Was the world's most influential climate target doomed from the start?
In 2015, when the countries of the world hammered out the Paris Agreement, they committed to limiting global temperatures to 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels and 'pursuing efforts' toward keeping them below 1.5 degrees C. The plan didn't work out so well. Ten years later, the planet might have crossed that lower threshold sooner than expected.
A pair of new studies in the journal Nature Climate Change looked at historical data and came to the conclusion that the record heat last year — the first year to surpass 1.5 degrees C — wasn't a temporary fluke, but a sign that the world is now soaring past this influential climate target over the long term. The new year continued that upward trajectory. Even as a natural cooling pattern called La Niña took hold recently, January managed to be hotter than ever, clocking in at a record 1.75 degrees C warmer than the preindustrial average.
One analysis of the two studies warned that Earth had entered a 'frightening new phase.' It's a reflection of the language that has been used around 1.5 C ever since the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations-backed team of leading climate experts, wrote an influential report in 2018 on the consequences of exceeding that threshold, which it estimated would happen in 2030. Headlines warned that the world had 12 years to avert climate catastrophe. The line was echoed by the young Swedish activist Greta Thunberg and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez from New York. So is the world now at the edge of disaster?
Mike Hulme, a professor of human geography at the University of Cambridge, asserts that it isn't. 'There's no 'cliff edge' that emerges from any of the scientific analyses that have been done about these thresholds,' he said. 'They are, in many senses, just arbitrary numbers plucked because they are either integers or half of an integer.'
Hulme, who has been studying the way people think about climate change for decades, argues that an obsession with global temperatures misunderstands why people care about climate change in the first place: They care about how it affects their lives, not abstract readings of the thermometer. He's also argued that climate advocates should stop chasing a series of 'deadlines' to try to drum up enthusiasm for meeting these goals.
Grist spoke with Hulme to learn more about how setting these deadlines can backfire and if there's a better way to talk about how to make progress on climate change. This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.
Q. You've written that the 1.5 C goal 'painted the world into a dangerous corner.' What exactly was dangerous about it?
A. The danger of this goal is that it was always impossible to achieve — or 99 percent impossible to achieve — 10 years ago. And everybody, I think, who understands both the dynamics of the physical climate system, and also the dynamics of the world energy system, understood that — 1.5 became a campaigning number around which civic groups, activists, and youth entrepreneurs mobilized: '1.5 to stay alive.' It was interpreted as being if 1.5 was breached, then the world either moved into an entirely different physical state that was dangerous compared to 1.4 — or, and this came along later, that somehow 1.5 represents a 'tipping point' in the Earth system, which if exceeded, triggers certain feedback mechanisms that cannot be undone.
Either way, it cultivates an atmosphere of fear. And the danger is, if we've transgressed 1.5, the feeling mounts that somehow it's game over, that we've failed in our task to manage the risks of climate change. And that, to some at least, will cultivate cynicism, disillusion, and a loss of focus. These are dangerous emotions. They don't help with clear-eyed thinking around the difficult politics of climate and energy.
Q. I think the report the IPCC wrote about 1.5 C in 2018 is really tied up with this discussion. Do you think that report was bound to be misinterpreted?
A. Yeah, the idea of deadlines is a long one in the history of climate advocacy and politics. To me, it's a pernicious way of thinking about this. There is no cliff edge over which the world's climate or humanity is going to fall over, whether it's 1.5, or 2, or 2.5.
The movie that came out a few years ago, Don't Look Up, used the idea of an asteroid hitting the planet as an allegory for climate change. And that is actually a very bad way of thinking about climate change. It's not something that will destroy the planet at any particular threshold. It's an incremental risk — and it's a relative risk, actually. By relative risk, I mean, one has to think about the things that concern people in the wider context of their life and their aspirations for the future. It's relative to a pandemic, relative to a nuclear war between two superpowers, relative to having one's family destroyed by terrorism. So climate change is that type of a problem. It's not like an asteroid.
