Ministers' botched £50m life sciences fund ‘achieved all its aims'
A 'FAILED EXPERIMENT' of investing public money in risky biotech-style businesses cost Welsh taxpayers at least £28m but achieved all of its original objectives, a committee heard.
Giles Thorley, who heads the Development Bank of Wales, largely blamed external factors for the poor performance of the now-closed Wales Life Sciences Investment Fund.
And the chief executive told the Senedd's public accounts committee the venture could be repeated in future provided the lessons are learned.
His report detailed how the Welsh Government-owned development bank lost £28.2m investing into 'very high risk', unprofitable life sciences businesses.
According to the paper published this week, the fund, which was managed by Arix Bioscience plc, paid £7.7m in fees or 15% of the initial £50m invested.
Mr Thorley revealed the fund contract set no limits on the fees charged by the manager.
He claimed the fund, which ran for the decade to 2023, met all of its initial four aims: to increase access to finance, attract businesses, grow the sector and boost research.
The fund also had an ambition to raise another £50m, bringing the total to £100m, but Arix invested £5m in 2016 – with only £21.8m returned to the public purse to date.
Managers ordinarily limit the investment into any one business to 10% but 40% of the fund was invested in only two businesses: Rutherford Health and ReNeuron.
Each received £10m from the fund and both later went under, returning nothing and raising concerns that the portfolio was 'overly concentrated' in a handful of businesses.
Mr Thorley wrote: 'Normally the maximum investment from a fund into a single business is limited to 10%. This mitigates the impact to the fund should some of the investments fail.'
The fund held investments in only nine companies, with three exceeding 10% each and totalling nearly 60% of all investments held.
By comparison, International Biotechnology Trust – a listed life sciences fund – holds dozens of investments to reduce risk, with none making up more than 5% according to its accounts.
That fund has returned roughly 60% to investors over the past decade compared with a -56% return for taxpayers from the Wales Life Sciences Investment Fund (WLSIF).
Mr Thorley said the failed investment strategy assumed the further £50m would be raised, which resulted in less diversification, increased risk and limited follow-on funding.
He also pointed to the pandemic, a big factor in Rutherford's failure, and the high-profile collapse of the Woodford Equity Income Fund – a co-investor in some WLSIF businesses.
Mr Thorley said disappointing clinical trial results were the main factor for businesses like ReNeuron, which relaunched as a private company in March after a year in administration.
He said: 'The nine investee businesses represented a broad portfolio, … from lower risk established businesses with revenue streams to very high risk (potentially very high return) pre-revenue businesses where future returns were wholly dependent on successful trials.
'To that extent, the portfolio was considered balanced.'
Mr Thorley pointed to Simbec-Orion, the fund's only success story, which provided a £19.7m (2.24x) return on an £8.75m investment.
He wrote: 'The fund did achieve all four of its objectives and it may have taken just one more portfolio company to succeed for the fund to have returned the full investment or profit.
'For that reason, provided all the lessons learnt from this fund are considered, the final lesson learnt is not to write off any future considerations for using a specialist fund manager with a dedicated fund as part of a wider approach to supporting growth in a business sector.'
But Senedd Members seemed less keen as they briefly discussed the paper on May 3.
Arix Bioscience blamed a two-year Wales Audit Office review of the fund as a major reason the extra £50m could not be raised.
Adrian Crompton, the auditor general for Wales who sits on the public accounts committee, said: 'At a high level, the lessons learned report indicates that, the assessment is that all of the objectives of the fund were met and you, I'm sure, will have some observations on that.'
Auditor General Adrian Crompton
Describing the fund as a failure, Plaid Cymru's Adam Price said: 'I would suggest on the basis of this that we shouldn't replicate this experiment.
'It's fine to experiment but if an experiment fails and you say 'oh well, it's OK for us to try again', I think there are some more basic questions.'
