelensky for crunch talks

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starmer and European allies travel to Washington with Zelensky for crunch talks

Sir Keir Starmer will join European leaders in presenting a united front with Volodymyr Zelensky at his crunch meeting at the White House with Donald Trump. The Prime Minister and six other political leaders will travel to Washington DC on Monday, with the aim of protecting Ukraine from having to submit to Russian land grabs as a price for peace. Those joining Sir Keir include France's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Alexander Stubb, president of Finland. Nato chief Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen are also attending. Mr Zelensky is expecting to face calls from the US president to concede to full Russian control of Donetsk and Luhansk, two mineral-rich regions of Ukraine that are mostly occupied by Vladimir Putin's forces. In exchange for these demands, the Russian president would reportedly withdraw his forces from other areas of Ukraine and accept a Nato-like guarantee that Ukraine would be protected from further incursion. The European leaders have said it is up to Ukraine to decide how it wishes to end the war, and hailed Mr Zelensky's commitment to a peace that is both 'just and lasting'. Mr Trump has appeared to drop his calls for a ceasefire after a summit in Alaska with his Russian counterpart on Friday. Mr Putin has long refused to agree to a ceasefire as a precondition for talks to end the war, prompting fears that Russia could continue gaining ground in Ukraine as negotiations take place. The US president has instead said he wants to focus a long-term peace deal, though his secretary of state Marco Rubio has signalled a deal is 'still a long ways off'. There will be 'additional consequences' for Russia if it does not agree to a peace deal, Mr Rubio added, though he suggested fresh financial sanctions would be unlikely to force Mr Putin to the negotiating table. Ms von der Leyen suggested at a press conference on Sunday that both a ceasefire and a peace deal would have the same impact: to 'stop the killing'. Appearing alongside her, Ukraine's Mr Zelensky appeared to agree, though he also signalled his preference for a ceasefire. 'It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons. So it's necessary to cease fire and work quickly on a final deal,' he said. European leaders are also keen to hear from Mr Trump after he signalled he would provide a security guarantee to the coalition of the willing. The coalition, which is aimed at deterring future Russian aggression once peace is agreed, has argued it needs an American backstop, likely in the form of air support, to succeed. Over the weekend, Sir Keir was among the leaders who welcomed suggestions from Mr Trump that he was open to providing a guarantee, but details of what support would be provided were scant. Following a meeting of the coalition on Sunday afternoon, a Downing Street spokesman said Sir Keir praised Mr Zelensky's desire for a 'just and lasting peace' in Ukraine. Leaders of the coalition 'reaffirmed their continued support to Ukraine' at the meeting chaired by the PM and Mr Macron, No 10 added. The French president, meanwhile, said the European delegation will ask Mr Trump to back its plans to bolster Ukraine's armed forces. Ahead of their Oval Office encounter, the allies are likely to be mindful of the previous occasion Mr Zelensky visited Mr Trump in the White House. February's public spat, which saw Vice President JD Vance accuse Mr Zelensky of not being thankful enough to the US, resulted in American aid to Ukraine being temporarily halted.

Starmer and European allies travel to Washington with Zelensky for crunch talks
Starmer and European allies travel to Washington with Zelensky for crunch talks

ITV News

time12 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Starmer and European allies travel to Washington with Zelensky for crunch talks

