Why the Menendez Brothers Being Resentenced to Life in Prison Means Possible Freedom
More than three decades after being arrested for murdering their parents in their Beverly Hills home, Lyle and Erik Menendez were resentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole in a Los Angeles courthouse on Tuesday. But for the first time, this signals the possibility of freedom for the Menendez brothers, who until now have been currently serving life sentences without the possibility of parole since their March 1996 conviction. Their case will now go to California Governor Gavin Newsom and the state parole board.
Judge Michael V. Jesic of Los Angeles Superior Court issued the decision following a day of testimony from family members, who said the brothers had transformed their lives in prison through education and self-help programs, and asked the court to reduce the sentences for the 1989 murders. As reported by The New York Times, Judge Jesic said he was most shocked by the amount of letters from corrections officers written on behalf of the brothers.
'I'm not suggesting they should be released. That's not for me to decide,' the judge said, per the NYT. 'I do believe they have done enough over the last 35 years to get that chance.'
Under the California constitution, the Governor can review parole grants recommended by the Board of Parole Hearings. The review, which can take up to 150 days, considers whether the person poses an unreasonable risk to public safety.
The journey to the parole board has been in motion for months now. Last fall, Los Angeles County district attorney George Gascón said he would be recommending resentencing for the brothers, who were convicted for the first-degree murder of their parents. 'I will never imply that what we're doing here is to excuse their behavior...if you get abused, the right path is to call the police,' Gascón said at the time. 'Even though they didn't think they would ever be let free, they engaged in a different journey—a journey of redemption and a journey of rehabilitation."
However, in March, Gascón's successor, district attorney Nathan Hochman, withdrew that recommendation, arguing that 'based on the current state of the record and the Menendez brothers' current and continual failure to show full insight and accept full responsibility for their murders,' Hochman said in a statement at the time.
The Menendez brothers' case received renewed attention last year, thanks to Netflix's Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story and the Menendez brothers documentary. The Menendez case first unfolded amid the upheaval of 1990s Los Angeles, marked by public skepticism about sexual abuse claims and sensational trial coverage. Their first trial in 1993 ended in mistrials during a period of citywide unrest following the Rodney King verdict. A second trial, held after O.J. Simpson's acquittal, imposed stricter courtroom rules—banning cameras and limiting abuse testimony—leading to the brothers' conviction and life sentences without parole. But in recent years, with younger generations have learned about the case online and rallied behind the brothers on social media, seeing them as victims of a flawed justice system as well as long-overlooked sexual abuse, addressed in the Netflix series and documentary.
Both brothers admitted guilt and took responsibility during the resentencing hearing on Tuesday, per NBC News.
'My actions were criminal, selfish, cruel and cowardly. I have no excuse, no justification for what I did. I take full responsibility for my crimes,' Erik Menendez told the court, per NBC. 'After the killings, I denied all responsibility. I am sorry for these lies. There is no excuse for my behavior.'
You Might Also Like
12 Weekend Getaway Spas For Every Type of Occasion
13 Beauty Tools to Up Your At-Home Facial Game
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Priscilla Presley blasts lawsuit claiming she pulled plug on Lisa Marie to gain control of Elvis' estate
Priscilla Presley is being accused of creating a multimillion-dollar scheme involving fraud, cover-ups and the exploitation of her own daughter's death. In a $50 million lawsuit filed Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court, Priscilla's former business partners, Brigitte Kruse and Kevin Fialko, alleged the 80-year-old widow of Elvis Presley made a calculated move in the final hours of Lisa Marie's life, accusing her of allegedly pulling her daughter off life support against her wishes. Meanwhile, Priscilla's high-profile attorney, Marty Singer, blasted the lawsuit as "shameful" and "salacious," and told Fox News Digital the accusations are "malicious character assassination." "Accusing a grieving mother of contributing to her daughter's death is not savvy advocacy – it's disgusting," Singer said. According to a lawsuit obtained by Fox News Digital, Priscilla acted immediately after Lisa Marie went into cardiac arrest on Jan. 12, 2023. "Within just over twenty-four hours, Lisa suffered cardiac arrest on Thursday, January 12th and she was rushed to West Hills Hospital," the complaint instead of honoring Lisa Marie's medical direction to "prolong her life," the lawsuit claimed Priscilla saw a window to regain control of the Presley estate, especially with Lisa Marie reportedly in the process of removing her as trustee of a multimillion-dollar trust. "Priscilla rushed to West Hills Hospital, and despite Lisa's clear directive to 'prolong her life,' Priscilla pulled the plug within hours of Lisa being admitted," the lawsuit stated, adding that Riley Keough, Lisa Marie's daughter and heir, had not yet arrived. The lawsuit further alleged that Priscilla wasted no time taking command of the media response. According to the filing, she pressured Kruse to issue a carefully worded statement soon after Lisa Marie's passing – Kruse and Fialko claim the rapid-fire statement was part of a calculated effort to recast Presley as the grieving family figurehead and consolidate power amid looming estate battles. "It is with a heavy heart