Q. Most estimates said that 1.5 C wouldn't happen until at least the early 2030s. What do you make of these new studies that show the world might be breaching that 1.5 C goal now?
A. The interesting thing about this is, how do we interpret 1.5? Climatologists have always worked with the understanding that climate is something that one can only adequately get a snapshot of over, traditionally, a 30-year period. The IPCC has more recently moved to defining this over a 20-year period. And what these papers are doing is trying to preempt this. Clearly, we haven't been exceeding 1.5 degrees for 20 years. No one's claiming that. What these papers are saying is that, in fact, if we're entering into this 20-year window from 2025 to 2045, we are now entering into this regime where the world's average temperature will be more regularly exceeding 1.5.
From a scientific point of view, statistical point of view, those studies are fair. I think the danger is the way they get interpreted — that if we have now reached 1.5, suddenly a new category of climate impacts or weather extremes will manifest themselves around the planet.
Of course, the thing that's going to happen is, 'Well, if 1.5 is now in the back mirror, what's in the front mirror now?' There's going to be a lot of work done to reconstruct a narrative for those people who think that 1.5 was the be-all and the end-all. There's now going to have to be very significant work in reeducating and reframing what the future actually holds, if 1.5 is no longer the benchmark.
Q. Is the problem with putting a deadline on climate change partly that it can motivate action in the near-term, but not the long term?
A. I think that's a good way of making the distinction, perhaps. Climate change is not something that can be arrested in the short term. It is something that is going to be managed in the long term. Putting 1.5 out there at the beginning in Paris in 2015 was not a good move. It may have had some mobilizing power initially, but it doesn't actually help us achieve the long-term goals of what we need around climate change.
Global temperature isn't a thing that anyone can control. At least in principle, if you disaggregate this, you can think about particular energy systems — whether they're fossil-driven or how efficient they are. There are no levers that can directly control global temperature, other than the putative lever of solar geoengineering.
Read Next
How the world gave up on 1.5 degrees
Lylla Younes
Q. The idea that we're running out of time to tackle climate change, or that the clock is ticking, is such a common metaphor. Do you think there's a better way to frame these efforts?
A. Well, yes. We know for a variety of reasons that a world that is 85 to 90 percent dependent on fossil fuels is probably not a good world for the future for all sorts of reasons, climate change being one of them. So one could actually structure some of the politics of this around decarbonization and providing incentives for accelerated decarbonization, but without putting artificial deadlines on it. It's not as though if we don't get the world energy system down to 80 percent, 75, 70, 65 percent by certain dates, we've somehow lost the battle. At least we're going in the right direction.
Another way into this is focusing on sustainable development goals. Actually, the things that matter to most people around the relationship that humans have with their physical environment and their social well-being are well captured in the U.N. sustainable development goals, particularly for those who are most exposed to some of the dangers of a changing climate. They are set out with a target to be met by 2030, so you could say there's a deadline there. But the way in which we think about development is very different from the way we think about climate. No one is saying that we've only got five more years in order to achieve any of those development goals. If we don't, we will continue over the following five or 10 or 15 years to alleviate poverty, increase sanitation, and bring education, particularly for women, up to the standards that people desire.
