
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis loyalist bails on his own nomination hearing
But a week later, Dr. Joel Rudman had left the country and withdrew his nomination to a college board in Pensacola — an appointment made by Gov. Ron DeSantis.
'Dr. Rudman was first an aggressive nominee who couldn't wait to come before the committee, then he decided to decline to come before the committee,' Republican state Sen. Don Gaetz said.
Rudman, a Panhandle physician known as 'Dr. Rock' for playing guitar in a bar band, claimed he had information about GOP members — including alleged illicit drug use — who were going after DeSantis and first lady Casey DeSantis.
'Their intentions were very clear from the outset, what you're looking at this was a planned ambush,' Rudman said in Pensacola last week at a DeSantis press conference held to defend Hope Florida, a state-run alternative to traditional welfare embraced by his wife, Casey.
Hope Florida is embroiled in controversy and under investigation by the House, where Republican lawmakers are demanding answers on how $10 million from a state Medicaid settlement ended up with the Hope Florida Foundation.
DeSantis, standing in front of a podium with a Hope Florida sign, blasted House leaders for attacking the charity. Rudman and several other DeSantis loyalists took the stage to join in that criticism and voice their support for the governor and first lady.
On Tuesday, Gaetz told the Senate Ethics and Elections Committee, which he chairs, that Rudman had said he had a list that he was 'keeping close to his vest' about GOP legislators criminally violating drug laws.
'Depending on how this committee behaved, he would have to reveal those names. It turns out Dr. Rudman is not the one who has been revealed,' Gaetz said.
Rudman was a no-show, however, and withdrew his nomination to the Pensacola State College Board of Trustees.
Gaetz added that he had planned to give Rudman the opportunity to reveal all of his names and provide the evidence. 'We have individuals from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement here to take all the evidence and names, but Dr. Rudman has not favored us with his appearance and resigned from the board. So we have no action.'
Rudman said he was in Barcelona celebrating his wife's birthday when he typed up his resignation letter Monday night.
'Pensacola State College is too important to me to have it get caught up in all this theatre surrounding the behavior of the Florida House,' Rudman said in a text message to the Sentinel. 'It was becoming exceedingly difficult for me to bite my tongue while former House colleagues were taking potshots and lobbing offensive accusations at our Governor.'
Last week, the Senate Higher Education Appropriations Committee unanimously rejected Rudman's nomination because of the threats he made on X about naming names, knowing where the bodies are and that all state legislators should be drug-tested.
Republican Sen. Tom Leek of St. Augustine said those comments were meant to intimidate the senators voting on Rudman's nomination.
Rudman resigned from the Legislature in November, after he was reelected to a second term, to run for a congressional seat vacated by Matt Gaetz when President Donald Trump nominated him to be U.S. Attorney General. Matt Gaetz, who is the son of Don Gaetz and a former state House member, withdrew his nomination after a flurry of allegations of sexual misconduct and illegal drug use, both of which he denied.
After Rudman resigned, all the bills he filed for the current legislative session were killed.
He ultimately lost the Republican primary to Florida CFO Jimmy Patronis, who went on to win the congressional seat.
Rudman characterized the investigation into Hope Florida by fellow Republican Rep. Alex Andrade of Pensacola as a politically motivated witch hunt orchestrated by House leadership.
At last week's press conference, Rudman described an orientation for lawmakers at the state Capitol in November where House leadership 'used our time to tell us we're not going to listen to Ron DeSantis. They literally said we are not going to be Ron DeSantis' dog, only they didn't use the word dog, they used a vulgar term instead'
He said he could not go along with that agenda because he was the 'second most conservative in the Legislature.'
He also criticized Andrade, whose name elicited boos from the audience, as someone who is 'actually taking shots at our governor.' Someone from the audience shouted that Andrade should be recalled.
'When I had a blogger harass me on the campaign trail and get in my wife's personal space, I sued for a restraining order' Rudman said. Andrade defended the blogger.
_____
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.


The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style
Vice President JD Vance criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Wednesday for trying to 'mimic' President Trump's style on social media. In an interview on Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle,' the vice president said Newsom's revamped approach to online messaging misses the 'fundamental genius' that has fueled Trump's appeal. 'This idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic Donald Trump's style — I think that ignores the fundamental genius of President Trump's political success,' Vance said, 'which is that he's authentic.' 'He just is who he is,' Vance added. The comments came after Fox News host Laura Ingraham noted Democrats 'are still doing their 2024 autopsy' and seem to have concluded that they need to be tougher and 'be more like Trump in tone' to win future elections. Vance said that lesson is misguided. 'Look, the autopsy for the Democrats — some free political advice from the president of the United States — is stop sounding like crazy people,' Vance said. 'That really is all it is.' 'You've got to be yourself,' Vance added after criticizing Newsom's approach. 'You've actually got to talk to people honestly about the issues. I don't think it's that complicated: Don't be a crazy person. Be authentic.' Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, in recent days has rolled out a revamped messaging strategy that mirrors Trump's signature social media style. The California governor has posted rants in all-caps letters, he's assigned nicknames to his political opponents, and he's referred to his legislative proposals and political rallies as 'beautiful.' While Newsom's approach has been embraced by many Democrats, who have struggled to find their footing since losing the 2024 election, the governor has faced criticism from some Republicans and Fox News hosts. 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ('RATINGS KING') SAVING AMERICA,' Newsom's office posted earlier this week, responding to that criticism.


The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict California's congressional map. 'Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,' reads a brief order posted to the docket. Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters' approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election. Republicans' legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting effort. Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state's high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the redistricting effort. The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers' attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats' strategy would be 'comically absurd.' In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is 'not the end of this fight.' 'This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats' plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,' the statement reads. 'We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,' it continued.