that I must share the devastating news that my beautiful daughter Lisa Marie has left us," her statement read. She has also been accused of instructing Kruse and Fialko to push press messaging that rebranded her as the "Queen" of Graceland. This allegation is one of several explosive claims in the $50 million lawsuit that accuses Priscilla of fraud, breach of contract and reputation destruction, including allegedly exploiting her daughter's death for personal and financial gain. Kruse and Fialko claimed Priscilla had sold the rights to her own name, image and likeness (NIL) two decades ago – and "forgot" to mention it. Their lawyer, Jordan Matthews, said in a statement obtained by Fox News Digital that the "evidence will establish that the real victims here are my clients, who invested millions and years of hard work into revitalizing Priscilla Presley's brand, only to be betrayed and falsely accused once the money was on the table and every personal and business issue had been resolved." Kruse and Fialko alleged that Priscilla first reached out to them in 2021 while drowning in debt – owing nearly $700,000 in taxes and reportedly behind on car payments. They claimed they spent thousands of hours – and millions in funding – revitalizing her brand, brokering deals and restructuring her finances. But behind the scenes, the lawsuit stated, Presley had already offloaded her NIL rights to Elvis Presley Enterprises in 2005 for $6.5 million – a deal she kept secret while leveraging her image to lure investments. The lawsuit stated that when confronted about the previous agreement, Priscilla repeatedly denied making it and later said she had forgotten about it when confronted with evidence of it. Kruse and Fialko also said they negotiated a $2.4 million payout for Priscilla in a high-stakes legal standoff with granddaughter Keough over the estate. They also claimed Priscilla cut them off, trashed their reputations and filed a retaliatory elder abuse lawsuit. "Elder abuse is a very serious problem in our society," attorney Matthews said. "Our complaint alleges that Priscilla targeted Kruse and Fialko from day one, when she was in dire financial need, faced with mounting IRS debt and multiple lawsuits, even within her own family. The complaint alleges that Priscilla's relationship with her daughter was in ruins for decades and long before Kruse and Fialko were involved." He added, "Kruse and Fialko invested seven figures into rebuilding Priscilla's brand, stabilizing her finances, settling her lawsuits, cleaning up numerous private family ordeals, and attempting to help Priscilla repair her relationship with her daughter. Priscilla has, in turn, smeared Kruse and Fialko with false lies and malicious campaigns." Also named in the lawsuit was Keya Morgan, the controversial former manager of Marvel icon Stan Lee, previously charged with elder abuse. Kruse and Fialko accused Morgan of coaching Priscilla to make false abuse claims, threatening them directly and taking their seats at the Venice Film Festival premiere of "Priscilla" – a film they claimed they helped bring to life. Priscilla's own lawsuit against her former business partners, filed last year, painted a very different picture. She claimed Kruse and Fialko isolated her from longtime advisors, took over her bank accounts and tricked her into signing 20-plus contracts in under 30 minutes – including ones that gave them majority control over her own name and likeness. "If plaintiff's allegations are true… it's classic elder abuse," one judge ruled in an earlier case. But Kruse and Fialko argued the elder abuse narrative is a lie, a legal weapon used by Priscilla and Morgan to silence and erase their contractual claims. They want the court to order Presley to stop profiting off her NIL outside the companies they formed – and pay more than $50 million in damages.
CBS News
13 hours ago
- CBS News
LA County judge denounces ICE arrest outside downtown courthouse
The presiding judge of the LA County Superior Court denounced Immigration and Customs Enforcement after agents arrested a man after his hearing in downtown. "I am deeply disturbed by such actions," Presiding Judge Sergio C. Tapia II said in a statement. "These intimidating and unnecessary displays undermine public trust in the justice system, deter people from seeking justice, and send a dangerous message to immigrant communities that they are not safe to fully and freely participate in the legal process." A video of the arrest showed the name, Stephen Reyes, screaming for help as immigration agents picked him up by his arms and legs before placing him in an unmarked car. Reyes had just attended a preliminary hearing on drug charges after police arrested him last month. The Alternate Public Defender's Office, which represents Reyes, called the arrest a violent abduction that threatened the "integrity of the court system." "It shocks the conscience to see any human violently abducted by a gang of mostly masked unidentified individuals," APD's spokesperson wrote in a statement. "Such aggressive ICE abductions threaten the integrity of the court system and discourage participation." Defense attorneys, such as Lou Shapiro, stated that similar immigration operations encourage people to miss their court dates. "They're afraid just to come to court to show progress on community service, because they realize that could result in a trip to Mexico instead," said Shapiro. "It's sad because people feel that there's no hope. That nothing good can come of this for them, even if they try to do the right thing." The LA County District Attorney's Office said the operations also interfere with their ability to prosecute cases. "Our ultimate goal is to seek justice for victims and hold criminals accountable," the District Attorney's Office wrote in a statement. "Detaining a defendant before the judicial process has concluded interferes with our ability to prosecute cases and is not to the advantage of the pursuit of justice." ICE did not immediately respond to KCAL News for comment.