Sir Keir Starmer will join European leaders in presenting a united front with Volodymyr Zelensky at his crunch meeting at the White House with Donald Trump. The Prime Minister and six other political leaders will travel to Washington DC on Monday, with the aim of protecting Ukraine from having to submit to Russian land grabs as a price for peace. Those joining Sir Keir include France's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Alexander Stubb, president of Finland. Nato chief Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen are also attending. Mr Zelensky is expecting to face calls from the US president to concede to full Russian control of Donetsk and Luhansk, two mineral-rich regions of Ukraine that are mostly occupied by Vladimir Putin's forces. In exchange for these demands, the Russian president would reportedly withdraw his forces from other areas of Ukraine and accept a Nato-like guarantee that Ukraine would be protected from further incursion. The European leaders have said it is up to Ukraine to decide how it wishes to end the war, and hailed Mr Zelensky's commitment to a peace that is both 'just and lasting'. Mr Trump has appeared to drop his calls for a ceasefire after a summit in Alaska with his Russian counterpart on Friday. Mr Putin has long refused to agree to a ceasefire as a precondition for talks to end the war, prompting fears that Russia could continue gaining ground in Ukraine as negotiations take place. The US president has instead said he wants to focus a long-term peace deal, though his secretary of state Marco Rubio has signalled a deal is 'still a long ways off'. There will be 'additional consequences' for Russia if it does not agree to a peace deal, Mr Rubio added, though he suggested fresh financial sanctions would be unlikely to force Mr Putin to the negotiating table. Ms von der Leyen suggested at a press conference on Sunday that both a ceasefire and a peace deal would have the same impact: to 'stop the killing'. Appearing alongside her, Ukraine's Mr Zelensky appeared to agree, though he also signalled his preference for a ceasefire. 'It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons. So it's necessary to cease fire and work quickly on a final deal,' he said. European leaders are also keen to hear from Mr Trump after he signalled he would provide a security guarantee to the coalition of the willing. The coalition, which is aimed at deterring future Russian aggression once peace is agreed, has argued it needs an American backstop, likely in the form of air support, to succeed. Over the weekend, Sir Keir was among the leaders who welcomed suggestions from Mr Trump that he was open to providing a guarantee, but details of what support would be provided were scant. Following a meeting of the coalition on Sunday afternoon, a Downing Street spokesman said Sir Keir praised Mr Zelensky's desire for a 'just and lasting peace' in Ukraine. Leaders of the coalition 'reaffirmed their continued support to Ukraine' at the meeting chaired by the PM and Mr Macron, No 10 added. The French president, meanwhile, said the European delegation will ask Mr Trump to back its plans to bolster Ukraine's armed forces. Ahead of their Oval Office encounter, the allies are likely to be mindful of the previous occasion Mr Zelensky visited Mr Trump in the White House. February's public spat, which saw Vice President JD Vance accuse Mr Zelensky of not being thankful enough to the US, resulted in American aid to Ukraine being temporarily halted.

Should Europe wean itself off US tech?
Should Europe wean itself off US tech?

BBC News

time13 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Should Europe wean itself off US tech?

