UN, Iran and Egypt meet in Cairo to discuss Iran's nuclear program
Iranian, Egyptian and UN leaders met in Cairo on Monday to discuss Iran's nuclear program after a report from the UN nuclear watchdog agency said Iran is further increasing its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels.
Rafael Mariano Grossi, the head of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, said the agency compiled the report because Iranian's uranium enrichment was an ongoing concern to the IAEA's board of governors. 'We hope that by providing the clarification we will be providing an incentive for clarity, an incentive for a peaceful solution and a diplomatic solution,' Grossi said in Cairo.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi met with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi and Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty, though it was unclear if Araghchi would meet directly with Grossi. The two spoke by phone early Sunday.
Araghchi wrote on the messaging app Telegram that he stressed Iran's 'continuous cooperation' when he spoke with Grossi.The confidential IAEA report, which was seen by The Associated Press on Saturday, raised a stern warning, saying Iran is now 'the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce such material,' something the agency said was of 'serious concern.'
Iranian leadership believes the IAEA report is politically motivated by Grossi's hopes to become the UN secretary general. Grossi is attempting to attract votes of several members of the UN Security Council with the report, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, Mohammad Eslami, told the official IRNA news agency late Sunday.
'He basically has chosen a political attitude, and this political attitude has led the environment to be more political rather that technical,' Eslami said. Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi, who is mediating the US-Iran talks, visited Tehran on Saturday to present the latest US proposal for ongoing talks. Araghchi wrote on Telegram that Iran is examining the proposal and crafting a response.
The US-Iran talks are an attempt to limit Iran's nuclear program in exchange for lifting of some of the crushing economic sanctions the US has imposed on the Islamic Republic, which have strained relations for almost 50 years. The fifth round of talks between the US and Iran concluded in Rome last week with 'some but not conclusive progress,' al-Busaidi said at the time.
Iran's deputy foreign minister published a detailed response Sunday, which rejected many of the report's findings. Kazem Gharibabadi noted that out of the IAEA's 682 inspections of 32 states, 493 were carried out in Iran alone.
'So long as a country's nuclear activities are under the IAEA's monitoring, there is no cause for concern,' he said. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is neither pursuing nuclear weapons nor does it possess any undeclared nuclear materials or activities.'
The IAEA report said Iran as of May 17 had amassed 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60%. That is an increase of almost 50% since the IAEA'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Gold price today: Rates rise as US-China trade tussle boosts safe haven demand; experts share key levels for MCX Gold
Nishant Kumar Updated 4 Jun 2025, 09:20 AM IST Gold price today: Gold rates climbed in the domestic futures market in the morning session on Wednesday, on trade war concerns. (Photo: Pixabay) Gold price today: Gold rates climbed in the domestic futures market Wednesday morning, supported by growing uncertainty about the US-China trade tussle and a largely stable US dollar. MCX Gold August 5 contracts traded 0.43 per cent higher at ₹ 98,140 per 10 grams around 9:20 AM. (This is a developing story. Please check back for fresh updates.)