Los Angeles Times
a day ago
- Los Angeles Times
Priscilla Presley's legal battle with her former business partner heats up with new $50 million suit
The bitter legal dispute between Priscilla Presley and her former business partner escalated this week. Brigitte Kruse, the founder of Agoura Hills-based GWS Auctions Inc. and her business associate Kevin Fialko on Tuesday filed a new fraud and breach of contract suit against Presley in Los Angeles Superior Court. The suit alleges that Elvis's ex-wife 'undermined their business ventures' and exploited the death of her daughter Lisa Marie Presley in order to gain control over her trust and Graceland. They are seeking more than $50 million in damages. The pair allege they 'invested thousands of hours of their time' and 'millions of dollars into Priscilla' to revive her public image and brand only to have their business relationship severed by Presley. The suit calls Presley, 80, an 'opportunist' and describes a tumultuous relationship between her and her daughter. Presley's attorney Wayne Harman was not available for comment. Kruse first filed a breach of contract suit against Elvis's former wife in Florida two years ago after she cut ties with the joint business venture they formed to to set up several companies to exploit Priscilla Presley's name and image and to bolster Kruse's Elvis memorabilia auctions, through her written 'recollections.' Last year Presley, sued Kruse, who is about half her age, and her business associates for fraud and elder abuse in Los Angeles, claiming she was forced into a 'form of indentured servitude,' leading her into signing away 80% of her income . Kruse denied the claims. While Kruse's Los Angeles suit surfaces many of the earlier claims, it also provides a counter-narrative to several of the allegations contained in Presley's fraud suit, her attorney said. 'The evidence will establish that the real victims here are my clients, who invested millions and years of hard work into revitalizing Priscilla Presley's brand, only to be betrayed and falsely accused once the money was on the table and every personal and business issue had been resolved,' said their attorney Jordan Matthews in a statement. The suit contends that Priscilla 'strong-arm[ed]' Elvis's father Vernon in 1979 on his deathbed into making her co-executor of his son's estate by putting a lien on Graceland and taking over management of the trust. It further alleges that Priscilla 'ultimately wanted to control' her daughter's trust and Graceland. Before Lisa Marie died suddenly in January 2023 at the age of 54, her relationship with her mother was severely strained with Lisa Marie refusing to walk the red carpet or sit with Presley at the Golden Globes to celebrate the multiple nominations of Baz Luhrmann's film 'Elvis,' according to the lawsuit. It was during this time that Lisa Marie was in process of removing her mother as the sole trustee of irrevocable life insurance policy and was 'threatening to sue her.' Kruse claims that she and Fialko, 'worked to keep the family together, ' and with Presley's publicist arranged for the women to appear on the red carpet together and sit next to one another during the award ceremony. Two days later, Lisa Marie suffered cardiac arrest and was rushed to West Hills Hospital. According to the complaint, Presley did not follow her daughter's advanced care directive instructions that stated that she wanted her 'life to be prolonged as long as possible within the limits of generally accepted health care standards.' A copy of the health care directive from 2010 is included as an exhibit to the suit. Following Lisa Marie's death Presley went to court to challenge an amendment that had earlier removed her as a trustee of Lisa Marie's estate, the Promenade Trust and made her granddaughter, the actress Riley Keough, sole trustee. The matter was settled five months later. Kruse alleges that she and Fialko brokered a deal with Keough on Presley's behalf that secured her a $2.4 million payout and 'a seven-figure deal for Priscilla's son, Navarone.' Kruse and her company GWS Auctions also are being sued by the Elvis Presley Estate over a cache of documents from Elvis and Col. Tom Parker that they claim were 'improperly and illegally offered for sale at auction.' An attorney for Kruse has disputed the claim, saying in a statement that when she had informed the Elvis estate of the existence of documents in 2021.