Imagine if US President Donald Trump could flip a switch and turn off Europe's may sound far-fetched, crazy even. But it's a scenario that has been seriously discussed in tech industry and policy circles in recent months, as tensions with Washington have escalated, and concerns about the EU's reliance on American technology have come to the the root of these concerns is the fact just three US giants - Google, Microsoft and Amazon - provide 70% of Europe's cloud-computing infrastructure, the scaffolding on which many online services some question whether an unpredictable US leader would weaponize the situation if relations seriously deteriorated - for example, by ordering those companies to turn off their services in Europe."Critical data would become inaccessible, websites would go dark, and essential state services like hospital IT systems would be thrown into chaos," says Robin Berjon, a digital governance specialist who advises EU believes that concerns over a so called US "kill switch" should be taken seriously. "It's hard to say how much trouble we would be in." Microsoft, Google and Amazon all say they offer "sovereign" cloud computing solutions that safeguard EU clients' data, and would prevent such a scenario ever occurring. The BBC has contacted the US Treasury department for truth, there have always been concerns about the lack of "digital sovereignty" in Europe, where US firms not only dominate the cloud-computing market, but also hardware, satellite internet and now artificial the region's main mobile operating systems - Apple and Android - and payment networks - Mastercard and Visa - are fears became urgent in May when it emerged that Karim Khan, the top prosecutor at the Netherlands-based International Criminal Court (ICC), had lost access to his Microsoft Outlook email account after being sanctioned by the White ICC has issued arrest warrants for top Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, over their roles in the Israel-Gaza war - something Mr Trump called "illegitimate".Khan has since temporarily stepped aside until a sexual misconduct probe against him is says that "at no point" did it cease or suspend its services to the ICC, although it was in touch with the ICC "throughout the process that resulted in the disconnection". Since then digital sovereignty has shot up the agenda in Brussels, while some public bodies are already seeking alternatives to US is it realistic to think they could wean themselves off US technology?Digital sovereignty is loosely defined as the ability of a governing body to control the data and technology systems within its problem faced by those pursuing it is the lack of comparable does have its own providers, such as France's OVHCloud, or Germany's Germany's T-Systems or Delos, in cloud they account for a fraction of the market, and don't have the same scale or range of capabilities, says Dario Maisto, a senior analyst covering digital sovereignty at global business consultancy open-source alternatives are available for common software packages like Office and Windows, but while proponents say they are more transparent and accessible, none is as comprehensive or well known. But while moving to sovereign alternatives wouldn't "happen overnight", it's a "myth" to think it's not possible, says Mr notes that the German state of Schleswig-Holstein is currently in the process of phasing out Microsoft products like Office 365 and Windows in favour of open-source solutions such as LibreOffice and Linux. Denmark's Ministry for Digitalisation is piloting a similar scheme."We sometimes overvalue the role of proprietary software in our organisations," Mr Maisto says, pointing out that for key services like word processing and email, open-source solutions work just fine."The main reasons organisations don't use open source are a lack of awareness and misplaced fears about cyber security," he adds."Our prediction is in the next five to 10 years, there will be an accelerated shift [to these solutions] because of this wake-up call." Benjamin Revcolevschi, boss of OVHCloud, tells the BBC that firms like his are ready to answer the sovereignty needs of public and private organisations in Europe."Only European cloud providers, whose headquarters are in the EU and with European governance, are able to offer immunity to non-European laws, to protect sensitive and personal data," he Microsoft, Amazon and Google say they already offer solutions that address concerns about digital sovereignty, solutions which store data on severs in the clients' country or region, not in the tells the BBC that it also partners with trusted local EU suppliers like T-Systems, granting them control over the encryption of client data, and giving customers "a technical veto over their data". The German Army is one of its Microsoft president Brad Smith has promised the firm would take legal action in the "exceedingly unlikely" event the US government ordered it to suspend services, and that it would include a clause in European contracts to that effect."We will continue to look for new ways to ensure the European Commission and our European customers have the options and assurances they need to operate with confidence," a Microsoft spokesman told the BBC. Zach Meyers, from the Brussels-based Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) think tank, says it might make sense for Europe to develop its own limited sovereign cloud to protect critical government he adds that it's unrealistic to try to "get Americans out of the supply chain, or to ensure that there's Europeans in the supply chain at each point".He points to Gaia X - a scheme launched in 2020 to create a European-based alternative to large, centralised cloud platforms, which has faced significant criticism and delays."A lot of these [tech] markets are winner takes all, so once you're the first mover it's really hard for anyone else to catch up."Instead, Mr Meyers thinks Europe should focus on areas of technology where it might gain an edge."It could be the industrial use of AI, because Europe already has a much bigger, stronger industrial base than the US has," he says. "Or the next generation of chipmaking equipment, because one of the few areas where Europe has foothold is in photolithography - the machines that make the really top-end chips." So where does the digital sovereignty agenda go from here?Some believe nothing will change unless Europe brings in new regulations that force regional organisations and governments to buy local technology. But according to Mr Berjon, the EU has been dragging its feet."There is definitely political interest, but it's a question of turning it into a shared strategy."Matthias Bauer, director at the European Centre for International Political Economy, thinks the goal should be building up Europe's technology sector so it can compete with the US and a report on EU competitiveness in 2024, Mario Draghi, former head of the European Central Bank, noted Europe is "severely lagging behind" in new technologies, and that "only four of the world's top 50 tech companies are European"."It's currently much harder for a tech company based in the EU to scale across the bloc than it would be for the same company in the US," Mr Bauer says."You not only face different languages, but different contract law, labour market laws, tax laws, and also different sector-specific regulation."As for the theory that President Trump might flip a "kill switch" and turn off Europe's internet, he's highly sceptical."It would be a realistic scenario if we were close to a war, but I don't see that on the horizon."Yet Mr Maisto says organisations must take the risk seriously, however remote."Two years ago, we didn't think we would be talking about these topics in these terms in 2025. Now organisations want to get ready for what might happen."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store