NASCAR near deal for Cup Series street course race in San Diego area: Sources
NASCAR is working toward finalizing a deal to race on a street course next year in the San Diego area, multiple industry sources told The Athletic, which would return its premier Cup Series to the Southern California market after a multi-year absence.
NASCAR and the city of San Diego have not yet agreed on a deal, but discussions are ongoing, and it is expected that an agreement will be reached, according to those sources. An announcement is tentatively slated for next month, pending a finalized deal.
Advertisement
NASCAR and Sports San Diego, the city's sports tourism commission, declined comment.
Adding a race in San Diego would accomplish NASCAR's stated goal of returning to Southern California, a move likely to be popular in the garage and throughout the sport's landscape. It would be the first points race in the market since California Speedway in Fontana was indefinitely shuttered in 2023. NASCAR last raced in Southern California in 2024, when it held the final of three straight season-opening exhibition races on a purposely-built oval inside the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum.
But racing at the Coliseum was never viewed as a long-term solution for NASCAR to maintain a presence in the region. NASCAR closed California Speedway, which it owns, with the intent of remodeling the facility, reconfiguring the track, and eventually returning to race there on a permanent basis. These plans, announced in September 2020, have since been put on hold.
With California Speedway off the schedule, NASCAR has explored multiple options to hold a points race in Southern California — a key market to the league, its teams, media rights partners and sponsors. This search led NASCAR to San Diego, which has never hosted a Cup race and offers a picturesque setting to construct the course, with the Pacific Ocean as a backdrop. The exact location and layout for the course is not yet known, industry sources indicated.
A race in San Diego would be NASCAR's second city street course race in three years after introducing one in downtown Chicago in 2023, the first time in NASCAR's modern era (1972 to present) that Cup competed on such a track. That race is considered a key development for NASCAR as part of an initiative to bring high-level stock car racing to major metropolitan markets, as opposed to the majority of its tracks, which are located in less populated areas.
Advertisement
NASCAR's intent with Chicago, which will host the third edition of its event on July 6, was to offer a proof-of-concept to other cities throughout the United States that it could design a course incorporating city streets and generate attention and tourism revenue for the community. NASCAR and the city of Chicago are in the last year of a three-year contract, though NASCAR does have an option to return in 2026 and has said it wants to continue racing there.
How San Diego would fit within the 2026 schedule is not yet clear. A current race would have to be dropped to accommodate any addition, as the schedule is presently at its 38-race cap (36 points races plus two exhibitions). With the Chicago deal potentially coming to an end, NASCAR could swap one city street course for another, but the league has also shown a willingness in recent years to shift a date from an existing track with two races on the schedule to accommodate a new addition it feels will enhance the sport. The addition of the Mexico City race this year, for example, led NASCAR to drop one of the two races at Richmond Raceway in Virginia.
(Top photo of San Diego skyline and the San Diego Bay, with the Coronado Bridge in the foreground: Joe Sohm / Visions of America / Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
an hour ago
- News24
Elon Musk's X Corp sues to block New York social media transparency law
• Elon Musk's X Corp has filed a federal lawsuit against a New York state law 'Stop Hiding Hate Act' that requires social media companies to submit semi-annual reports on how they moderate hate speech and disinformation. • X argues the law violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive moderation practices. • The law targets companies with over $100 million in annual revenue, imposes $15 000 daily fines for violations. Elon Musk's X Corp has filed a lawsuit challenging a New York state law that requires social media companies to report how they moderate hate speech and disinformation. The complaint, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, seeks to halt the law, which X argues violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive information about their content moderation practices. "Today, @X filed a First Amendment lawsuit against a New York law, NY S895B," X's Global Government Affairs team posted Tuesday, adding that it had successfully challenged a similar law in California. "X is the only platform fighting for its users by challenging the law, and we are confident we will prevail in this case as well," the company said. The New York law requires social media companies with more than $100 million in annual revenue to submit semi-annual reports detailing how they define and moderate hate speech, racism, extremism, disinformation and harassment. Companies face fines of $15 000 per day for violations, which can be sought by the attorney general's office. X says the law is "an impermissible attempt by the State to inject itself into the content-moderation editorial process" and seeks to pressure platforms into restricting constitutionally protected speech. The lawsuit comes after X successfully challenged a nearly identical California law last year, according to the filing. New York's law is "a carbon copy" of the California provisions that were struck down, the filing adds. X claims New York lawmakers refused to discuss changes to the bill after the California ruling, with sponsors saying they declined to meet because of content on X promoted by owner Musk that "threatens the foundations of our democracy." READ | Musk's X sues to block California anti-hate speech law The company argues this indicated "viewpoint discriminatory motives" behind the law's passage. Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assembly member Grace Lee - who introduced the law - said in a statement that their act "does not infringe upon the First Amendment rights of social media companies, nor does it conflict with federal law". "Instead, the Stop Hiding Hate Act requires narrowly tailored disclosures by social media companies to allow consumers to better decide which social media platforms they utilise," they added. "The fact that Elon Musk would go to these lengths to avoid disclosing straightforward information to New Yorkers as required by our statute illustrates exactly why we need the Stop Hiding Hate Act."