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Was the world's most influential climate target doomed from the start? on Feb 14, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Residents endure brutal conditions as record-breaking temperatures soar to 125 degrees: 'Extremely vulnerable'
May sizzled in the Middle East as the United Arab Emirates set back-to-back records for heat. The mercury climbed to an incredible 51.6 degrees Celsius (nearly 125 degrees Fahrenheit) on May 24 in Sweihan, a town in the Al Ain Region of the United Arab Emirates, according to an AFP report. It was only about 0.7 degrees Fahrenheit lower than the hottest temperature recorded in the UAE since tracking began in 2003. The temperature of 51.6 degrees Celsius in Sweihan and a measurement of 50.4 degrees Celsius (about 122.7 degrees Fahrenheit) in Abu Dhabi a day earlier both eclipsed the previous UAE record for May of 50.2 degrees Celsius (about 122.4 degrees Fahrenheit), according to the AFP report, which contains meteorology office information. It's been a brutal year for extreme temperatures in the Middle East. The UAE also reported an average daily high of 42.6 degrees Celsius (about 109 degrees Fahrenheit) in April, a new record for the month. A 2022 Greenpeace report titled "Living on the Edge" warned of the dangerous impact extreme heat would have on six countries in the Middle East and North Africa region. That report said the region was "extremely vulnerable" to the effects of an overheating planet, per Individual temperature records do not indicate a trend on their own, but taken in the broader context of average warming over time, they can highlight a larger concern. A recently released World Meteorological Organization report has forecasted continuing record-high global temperatures. "There is an 80% chance that at least one year between 2025 and 2029 will be warmer than the warmest year on record (currently 2024)," the report noted. "And there is an 86% chance that at least one year will be more than 1.5°C above the pre-industrial level." This underscores how close the world is to breaching — at least for a single-year average — the long-term 1.5-degree Celsius target limit for warming established by the Paris Agreement, a global pact of 195 nations. The WMO's warning shouldn't surprise anyone, since Earth has been running a fever for over a decade. Last year added to a streak: Each of the last 11 years ranks among the hottest ever recorded, and since only 2012, the U.S. has seen its eight warmest years, as Climate Central reported. As NASA noted, "Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth's surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth's climate." Therefore, one way to try to avoid the worst effects of extreme heat is to seek alternatives to burning fuels for energy. Do you think your city has good air quality? Definitely Somewhat Depends on the time of year Not at all Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. There have been promising new developments in the solar industry. For example, scientists in Japan have developed an all-organic material that could revolutionize solar panels — they are working on making solar panels not only more efficient, but also more eco-friendly. An international team of scientists is also collaborating to pave the way for more efficient thin-film solar panel technology. Thin film solar has been described as "the future of the solar industry" by the American Solar Energy Society because it's cheaper to make, uses fewer materials, and is easy to manufacture. Installing solar panels with a battery can help protect your home against blackouts and extreme weather while slashing your dependence on dirty energy — and in many cases, reducing your energy bill to nearly zero. With EnergySage, you can compare trusted installers and save up to $10,000 on solar installation. Embracing renewable energy sources like solar can help cool our planet by curbing harmful carbon pollution. Other ways to help the world and your wallet include replacing an old HVAC system with a heat pump and opting for an induction stove instead of a conventional range. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Los Angeles Times
18 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
U.N. Ocean Conference sets sail off France on World Oceans Day
NICE, France — Dozens of research and exploration vessels from around the world set sail just off the French coastal city of Nice on Sunday to kick off the third U.N. Ocean Conference and mark World Oceans Day. At the 'Ocean Wonders' event, vessels sailed across Nice's Baie des Anges, or Bay of Angels, to spotlight the beauty and importance of the ocean while urging world leaders to not lose sight of its value as they make decisions about the planet's future. Thousands of delegates, including heads of state, scientists and environmental advocates, are expected in Nice this week to confront growing threats to the ocean and the need to transform pledges into protection. The United Nations has called the threats a global emergency facing the world's oceans as they face rising temperatures, plastic pollution choking marine life, and relentless overexploitation of fish and other resources. Just 2.7% of the global ocean is effectively protected from destructive activities such as industrial fishing and deep-sea