13 coastal cities in the US that are slowly sinking
Cities all over the world, including on the US East and Gulf Coasts, are sinking.
This phenomenon, called subsidence, can make extreme flooding worse and damage infrastructure.
From New York to Houston, these 13 cities are losing height each year.
Cities are sinking across the US, some at a few fractions of a millimeter each year, while others lose up to six millimeters a year.
This phenomenon, called subsidence, is a "slow-moving yet widespread hazard," said Manoochehr Shirzaei, a geophysicist at Virginia Tech who co-authored a study published in Nature in March that measured subsidence in 32 coastal cities in the US.
Sinking can come from the sheer weight of skyscrapers and infrastructure, or from people drawing water from underground. Some of it is leftover from the last Ice Age.
Coastal cities worldwide are already prone to catastrophic flooding as sea levels rise because of the climate crisis. Factor in sinking, and the world's vulnerability to future coastal flooding triples, according to a 2019 study.
In the US, sea-level rise combined with subsidence could expose $109 billion of coastal property to high-tide flooding by 2050, according to Shirzaei's calculations.
The good news is that there are relatively inexpensive solutions to subsidence, Shirzaei told Business Insider in an email.
"The key takeaway is that we still have sufficient time to manage this hazard," he said.
Here are the biggest cities that are sinking the most, according to his new study, in geographical order starting from the northern East Coast.
Boston, Massachusetts
Shirzaei and his co-authors have found that there's a lot of variation in subsidence throughout Boston. When sinking occurs at different rates like that, it can put extra strain on infrastructure.
For example, some areas of Boston are sinking about 1 millimeter per year, give or take. Others sink nearly 4 millimeters a year — which translates to almost 4 centimeters per decade.
New York City
The Big Apple is losing about 1.5 millimeters of height each year.
All three airports in the NYC area are sinking, too, according to a study Shirzaei co-authored in 2024. JFK is sinking about 1.7 mm per year, LaGuardia at 1.5 mm per year, and Newark's airport is clocking 1.4 mm per year.
LaGuardia, for one, has already installed water pumps, berms, flood walls, and flood doors. Previous estimates had Laguardia flooding monthly by 2050 and fully underwater by 2100 — and that's without subsidence.
Jersey City, New Jersey
Just across the Hudson River, Jersey City is matching NYC's pace of about 1.5 millimeters per year.
To measure sinking at such a granular level, Shirzaei and his co-authors mapped ground deformations using a satellite-based radar technique called InSAR (short for Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar).
Atlantic City, New Jersey
A little further south, Atlantic City has its neighbors beat with a subsidence of about 2.8 millimeters per year.
A portion of the East Coast's subsidence is a leftover reaction from the disappearance of the Laurentide ice sheet, which covered much of North America during the last Ice Age. The ice sheet's bulk caused the exposed land around its edges to bulge upward — and the mid-Atlantic region is still settling down from the ice sheet's retreat.
Virginia Beach, Virginia
Virginia Beach, Virginia, is sinking 2.2 millimeters per year. Meanwhile, sea level rise has become a growing concern for locals.
In 2021, residents voted in favor of a $568 million program to build infrastructure that guards against rising sea level, according to PBS news.
Charleston, South Carolina
Charleston is the most populous city in South Carolina and its downtown sits on a peninsula flanked by the Ashley River and Cooper River. The city overall is sinking at a median rate of 2.2 millimeters per year, though in some areas its more dramatic at a rate of 6 millimeters per year.
Savannah, Georgia
Savannah is losing almost 2 millimeters per year, though some areas are sinking as much as 5 millimeters per year.
Over 13,000 properties in Savannah are at risk of flooding over the next 30 years, according to the climate risk analysis group First Street. That's over 23% of all homes in the city.
Miami
Last year, a study found that luxury high-rises were slowly sinking on the barrier islands surrounding Miami, possibly due to vibration from nearby construction. Shirzaei found the mainland is sinking, too, by about half a millimeter each year.
Mobile, Alabama
Mobile is losing 1.87 millimeters per year. The Gulf Coast city experiences some of the highest volume of rain in the US, according to the city's official website, and encourages all residents to have disaster survival kits, including canned foods and flashlights, on hand in the event of a flooding emergency.
Biloxi, Mississippi
Biloxi has the most drastic subsidence of all the US cities Shirzaei's team assessed. On the whole, Biloxi is sinking about 5.6 millimeters per year, with a lot of variation. Some parts of the city may be sinking as much as 10 millimeters per year.
New Orleans
New Orleans is losing 1.3 millimeters per year. First Street reports that 99.6% of all properties in the city are at risk of flooding in the next 30 years.
Houston and Galveston, Texas
Shirzaei found that Galveston, Texas, is sinking more than 4 millimeters a year, but inland parts of Houston have also been sinking for decades due to groundwater extraction.