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Road to a $3.7 Trillion Stablecoin Market Is Full of Obstacles
The passage of stablecoin legislation in the US Senate marks a huge leap forward for the potential mainstreaming of cryptocurrencies that track the US dollar one-to-one. Yet there are still big problems to solve before many businesses can capitalize on the opportunities that are arising. Now, stablecoins are taking the leap from their original use as crypto-market poker chips to common mediums of exchange, offering merchants and consumers cheaper and more efficient payments systems.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
New Nissan Leaf Halves Charging Time Thanks To Tesla Superchargers
The new Leaf borrows styling hints from the Ariya SUV Pretty much the only aspect of the all-new Nissan Leaf that will resonate with potential buyers, apart from its all-new Ariya-inspired styling, greater range and improved performance and handing, is the fact that it can be charged quicker than ever using Tesla's Supercharger network. When the original Leaf debuted in late-2010 as the world's first mass-produced electric vehicle, it boasted a paltry 24-kWh battery that delivered an underwhelming EPA-rated 73 miles of range. Landing in showrooms for under $33,000, not including the $7,500 tax credit, it was the best-selling EV from 2011 to 2014, and even picked up some awards like the 2011 World Car Award and European Car of the Year gong. The new Leaf has an EPA range of 303 miles The second generation Leaf came along in 2017 with a larger 40-kWh battery that elevated range to 151 miles, before a 62-kWh battery-powered Leaf Plus update followed in 2019 offering a (finally) competitive 212 miles. Charging the battery on DC fast charging was painfully slow at just 50kW which would take up to an hour to reach 80% state of charge. Offered only in front-wheel-drive, the just-launched new third generation model totally redefines those figures. Employing a distinctive Ariya-like crossover style, the new Leaf is basically the same size as its predecessor but is around 300-lbs heavier mainly due to the bigger 75-kWh battery that delivers 303 miles of range. Nissan has not given a range yet for its smaller, more (expected to be) reasonably-priced 52-kWh version but we can expect that number soon. At 150kW on a Tesla Supercharger, the new Leaf can charge from 10-80% in 35 minutes, nearly twice as fast as the outgoing model. In addition, a new three-in-one packaging of the motor, inverter and reducer into one compact unit allows for a 10 percent downsizing of the drivetrain. One extra styling revision that will impress potential buyers is that designers have shifted the charging ports from the nose of the car to the sides, just under the A-pillar. The new cabin is simple yet elegant Inside the Leaf incorporates scaled-down Ariya SUV aesthetics with a similar two-spoke steering wheel and large single piece screen boasting two displays. All specs get a 12.3 driver instrument display with the S and S+ trims getting a similar sized infotainment touchscreen. The flagship SV+ and Platinum+ models employ a larger 14.3-inch touchscreen that includes an Android infotainment system with Google Services. Expected to go on sale in North America this fall, pricing will be a thorny issue in the era of on-again, off-again, on-again tariffs. Given that the new Leaf will not be built in the U.S., but assembled in either Britain's Sunderland plant of Japan's Tochigi factory, America is not expected to be the Leaf's biggest market. Europe will be.