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Killer gangs are inches from ruling all of Haiti
The collapse of Haiti's government in April last year was a challenge but also an opportunity. An interim government called the Transitional Presidential Council was installed. A UN-brokered, Kenyan-led security mission arrived soon after. But a year later things are worse than ever. 'We are approaching a point of no return,' María Isabel Salvador, the UN's top official in Haiti, told its Security Council at a meeting on April 21st. Tasked with preparing for elections that in theory will be held in November, the council is now mired in allegations of corruption. The security force of around 1,000 people (less than half the number originally planned) has not been able to stem the chaos. Its funding runs out in September. The council is a 'transitional authority that controls nothing', says Claude Joseph, a former prime minister. 'It's an unsustainable catastrophe. We could lose Port-au-Prince at any time.' Port-au-Prince, the capital, now sees daily gun battles in which police and civilian vigilantes face off against a gang coalition called Viv Ansanm ('Living Together'). It has seized control of much of the city. The international airport has been all but shut down; the only way in or out is by helicopter, or by a barge that skirts the coast to bypass gang territory to the south. On May 2nd the United States designated Viv Ansanm and a sister organisation as terrorist groups, opening the door to tougher criminal penalties for those who provide them with money and weapons. The collapse of public life is accelerating. Most schools are shut. Cholera is spreading. The Marriott, one of the last functioning hotels, has closed its doors. Gangs have surrounded the offices of Digicel, Haiti's main cellular network, through which most people connect to the internet. 'If Digicel goes down, the country goes dark,' warns a security expert. The gangs don't need it. Increasingly sophisticated, they use Elon Musk's Starlink satellite system to communicate, organising themselves to the extent that they have been able to keep control over access to Haiti's ports. They also extort lorry drivers and bus operators moving along many of the country's main roads. The UN reports that in February and March more than 1,000 people were killed and 60,000 displaced, adding to the 1m, nearly 10% of the population, who have fled their homes in the past two years. Circulating videos show gang members playing football with severed heads, bragging: 'We got the dogs.' Central Haiti, once relatively peaceful, is fragmenting into fiefs. Mirebalais, a city which lies between Port-au-Prince and the border with the Dominican Republic, is now controlled by gangs. 'The country has become a criminal enterprise. It's the wild, wild West,' says a foreign official. Patience is running thin at the UN Security Council. The United States has already committed $600m to the security mission, but is unlikely to offer more. 'America cannot continue shouldering such a significant financial burden,' said Dorothy Shea, the US ambassador to the UN. Few other countries want to donate. The Transitional Presidential Council is so desperate that it is exploring deals with private military contractors. It has been talking to Osprey Global Solutions, a firm based in North Carolina. The founder of Blackwater, Erik Prince, visited Haiti in April to negotiate contracts to provide attack drones and training for an anti-gang task force. The council declined to comment. The Haitian police are overwhelmed; an estimated 12,000 officers police a population that approaches 12m, barely half the UN-recommended ratio. Weak leadership, poor co-ordination with the Kenyan-led force, and calls for the ousting of the police chief point to deep institutional rot. In Canapé-Vert, one of Port-au-Prince's last gang-free pockets, a former policeman known as 'Commander Samuel' leads a vigilante group called Du Sang 9 ('New Blood' in Creole). Gangs have thinned its numbers. It is all that stands between them and the prime minister's office. Clarification (June 3rd 2025): Paragraph eight of this article has been amended to make clear that the council exploring deals is the Transitional Presidential Council. Sign up to El Boletín, our subscriber-only newsletter on Latin America, to understand the forces shaping a fascinating and complex region. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
The Print
23 minutes ago
- The Print
Lashkar's renewed blossoming shows war hasn't coerced Pakistan Army into giving up on Kashmir