Corpus Christi, Texas
Corpus Christi is sinking almost 3 millimeters per year. Some researchers think local oil and gas drilling has contributed to subsidence, reported local ABC outlet KIIV
"Extraction, generally, we believe it initiates and activates movement around faults and those could initiate land subsidence in some areas," Mohamed Ahmed, a geophysics professor at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi, told the outlet.
What about the West Coast?
Shirzaei's team didn't find much subsidence in California's coastal cities, although the state's inland Central Valley is sinking due to groundwater extraction.
As for Oregon and Washington, the researchers simply don't have good enough data yet to say what's happening to the ground there.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
First evidence of ‘living towers' made of worms discovered in nature
Nature seems to offer an escape from the hustle and bustle of city life, but the world at your feet may tell another story. Even in the shade of a fruit tree, you could be surrounded by tiny skyscrapers — not made of steel or concrete, but of microscopic worms wriggling and writhing into the shape of long, vertical towers. Even though these miniature architects, called nematodes, are found all over Earth's surface, scientists in Germany recently witnessed their impressive building techniques in nature for the first time. After months of closely inspecting rotten pears and apples in local orchards, researchers from the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior and the University of Konstanz were able to spot hundreds of the 1-millimeter-long (0.04-inch) worms climbing onto one another, amassing structures up to 10 times their individual size. Related video Rare video shows 12 sharks co-feed socially To learn more about the mysterious physics of the soft, slimy towers, the study team brought samples of nematodes called Caenorhabditis elegans into a lab and analyzed them. There, the scientists noticed the worms could assemble in a matter of hours, with some reaching out from the twisting mass as exploratory 'arms' sensing the environment and building accordingly. But why the worms formed the structures wasn't immediately clear. The team's findings, published Thursday in the journal Current Biology, show that even the smallest animals can prompt big questions about the evolutionary purpose of social behaviors. 'What we got was more than just some worms standing on top of each other,' said senior study author Serena Ding, a Max Planck research group leader of genes and behavior. 'It's a coordinated superorganism, acting and moving as a whole.' To find out what was motivating the nematodes' building behavior, the study team tested the worms' reactions to being poked, prodded and even visited by a fly — all while stacked in a tower formation. 'We saw that they are very reactive to the presence of a stimulus,' said the study's first author, Daniela Perez, who is a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior. 'They sense it, and then the tower goes towards this stimulus, attaching itself to our metal pick or a fly buzzing around.' This coordinated reaction suggests the hungry nematodes may be joining together to easily hitch a ride on larger animals such as insects that transport them to (not so) greener pastures with more rotten fruit to feast on, Perez said. 'If you think about it, an animal that is 1 millimeter long cannot just crawl all the way to the next fruit 2 meters (6.6 feet) away. It could easily die on the way there, or be eaten by a predator,' Perez explained. Nematodes are capable of hitchhiking solo too, she added, but arriving to a new area in a group may allow them to continue reproducing. The structures themselves may also serve as a mode of transport, as evidenced by how some worms formed bridges across gaps within the petri dishes to get from one surface to another, Perez noted. 'This discovery is really exciting,' said Orit Peleg, an associate professor of computer science who studies living systems at the University of Colorado Boulder's BioFrontiers Institute. 'It's both establishing the ecological function of creating a tower, and it really opens up the door to do more controlled experimentation to try to understand the perceptual world of these organisms, and how they communicate within a large group.' Peleg was not involved in the study. As the next step, Perez said her team would like to learn whether the formation of these structures is a cooperative or competitive behavior. In other words, are the towering nematodes behaving socially to help each other out, or are their towers more akin to a Black Friday sale stampede? Studying the behaviors of other self-assembling creatures could offer clues to the social norms of nematodes and help answer this question, Ding said. Ants, which assemble to form buoyant rafts to survive floodwaters, are among the few creatures known to team up like nematodes, said David Hu, a professor of mechanical engineering and biology at Georgia Tech. Hu was not involved in the study. 'Ants are incredibly sacrificial for one another, and they do not generally fight within the colony,' Hu said. 'That's because of their genetics. They all come from the same queen, so they are like siblings.' Like ants, nematodes didn't appear to display any obvious role differentiation or hierarchy within the tower structures, Perez said. Each worm from the base to the top of the structure was equally mobile and strong, indicating no competition was at play. However, the lab-cultivated worms were basically clones of one another, so it's not clear whether role differentiation occurs more often in nature, where nematode populations could have more genetic differences, she noted. Additionally, socially cooperative creatures tend to use some form of communication, Peleg said. In the case of ants, it may be their pheromone trails, while honeybees rely on their ritual dance routines and slime molds use their pulsing chemical signals. With nematodes, however, it's still not clear how they might communicate — or if they are communicating at all, Ding said. 'The next steps for (the team) are really just choosing the next questions to ask.' Notably, there has been a lot of interest in studying cooperative animal behaviors among the robotics community, Hu said. It's possible that one day, he added, information about the complex sociality of creatures like nematodes could be used to inform how technology, such as computer servers or drone systems, communicates.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists stunned after witnessing unprecedented cascade triggered by common fishing practice: 'Collective memory loss'