mining — far below the global goal of 30% by 2030. Participating boats included the Energy Observer, a solar-panel covered catamaran that was the first vessel to circumnavigate the globe using only renewable energy. It produces hydrogen fuel on board via seawater electrolysis, offering a vision of zero-emissions maritime travel. Other standout vessels included France's Alfred Merlin, dedicated to underwater archaeology; the OceanXplorer, a high-tech billionaire-owned research yacht; and the WWF's Blue Panda, which is working to map and protect the last remaining seagrass meadows in the Mediterranean Sea. At the heart of the conference is the push to ratify the High Seas Treaty, adopted in 2023. If it takes effect, the treaty would for the first time allow countries to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which cover nearly two-thirds of the ocean and remain largely ungoverned. 'The High Seas Treaty is critical to ensuring we can protect biodiversity in the ocean,' said Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance. 'We're in the middle of a biodiversity and climate crisis. We absolutely have to protect the ocean to address those crises.' But even in waters already designated as protected, enforcement often falls short. Many countries, France included, face criticism from environmental groups over weak regulation and continued industrial activity within their marine protected areas. 'The ambition is not there, the speed is not there, and the scale has not been there,' said Sílvia Tavares, project manager at Oceano Azul Foundation. 'Moments like UNOC are key to changing that.' Several countries are expected to announce new marine protected areas, or MPAs, during the conference, along with bans on bottom trawling and other destructive activities within their existing MPA networks. The 'Ocean Wonders' fleet will remain docked in Nice and open to the public until the conference concludes Friday. Hammerschlag writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Japanese Lunar Lander Crashes In Second Failed Mission
A private Japanese lunar lander crashed during an attempted touchdown on the moon Friday. This marks the second failed mission for the Tokyo-based global lunar exploration company, ispace. The lander, named Resilience, lost communication less than two minutes before its scheduled landing in Mare Frigoris, a flat, crater-filled region on the moon's northern near side. A preliminary analysis indicated the laser system for measuring altitude malfunctioned, causing the lander to descend too fast. 'Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface,' ispace said in a statement. 'This is the second time that we were not able to land. So we really have to take it very seriously,' CEO and founder Takeshi Hakamada told reporters, per Associated Press. He apologized to contributors and added that the mission was 'merely a stepping stone' to a larger lander planned for 2027 with NASA involvement. 'Engineers did everything they possibly could' to ensure success, he said minutes before the attempted landing. The 7.5-foot Resilience, launched in January from Florida on a SpaceX rocket, carried an 11-pound, four-wheeled rover named Tenacious, built by ispace's Luxembourg subsidiary. The rover, equipped with a high-definition camera and a shovel for NASA to collect lunar soil, was designed to operate for two weeks during the moon's daylight period. It also carried a toy-size Swedish-style red cottage, dubbed Moonhouse by artist Mikael Genberg, for placement on the lunar surface. The mission's $16 million payload included scientific instruments from Japanese firms and a Taiwanese university. The failure follows ispace's first lunar crash in 2023, caused by inaccurate altitude readings. 'Truly diverse scenarios were possible, including issues with the propulsion system, software or hardware, especially with sensors,' Chief Technology Officer Ryo Ujiie said at a press conference. Jeremy Fix, chief engineer for ispace's U.S. subsidiary, noted last month that the company, with a mission cost less than the first's $100 million, lacks 'infinite funds' and cannot afford repeated failures. 'We're not facing any immediate financial deterioration or distress because of the event,' CFO Jumpei Nozaki said, citing investor support. However, space shares faced heavy sell orders and were poised for a 29% drop. As of Thursday, their market capitalization was over 110 billion yen ($766 million). The crash marks another setback in the commercial lunar race, which began in 2019. U.S. firms Firefly Aerospace and Intuitive Machines achieved successful landings in March, though Intuitive's lander toppled in a crater. Japan's space agency, JAXA, landed its SLIM probe last year, joining Russia, the U.S., China, and India as the only nations with successful robotic lunar landings. 'Expectations for ispace have not faded,' Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba posted on X, reported Reuters. Ispace remains committed to NASA's Artemis program, with plans for a third mission in 2027. 'NASA increasingly needs private companies to improve cost efficiency for key missions with limited budgets,' Hakamada said, referencing proposed U.S. budget cuts. Two U.S. companies, Blue Origin and Astrobotic Technology, aim for moon landings by year's end following Astrobotic's 2024 failure.