Washington DC sues Trump administration over 'hostile takeover' of police
According to the Trump administration's plan, the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Terry Cole, would take over as "emergency police commissioner" in Washington DC. Bondi said Cole would have "all powers and duties" of the city's police chief.She added that MPD staff would have to get Cole's approval before giving any orders. This created confusion about the role of Pamela Smith, the current police chief appointed by the city's mayor, Muriel Bowser.Local leaders immediately opposed the move and filed a lawsuit to stop it. They say the decision undermines local democracy and breaks the Home Rule Act, which gives Washington DC limited self-government.BOWSER AND SCHWALB CHALLENGE WHITE HOUSE MOVEMayor Bowser criticised the takeover on Thursday night. She posted on social media that "there is no statute that gives a federal official control over the District's personnel."Bowser also shared a letter from Schwalb to Chief Smith. In it, Schwalb said Bondi's order was "unlawful" and told Smith she was "not legally obligated to follow it." He instructed MPD officers to follow the orders of the police chief appointed by the mayor — not any federal appointee.The takeover comes four days after Trump sent National Guard troops into the city. The president had declared a crisis of crime and homelessness in Washington DC.Bondi defended the decision, saying the city's police needed stronger leadership to handle public safety. She claimed that Cole's appointment would make operations more effective and allow better coordination with federal agencies.CLASH OVER DC'S SANCTUARY CITY RULESThe tension grew after Chief Smith issued an order telling MPD officers to share information about people not in custody with federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).Since Washington DC is a "sanctuary city", local law still prevents police from giving immigration authorities details about undocumented people in custody. Police also cannot arrest someone solely for their immigration status or allow immigration officers to interview detainees.- EndsWith inputs from Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
India may crack open the gates to Chinese inflows
New Delhi: Ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit, India is weighing easier rules for Chinese investments in select sectors in another step to restore ties as New Delhi seeks to bolster trade amid US tariff uncertainty, said two people aware of the matter. The proposal under consideration is to identify non-sensitive areas such as specific segments of manufacturing, renewable energy, and consumer goods, where investment proposals from Chinese companies could be cleared through a faster and simplified approval process, said the first of the two people cited above. 'Talks are underway at the diplomatic level to find a workable solution, keeping sensitive sectors such as defence and telecom, and critical digital infrastructure to ensure that national security is not compromised even as economic benefits are realized," said the second person. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity. 'As there is no plan to review Press Note 3, investments from China will be considered through the government approval route and not via the automatic route," this person said. Under Press Note 3, investments from countries sharing a land border with India must be approved by the government first. India restricted Chinese investments after the deadly clash between the soldiers of the two nations in Ladakh's Galwan Valley in trade continued to grow as India relies on its neighbour for imports of pharmaceutical raw materials to electronic imports from China increased from $94.57 billion in FY22 to $113.45 billion in FY25. In contrast, exports to China declined from $21.26 billion in FY22 to $14.25 billion in FY25. Inbound shipments from China during April–July 2025 stood at $40.66 billion, up 13.1% from a year earlier. Exports to China jumped 20% to $5.76 billion during the period. On its part, China has also exerted pressure on India by leveraging its dominance in critical sectors. Its near-monopoly on rare earth magnets gives it significant leverage against India, which is heavily reliant on imports. China has also strategically controlled the supply of tunnel-boring machines (TBMs) used in major infrastructure projects, causing delays and increasing costs. This is compounded by the withdrawal of Chinese tech professionals from Indian manufacturing units, potentially disrupting operations. As Trump announced tariffs on its trading partners, New Delhi started easing some of the curbs to improve strained ties. India has resumed issuing tourist visas to Chinese nationals after a five-year gap. In a parallel move, New Delhi is preparing to restart direct flights to Beijing from next month, restoring air connectivity that has remained suspended since the Covid-19 pandemic. Modi will also visit China for the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit. Queries sent to the ministries of commerce and external affairs remained unanswered till press time. Need to boost FDI Trump, meanwhile, imposed the highest 50% tariffs on India, including a 25% penalty for buying Russian oil. The first set of 25% duty came into effect on 7 August, while another 25% will come into force on 27 August, giving India time to negotiate. However, the sixth round of talks for the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), which was scheduled for 25 August, has been cancelled, and no fresh dates have been announced, leaving the negotiations in limbo. 