Then, on 28 May, just two weeks after the 100-hour India-Pakistan war set off by that carnage, Saifullah was on stage vowing jihad without end against India—a warning that India's cruise missile attacks haven't coerced Pakistan into ending its covert war in Kashmir. Even though New Delhi believes the punishment it delivered has drawn new red lines, deterrence cannot be inferred from conjectures. The harms one adversary considers unacceptable might not be so for another. To conclude that some degree of deterrence has been secured, evidence has to be sought in the real-world actions of the adversary. Eighteen years ago this summer, then-Lashkar-e-Taiba commander in charge of operations in southern Kashmir's Kulgam, Saifullah had dramatically escaped across the Line of Control, together with his new bride, Shabbira Kucchay. From his home near Kasur in Pakistan, the National Investigation Agency alleges , he led forces which harried Indian troops, executed dozens of civilians, and conducted the communal massacre in Pahalgam. Tu paani band karega, to hum saans band kar dengey ': The crowd swayed listlessly in the Lahore heat, perhaps to keep off the flies, as the anthem threatening to choke India's breath blared out through low-grade loudspeakers. 'Light up your phones to welcome this man of courage, the hero of Kashmir, the conqueror India,' the sweat-drenched compere shouted over the music, a miserable remix of an ageing disco-era Bollywood hit. Finally, making his way through a swarm of selfie-seeking fanboys, Sajid Saifullah Jatt emerged on the stage in Lahore: The appearance of the jihadist icon, a carefully-crafted message from the Pakistan Army. For now, there's no evidence at all that ought give India comfort. Far from hiding their links with terrorists, as Pakistani officials were compelled to do after 26/11, high officials have given slain Lashkar personnel state funerals, joined their functions, and allowed the organisation to hold processions across the country. Even before the Pahalgam attack, Pakistan-based journalist Kunwar Khuldune Shahid reports, Lashkar leader Naseer Ahmad told a gathering in Muridke that 'the ideological offspring of Hafiz Mohammed Saeed will continue his jihad.' Earlier, Lashkar co-founder Amir Hamza, internationally-sanctioned for his role in raising terrorism funding, delivered a sermon in Murdike urging 'jihad against the infidels.' Local Lashkar leader Rizwan Hanif, speaking in Bazaar Khaigala of Rawalakot, urged followers to prepare for 'our jihad against the cow-worshippers.' The speaker of Punjab's Legislative Assembly, Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan, shared a stage with members of the Lashkar's political front this week, praising its jailed chief, Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, and promising future support. Little doubt exists that these public declarations of support would not take place without permission from the Pakistan Army. Two years ago, facing the risk of sanctions from the multinational Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on terror finance, Pakistan had jailed several key Lashkar terrorists, and pushed its activities underground. Today, jihadist groups—not just the Lashkar, but also the Jaish-e-Muhammad—have been freed from their cages. There's no knowing, just yet, what ends Field Marshal Asim Munir—who served as Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief during the 2019 Pulwama attack—is seeking through this escalation. The commander might see it as retaliation for Indian support for secessionists in Baluchistan, or be securing his credentials as a hawk among other Generals displeased by the decision to hold power for five entire years. The guardians of the Islamic state Located at the peripheries of Pakistan's national project, Islamism was to have a profound effect on its evolution. The state, Jamaat-e-Islami leader Abul 'Ala Maududi argued, 'and all that it contains belongs to God, who alone is its sovereign.' This language was appropriated by the country's military. The 1962 constitution of Field Marshal Ayub Khan's regime established a council to enforce legal compliance with religious ideology. The war of 1965 saw fallen soldiers for the first time being hailed as religious martyrs. Following the liberation of Bangladesh in 1971, the tensions over Pakistan's identity grew deeper. The new prime minister, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, increasingly relied on religious polemic, and his 1973 constitution made Islam the state religion. These organisations would flourish in the regime of General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, who recruited Islamist groups to support his campaign against the Soviet Union. The Ahl-e-Hadith, the religious order from which the Lashkar flowered, was not among them. Founded in the mid-19th century, by Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan of Bhopal and Nazir Hussain Dehlavi, the Ahl-e-Hadith claimed lineage from the ideas of the anti-colonial cleric Shah Wali Allah. The sect's members, largely landed elites who had experienced downward mobility during colonial rule, blamed their plight on the decadence of Islam. Elements of the Ahl-e-Hadith, known as the Tehreek-ul-Mujahideen, participated in the anti-colonial jihadist operations in the North-West Frontier Province, historian Lal Baha records. Their strength rarely exceeded a few dozen men, and their base at Chamarkand was largely ignored by colonial forces. The organisation