The public accounts committee, chaired by the Conservatives' Mark Isherwood, decided to discuss the matter in more detail behind closed doors, excluding the public and press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
44 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Rachel Reeves' £445m is a major victory for Wales, but there is more to do
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info As of yesterday lunchtimes, Wales' First Minister and her cabinet were still in the dark, waiting to hear whether their letters, their lobbying, their pleas, had been heard by Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer. They knew that if Wales didn't get a big sum, it would be disastrous. Not just politically, as it would provide untold hours of capital for opponents to be able to accuse them of not even having influence with their party colleagues in power in Westminster, but with voters. Voters who have been telling any Labour party member knocking on their door that they were fed up. Fed up of the cuts to welfare payments, fed up of the changes to winter fuel payments, and fed up with services that just aren't good enough. Then in the early evening on Tuesday night, the figure of £445m was starting to circulate, and there was a collective exhale of breath. That is clearly a big sum of money that Rachel Reeves is all but certain to confirm will be spent in Wales when she stands up in the Commons today, and it is specifically to improve rail in Wales. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here It will be spent by both governments - because rail is complicated and bits of the network here are controlled by the Welsh Government and other parts of it by the UK government But the bit of the announcement that actually brought particular joy was that the figure before the pound sign was prefaced with two words "at least". There has been a concerted lobbying effort behind the scenes. Labour figures are talking up Jo Stevens' role as Welsh secretary and it is certainly a big win for her. Labour MPs too have been at pains to explain they have been involved, slowly and cautiously bending the ear of chief secretary to the Treasury, Darren Jones, about why it made sense to invest in rail in Wales. WalesOnline has been campaigning since the start of the year. We've given a platform to different voices arguing what should be done to rectify decades of underfunding of the rail network here - and put pressure on politicians to act in a critical year in which the Labour administration at Westminster has two significant opportunities to act. (Image: Marc White / WalesOnline) For politicians, it has been a long game, a careful plan of sending formal letters, of getting public acknowledgement rail had been historically underfunded in Wales. MPs from Wales met with Mr Jones privately to explain why they need this, the benefits it will bring on both an individual constituency level, but to Wales as a nation, and those dire polling numbers won't be far from anyone's minds. This spending review has committed money to improving rail in Wales in the short term, over the next few years. That was one of the asks of our campaign. The other is for the UK Government to put in place a mechanism to ensure fair funding over the long term as well. Keir Starmer's government has an opportunity through its Railways Bill to put in place a system to ensure that the Welsh rail network is never denied fair funding again. This is more complicated than it has ever been before because the Welsh Government has control of the Core Valleys Lines. But the UK government can put in place a system to ensure that both the Welsh Government gets fair funding to maintain and enhance those rail lines and also that a fair share of investment goes into the lines like the main lines in south and north Wales that are still owned and run by Westminster. This is vital because the way the Treasury has historically allocated investment through the Green Book formula - which focuses with tunnel vision on return on investment - has meant that cash has been ploughed into the most populous areas in the south east for decades and decades. WalesOnline's campaign for fair funding Keir Starmer has a historic chance this year to end decades of second-class treatment of the Welsh rail network. Far less money is spent per person on rail in Wales compared to England and that has left us with far less electrified track and without the capacity to build a transport network fit for the nation's needs. This spring Mr Starmer's government is conducting a multi-year spending review which gives him the opportunity to reset the amount of funding allocated to the rail network in Wales. Later on in the year, he's planning a major bit of rail legislation that will be a once-in-a-generation chance to put in place a mechanism to guarantee fairness in perpetuity. Read more about this here. You can help put pressure on him to do use this historic opportunity by signing WalesOnline's petition on the UK government website calling for fair rail funding for Wales. Very simply, we want people in England and Wales to be treated the same when it comes to rail. There are arguments about how this should be done but widespread agreement that things must change. One academic told WalesOnline the Wales always comes at the bottom of the pile and will continue to unless there is full devolution. Another told us there was no appetite in either Cardiff Bay or Westminster for devolution and this lack of ambition was repeating the biggest mistake the Welsh Government had ever made. There are fears that unless there is full devolution, Wales will suffer every time the UK government cuts spending but protects major projects in England, as is happening right now. However the Welsh Government believes fair funding can be delivered without full devolution, which is does not want. And the head of a passenger body told us he didn't care who got the money as long as they did a good job with it, adding more cash could make a huge difference. The result has been that London and the surrounding counties have an extensive, electrified rail network encompassing underground trains, light rail lines, commuter services, dedicated airport lines and express services all serving the UK's most densely populated region. But Wales? We've been left with old stock, reliability issues and overcrowded services we all know too well. In recent years, the Welsh Government has been ploughing in its own money to address some of these problems. But that money has effectively been redirected from the share of public spending on other areas that the Welsh Government gets from Westminster. Today's announcement ensures that there will be a significant sum of funding for rail in Wales that should allow investment in both maintenance and also improvements, such as work on the Burns stations in south Wales and progress towards electrification in the north. Yet we will again be left depending on academics reviewing spending in the years to come to work out just how fair this has been - and whether these millions being spent in Wales are truly a fair share of the