'As India aims to achieve developed nation status by 2047, building a stronger manufacturing ecosystem and attracting greater investment(from China)without jeopardising the domestic sector will be the key drivers of this ambition," said Dr Amit Singh, associate professor, Special Centre for National Security Studies at JNU. India attracted foreign direct investment (FDI) worth $81.04 billion in FY25, up 14% from the previous year, data from the commerce ministry showed. The services sector emerged as the top recipient of FDI equity inflows, accounting for 19% of the total, with investments rising nearly 41% to $9.35 billion in FY25. However, FDI inflows into India had peaked at $84.83 billion in FY22, according to data shared by minister of state for finance Pankaj Chaudhary in the Lok Sabha on 10 March. FDI slipped to $71.35 billion in FY23 and $71.27 billion in FY24, amid concerns over a potential global recession, economic crises triggered by geopolitical conflicts, and rising protectionist measures worldwide. Attracting Chinese investments is 'important as it could help replenish investment and address the recent decline in FDI flows", said Biswajit Dhar, a trade policy expert from the Delhi-based think tank, Council for Social Development. 'If India is able to attract more export-oriented investments—what is often referred to as investment-led trade—it could also have a positive effect on the country's rising trade deficit." The government targets to attract $100 billion in FDI in FY26. Modi's first visit since 2019 Meanwhile, Modi is scheduled to travel to Tianjin, China, to attend the SCO summit from 31 August to 1 September. This will mark his first visit to China since the Galwan Valley clash in 2020. He last visited that country in 2019. Ahead of the summit, the Prime Minister will visit Japan on 30 August to participate in the annual India-Japan Summit with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, after which he will head to China, according to media reports. In the run-up to Modi's visit, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi will be in New Delhi from 18–19 August for the 24th round of special representatives' talks on the India-China boundary question with National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, according to a statement from the ministry of external affairs.
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Russia-Ukraine peace deal closer? Trump envoy says Putin agrees to NATO-style protection for Kyiv
During his summit with President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin accepted the proposal that the US and its European allies could extend Ukraine a security guarantee similar to NATO's collective defense mandate as part of a potential peace settlement. Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff, who attended Friday's talks at a military base in Alaska, said 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that' and called it 'game-changing.' Witkoff told CNN on Sunday, 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO," Witkoff did not elaborate on how the security framework might function, but the proposal signaled a significant shift for Putin and could provide a way around his longstanding resistance to Ukraine joining NATO. It is likely to be a key topic Monday as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and major European leaders meet with Trump at the White House to discuss ending the 3 1/2-year conflict. Witkoff added that Russia had also consented to pass legislation pledging not to 'go after any other European countries and violate their sovereignty.' 'The Russians agreed on enshrining legislatively language that would prevent them from — or that they would attest to not attempting to take any more land from Ukraine after a peace deal, where they would attest to not violating any European borders," he said on 'Fox News Sunday.' Europe welcomes US openness to security guarantees European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, speaking in Brussels alongside Zelenskyy, applauded the news from the White House as a European coalition looks to set up a force to police any future peace in Ukraine. "We welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine and the coalition of the willing' — including the European Union — is ready to do its share,' she said. Zelenskyy thanked the US for signaling that it was willing to support such guarantees but said much remained unclear. 'There are no details how it will work, and what America's role will be, Europe's role will be and what the EU can do — and this is our main task: We need security to work in practice like Article 5 of NATO,' he said. French President Emmanuel Macron said the substance of security guarantees to secure any peace arrangement will be more important than whether they are given an Article 5-type label.
Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
Putin, Trump, and a summit that ended in stalemate
It was a meeting of the two titans. The world waited with bated breath as the global media trained its cameras and mikes for the action to follow. On the morning of 15 August Russian president Vladimir Putin landed at Anchorage Airport in Alaska, a province which his nation sold to the US a century and half ago. The US president, standing on a red carpet, eagerly awaited his guest's arrival, and Putin, alighting from the plane, walked sure-footedly towards Trump and set the tone and tempo of the summit with the opening line, 'Good afternoon dear neighbour, good to see you." Till date Trump hasn't accorded such honour to any of his Western allies. Those accustomed to jumping to conclusions lost no time in busying themselves drawing positive conclusions from the 'body language" of both the leaders. But they quickly got a rude jolt. The Alaska summit that began with heightened expectations failed to reach a conclusion leaving behind a fog of new concerns. There's a host of reasons for such a conclusion. Also read | Is our democracy headed in the right direction? Earlier it was thought that the summit would last for five to six hours but it ended within three hours. A day earlier Donald Trump claimed that if a cease-fire doesn't happen he won't be happy. He had earlier threatened Russia with harsher sanctions if it doesn't agree to a cease-fire. However, his threats proved ineffective and his expectations gutted. During the press conference he grudgingly accepted that while they made some progress many important issues remained unresolved. Putin on his part hoped both the countries could work together on key concerns. The summit should be seen as a diplomatic thaw with little concrete outcomes. At most, Alaska can pave the way for another discussion. Trump said as much when he announced that he would be talking to the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and Nato allies to fix a date and venue for further talks. In an interview to Fox News just before the Summit, Trump hinted that now it's up to Zelensky to take a call on the future of his nation. Does it raise the spectre of Zelensky ending up isolated? Remember the way Trump and his deputy J. D. Vance pounced on hapless Zelensky, bullying him in full media glare at the White House. Zelensky clearly became a victim of American deception. Experts argue that last year in Istanbul, Turkiye, Russia, and Ukraine were on the verge of a deal but Zelensky stopped short of it on the assurance of US support. Also read | Kanwars: let's pause, reflect and recalibrate Ukraine is surviving with the help of European nations but as the conflict slides into an endless morass a depleted European Union will find it difficult to support this beleaguered nation. Putin understands Europe's predicament and is in no hurry for a resolution of the conflict. Another interesting fact during the Alaska Summit was Trump controlling his usual urge to hog the limelight by offering the opening slot to address the press conference to Putin. In a 12 minute press meet where journalists weren't allowed to ask questions, Putin spoke for a little over eight minutes while Trump took less than four minutes. He ended in his characteristic style saying, 'Vladimir I hope we meet soon." Never to miss an opportunity, pat came Putin's reply in English, 'This time in Moscow." The statement caught Trump off guard. He was rattled but quickly composed himself. It was clear both the leaders had nothing to say. But why didn't the Summit reach any conclusion? It's because the Russian president isn't budging from his four core demands. He insists that a large portion of land Russia has annexed from Ukraine should be recognized as Russian territory along with 11-year-old Crimean annexation. There should be an immediate ban on Nato's expansion, and sanctions on Russia should be immediately lifted. Also read | The language controversy has lost its sting. Netas take heed Trump can't accept these demands and he does not have the political capital to force Ukraine or his Western allies to accept them. Trump is not bothered about lives being lost in Ukraine. His eyes are set on its minerals and agricultural products and he's wary of increasing closeness between Moscow and Beijing. Brics is an emerging threat and if the group keeps gaining heft it may become a threat for the US. Now let's look at India. After the summit Trump said he won't put an extra penalty on nations buying Russian oil. It's not clear whether he referred to the 25% penalty he imposed or any new tariff that he plans. As the Alaska meet turns out to be a damp squib, New Delhi is keenly watching an unpredictable Trump and his next 'Tughlaqi move".