The world's largest herring population has experienced an unprecedented 800-kilometer (497-mile) shift in its spawning grounds because of fishing practices that target older fish, according to a study in the journal Nature. Norwegian spring spawning herring have traditionally migrated up to 1,300 kilometers (808 miles) southward from northern Norwegian waters to spawn at the west coast, a journey that helps ensure better survival rates for their offspring. However, new research shows these fish have abruptly shifted their spawning grounds northward after heavy fishing pressure targeted older, more experienced fish that typically "teach" migration routes to younger generations. The research team found that when fisheries selectively harvested older herring, it created a "collective memory loss" within the population, disrupting long-established migration patterns. The change occurred when a large cohort of young herring emerged in 2016, when the population of older fish had plummeted by 68%. Without enough elder "guides," these young fish established their own, shorter migration routes that older survivors eventually adopted. This disruption in fish migration doesn't just affect herring. It impacts entire coastal ecosystems and communities that depend on these spawning events. When herring spawn in southern areas, their eggs and hatched larvae spread over larger areas during their northward drift, enriching diverse coastal ecosystems. Local predatory fish, endangered seabird colonies, and even coastal communities benefit from this natural energy distribution pattern along the Norwegian coast. The shift could lead to lower fish production over time, as the northward spawning areas may not provide the same survival advantages for young fish. For you at home, this could eventually mean fewer herring available in grocery stores and higher prices for this nutritious seafood option. The research also raises broader concerns about how current fishing practices might be disrupting important animal behaviors that have evolved over centuries. If fish can't pass down their migration knowledge, we may see similar problems affect other commercial fish species, potentially threatening food security for communities worldwide. Scientists are advocating for "longevity conservation" in fisheries management — namely, policies that protect older fish instead of focusing on overall population numbers. Maintaining a healthy age structure in fish preserves their collective knowledge and cultural behaviors. Do you think America has a plastic waste problem? Definitely Only in some areas Not really I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Some fisheries are already exploring finer-scale management strategies that protect fish at different life stages and locations, rather than treating entire populations as single units. If you want to help, look for seafood certified by organizations like the Marine Stewardship Council, which promotes sustainable fishing practices. You can also use seafood guides from groups like Seafood Watch to choose fish harvested using methods that minimize ecosystem impacts. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.


Tom's Guide
a day ago
- Tom's Guide
I just read Claude's new blog — and you'd never guess it was written by AI
Anthropic has a new blog called Claude Explains, but it's not your typical corporate blog. As the name suggests, the company's AI chatbot is the one doing much of the writing. Unlike other tech attempts at fully automated content, this experiment is grounded in a cautious, human-in-the-loop approach that puts expert oversight front and center. Launched last week with little fanfare, Claude Explains lives on Anthropic's website and features blog posts that explore technical topics and practical AI use cases.A cheery note on the homepage reads, 'Welcome to the small corner of the Anthropic universe where Claude is writing on every topic under the sun,' making it sound like Claude is blogging freely without supervision. But behind the scenes, Anthropic says it's anything but hands-off. Claude generates the drafts, but subject matter experts and editorial teams enhance the content with insights, examples and practical blog serves as an early example of how AI can augment human work rather than replace it. By generating drafts that are then refined by subject matter experts, Claude helps teams move faster while still delivering high-quality, insightful content; effectively amplifying what human creators can accomplish on their own. Anthropic plans to expand the blog beyond technical topics, with upcoming posts focused on creative writing, data analysis and business strategy. And notably, the company is still hiring across editorial, content and marketing roles — underscoring its view that AI is a tool for humans, not a replacement. Anthropic's new blog arrives at a time when many companies are grappling with how (and how not) to use AI for content creation. OpenAI has teased models for creative writing. Meta wants AI to handle ad copy end to end. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Publishers like Gannett, Bloomberg and Business Insider have all tested AI-written articles — with mixed, often embarrassing, results. Business Insider recently had to walk back book recommendations that may have been generated by AI and pointed readers to titles that didn't exist. Bloomberg corrected dozens of AI-generated summaries. G/O Media drew public backlash for publishing error-filled AI articles without editorial approval. The common thread? Lack of oversight. Anthropic's blog aims to sidestep these missteps by anchoring Claude's contributions in a strong editorial framework. Human editors verify facts, reshape structure and ensure that each post genuinely helps readers understand AI's capabilities — especially in real-world scenarios. Claude Explains is an experiment in AI-generated content, while also making a statment. Anthropic's measured approach, combining AI speed with human judgment, offers a sharp contrast to efforts that rush to automate creativity without a safety net. The company isn't claiming AI can replace writers, in fact, it's showing what's possible when AI tools like Claude are used to support (not supplant) the people behind the content. It's too early to determine if this model will become a new industry standard, but for now, one thing is clear: Claude may be doing the writing, but humans aren't going anywhere and are still very much in charge.