millions that will be spent in the same period on the flagship projects in England like HS2, East West rail. The UK government has an opportunity later this year to end the baffling, endless, arguments about how projects are classified, which has left the public utterly befuddled. It has an opportunity to guarantee fairness for posterity. There is a very simple truth that over the coming decades billions and billions are going to be spent in England on massive schemes like HS2, East West rail and the huge plans for trams and trains in the north of England. Although we've been talking about it for years, HS2 is not a historic injustice. It's still largely a future one as most of the money has not been spent yet. There are still 16 more years of spending to come. The widely-misunderstood fact is that the £4bn figure everyone cites is not something Wales has already missed out on - it's the amount Wales will miss out on if nothing is done. That's why it will be slightly misleading if you hear politicians today compare the £445m being announced in today's spending review with that much larger HS2 consequential figure. A fair share of those HS2 billions still can and should come to Wales. Not all of it should go to the Welsh Government, at least not while much of the rail network in Wales is controlled from Westminster. But this argument can be ended by putting in place a formula to guarantee a population-based share of rail funding for Wales for posterity. The lobbying campaign that delivered today's funding announcement should celebrate. But it will have to go again because major bits of rail legislation are few and far between. It is 20 years since the last one and the importance of this opportunity must be hammered home to politicians and civil servants in Westminster. There is a chance for Wales to put baffling arguments about rail classification, like the £6bn East West rail row we wrote about here, behind us. It is accepted by both governments that Wales has missed out in terms of rail. Today is a welcome step in the right direction but Keir Starmer must now take the chance he has later this year to make sure it doesn't happen again.
Daily Mirror
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Wrexham 'will break financial rules' with promotion as Ryan Reynolds warned
Wrexham's Hollywood owners have been told they face an uphill challenge in reaching the Premier League in the near future without being punished over financial breaches Wrexham's Hollywood owners have been warned they will struggle to reach the Premier League in the next couple of years without breaking financial rules. The Welsh side have enjoyed enormous success since being bought by actors Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney more than four years ago. Under the management of Phil Parkinson, Wrexham have achieved promotion in each of their last three seasons, lifting them from the National League into the Championship. The Red Dragons have been backed in some quarters to challenge again in the second tier next term as the co-owners look to achieve their dream of taking the club all the way to the Premier League. However, a football finance expert has now cautioned the A-list pair that a short-term push for the top flight will be difficult to achieve without contravening profit and sustainability (PSR) rules. Dr Rob Wilson said he believed a mid-table finish would be more realistic for Wrexham as they look to establish themselves at the next level. He told BettingLounge: "I don't see how Wrexham can get into the Premier League in a season or two without breaching the financial regulations that exist within the division. However, you would probably argue given their trajectory that if they were to get into the Premier League, they would probably stay there for a little while. "Then they could afford to take any hit if they were then ultimately relegated at some point. I think mid-table is probably where I think you'd see an incredible amount of investment to try and protect that. It links with the new stadium and with some of the broader plans to activate the commercial and the broadcast opportunities. "Probably mid-table would be a good shout, but they'll have to invest heavily to achieve that. I'm probably with some of the Championship club chief executives and I think it'll be incredibly difficult for them to do that mainly because of parachute payments. "All those clubs coming out are three times more likely to be promoted next year than anybody that doesn't have a parachute payment. The odds are heavily stacked against them, but who'd have thought Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney would have owned Wrexham a few years ago." Last week, it was reported that Reynolds and McElhenney are seeking fresh investment in Wrexham in a move which could see the club's value soar to as much as £350million. It's claimed that bank advisors have been instructed to find potential new investors and to discover if there is a demand. The new suggested valuation of around £350m would make Wrexham the highest priced team in the Championship. For context, Sheffield United were bought in December by an American consortium for roughly £111m. However, Dr Wilson has expressed scepticism over the lofty figure, despite admitting to being impressed by the amount of money the two actors have been able to generate. He said: "It's bonkers, it's just a massive valuation and reflects the Disneyification of Wrexham. It reflects the blend of their asset base, their projected earnings and their projected media exposure based on what they've been able to get through the Disney+ series. "The global following and the promotion boost that they will have achieved really helps just amplify it. That valuation is nuts. But then football as a product is nuts sometimes. If people want to be involved in that story then it's a great way of raising an additional bit of capital. It's a great way of accelerating your team's progression. "But they are running a very smart business operation behind the scenes, which is naturally amplified because of the ownership. I don't know what the ceiling is but a club valuation three times that of Sheffield United is really optimistic." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Sign up to our newsletter! Wrexham is the Game is great new way to get top-class coverage Wrexham AFC is the arguably the fastest-growing club in the world at the moment thanks to a certain Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney. The Dragons have achieved two consecutive promotions and are cheered on by crowds from not only North Wales but also from all over the globe, thanks to the success of the Disney+ documentary 'Welcome to Wrexham'. But does it have a dedicated, quality source of information piped through to your inbox each week, free of ads but packed with informed opinion, analysis and even a little bit of fun each week? That's where Wrexham is the Game steps in... Available every Wednesday, it provides all the insights you need to be a top red. And for a limited time, a subscription to 'Wrexham is the Game' will cost fans just £15 for the first year.