may have also played a marginal role in supporting Pakistan Army-backed irregulars who attacked Kashmir in 1947. The Ahl-e-Hadith split into several factions soon after, each focussed on building seminaries and mosques across Sindh and Punjab. Also read: Asim Munir just stole his 5th star & has nothing to show for it. It'll make him desperate, dangerous The Afghan jihadists From the work of Lashkar propagandist Amir Hamza, we know some young Ahl-e-Hadith seminarians began pushing to join the jihad in Afghanistan soon after the Soviet invasion, even though they had no armed group. Led by Abdul Qahar from Sargodha, a small group travelled in 1977, followed by students from seminaries in Gujaranwala and Faisalabad. Then, in 1983, to-be Lashkar deputy Zaki-ur-Rahman Lakhvi took another group of volunteers from Gujaranwala to the Nuristan region in Afghanistan, where there was an old Ahl-e-Hadith presence. The push to form the Lashkar, though, came from Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, an ethnic-Gujjar who had moved to Lahore during Partition, from what is now Haryana. Teaching at the International Islamic University in Islamabad, Saeed came into contact with Afghan jihadist circles through Abdullah Azzam, also a teacher at the university, who was Osama Bin Laden's mentor. Later, during a two-year stint at Saudi Arabia's King Saud University, Saeed was introduced to the powerful cleric Sheikh Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz, and tapped jihad donors around him. A one-time convert from the syncretic Barelvi sect, Zafar Iqbal, together with Amir Hamza and Lakhvi, formed the core of a new jihadist organisation, the Markaz ud Dawat wal'Irshad, or Centre for Proselytisation. The organisation's rise wasn't predestined. Two influential Ahl-e-Hadith figures, political scientist Sameena Yasmin has written in her authoritative work on the Lashkar, held out. Sajid Mir—not to be confused with the Sajid Mir involved in the 26/11 attacks—continued to dominate the religious infrastructure of the Ahl-e-Hadith. Eminent Ahl-e-Hadith scholars like Hafiz Abdullah Bahawalpuri and Hafiz Mohammad Yahya Aziz also chose not to participate in the new group. Following the founding of its first training camp at Karair, near Tangu in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, in February 1990, the MDI's armed wing, the Lashkar, began funnelling small numbers of fighters across the Line of Control. It focussed, though, on recruitment. Giant rallies were held in 1995, 1996, and 1997 at its new campus near Lahore, which were addressed by Bin Laden himself. The group used the deaths of cadre to draw more volunteers. As historian Mariam Abou Zahab has written, the funerals were treated as celebratory occasions, akin to marriages, where the slain terrorist was identified as a divine groom joining the houris in paradise. Literature produced by the Lashkar claimed the killed terrorist would be able to intercede for his loved ones at the gates of heaven. Also read: Pakistan has no natural tendency to be democratic. Rule of Islam is the priority Annihilation of India From the outset, the Lashkar made no secret of the fact that its objective was the annihilation of India, not just the capture of Kashmir. 'Through the jihad waged by mujahideen people of Pakistan, and particularly those from Lahore, [we] would soon be able to [visit and enjoy] the real Chamba and Shimla,' Amir Hamza cheerily asserted in 1999. Later that year, cleric Sheikh Hafiz Ahmad wrote that 'Hindustan is the worst infidel in the world. These idolaters are even worse than the infidels of Mecca as they have millions of gods. This language has increasingly infiltrated Pakistan's official discourse. Inter-Services Public Relations Director General Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhury has spoken of a Fitna al-Hindustan, suggesting the country is a legitimate target of an existential religious war. Field Marshal Munir, journalist Ailia Zahra points out, has also used similar motifs. In one speech made in April, he proclaimed being 'different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life. Our religion is different. Our customs are different. Our traditions are different. Our thoughts are different.' To this, he added the proposition that the Islamic Kalima, or profession of faith, was the foundation of the state of Pakistan itself. Ideological wars are unlike all other wars, because they seek no strategic or political ends. Islamabad has known since at least 1965 that it cannot take Kashmir by force, and yet it persists in waging a war without an end. To give up the conflict would mean giving up the idea on which the project of Pakistan rests. To prevail in this conflict, India needs weapons, but also a powerful idea it is increasingly at risk of losing sight of: The idea that nationhood can be built on something other than irreducible religious hatred. Praveen Swami is contributing editor at ThePrint. His X handle is @praveenswami. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