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Spending Review 2025: what time is Reeves' announcement?
Big pledges on housing, healthcare, and transport are expected, but questions remain over where cuts may fall 🚆 Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Rachel Reeves unveils her 2025 spending review today, promising to prioritise 'working people' and drive Britain's economic renewal Big spending boosts are expected to include £30bn for the NHS, £4.5bn for schools, and £39bn for social housing Transport and energy upgrades should also feature heavily, including billions for public transport, nuclear power, and a £3 bus fare cap extension No tax hikes (on income tax, National Insurance, or VAT) are expected, but other departments may face cuts to balance the books Watch live around 12:30pm on Parliament TV, BBC News, Sky News or BBC Parliament Rachel Reeves will today (June 11) unveil her much-anticipated 2025 spending review, pledging to align government priorities with those of 'working people' and spearhead what she is calling 'Britain's renewal.' The Chancellor is expected to focus heavily on boosting core public services and infrastructure while juggling tough monetary constraints – all without raising income tax, National Insurance or VAT. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Reeves will outline day-to-day spending plans for the next three years and capital investment plans stretching into 2029. Here's what's expected to be announced, and how it might impact your money: (Photo: Peter Byrne -) | Getty Images Major spending increases Headline commitments expected to be or already announced include: £30 billion increase in NHS funding – a 2.8% real-terms rise, aimed at tackling record waiting lists and modernising healthcare. £4.5 billion extra for schools, enhancing classroom resources and teacher support. Defence spending rise to 2.5% of GDP, in line with NATO obligations and national security priorities. £39 billion over 10 years for affordable and social housing, nearly doubling annual housing investment to £4 billion by 2029/30. £15.6 billion for public transport in English city regions, supporting tram and bus upgrades outside the capital. £16.7 billion for nuclear energy, most of it going to build the new Sizewell C power plant in Suffolk. £445 million for Welsh rail upgrades, and an extension of the £3 bus fare cap until March 2027. One of the notable omissions in the spending review is the lack of major infrastructure funding for London, and no sign of a tourist levy – a key request from Mayor Sadiq Khan. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad While the Government promises reform of the Treasury's 'green book' rules – which decide how investment is distributed – the shift is designed to favour regions outside London and the South East. Will there be tax hikes? Despite the expanded spending commitments, Reeves has repeatedly stressed that Labour's 'fiscal rules' remain in place, and that there will be no increases to income tax, National Insurance, or VAT – raising the question of where future savings or revenues will come from. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has warned that real-terms increases to the NHS above 2.5% may mean squeezes elsewhere – particularly for departments like local government, justice, and the Home Office. Although some departments, such as policing, may receive inflation-beating settlements, others are likely to face tightening belts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Additionally, the Government's recent U-turn on winter fuel payments – now extended to pensioners earning up to £35,000 – adds around £1.25 billion to public spending, reducing Reeves' fiscal headroom even further. What it means for you Better public services, particularly in health and education, may mean improvements in access and quality – though not immediately. More affordable housing could ease rental pressure and improve supply, especially for lower-income households. The extended bus fare cap and transport upgrades could mean cheaper and more reliable travel, particularly in city regions outside London. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad No major tax rises (yet) will be a relief for household budgets, though future tax tweaks or spending cuts in other areas remain a possibility. What time is the Spending Review? The Chancellor's speech is expected around 12:30 pm BST, shortly after Prime Minister's Questions, which start at noon in the House of Commons. Major broadcasters, including BBC News and Sky News, will carry live coverage.
